"ECLI:EU:C:2019:357"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV OST."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:245"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Petra Flašker v European Commission.#State aid – Measures granted by Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies – Preliminary examination phase – Decision of the Commission finding no State aid and, possibly, that there is existing aid – Decision adopted without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU – Serious difficulties.#Case T-392/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:18"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 26 January 2022.#ICA Traffic GmbH v European Commission.#Application for interim relief – Public procurement – Supply of disinfection robots – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-717/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:222"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#FC v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Pre-disciplinary proceedings – Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities – OLAF Report – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Liability – Close link with the claim for annulment.#Case T-634/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:235"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#SS and ST v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Actions for failure to act – Right to asylum – Invitation to act – Position taken by Frontex – Inadmissibility.#Case T-282/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:233"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 April 2022.#Virginie Alauzun and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for failure to act – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Conditional marketing authorisation for mRNA-technology vaccines – Lack of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Delay – No invitation to act – Position taken – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility – Request for the Court to issue directions – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-695/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:294"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#VP and Others v Elliniko Dimosio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector – National legislation establishing a difference in treatment as regards remuneration between workers employed under fixed-term contracts for the supply of services and those employed under contracts of indefinite duration – No justification – Concept of ‘objective reasons’.#Case C-133/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:262"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:340"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Valvis Holding SA v Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – EU trade mark – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-420/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2019:221"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Harry Shindler and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Institutional law — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Article 50 TEU — Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations with the United Kingdom with a view to concluding an agreement determining the terms of withdrawal – Loss of citizenship of the Union — Article 263, fourth para., TFEU — Whether directly concerned.#Case C-755/18 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:937"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52(4)(c) – Flat-rate financial corrections – 24-month period – Expenses covered by the 24-month period – Method of calculating the correction – Adjustment of the rate of correction.#Case C-107/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:779"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Sasol Germany GmbH and Others v European Commission.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a list of identified substances with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying the substance 4-tert-butylphenol as a substance meeting the criteria for inclusion in the list – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Weight of evidence approach – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-661/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:49"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 7 February 2022.#Eurecna SpA v European Commission.#Interim relief – Public supply contracts – Application for interim measures – Lack of any urgency.#Case T-739/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:3"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 January 2022.#MW v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Political group – Dismissal – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Psychological harassment – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Liability.#Case T-630/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:40"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:30"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#FC v European Asylum Support Office.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Refusal to provide a certificate of good character – Refusal to accept a withdrawal of the resignation – Purely confirmatory act – Time limit for complaints – Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Close link with the claim for annulment – Inadmissibility.#Case T-148/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:24"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#MN v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract for an indefinite period – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-586/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:945"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#YB v Unión de Créditos Inmobiliarios SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Variable interest rate – Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) – Review of transparency by the national court – Duty to provide information – Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms – Requirements of good faith, balance and transparency – Consequences of a declaration of nullity.#Case C-79/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:952"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 November 2021.#Birkenstock IP GmbH and Birkenstock Sales GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-498/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:943"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Variable interest rate – Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) – Review of transparency by the national court – Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms – Consequences of a declaration of nullity – Judgment of 3 March 2020, Gómez del Moral Guasch (C‑125/18, EU:C:2020:138) – New questions.#Case C-655/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:380"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Future Motion, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HYPERCORE – Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-356/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:401"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 27 June 2022.#Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of Russian actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-237/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:434"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#JP v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Open competition – Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Lis pendens – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-638/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:419"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Les Éditions P. Amaury v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BALLON D’OR – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Classification of the services.#Case T-478/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:319"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India – Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T‑300/16 – Reimposition of a definitive countervailing duty – Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive countervailing duty – Legal basis – Non-retroactivity – Legal certainty – Article 266 TFEU – Proportionality – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 103 of the Union Customs Code – Registration Regulation – Plea of illegality – Admissibility.#Case T-441/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:367"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Commission staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-236/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:442"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Design Light & Led Made in Europe and Design Luce & Led Made in Italy v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – LED lighting sector – Patent Licensing Program – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons – No EU interest – Probability of being able to establish the existence of an infringement.#Case T-886/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:449"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#CCTY Bearing Company v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CCTY – Earlier EU figurative mark CCVI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Misuse of rights – Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-176/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:17"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2022.#YG v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Official – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the appellant – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Comparison of the merits – Principle of equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case C-361/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:222"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Hermann Albers eK v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Concept of ‘aid’ – Public transport of passengers – Offsetting of costs involved in the performance of public service obligations – Transfer of financial resources between public authorities – Obligation for municipal authorities that organise transport to guarantee reduced tariffs for students and apprentices – Lack of an advantage granted by the State to an undertaking – Obligation to notify.#Case C-656/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:225"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Gesamtverband Verkehrsgewerbe Niedersachsen eV (GVN) v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Concept of ‘aid’ – Public passenger transport – Compensating the costs related to the performance of public service obligations – Transfer of financial resources between public authorities – Obligation for the municipal transport authorities to determine reduced tariffs for students and apprentices – No advantage granted by the State to an undertaking – Concept of ‘undertaking’.#Case C-666/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:579"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-104/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:578"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-103/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:570"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-95/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:573"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-97/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:575"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-101/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:577"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-102/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:584"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-109/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:581"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-105/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:582"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-106/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:585"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-110/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:583"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-107/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:687"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 8 October 2021.#Paccor Packaging GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Interim relief – Environment – Directive (EU) 2019/904 – Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 – Harmonised marking specifications for beverage cups – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-148/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:824"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#CX v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary measure – Removal from post – OLAF investigation – Unauthorised and clandestine negotiation of a contract – Conflict of interests – Certification of a non-compliant invoice – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Repeated absence of the applicant and his lawyer from the disciplinary hearing – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Reasonable time – Principle ne bis in idem – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-743/16 RENV II."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:647"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources.#Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:717"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#Ioana-Felicia Rosca v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 – Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Article 27 of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment.#Case T-434/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:646"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#AZ v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Germany for some large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in respect of the 2012-2013 period – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful, and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of aid – State resources – Selectivity – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-196/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:709"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#YG v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 9 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-599/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:788"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#KR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Dependent child allowance – Article 2 of Annex VII of the Statute – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Refusal to grant dependent child status to a student receiving a grant – Actual maintenance of the child – Health insurance scheme.#Case T-408/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:692"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Erik Simpson v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Refusal of the Council to reclassify the person concerned, after he passed an open competition, at the grade laid down in the competition notice – Dismissal of the action on the merits – Appeal – Judgment set aside – Appeal judgment reviewed by the Court of Justice and set aside – Referral back to the General Court as the appeal court – Obligation to state grounds – Equal treatment.#Case T-646/16 P RENV-RX."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:648"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Wepa Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid regime implemented by Germany for certain large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges for the period 2012-2013 – Decision declaring the aid regime incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid granted – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Concept of ‘aid’ – State resources – Selectivity.#Case T-238/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:915"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#MG v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Family allowances – Refusal to grant allowances to non-custodial parent – Conciliation procedure – Reasonable time – Liability.#Case T-573/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:931"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Cater contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests.#Case T-190/17."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:916"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#MO v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Compulsory reassignment – 2019 Appraisal exercise – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-587/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:929"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests – Subcontracting.#Case T-177/17."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:823"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#YP v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits – Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic – Seniority in grade – Presumption of innocence – Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to state reasons – Compliance with a settlement agreement.#Case T-581/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:890"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#HB v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – Staff of the EIB – Complaint alleging psychological harassment – Administrative enquiry – Decision dismissing the complaint – Decision rejecting the request for conciliation – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-757/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:870"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Energy efficiency – Measurement method – Annulment by the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals).#Case T-127/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:930"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Humabio contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme – Eligible costs – Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced – Reliability of the time records – Conflict of interests.#Case T-189/17."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:887"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 December 2021.#FC v European Asylum Support Office.#Action for annulment – Civil Service – Temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Applications for suspension – Summons to attend a hearing before the Disciplinary Board – Postponement of the date of the hearing – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Premature action – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-303/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:834"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 26 November 2021.#Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament.#Interim measures – Institutional law – Member of Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Waiver of the parliamentary immunity of a Member of the Parliament – Application for suspension of operation – No urgency.#Case T-272/21 RII."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:922"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 November 2021.#König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-465/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:928"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-424/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:947"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#„AKZ - Burgas“ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security contributions – Repayment of contributions wrongly paid – Limitation of interest on repayment – National procedural autonomy – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-602/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:914"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Common agricultural policy – EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic – Conformity clearance procedure – Plea raised for the first time during the oral proceedings at first instance – Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 – Article 2(2) – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 4(1)(h) – Concept of ‘permanent pasture’ – Distortion of evidence – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 – Article 12(4) – One-off correction – Conditions – Burden of proof.#Case C-106/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:927"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-425/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:666"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:328"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Puma SE and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam – Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C‑659/13 and C‑34/14 – Reinstitution of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty – Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid – Market economy treatment (MET) – Individual treatment (IT) – Desk analysis – Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information – Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties – Legal basis – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Non-retroactivity – Proportionality – Misuse of powers – Non-discrimination – Previous decision-making practice.#Case T-781/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:315"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2021.#Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.#State aid – Healthcare services – Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of economic activity.#Case T-223/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:434"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Claims for damages – Non-material damage – Implementation of the judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal and of the General Court.#Case T-632/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:765"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Waseem Alkattan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Error of assessment – Determination of listing criteria.#Case T-218/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:435"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Fernando Carbajo Ferrero v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Procedure of appointment to a director’s post – Notice of vacancy – Rejection of the applicant’s application and appointment of another applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality in respect of the measures setting the internal rules of procedure – Irregularity of the recruitment procedure – Manifest error of assessment – Inaccuracy of the information sent to the Appointing Authority – Transparency – Equal treatment – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-670/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:713"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#Yadex International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PINAR Süzme Peynir – Earlier international figurative mark Süzme Peynir – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-559/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:768"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Selmikeit & Giczella GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HALLOWIENER – No genuine use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-500/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:720"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Strong like nature – Earlier EU figurative mark STRONG NATURE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-352/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:725"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 20 October 2021.#Giovanna Paola Girardi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Interim relief – EU trade mark – Professional representation – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-497/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:769"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Nissan Motor Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VDL E-POWER – Earlier national figurative marks e-POWER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-755/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:774"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Phi Group GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark REDELLO – Earlier EU figurative mark CADELLO 88 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-532/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:791"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#KV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition – Eligibility criterion related to professional experience – Compliance of the criterion used by the selection board with the competition notice.#Case T-430/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:770"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Nissan Motor Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VDL E-POWERED – Earlier national figurative marks e-POWER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-756/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:329"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Roland SE v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam – Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C‑659/13 and C‑34/14 – Reinstitution of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty – Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid – Market economy treatment (MET) – Individual treatment (IT) – Desk analysis – Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information – Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties – Legal basis – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Non-retroactivity – Proportionality – Non-discrimination – Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Previous decision-making practice – Competence of national authorities and courts.#Case T-132/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:903"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Jörg Lück v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MALLE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Ineffective nature of the single plea in law.#Case T-188/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:957"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2021.#Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Act imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Definitive anti-dumping duty – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-725/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:877"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Roberto Alessio and Others v European Central Bank.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Early intervention measures – Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige under temporary administration – Subsequent extension decisions – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Delay – Inadmissibility.#Case T-620/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:845"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Vanesa Ruiz-Ruiz v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Admission criterion related to professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-293/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:840"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#KY v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Pensions – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the EU – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Refund of the amount of pension rights not taken into account in the EU’s pension annuity scheme – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – The ‘minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Unjust enrichment.#Case T-433/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:852"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 1 December 2021.#OJ v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – Civil service – Recruitment – Open competition – EPSO decision to refuse the extension of the dates of the multiple choice computer-based tests – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-709/20 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:795"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Philip Jakober v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cup – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-658/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:792"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Think Schuhwerk GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU Trade Mark – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing red shoe lace aglets – Rejection of application – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Essentially identical previous application – No res judicata – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-298/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:752"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 3 November 2021.#Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and WA v European Commission.#Interim relief – State aid – Aid granted by France to a professional football club – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-538/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:436"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#KO v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Habitual residence – Period of training.#Case T-389/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:815"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#Piotr Włodarczyk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark dziandruk – Absolute ground for invalidity – Absence of bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-434/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:591"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Celler Lagravera, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Cíclic – Earlier EU word mark CYCLIC – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-673/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:776"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Monster Energy Co. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word marks MONSTER and MONSTER ENERGY – Genuine use of the marks – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the marks were registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-758/20 and T-759/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:714"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#Yadex International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz – Earlier international figurative mark Süzme Peynir – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-560/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:702"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 13 October 2021.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative trade mark Frutaria – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use – Nature of use.#Case T-12/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:777"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#PIK-KO AD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark P.I.C. Co. – Earlier national figurative mark PIK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity.#Case T-73/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:794"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Res judicata.#Case T-616/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:816"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#Jeronimo Martins Polska S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Riviva – Earlier EU word mark RIVELLA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-551/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:707"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission.#Financial assistance – Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002-2006) – Contract concerning Union financial assistance in favour of a project in the field of medical collaboration – Enforceable decision – Competence of the Commission – Grant agreements – Recovery of part of the financial contribution paid – Arbitration clause – Eligible costs – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-191/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:478"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#AI v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – ECDC staff – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Damage to reputation – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Dismissal of application – Right to be heard – Absence of prima facie evidence – Duty of care – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-79/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:775"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark RUXIMBLIS – Earlier EU word mark RUXIMERA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-542/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:859"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 November 2021.#Despina Kanellou v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses and grant of travelling time – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-515/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:838"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"__[no-tr-for:ord-t-p]__ __[no-tr-for:du]__ 30 ____[unreferenced:no-tr-for:mois-11.2]____ 2021.#Robert Roos __[no-tr-for:ea]__ __[no-tr-for:contre]__ Parlement européen.#Interim relief – Members of the European Parliament – Conditions of access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work related to the health crisis – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of any urgency.#__[no-tr-for:affaire]__ T-710/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:569"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Albéa Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ALBÉA – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Word mark Balea – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Distinctiveness of the earlier international registration designating the European Union – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-852/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:934"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International figurative registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark HYALOSTEL ONE – Earlier EU word mark HYALISTIL and earlier figurative mark HyalOne – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-194/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:842"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ZARA – Earlier international word mark LE DELIZIE ZARA and earlier national figurative mark ZARA – Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-467/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:642"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#LP v European Parliament.#Civil service – Accredited parliamentary assistants – Refusal to offer employment – Conditions of employment – Character references – Manifest error of assessment – Due diligence.#Case T-519/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:841"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Team Beverage AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Team Beverage – Earlier EU word mark TEAM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-359/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:789"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Soapland GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Manòu – Earlier national and international word marks MANOU – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks.#Case T-504/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:522"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2021.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-219/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:509"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2021.#VA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State for the purposes of criminal prosecution on the basis of a measure involving deprivation of liberty issued by the same authority – No judicial review prior to surrender of the requested person – Consequences – Effective judicial protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47.#Case C-206/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:521"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 24 June 2021.#ratiopharm GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Directive 2001/83/EC – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Dexmedetomidine Accord – dexmedetomidine – Dismissal.#Case C-220/21 P(I)."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:508"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 22 June 2021.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-114/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:837"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 30 November 2021.#ID and Others v European Parliament.#Application for interim measures – Civil service – Conditions of access to the European Parliament buildings at its three places of work related to the health crisis – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-711/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:865"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI BURGER – Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No detriment to repute – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-593/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:874"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021.#Rosa D'Amato and Others v European Parliament.#Application for interim measures – Members of Parliament – Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-722/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:866"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI BURGER – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No detriment to repute – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-595/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:849"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#HC v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/363/18 – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Language rules for the competition – Discrimination based on language – Liability.#Case T-804/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:953"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Kewazo GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Liftbot – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-205/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:2"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Word mark APIRETAL – Declaration of revocation – No genuine use – No proper reasons for non-use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-160/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:844"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Jieyang Defa Industry Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a doll’s head – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-84/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:867"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Talleres de Escoriaza, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KAAS KEYS AS A SERVICE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Signs or indications which have become customary – Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-294/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:872"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021.#Robert Jan Rooken and Others v European Parliament.#Application for interim measures – Members of Parliament – Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-723/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:869"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Sun West and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Production of electricity by photovoltaic installations – Obligation to purchase the electricity at a higher price than the market price – Rejection of a complaint – Second subparagraph of Article 12(1) and Article 24(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589.#Case T-623/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:456"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#AQ v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Sick leave – Termination of the contract without notice – Article 16 of the CEOS – Article 48(b) of the CEOS – Duty of care – Article 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Liability – Material harm – Non-material harm – Causal link.#Case T-164/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:863"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#BZ v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Request for recognition of an occupational disease – Non-contractual liability – Material damage – Non-material damage.#Case T-500/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:864"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Similarity between services and goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-556/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:538"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#AH v European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Action for annulment – Lis pendens – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint – Obligation to state reasons – Lack of competence of the author of an act – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-630/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:843"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Muratbey Gida Sanayí Ve Tícaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing triple helicoid cheese – Earlier international design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-662/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:817"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#European Political Subdivision of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-160/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:868"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#QB v European Commission.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Main occupation – Work done for another State.#Case T-71/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:553"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notices of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of public health and food safety – Restriction of the choice of language 2 to four languages – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-355/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:542"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 July 2021.#Marina Karpeta-Kovalyova v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Spouse of a Greek diplomat who resided in Brussels prior to the recruitment – Definition of the place of recruitment and the centre of interests – Refusal to grant the appellant the expatriation allowance and related benefits – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-717/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:871"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 October 2021.#T.B. and D. sp. z. o. o. v G. I. A/S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in insurance matters – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 12 – Article 13(2) – Scope ratione personae – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Professional – Special jurisdiction – Article 7(2).#Case C-393/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:990"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Active substance – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Article 6(f) – Annex II, point 2.2 – Definition of ‘further confirmatory information’ – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Article 13(3) – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance ‘oxasulfuron’ for its placing on the market – Scope of the rapporteur Member State’s decision to declare the application for renewal to be admissible – Right of that Member State and of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to require the applicant to provide further information – Right of the rapporteur Member State to amend its draft renewal assessment report – Precautionary principle.#Case C-374/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1001"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-473/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:30"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 January 2022.#Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (Anatecor).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Interpretation of national law – National insolvency proceedings – Possibility for the insolvency judge to verify his or her substantive jurisdiction and the claim – Purely internal dispute – Lack of connection with EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-400/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2022.#EL and CP v Ryanair DAC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Strike by cabin crew and pilots – Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 12 and 28 – No infringement of the workers’ freedom of assembly and association and the air carrier’s right of negotiation.#Case C-287/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1012"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 December 2021.#Abitron Germany GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-589/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1011"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 December 2021.#Cora v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-619/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1010"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#KQ v Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Definition of ‘employment conditions’ – Exemption from providing on-call medical services on the grounds of age granted solely to permanent workers.#Case C-226/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:199"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 19 March 2021.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Application for interim relief – Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-742/20 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:383"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Interim relief – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone – Application of that aid scheme in breach of Commission Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-95/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:382"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Application for interim measures – REACH – Hexahydro-4-methylphthalic anhydride substance – Obligation to register – Evaluation of dossiers – Examination of testing proposals – Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-207/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:941"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Georgios Theodorakis and Maria Theodoraki v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-495/14."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:926"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Kosakowo v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-209/15."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:921"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#European Federation of Financial Analysts' Societies (EFFAS) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst – Earlier EU word mark CFA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-369/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:956"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Luna Italia Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark LUNA SPLENDIDA – Earlier EU figurative mark Luna – Relative ground for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:12"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Estetica Group Iwona Michalak v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark PURE BEAUTY – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-270/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:924"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Dante Ricardo Bustos v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark motwi – Earlier national word mark MONTY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-159/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:928"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Fashion Energy Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Phonetic similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-699/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:907"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Grounds for invalidity – Lack of novelty – No individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – Lack of a different overall impression – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-682/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:909"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Grounds for invalidity – Lack of novelty – No individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – Lack of a different overall impression – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-683/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:1"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 January 2022.#Neolith Distribution, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU pattern mark – Representation of an ornamental pattern – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-259/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:912"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier national and Community designs produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Grounds for invalidity – Lack of novelty – No individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – Lack of a different overall impression – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-684/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:945"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Georgios Legakis and Others v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-765/14."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:944"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Berry Investments, Inc. v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – President of the Euro Group Statement of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-496/14."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:920"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Dr. Spiller GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller – Earlier EU word mark RAUSCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-6/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:922"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ARCH FIT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-598/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:837"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely – Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-316/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:951"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 23 November 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-345/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:971"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#„Pilsētas zemes dienests” AS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(l) and Article 135(2) – Leasing and letting of immovable property – Exclusion from exemption of a compulsory land lease to owners of buildings – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-598/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1049"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:983"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 December 2021.#Hasbro Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-373/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1033"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 16 December 2021.#Innovative Cosmetic Concepts LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-523/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1047"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#PlasticsEurope v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation – List of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as a substance of very high concern.#Case C-876/19 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:560"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2021.#MKB Multifunds BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Private equity fund – Complaint – Measures allegedly constituting State aid related to Dutch Venture Initiative – Decision adopted at the end of the preliminary procedure for reviewing aid – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Status as an interested party – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Inadmissibility.#Case T-277/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:548"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Environmental incentive adopted by Spain in favour of coal-fired power plants – Decision to initiate the procedure laid down by Article 108(2) TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Selective nature.#Case T-328/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:427"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#IN v European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Decision not to renew – Appraisal – Right to be heard – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Manifest error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-119/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:550"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#IZ v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Political group – Dismissal – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Right to be heard – Equal treatment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability.#Case T-155/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:551"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#JA v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Political group – Dismissal – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Right to be heard – Equal treatment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability.#Case T-156/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:549"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#IY v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Political group – Dismissal – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Right to be heard – Equal treatment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability.#Case T-154/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:14"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Construcciones EElectromecánicas Sabero, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Heras Bareche – Earlier EU figurative mark MAGDALENAS DeLasHeras – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-99/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:847"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Union syndicale Solidaires des services départementaux d'incendie et de secours (SDIS) de France et DOM/TOM v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Filing of a complaint with the Commission concerning the application of EU law – Time limit for reply – Right to good administration – Mandatory due diligence – Reasonable period – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-152/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:54"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2022.#ultra air GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for invalidity and revocation – European Union word mark ultrafilter international – Request for conversion to a national trade mark application – Revocation proceedings devoid of purpose – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-67/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:497"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court of 30 July 2021.#Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament.#Interim relief – Institutional law – Member of Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Waiver of the parliamentary immunity of a Member of the Parliament – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-272/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:796"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#ZU v European External Action Service.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Officials – Commission staff serving in the EEAS – Request for reimbursement of mission expenses – Request for assistance – Rejection – Competence of the author of the act – Delegation of powers – Pre-litigation procedure – Designation of the defendant – Partial inadmissibility – Principle of sound financial management – Misuse of powers – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-689/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:893"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Carmine Rotondaro v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark COLLINI – Earlier EU and national word marks POLLINI and STUDIO POLLINI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-69/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:676"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2021.#NB v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Decision not to appoint the applicant to grade AST 10 – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Delay – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-648/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:913"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Helene Hamers v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Investigation conducted by OLAF – Transmission to national judicial authorities of information relating to facts liable to lead to criminal proceedings – National criminal proceedings – Acquittal – Cedefop’s conduct in relation to the national criminal proceedings – Rejection of the claim for compensation – Action for annulment and damages – Conflict of interests – Presumption of innocence – Powers of Cedefop’s Board of Appeal.#Case T-159/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:4"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 January 2022.#1031023 B.C. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a circle drawn by a brush – Earlier national figurative mark ORIGIUM 1944 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-366/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2020:505"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2020.#KN v European Economic and Social Committee.#Application for interim measures – Civil Service – Member of the EESC – Harassment – OLAF investigation – EESC Bureau decision – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – New application – New facts – Lack of urgency.#Case T-377/20 RII."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:933"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of his name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case C-681/19 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:932"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fulmen v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case C-680/19 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:966"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 26 November 2021.#Giro Travel Company SRL v Andréas Stihl AG & Co. KG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-327/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:740"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2021.#FVE Holýšov I s. r. o. and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Renewable energy support scheme – Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment.#Case C-850/19 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1031"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA and Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA - Inwit SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Approximation of laws – Electronic communications networks and services – Restrictions on the installation of mobile telephone relay antennas imposed by the local authorities – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the question referred for the purpose of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-467/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1051"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2021.#RY v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Temporary staff – Action for annulment – Termination of a contract of indefinite duration pursuant to Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Right to be heard – Compliance with a judgment annulling a measure – Article 266 TFEU – confirmatory of the initial compliance check decision – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-193/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:53"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022.#Criminal proceedings against ZI and TQ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) Rules of Procedure of the Court – Games of chance – Licences for the collection of bets – Extension of existing licences – Regularisation of data transmission centres (DTC) engaged in the collection of bets without the necessary licence and police authorisation – Limited period – Manifest inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-437/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:899"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-225/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:33"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 January 2022.#Car-Master 2 sp. z o.o. sp.k. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Motor vehicle repair market in Poland – Decision rejecting a complaint – Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Case dealt with by a national competition authority – Action lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-743/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:407"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court of 2 July 2021.#David Bourel and Others v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – State aid – Construction of wind farms – Individual aid measures granted by France to several marine wind farms – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Start of work – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-777/19 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:500"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 July 2021.#Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Road transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – International road haulage market – Cabotage – Trade association – Legal standing – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-634/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:715"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Transfer in the interests of the service – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Article 25 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence and the right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration and duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – 2017 appraisal exercise – Appraisal report – 2018 promotion exercise – Proposed non-promotion – Liability.#Joined Cases T-671/18 and T-140/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:496"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 28 July 2021.#SN v European Parliament.#Interim measures – Member of the European Parliament – Recovery of allowances paid by way of reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility – No urgency.#Case T-249/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:417"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-267/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:16"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Masterbuilders, Heiermann, Schmidtmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark POMODORO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Statement setting out the grounds of appeal – Period for lodging – Article 58(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-76/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:480"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2021.#Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 – Rules on the distribution of air traffic between Schiphol and Lelystad Airports – Priority for the allocation of slots to Lelystad Airport – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Not individually concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-866/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:825"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2021.#VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Interim relief – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Application for interim measures – Inadmissibility.#Case T-534/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:507"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 July 2021.#Dual Star Logistic SRL and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Road transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment of undertakings – Return of vehicles to the operational centre in the Member State of origin within a maximum period of eight weeks – Professional association – Standing to bring proceedings – Act not of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-645/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:512"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 August 2021.#Stasys Jakeliūnas v European Securities and Markets Authority.#Action for annulment and for failure to act – Request to launch an inquiry – Refusal of the President of ESMA – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Application for an injunction – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-760/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:898"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FT and Others v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – Commission staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-224/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:629"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International Registration designating the European Union – Word mark MASTIHACARE – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-60/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:854"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 November 2021.#Amal Bergallou v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Contract staff – 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses and grant of travelling time – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-521/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:857"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 November 2021.#Huynh Duong Vi Nguyen v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Contract staff – 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses and grant of travelling time – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-522/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:942"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 December 2021.#Heikki Niemelä and Others v European Central Bank.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings – Action which has become devoid of purpose – Loss of interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-321/17."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:788"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 22 September 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-369/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:771"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2021.#FL Brüterei M-V GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for damages and for annulment – Organic farming – Livestock production – Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs – Use of non-organic animals – Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-540/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:789"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2021.#Ramón González Calvet and Joan González Calvet v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanisms for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision refusing to grant financial compensation to the shareholders and creditors concerned – Content of the application – Lack of pleas in law and arguments – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-27/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:770"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2021.#IO v Wallonische Region.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Road traffic – Driver residing in one Member State – Vehicle registered in another Member State – Vehicle made available to the partner and manager of an undertaking established in that other Member State – Registration obligation in the first Member State.#Case C-23/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:773"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 September 2021.#Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Agricultural policy – Organic products imported into the European Union – Withdrawal of the recognition of the control body – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Directly concerned person – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-309/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:744"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 September 2021.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Article 14(1)(c) – Exemption of energy products used as fuel for the purposes of navigation within EU waters – Exemption granted only to private pleasure craft which are the subject of a charter agreement.#Case C-341/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:859"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 October 2021.#YE and Others v Vueling Airlines SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 3(3) – Scope – Passengers travelling free of charge or at a reduced fare not available directly or indirectly to the public – Young child travelling free of charge – Article 2(f) – Definition of ‘ticket’.#Case C-686/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:840"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#FI and RE v TUIfly GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5 – Article 7 – Article 8(3) – Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made – Re-routing of passengers by coach.#Case C-253/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:836"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#José María Castillejo Oriol v Kingdom of Spain.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Actions for failure to act – Application lodged by means of e-Curia – Article 56a(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Non-compliance with 10-day time limit – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-145/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:841"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:854"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#F.C.I. v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 3(2) – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Survivors’ benefits – Survivor’s pension based on a de facto partnership – Exclusion clause – Validity – Prohibition of any discrimination based on sex – Benefit which does not come within the scope of Directive 79/7 – Inadmissibility – Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Non-discrimination on grounds of sex – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Legal situation which does not come within the scope of EU law – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-244/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:895"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2021.#B v O and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU law – Principles – Article 18 TFEU – Equal treatment – Discrimination on grounds of nationality – Prohibition – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Joint and several liability of companies which form part of a group for debts resulting from an employment contract entered into by one of those companies – Exclusion by the legislation of the Member State concerned of companies that have their seat in another Member State.#Case C-691/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:924"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 November 2021.#Comercializadora Eloro SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-415/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:860"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#NSV and NM v BT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Scope – Article 1(2) – Contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency – Terms relating to the exchange rate risk which reproduce a supplementary provision of national law – Alleged failure to fulfil the obligation of information borne by the banking institution providing the loan – Requirement of good faith – Examination to be carried out by the national court as a matter of priority in the light of Article 1(2) of Directive 93/13.#Case C-87/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:872"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 October 2021.#Lípidos Santiga, SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Limit on use of biofuels produced from food and feed crops – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 – Definition of high indirect land-use change (ILUC) risk feedstock – Palm oil – Action for annulment – Condition that a natural or legal person must be directly concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case C-402/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:848"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#KF v European Union Satellite Centre.#Appeal – Institutional law – Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) – Members of the contract staff – Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out in respect of the applicant – Reopening of the investigation – Compliance with the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 25 October 2018, KF v SatCen (T‑286/15, EU:T:2018:718) – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-464/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:787"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Luis Gonzalo Segura del Oro Pulido v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Actions for failure to act – Failure of the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings – Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-225/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:967"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021.#WD v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct support schemes – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Article 32(2) – Single area payment application – Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ – Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register – Actual use for agricultural purposes.#Case C-273/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:981"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 30 November 2021.#Health Product Group sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-483/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:970"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 November 2021.#Keun Jig Lee v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-381/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:968"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 26 November 2021.#Davide Groppi Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-490/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1014"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#XG v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct taxation – Taxation of capital gains on immovable property – Articles 63, 64 and 65 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by residents of third countries.#Case C-647/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1003"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 December 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-476/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:926"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 November 2021.#Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli - Ufficio delle dogane di Gaeta v Punto Nautica Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Taxation – Harmonisation of legislation – Excise duty – Directive 92/12/EEC – Article 3(2) – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Other indirect taxes on excise goods – Regional tax on the sale of fuel for motor vehicles – Specific purposes – Absence.#Case C-255/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1013"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct taxation – Taxation of capital gains from property – Articles 63 and 65 TFUE – Free movement of capital – Discrimination – Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents – Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents.#Case C-224/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1000"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-475/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1005"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Field of public health – Calculation of length-of-service increments – National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category.#Case C-151/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1053"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 21 December 2021.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-538/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:598"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 September 2021.#Far Polymers Srl and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Dumping – Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Legislative act involving implementing measures – Inadmissibility.#Case T-722/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:802"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 November 2021.#Heidi Amort and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen – COVID-19 vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S [recombinant])’ – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-267/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:758"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 November 2021.#ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gases – Allocation of emission allowances – Request to transfer emission certificates to Germany – Request made in the context of national proceedings for interim relief aimed at guaranteeing the effectiveness of the preliminary ruling procedure in Case C‑126/20 – Commission refusal decision – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-731/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:862"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 2 December 2021.#FC v European Asylum Support Office.#Application for interim measures – Main action clearly inadmissible – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-303/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:501"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 July 2021.#Annamaria Csordas and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Regularity of the elections for the Luxembourg local section of the Commission’s Staff Committee – Presentation of a joint list of six trade unions or professional organisations – Supervisory obligation of the institution – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-146/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:805"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 November 2021.#Heidi Amort and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca – COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S [recombinant]) ’ – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-165/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:756"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 November 2021.#Aurubis AG v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gases – Allocation of emission allowances – Request to transfer emission certificates to Germany – Request made in the context of national proceedings for interim relief aimed at guaranteeing the effectiveness of the preliminary ruling procedure in Case C‑271/20 – Commission refusal decision – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-729/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:960"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2021.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Medicines Agency.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus – Non-renewal of a permanent scientific advisory group – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-381/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:704"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2021.#Guglielmina Natale v Italian Republic.#Application for interim relief – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-469/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:910"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2021.#Raymond Irvine McCord v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Action for failure to act – Draft Commission regulation making the exportation of certain products outside the European Union subject to the production of an export authorisation – Commission proposal to make the exportation of COVID-19 vaccines to Northern Ireland subject to the production of an export authorisation pursuant to Article 16 of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Absence of a published policy of the circumstances in which the European Union will trigger Article 16 of that protocol – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-161/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:641"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2021.#Airoldi Metalli SpA v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Dumping – Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Registration of imports – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-611/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:798"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#KS and KD v Council of the European Union and Others.#Action for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Eulex Kosovo mission – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-771/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:829"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#RG v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Area of freedom, security and justice – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Euratom, on the one hand, and the United Kingdom, on the other – Council decision on the signing and on provisional application of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement – Mechanism of surrender pursuant to an arrest warrant – Person arrested and detained in Ireland after the end of the transition period for the purpose of the execution of a European Arrest Warrant issued by the United Kingdom during the transition period – Act not of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-157/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:600"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2021.#Verena Kühne v European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Mobility regime – Request concerning the mobility obligation – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-691/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:39"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2022.#Virginie Alauzun and Others v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Amendment to the conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Comirnaty – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – No interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – Act not of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-418/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:674"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2021.#Thierry Mariani and Others v European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 – Cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations – Act not of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-124/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:728"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 October 2021.#Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Request for privileges and immunities to be defended – Decision of the President of the Parliament not to grant that request – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-100/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:807"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 November 2021.#Heidi Amort and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna – COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside-modified)’ – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-136/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:596"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2021.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Commission and European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Debit note issued by EASME – Identification of the defendant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-654/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:541"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2021.#Cara Therapeutics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KORSUVA – Earlier national word mark AROSUVA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-584/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1009"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 13 December 2021.#Asolo LTD and WeMO Brands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-387/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:108"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 February 2022.#Lajos Bese v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-611/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:726"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 October 2021.#JH v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Action for damages – Civil service – Temporary staff – Europol – Probative value of the evidence – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Irregular nature of the pre-litigation procedure – Inadmissibility.#Case T-208/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:894"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic – Decoupled direct aid – Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing – Discrepancies between the results of the checks – Wine sector – On-the-spot checks of the investments by means of sampling.#Case T-627/16 RENV."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:790"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Nikolaos Anastassopoulos and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Restructuring of Greek public debt – Private sector involvement – Collective action clauses – Private creditors – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Natural and legal persons – Limitation periods – Whether European Union answerable for the measures at issue – Admissibility – Strict liability – Unusual and special damage.#Case T-147/17."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:415"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#HM v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Competition notice EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Refusal to allow participation in the assessment tests – Request for review – Refusal to forward that request to the selection board for the open competition on the grounds that it was out of time – Division of competences between EPSO and the competition selection board – Interest in bringing proceedings.#Case T-587/16 RENV."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:891"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#HB v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dismissal – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Lack of competence of the author of the act.#Case T-689/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:858"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 November 2021.#Antonio Aresu v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations – Travelling time – Home leave – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-524/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:901"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Annual and interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-619/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:936"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2021.#Francisco Javier Castellanos Triviño and Others v European Commission.#Interim relief – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-768/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:900"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – Commission staff posted to a third country – Annual and interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-618/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:914"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#KS v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Termination of the contract – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Article 47(b)(ii) of the CEOS – Right to be heard – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Requests for assistance and compensation – Action for annulment and compensation.#Case T-409/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:935"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Magic Box Int. Toys SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SUPERZINGS – Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-549/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:107"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 February 2022.#Svenska Metallkompaniet AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-610/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:32"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 17 January 2022.#AM.VI. Srl and Quinam Limited v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:80"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2022.#Roberto Alejandro Macías Chávez and Others v European Parliament and Kingdom of Spain.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for failure to act and for damages – Institutional law – European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions – Petition alleging infringement by the Spanish courts of EU law in the field of fundamental rights – Decision to declare the petition closed – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-322/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:68"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 27 January 2022.#Acciona, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-557/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:110"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#Hochmann Marketing v European Commission.#Application for revision – Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Conditions – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-539/20 P-REV."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:139"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 February 2022.#Leonardo SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate - Direzione Regionale del Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-550/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:41"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Novelis Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a grill dish – Earlier national design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-173/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:873"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021.#IL and Others v European Parliament.#Application for interim measures – Civil Service – Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-724/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:13"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE v European Commission.#State aid – Greek casinos – System providing for a levy of 80% on admission fees of different amounts – Differentiation between public and private casinos – Complaint – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Annulment of the decision by a decision of the General Court – Decision finding no State aid – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Rights of the defence.#Case T-757/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:21"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#CNH Industrial NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOILXPLORER – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-300/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:42"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte – Earlier EU word mark TRILUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-202/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:81"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 4 February 2022.#Eos Products Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-672/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:54"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment – EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by Hungary.#Case C-185/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:109"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-679/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:170"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 22 February 2022.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-674/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:115"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Ernests Bernis and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Declaration by the European Central Bank (ECB) that an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme – Lack of public interest – Winding up in accordance with national law – Shareholders – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case C-364/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:918"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#HB v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Provision of technical assistance services to the Ukrainian authorities – Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid – Action for annulment and for damages – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – No arbitration clause – Inadmissibility – No heads of damage that are separable from the contract.#Case T-796/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:927"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Withdrawal of a decision – Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-263/15 RENV."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:923"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Action for damages – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Initiation of an administrative inquiry – Article 86(2) of the Staff Regulations – Duty to provide information – Duration of the procedure – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Confidentiality of the administrative inquiry – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Non-material damage – Causal link.#Case T-703/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:848"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity – Articles 8 and 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union – Procedure for waiving immunity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-230/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:917"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#HB v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council – Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid – Action for annulment and for damages – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable – No arbitration clause – Inadmissibility – No heads of damage that are separable from the contract.#Case T-795/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:742"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 October 2021.#WM v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open Competition EPSO/AD/338/17 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Articles 21 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 1d(1), (4) and (5) of the Staff Regulations – Reasonable accommodation – Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability – Directive 2000/78/EC – Liability – Material and non-material harm.#Case T-411/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:25"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal products – Marketing authorisations for the medicinal products Tobramycin VVB and associated names – Derogation from the market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin – Article 8(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Concept of ‘significant benefit’ – Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ – Article 3(2) and (3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-303/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:66"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-520/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:23"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Unger Marketing International LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Design representing a water purifier – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Declaration of invalidity.#Case T-325/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:65"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#GEA Group AG v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European markets in tin stabilisers and in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 81 EC – Decision amending the initial decision annulled – Decision rejecting a request for repayment of the fine – Action for annulment – Actionable measure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 266(1) TFEU.#Case T-195/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:26"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Diego Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WOOD STEP LAMINATE FLOORING – Earlier international word mark STEP – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Free movement of goods.#Case T-498/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:11"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Tecnica Group SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a boot – Declaration of partial invalidity – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decisions of EU trade mark courts ruling on an action for a declaration of non-infringement – Res judicata.#Case T-483/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:45"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maria Alexandra Canisius v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA – Earlier EU word mark LABELLO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-694/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:17"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 24 January 2022.#Společnost pro eHealth databáze, a.s. v European Commission.#Application for interim measures – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) – Recovery of sums paid – Application for suspension of operation – No urgency.#Case T-731/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:20"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Kedrion SpA v European Medicines Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Collection and processing of plasma – Plasma master file – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Incorrect determination of the subject matter of the application – Obligation to base the refusal to grant access on specific and concrete reasons.#Case T-570/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:47"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maternus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark WILD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-116/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:68"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022.#Sonja Faller and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Variation of the conditional marketing authorisation for the Comirnaty medicinal product for human use – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-464/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:27"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#Meta Cluster GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Clustermedizin – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-233/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:208"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals should proceed) of 23 March 2022.#Collibra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-730/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:244"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2002/49/EC – Assessment and management of environmental noise – Agglomerations, major roads and major railways – Article 7(2) – Strategic noise maps – Article 8(2) – Action plans – Article 10(2) – Annex VI – Information provided by the strategic noise maps – Summaries of action plans – Failure to communicate to the European Commission within the periods prescribed.#Case C-687/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:213"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#European Commission v Ireland.#Action for failure to fulfil obligations – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision – Failure to notify to the European Commission.#Case C-125/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:214"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#European Commission v Ireland.#Action for failure to fulfil obligations – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition of decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention – Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA – Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision – Failure to notify to the European Commission.#Case C-126/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:172"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 45 TFEU – Article 28 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Free movement of workers – Direct taxation – Income tax – Deductions – Maintenance annuities – Equal treatment – Discrimination between resident and non-resident taxpayers.#Case C-60/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:154"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Civil Service – Request for assistance – Claim for damages – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 24, paragraphs 1 and 2 – Article 90(1) and (2) – Review of an administrative measure which has become final.#Case C-171/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:228"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AZ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 1999/37/EC – Registration documents for vehicles – Directive 2014/45/EU – Periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving a motor vehicle which is not duly registered – Penalties – No implementation of EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-454/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:189"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 March 2022.#Luis Miguel Novais v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act brought against a national court – General Court clearly lacking jurisdiction – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-816/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:144"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Petr Fryč v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Block exemption regulations – Printing sector – Aid programme granted by the Czech authorities in favour of certain undertakings – Commission decision approving that programme – Action for annulment dismissed on the ground that it was out of time – Action for damages – Damage allegedly caused by acts of the Commission and the Court of Justice – Application for legal aid – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-239/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:164"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Milis Energy SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Environment – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 16 and 17 – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 10 – Applicability – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3(3)(a) – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations – Amendment of an aid scheme.#Joined Cases C-306/19, C-512/19, C-595/19 and C-608/20 to C-610/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:336"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#RM v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU – Games of chance – Provision of prohibited lotteries – Penalties – Proportionality – Minimal fines – Overlapping – Lack of a cap – Alternative custodial sentence – Proportional contribution to procedural costs – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49(3).#Case C-508/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:255"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:249"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:256"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton's Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:257"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:161"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Single Resolution Board v Portigon AG and European Commission.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Authentication of a decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Obligation to state reasons – Confidential data.#Case C-664/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:162"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Single Resolution Board (SRB) v Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Authentication of a decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Obligation to state reasons – Confidential data.#Case C-663/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:293"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J.P. v B.d.S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Tolls – Non-payment – Penalties – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Lack of sufficient information – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-521/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:140"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2022.#OZ v European Investment Bank.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-558/17 P-DEP."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:233"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v AN and CN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency (Swiss francs) – Article 4(2) – Main subject matter of the contract – Terms exposing the borrower to a foreign exchange risk – Requirements of intelligibility and transparency – Article 3(1) – Significant imbalance – Article 5 – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language.#Case C-82/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:231"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v ZD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency (Swiss francs) – Terms exposing the borrower to a foreign exchange risk – Article 4(2) – Requirements of intelligibility and transparency – Burden of proof – Article 3(1) – Significant imbalance – Article 5 – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language.#Case C-288/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:232"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 March 2022.#Criminal proceedings against IP and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 267 TFEU – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47, second paragraph – Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Content of a request for a preliminary ruling – National rule providing for the national criminal court to decline jurisdiction on the basis that it expressed a view on the facts of the case in the request for a preliminary ruling on pain of annulment of the decision to be given on the merits of the case – Article 18 TFEU – Article 21(2) of the Charter – Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Requirement for national courts to inform their own Member State of any request for a preliminary ruling submitted to the Court.#Case C-609/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:793"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Marcos Guasch Pubill v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing table linen – Disclosure of earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-538/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:701"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Ciano Trading & Services CT & S SpA and Others v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Sustainable restoration for the Commission in Brussels and its surroundings – Annulment of the tendering procedure – Legitimate expectations – Abuse of rights.#Case T-45/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:120"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#LA v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criteria to assess professional experience – Compliance of criteria applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-456/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:82"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#OA v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Disciplinary procedure – Disciplinary penalty – Written warning – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-671/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:90"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Ignacio Carrasco SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark La Hoja del Carrasco – Earlier national figurative mark CARRASCO, Guijuelo – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Dominant and distinctive elements of the marks at issue.#Case T-209/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:22"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.#CNH Industrial NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark CROPXPLORER – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-301/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:152"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Team Beverage AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Beverage Analytics – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-113/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:121"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#LD v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criterion to assess professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-474/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:153"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AION – Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-465/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:187"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:122"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Alessandro Zardini v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision of the Selection Board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition – Criterion to assess professional experience – Compliance of criterion applied by the Selection Board with the competition notice.#Case T-511/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:155"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#ON v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Retroactive refusal – Recovery of undue payments – Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case T-730/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:192"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#PO v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 1d(1) and (4) of the Staff Regulations – Reasonable accommodation – Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability – Directive 2000/78/EC – Obligation to state reasons – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Responsibility – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-36/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:216"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Funline International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Trade mark contrary to public policy – Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-680/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:231"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Confirmatory application made prematurely – Article 7 of Regulation No 1049/2001 – No challengeable act – Express refusal to grant access – Modification of the application – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-154/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:232"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-679/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:270"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#PricewaterhouseCoopers Belastingadviseurs NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Prior EU figurative mark TAXMAN – Suspension of proceedings – Article 71(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-619/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:280"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2022.#Creaticon d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE – Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-93/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:309"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Roberto Aquino v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Staff Committee of the Parliament – Election of the president of the Staff Committee – Annulment of the election – Liability.#Case T-253/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:267"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FIS – Earlier EU word mark IFIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-237/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:320"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyj Octyabr" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:321"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#PAO Moscow Confectionery Factory "Krasnyj Octyabr" v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE – Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-363/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:353"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Equinoccio-Compañía de Comercio Exterior, SL v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – Non-Member State – National public procurement – Termination of the contract by the contracting authority – Request for enforcement by the contracting authority of a bank guarantee – Countersignature by the Head of the EU Delegation in the non-Member State – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-493/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:370"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-246/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:341"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision to register – Authorisation to use a quota – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-92/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:350"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Apple Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT – No genuine use of the marks – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:362"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#Vasile Dumitrescu and Guido Schwarz v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses – Place of origin located in a third country – Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national.#Case T-531/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:361"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#QI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – 2018 and 2019 appraisal exercises – Unsatisfactory appraisal of leadership performance – General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Validation procedure – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-122/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:364"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#YV and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses – Place of origin located in a third country – Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national.#Case T-533/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:363"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#YT and YU v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses – Place of origin located in a third country – Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national.#Case T-532/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:366"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#YY and ZA v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses – Place of origin located in a third country – Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national.#Case T-545/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:403"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Leonine Distribution GmbH v European Commission.#Culture – Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) – MEDIA sub-programme – Call for Proposals EACEA/05/2018 – Decision of the EACEA rejecting the applicant’s application on the ground of failure to comply with the eligibility conditions – Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal relating to the EACEA’s decision – Concept of ‘European company’ – Grant open only to applicants owned, directly or by majority participation, by nationals of EU Member States or by nationals of other European countries participating in the sub-programme – Errors of assessment – Failure to examine the documents annexed to the proposal – Proportionality.#Case T-641/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:537"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2021.#NKT Verwaltungs GmbH and NKT A/S v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None – Article 158 of the Rules of Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment – Inadmissibility.#Case C-607/18 P-OST."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2020:366"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2020.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construçôes and Others v European Central Bank (ECB).#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Omission to give a decision — None.#Case C-251/19 P-OST."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:155"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Request for assistance – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 90(1) and (2) – Date on which the request was made – Implied decision refusing the request – Complaint – Submission – Time period – Excusable error.#Case C-172/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:972"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 November 2021.#Land Rheinland-Pfalz v Deutsche Lufthansa AG.#Interim relief – Appeal – Article 278 TFEU – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – State aid – Operating aid granted to Francfort-Hahn airport – Decision not to raise any objection – Urgency – Risk to the financial viability of the company concerned.#Case C-466/21 P-R."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:815"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 91/271/EEC – Collection and treatment of urban waste water – Articles 3 to 5 and 10 – No collecting systems for urban water in certain agglomerations – No secondary treatment or equivalent treatment of urban waste water in certain agglomerations – Construction and operation of treatment plants – Control of discharges from such plants – Sensitive areas – More stringent treatment of waste water.#Case C-668/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:861"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Liberty Seguros, Compañia de Seguros y Reaseguros, SA – Sucursal em Portugal v DR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Insurance contract concluded on the basis of false statements – International transport of persons and goods without authorisation – Nullity of the insurance contract – Enforceability against third-party victims and the body responsible for compensating victims.#Case C-375/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:1007"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 13 December 2021.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to companies – State aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Urgency – Serious and irreparable harm.#Case C-547/21 P(R)."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:66"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 January 2022.#Sergio Spadafora v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Notice of vacancy – Job of Head of Unit in the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – New selection procedure after the cancellation of the first appointment – Rejection of application.#Case C-169/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:964"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#European Commission v UG.#Appeal – Civil service – Contract staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination – Grounds for termination – Distortion – Non-material damage – Admissibility – Failure to rule on a head of claim.#Case C-249/20 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:70"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#FT and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials and Agents – Remuneration – European Commission staff assigned to a third country – Update of the correction coefficients applicable to their remuneration – Manifest errors of assessment – Retroactive effect – Recovery of undue payments – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-518/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:69"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 January 2022.#TM v EJ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 3 – Compulsory cover of damage to property – Scope – Legislation of a Member State excluding loss of earnings from cover by compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles.#Case C-28/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:63"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Elevolution - Engenharia, SA v European Commission.#Public procurement – Financial Regulation – Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the EDF for a three-year period – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-652/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:60"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Ivo Van Walle v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – ECDC staff members – Appraisal report for 2018 – Freedom of expression – Obligation to state reasons – Case requiring a specific statement of reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard.#Case T-33/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:59"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY – Earlier EU word mark YAMAMAY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Admissibility of new evidence – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-589/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:62"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance ethoprophos – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-317/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:64"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Companhia de Seguros Índico SA v European Commission.#Public procurement – Financial Regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general EU budget and by the EDF for a three-year period – Principle of good faith – Abuse of rights – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-672/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:92"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2022.#WO v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Application for interim measures – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Lithuania – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-603/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:78"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 February 2022.#Lagardère, unité médico-sociale v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – EU Digital Covid-19 Certificate – Freedom of movement for persons – Restrictions – Incorrect designation of the defendant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-503/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:69"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#OP v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment.#Case T-736/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:74"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 11 February 2022.#Jérôme Rivière v European Parliament and Groupe politique Identité et démocratie (ID).#Interim relief – Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Suspension and exclusion of a Member from his political group – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-54/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:91"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2022.#Atesos medical AG and Others v European Commission.#Interim relief – Medical devices – Directive 93/42/EEC – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-764/21 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:87"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Govern d'Andorra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Andorra – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-806/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:75"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 11 February 2022.#Gilbert Collard v European Parliament and Groupe politique Identité et démocratie (ID).#Interim measures – Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Suspension and exclusion of a Member from his political group – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-53/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:81"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#OJ v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Decision to refuse to extend the test dates for a competition – Time limits set for passing a selection test in a test centre – Right to a fair procedure – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Equal treatment.#Case T-709/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:135"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Karin Agreiter and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Amendment of the conditional marketing authorisation for Spikevax, a medicinal product for human use – COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified) – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-632/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:100"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Huhtamaki Sàrl v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a State aid investigation – Advance tax agreements – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Not irrebuttable – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-134/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:114"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Genekam Biotechnology AG v European Commission.#Grant agreement concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Fibrogelnet project – Recovery of an amount receivable – Risk avoidance mechanism – Amount receivable effectively recovered from the Guarantee Fund – Decision establishing a pecuniary obligation and forming an enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Competence of the author of the act – Termination of the applicant’s participation in the project – Eligible costs – Reports and deliverables.#Case T-579/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:113"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal – Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-333/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:109"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Mood Media Netherlands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MOOD MEDIA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-615/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:398"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#OH v European Court of Human Rights.#Appeal – Application for legal aid – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Decision of the General Court of the European Union from which no appeal lies – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-692/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:343"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#José María Castillejo Oriol v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Refusal of the European Commission to bring infringement proceedings – Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-1/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:369"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 May 2022.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-65/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:412"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#Proceedings brought by Frontera Capital SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary – Meaning of a ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – No dispute before the referring body – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-722/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:535"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2021.#Silvana Moro and Others v European Commission.#Application for leave to serve a garnishee order on the European Commission.#Case C-593/20 SA."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:101"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Degode-Dermago Development GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Skinovea – Earlier national word mark SKINOREN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-715/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:106"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Pluscard Service-Gesellschaft für Kreditkarten-Processing mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PLUSCARD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-669/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:108"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an item of furniture – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata.#Case T-1/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:103"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITADHA – Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-149/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:107"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Makeblock – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-86/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:110"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-140/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:105"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark META – Earlier national word mark METALGIAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-192/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:104"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Ubisoft Entertainment v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR – Earlier EU word mark HONOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-171/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:115"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 3 March 2022.#Esedra v European Parliament.#Interim measures – Public service contracts – Early childhood care services – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-46/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:126"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 March 2022.#Union nationale des indépendants solidaires (UNIS) v European Commission.#Application for annulment – Social security – Bodies entrusted with the management of statutory health insurance and old-age insurance schemes – Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse – Economic activity – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-431/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:124"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LOOP – Partial rejection of the application for registration – Absolute grounds of refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent in the nature of the products and services – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-132/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:165"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Correspondence of the Commission concerning the quantities and delivery times of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccines – Implied refusal of access – Express decision adopted after the action was brought – No need to adjudicate – Requests to amend the form of order sought – Lis pendens – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-232/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:158"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Claudio Necci v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Social security – JSIS – Rejection of the application for membership following a transfer of pension rights – Condition relating to a period of employment of more than three years – Article 95 of the CEOS – Article 34(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 45 TFEU.#Case T-129/19 RENV."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:141"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark APIAL – Earlier EU word mark APIRETAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-315/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:142"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Bromine Science Environnemental Forum (BSEF) v European Commission.#Energy – Directive 2009/125/EC – Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays – Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 – Ban on halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays – Competence of the author of the act – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Equal treatment.#Case T-113/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:116"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Stryker Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RUGGED – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-204/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:208"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 March 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines – Initial refusal – Act not open to challenge – Application to modify the form of order sought – Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-151/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:194"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Daimler AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU pattern mark – Representation of three-pointed stars on a black background I – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-277/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:157"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a stand-up collar – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-252/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:195"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Daimler AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU pattern mark – Representation of three-pointed stars on a black background II – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-278/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:191"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oliver Kalita and Christian Haas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-206/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:342"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.#Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:191"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Criminal proceedings against K.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy – Article 89 – Measures to ensure compliance – Article 90 – Criminal sanctions – Principle of proportionality – Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C‑77/20, EU:C:2021:112).#Case C-493/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:300"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:254"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Orbest, SA v CS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 5(3) – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Aircraft’s technical failure caused by the collision of a catering vehicle owned by a third party with that aircraft while the latter was parked at the airport.#Case C-659/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:464"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 June 2022.#Unie van Professionele Transporteurs en Logistieke Ondernemers (UPTR) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Access to the international road haulage market – Cabotage – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition according to which an applicant must be individually concerned – Trade association – Effective judicial protection – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-603/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:141"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:143"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#TA v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – Staff report 2019 – Fixing of objectives – Internal rules on staff reports – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-314/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:198"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPALLI – Earlier national word mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.#Case T-445/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:227"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark QUEST 9 – Earlier EU word mark QUEX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Articles 95 and 97 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-516/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:137"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Verena Kühne v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Policy of Parliament staff mobility – Reassignment in the interest of the service.#Case T-468/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:223"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#MF v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Post occupied requiring security clearance – Clearance refused by the national security authority – Termination of the contract – No request for a hearing – Right to be heard within the meaning of Article 11(5)(b) of Decision 2015/444.#Case T-568/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:196"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Daimler AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark – Representation of three-pointed stars on a black background IV – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-279/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:188"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:214"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Cilem Records International UG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark HALIX RECORDS – Earlier national word and figurative marks HALIX RECORDS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rule 19(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and (2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-118/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:171"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#KF v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Complaint of psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Decision rejecting the complaint – Error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Liability.#Case T-299/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:123"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#PrenzMarien GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STONES – Declaration of revocation in part – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use in the European Union – Article 19(1) and Article 10(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-766/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:197"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Daimler AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark – Representation of three-pointed stars on a black background III – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-280/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:199"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2022.#RT France v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Suspension of the broadcasting activities of certain media – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency – Weighing of competing interests.#Case T-125/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:228"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Dorit-DFT Fleischereimaschinen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DORIT – Earlier national company names – Relative ground for refusal – No use in trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-208/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:219"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Agora Invest, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAMOSA – Earlier EU figurative mark TRAMO,SA TRANSPORTE MAQUINARIA Y OBRAS,S.A. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-219/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:215"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Biogena GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark NUTRIFEM AGNUBALANCE – Earlier EU word mark NUTRIBEN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-370/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:224"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#KU v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – EEAS staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Reasonable time – Liability.#Case T-425/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:225"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Contracts concluded by the Commission on behalf of the Member States for the delivery of COVID-19 vaccines – Invitation emails to meetings of the Steering Committee – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – The transmission of personal data is not necessary for a specific purpose in the public interest – Article 9(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.#Case T-506/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:119"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Area-related aid scheme – Financial corrections – Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 12(2) and (6) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 – Definition of ‘permanent grasslands’ – Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Producer organisation and operational programmes – Articles 26, 27, 31, 104 and 106 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 – Article 155 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 499/2014 – Public procurement procedure – Article 24(2)(c) and Article 26(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 – Article 48(2) and Article 51(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Risk of financial loss.#Case T-10/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:253"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages.#Case C-305/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:337"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#QL v Universitat de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector – Clause 2 and Clause 3(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘fixed-term worker’.#Case C-464/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:335"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Application for interpretation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-395/17 INT."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:529"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Andrea Homoki v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Final report of the OLAF investigation into the implementation of a street-lighting investment project in Hungary – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Protection of personal data.#Case T-517/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:79"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2022.#eSlovensko Bratislava v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Financial provisions – EU programme on promoting safer use of the internet – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-425/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:833"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2021.#Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common commercial policy – Generalised arrangement of preferential customs tariffs established by Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 – Temporary withdrawal of trade preferences applicable to certain products originating in Cambodia for reason of serious and systematic violations of human rights – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-454/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:72"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#TO v European Environment Agency.#Civil service – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Decision which was not contested in time – Res judicata – Conditional undertaking given by the AECC in the context of an out-of-court settlement – Settlement offer not accepted by the applicant – No act adversely affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-434/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:498"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 July 2021.#NG and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Road transport – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Driver’s rest periods – Impossibility of taking certain rest periods in the vehicle – Return to the employer’s operational centre or to the place of residence for certain rest periods – Professional association – Standing to bring proceedings – Act not of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-646/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:77"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2022.#eSlovensko v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Financial provisions – EU programme on promoting safer use of the internet – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-295/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:682"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2021.#Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election of a Member of the European Parliament as a result of another parliamentary seat becoming vacant – Locus standi – Concept of ‘addressee’ of a decision – Lack of direct concern – No regulatory act of general application – Inadmissibility.#Case T-613/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:93"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Rhiannon Thomas and Michaël Julien v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Area of freedom, security and justice – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Euratom, of the one part, and the United Kingdom, of the other part – Council decision on the conclusion of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement – Act not of individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-442/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:885"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 November 2021.#Advansa Manufacturing GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021 – Eligible sectors – Exclusion of the man-made fibres manufacturing sector – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-741/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:884"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 November 2021.#Grupa Azoty S.A. and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021 – Eligible sectors – Exclusion of the fertiliser manufacturing sector – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-726/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:162"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Alessandro Di Taranto v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Derived unlawfulness – Candidates nominated by the Italian Republic – Nomination disputed before the national court – Inadmissibility.#Case T-368/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:735"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 October 2021.#Egis Bâtiments International and InCA - Ingénieurs Conseils Associés Sàrl v European Parliament.#Arbitration clause – Project to extend and modernise the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg – Settlement agreement – Confidentiality clause – Principle of good faith – Contractual liability.#Case T-610/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:932"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Datax sp. z o.o. v European Research Executive Agency.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – HELP and GreenNets grant agreements – OLAF’s investigation – Personnel costs – Burden of proof – Reliability of timesheets – Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary – Request for recovery – Debit notes – Limitation – Reasonable time – Proportionality.#Case T-381/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:801"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#QC v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service – Circumscribed powers – Action for annulment and for damages – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Inadmissibility – Request for directions to be issued – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-77/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:797"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 November 2021.#Satabank plc v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of less significant credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific tasks of the ECB – Refusal to carry out direct prudential supervision – Refusal to give instructions to the competent person – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-494/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:230"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Bloom v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 – European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund – Financial support granted under shared management with the Member States – Ineligible operations or expenditure – Derogations from ineligibility – Association for the protection of the marine environment – Legislative act – No individual concern – No direct concern – Right to effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case T-645/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:259"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 – Determination of injury – Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Price undercutting calculation – Causal link.#Case T-242/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:246"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Request for career reconstitution – Rejection of the request – Action for annulment – Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Entitlement to reasonable career prospects – Absence of a right to career constitution – Obligation to carry out a consideration of the comparative merits – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-750/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:226"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:260"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China – Definitive countervailing duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 – Determination of injury – Article 8(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting calculation – Causal link.#Case T-243/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:247"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SmartThinQ – Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings – Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-181/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:96"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 February 2022.#Brinkmann (Steel Trading) Ltd and Others v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-161/15."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:619"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 September 2021.#Health and Happiness (H&H) Hong Kong Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Swisse – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-486/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:339"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Legal relationship between a national radio broadcaster and a natural person who is subject to the radio fee – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-638/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:319"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#European Commission v French Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of the limit values for micro particles (PM10) in certain zones in France – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-286/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:89"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Хозяйка – Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-185/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:444"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#Marie-Christine Arnautu v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules on expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Plea of illegality – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment.#Case T-740/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:200"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 31 March 2022.#AL v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Removal from post – Application for interim measures – Urgency – Prima facie case – Weighing of interests.#Case T-22/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:88"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Хозяин – Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-184/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:251"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#Bálint Krátky v European Parliament and Others.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Consumer contracts – Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency – Alleged failure by the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission to adopt the measures referred to in Article 169(2)(b) TFEU – Actions for damages – Causal link – None – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-503/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:411"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#UC v Ministero dell'istruzione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Concept of ‘employment conditions’ – Allowance to support the in-service training of teachers and to enhance their professional skills.#Case C-450/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:368"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA v VX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 8 – Informing the addressee, by means of the standard form in Annex II to that regulation, of his or her right to refuse to accept a judicial document which is not written in or accompanied by a translation into a language which the addressee understands or into the official language or one of the official languages of the Member State addressed – Failure to use the standard form – Consequences.#Case C-346/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:308"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#OG v European Defence Agency.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – EDA staff – Vacancy notice – Head of Unit post – Rejection of application – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Transparency – Objectivity – Principle of sound administration – Infringement of the vacancy notice – Manifest error of assessment – Liability – Non-material harm.#Case T-632/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:316"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Adrian Sorin Cristescu v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Acts contrary to the dignity of the office – Preliminary assessment – Administrative investigation – Mandate entrusted to IDOC – Data protection – Principle of impartiality – Principle of sound administration – Disciplinary procedure – Rights of the defence – Disciplinary penalty of reprimand – Procedural irregularity – Reasonable time – Extenuating circumstances.#Case T-754/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:365"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#Dora Schaffrin v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations – Reimbursement of annual travel expenses – Place of origin located in a third country – Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national.#Case T-538/16."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:297"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Domator24.com Paweł Nowak v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing an armchair – Earlier community design – Proof of disclosure – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-256/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:303"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#TK v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2020 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 15 – Comparing merits – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-435/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:327"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 May 2022.#VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Temporary staff – Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period – Decision not to renew – Action for annulment and for damages – Actionable measure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-534/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:117"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SO …? – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-196/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:118"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SO …? – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-197/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2021:871"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2021.#JP v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators at grade AD 7 in the field of taxation – Restriction of the scope of the application for access – Refusal to grant access – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Article 6 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings – Partial access – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-247/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:86"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Chemours Netherlands BV v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-636/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:500"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Court determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-152/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:551"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:590"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#CM v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-25/22."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:598"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 22 July 2022.#Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission.#Interim relief – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Appeal – Application for suspension of operation and other interim measures – Public procurement – Article 160(7) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.#Case C-478/22 P(R)-R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:271"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Deichmann SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a cross on the side of a sports shoe – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-117/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:111"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Medicinal products for human use – Application for conditional marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus – sodium oxybate – Decision of refusal by the Commission – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Procedure – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Request for consultation of a specific scientific advisory group – Impartiality of members of an ad hoc committee of experts – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment.#Case T-556/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:290"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 13 May 2022.#Conserve Italia - Consorzio Italiano fra cooperative agricole Soc. coop. agr. and Conserves France v European Commission.#Interim relief – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for preserved vegetables – Decision imposing a fine – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-59/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:243"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#QA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) – Audit report – Language – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Proportionality – Principle of good administration.#Case T-68/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:128"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 March 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark airscreen – Earlier EU word mark AIRSCREEN – Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-382/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:172"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Testa Rossa – Earlier EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-451/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:296"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Wieland-Werke AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Market for rolled products and pre-rolled strip made of copper and copper alloys – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Relevant market – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of good administration – Rights of the defence.#Case T-251/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:173"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION – Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-35/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:300"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Period of six months – Extension – Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Selective nature – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-593/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:304"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Eurobolt BV and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia – Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice – Article 266 TFEU – Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Non-retroactivity – Effective judicial protection – Principle of good administration – Competence of the author of the act.#Case T-479/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:190"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark SO COUTURE – EU word mark SO …? – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-30/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:189"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Perry Street Software, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark SCRUFFS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-720/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:159"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Vetpharma Animal Health, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC – Earlier EU word mark DELTA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-146/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:273"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#OC v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – OLAF investigation – Press release – Processing of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Confidentiality of OLAF investigations – Right to sound administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-384/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:302"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive duration of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case T-601/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:317"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Initial inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Errors of assessment – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Foreseeability of acts of the European Union.#Case T-723/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:318"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India – Compliance with the judgment of the General Court in Case T 301/16 – Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Non-repayment in full of the initial definitive anti-dumping duty – Legal basis – Non-retroactivity – Legal certainty – Article 266 TFEU – Proportionality – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 103 of the Union Customs Code – Registration Regulation – Plea of illegality – Admissibility.#Case T-440/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:322"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 3 June 2022.#Thierry Mariani v European Parliament.#Interim measures – Institutional law – Member of Parliament – Exclusion from taking part in election observation delegations of the Parliament – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-196/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:331"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – No ex post definitive valuation of Banco Popular Español – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-512/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:393"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 May 2022.#Criminal proceedings against RV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States – Criminal offence specifically concerning international child abduction – Restriction – Child protection – Proportionality.#Case C-724/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:386"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Market for the production and distribution of flat carbon steel – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Relevant market – Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition – Commitments – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-584/19."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:379"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark FRAAS – Genuine use of a mark – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-329/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:388"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Beveland, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BUCANERO – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-29/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:344"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Vitronic Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Enforcement Trailer – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 7(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-433/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:381"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-739/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:346"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in China – Review investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Related companies – Procedural obligations – Article 5(10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Articles 6.1, 6.2 and 12.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement – Rights of the defence – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-144/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:387"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:359"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#Tubes Radiatori Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a radiator – Earlier designs – Grounds for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Freedom of the designer – Saturation of the state of the art – Overall impression.#Case T-380/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:348"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 – Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-355/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:343"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8 (1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-738/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:351"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 8 June 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#Interim measures – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – European Structural and Investment Funds – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Documents originating from a Member State – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Prima facie case – Urgency – Balancing of interests.#Case T-104/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:375"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 May 2022.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 – Article 2b and Article 9(2) – Decision 2010/788/CFSP – Article 3(2) and Article 9(2) – Applicant continuing to be included on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures – Decision (CFSP) 2018/1940 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1931 – Right to be heard.#Case C-242/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:301"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-785/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:448"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Marie-Christine Arnautu v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Article 33(1) and (2) – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of undue payments – Plea of illegality – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Assessment of evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-573/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:438"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 May 2022.#Criminal proceedings against M.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – No dispute before the referring court – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-783/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:145"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Antonius Maria Vervloet and Cornelia Wilhelmina Vervloet-Mulder v Agència Estatal de Resolució d’Entitats Bancàries (AREB).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement of clarity and precision of the pleas in law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-526/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:407"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2), in fine – Exceptions to the right of access – Overriding public interest – Concept – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rights of the defence – Specific aims of the procedure for reviewing State aid – Refusal to grant access – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-764/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:292"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-784/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:406"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision – Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Request for conversion into a national trade mark application – Ground precluding conversion – Non-use of the EU trade mark – Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-337/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:408"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-640/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:384"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Tequila Revolución S.A.P.I. De C.V. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Revolution Vodka – Earlier EU word mark TEQUILA REVOLUCIÓN – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Absence of genuine use – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-628/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:410"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 June 2022.#Compass Tex Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Trusted Handwork – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-704/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:405"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Jose A. Alfonso Arpon SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark PLUMAflex by Roal – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-357/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:382"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Kubara sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark good calories – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-602/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:73"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Sunwhite – Earlier national figurative mark Sunwhite – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-459/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:437"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Tigercat International Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Tigercat – Earlier EU figurative mark CAT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-251/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:445"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Purasac Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Rejeunesse – Earlier EU word mark REVANESSE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-543/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:444"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark GUGLER – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-147/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:420"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#ALO jewelry CZ s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ALOve – Earlier international figurative mark LOVe – Relative ground for refusal – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-288/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:305"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 18 May 2022.#OG and Others v European Commission.#Interim Relief – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 – EU Digital COVID certificate – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-101/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:193"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Établissement Amra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a rebound shoe – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Presence of word elements – Lack of essential non-functional characteristics.#Case T-264/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:220"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Planistat Europe and Hervé-Patrick Charlot v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – ‘Eurostat’ case – External investigation by OLAF – Forwarding to the national judicial authorities of information concerning matters liable to result in criminal proceedings before the conclusion of the investigation – Filing of a complaint by the Commission before the conclusion of the investigation – National criminal proceedings – Ruling that there is no need to adjudicate which has become final – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-735/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:221"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Moio GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark moio.care – Earlier EU word mark Molicare – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-276/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:244"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark LOPEZ DE HARO – Earlier EU word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-210/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:492"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 15 June 2022.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-121/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:493"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 15 June 2022.#Republic of Cyprus v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, coherence or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-120/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:516"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#Laure Camerin v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Former official – Sums deducted from retirement pension – Enforcement of a decision of a national court – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-63/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:428"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#Aerospinning Master Franchising s. r. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SPINNING – Trade mark which has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered – Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant public.#Case T-246/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:460"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 14 July 2022.#Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission.#Interim relief – Public contracts for services – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA) – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency.#Case T-170/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:478"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2022.#Fersher Developments LTD and Vladimir Lisin v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-200/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:496"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 August 2022.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party independent of the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-85/18."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:347"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#Medela Holding AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark MAXFLOW – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-744/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:458"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Standard International Management LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark The Standard – Declaration of revocation – Place of the use of the mark – Advertisements and offers for sale to consumers in the EU – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-768/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:360"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ECODOWN – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-338/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:342"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.#EMCS ltd. v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Provision of temporary agency workers for EASO – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Equal treatment – Principle of transparency – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-621/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:501"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-154/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:524"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-153/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:443"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 12 May 2022.#Govern d'Andorra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-300/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:520"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#QC v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Transfer of pension rights to the EU scheme – Calculation of the pension rights to be transferred – Competence of the national social security authority – Refusal to transfer those rights – Decision of the European Commission fixing the number of years of pensionable service – Power of assessment of the Commission in calculating these rights – None – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-14/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:665"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Enol Velasco Granda and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Measures transposing the directive – Complaint to the European Commission seeking a declaration of infringement of EU law by the Kingdom of Spain – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Actions for failure to act.#Case C-39/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:663"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#José Antonio Santos Cañibano and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Measures transposing the directive – Complaint to the European Commission seeking a declaration of infringement of EU law by the Kingdom of Spain – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Actions for failure to act.#Case C-38/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:662"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Ramón Baides Fernández and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Council Directive 1999/70/EC – Measures transposing the directive into national law – Complaint to the European Commission seeking a declaration of infringement of EU law by the Kingdom of Spain – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Actions for failure to act.#Case C-40/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:664"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Francisco Javier Fernández-Pacheco Yáñez and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Measures transposing the directive – Complaint to the European Commission seeking a declaration of infringement of EU law by the Kingdom of Spain – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Actions for failure to act.#Case C-37/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:666"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Silvia González Sordo and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Measures transposing the directive – Complaint to the European Commission seeking a declaration of infringement of EU law by the Kingdom of Spain – No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations – Actions for failure to act.#Case C-36/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:566"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Right to access OLAF’s file – Right to be heard – Burden of proof – Distortion of the facts – Probative value – Principle of proportionality – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-371/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:460"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 7 June 2022.#SES Astra SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Article 40, second paragraph, second sentence, of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Dispute between a Member State and an Institution of the European Union – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Dismissal.#Case C-212/22 P(I)."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:517"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#Fakro sp. z o.o. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Rejection of a complaint by the European Commission – Lack of European Union interest.#Case C-149/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:640"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria – Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded – Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.#Case C-113/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:523"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 June 2022.#HG v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Decision of the General Court of the European Union from which no appeal lies – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-150/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:447"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Article 33(1) and (2) – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of undue payments – Plea of illegality – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Assessment of evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-541/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:218"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Obligation to increase on-the-spot checks – Article 35 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Legal value of the working documents of the Commission – Calculation of the increase in the rate of on-the-spot checks.#Case T-57/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:248"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-103/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:250"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-105/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:251"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-106/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:249"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-104/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:418"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Petróleos de Portugal – Petrogal, SA v Secretário de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-706/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:254"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-109/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:255"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-110/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:258"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-120/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:256"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-112/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:252"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-107/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:257"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-119/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:414"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#Estaleiros Navais de Peniche SA v Município de Aveiro and Others.#Request for a preliminary reference – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Interest in bringing proceedings – Access to the review procedures – Tenderer excluded by a decision of the contracting authority which has become final, as a result of failing to challenge all the grounds for rejection of its tender – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-787/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:416"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2022.#Jean-Lin Lacapelle v European Parliament.#Interim relief – Law governing the Institutions – Member of Parliament – Exclusion from participation in election observation delegations of the Parliament – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of urgency.#Case T-240/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:422"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#OC v European External Action Service.#Liability – Civil service – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Reporting of irregularities – Inspection report – Transfer – Acts adversely affecting an official – Conduct not entailing a decision – Compliance with the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure – Protection of whistleblowers – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – Duty of care – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to privacy – Protection of personal data.#Case T-681/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:427"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 July 2022.#VI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Stability in the composition of the selection board.#Case T-20/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:423"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 July 2022.#JP v European Commission.#Civil service – Open competition – Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Composition of the selection board – Stability – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-179/20."@en

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:415"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2022.#Hervé Juvin v European Parliament.#Interim relief – Law governing the Institutions – Member of Parliament – Exclusion from participation in election observation delegations of the Parliament – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of urgency.#Case T-241/22 R."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:429"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#EM v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – European Parliament – Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 7 – Transfer – Article 12 and Article 12a(3) – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Failure to assign tasks – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Request for assistance – Loss or harm – Compensation.#Case C-299/21 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:547"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court of 11 July 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-187/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:553"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#Luis Miguel Novais v Portuguese Republic.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None.#Case C-816/21 P-OST."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:592"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedure between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued, if surrendered, runs a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.#Case C-480/21."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:546"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 July 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-253/22 P."@en

"ECLI:EU:C:2021:999"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:250"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"ECLI:EU:C:2022:192"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:130"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>

"ECLI:EU:T:2022:102"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>