<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1979ENA.0600269301.case.xml"><NO.CASE>260/78</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61978C0260</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0030.0002</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>2702</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>2703</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>2</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR REISCHL — CASE 260/78</LEFT><RIGHT>MAGGI v HAUPTZOLLAMT MÜNSTER</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of Mr advocate general Reischl</HT></P><P><HT TYPE="UC">Delivered on <DATE ISO="19790621">21 June 1979</DATE></HT><NOTE NOTE.ID="E0002"><P>Translated from the German.</P></NOTE></P></TI></TITLE><P>In connexion with the reference for a preliminary ruling by the Finanzgericht Münster on which only the Commission of the European Communities has put forward written and oral observations, it is sufficient, I feel, to state that I find the<?PAGE NO="2703"?> Commission's arguments — for which I would refer to the excellent' report for the hearing — entirely convincing. The Agent for the. Commission has made some supplementary points and I think that in the circumstances it is possible to dispense with a further summary of the arguments.</P><P>I therefore simply propose that the questions referred to the Court should be answered as recommended by the Commission, that is to say to reply in the negative to the first question, so that no answer will be needed to the other two.</P></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>