218/87223/8772/8892/8861987C02180005.00011713117131OPINION OF MR VAN Lenz — CASE 218 and 223/87, 72 and 92/88HOOGOVENS GROEP AND OTHERS v COMMISSION<TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of the Advocate General</HT></P></TI>

Mr Advocate Generale Lenz delivered his Opinion on 28 April 1989.

Original language German

He proposed that the Court should:

(1)(a)dismiss the application in Case 218/87;(b)order the applicant to bear the costs of the proceedings in Case 218/87;(2)(a)declare void Commission Decision No 1433/87/ECSC of 20 May 1987;(b)order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings in Case 223/87, including the costs of the application for interim measures;(3)(a)declare void Article 5 of Commission Decision No 194/88/ECSC of 6 January 1988;(b)dismiss the remainder of the application in Case 72/88;(c)order the parties in Case 72/88 to bear their own costs;(4)(a)declare void Article 17 of Commission Decision No 194/88/ECSC of 6 January 1988;(b)order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings in Case 92/88, including the costs of the application for interim measures.