<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ORDER xmlns:fmx="http://opoce" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-05.58-20161101.xd"><BIB.ORDER><REF.CASE FILE="n.a."><NO.CASE>T-673/15</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>62015TO0673</NO.CELEX><NO.ECLI ECLI="ECLI:EU:T:2019:559">EU:T:2019:559</NO.ECLI><NO.SEQ>0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST.ECR>1</PAGE.FIRST.ECR><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST.ECR>2</PAGE.LAST.ECR><PAGE.TOTAL>2</PAGE.TOTAL><AUTHOR>T</AUTHOR></BIB.ORDER><CURR.TITLE><PAGE.HEADER><P><HT TYPE="SC">Order of <DATE ISO="20190903">3. 9. 2019</DATE> — Case T‑673/15</HT></P><P><HT TYPE="SC">Guardian Europe v European Union</HT></P></PAGE.HEADER></CURR.TITLE><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Order of the General Court</HT> (Third Chamber, Extended Composition)</P><P><DATE ISO="20190903">3 September 2019</DATE><NOTE TYPE="FOOTNOTE" NUMBERING="STAR" NOTE.ID="E0001"><P>Language of the case: English.</P></NOTE></P></TI></TITLE><INTERMEDIATE><INDEX IDX.CLOSE=")" SEPARATOR="" IDX.OPEN="("><KEYWORD>Rectification</KEYWORD></INDEX></INTERMEDIATE><ORDER.INIT><P>In Case T‑673/15,</P></ORDER.INIT><PARTIES><PLAINTIFS><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Guardian Europe Sàrl,</HT> established in Bertrange (Luxembourg), represented by F. Louis, lawyer, and C. O’Daly, Solicitor,</P><PARTY.STATUS>applicant,</PARTY.STATUS></PLAINTIFS><AGAINST>v</AGAINST><DEFENDANTS><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">European Union,</HT> represented by:</P><P>(1) European Commission, represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents,</P><P>(2) Court of Justice of the European Union, represented by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, acting as Agents,</P><PARTY.STATUS>defendant,</PARTY.STATUS></DEFENDANTS></PARTIES><P>APPLICATION on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant because of, first, the length of the proceedings in the case giving rise to the judgment of <REF.DOC.ECR><DATE ISO="20120927">27 September 2012</DATE>, <NAME.CASE><HT TYPE="ITALIC">Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe</HT> v <HT TYPE="ITALIC">Commission</HT></NAME.CASE> (<NO.CASE>T‑82/08</NO.CASE>, <NO.ECLI ECLI="ECLI:EU:T:2012:494">EU:T:2012:494</NO.ECLI></REF.DOC.ECR>), and, secondly, the infringement of the principle of equal treatment in Commission Decision C(2007) 5791 final of <DATE ISO="20071128">28 November 2007</DATE> relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39165 — Flat glass) and in the judgment of <REF.DOC.ECR><DATE ISO="20120927">27 September 2012</DATE>, <NAME.CASE><HT TYPE="ITALIC">Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe</HT> v <HT TYPE="ITALIC">Commission</HT></NAME.CASE> (<NO.CASE>T‑82/08</NO.CASE>, <NO.ECLI ECLI="ECLI:EU:T:2012:494">EU:T:2012:494</NO.ECLI></REF.DOC.ECR>),</P><PREAMBLE.GEN><PREAMBLE.INIT><P>THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber, Extended Composition),</P><P>composed of S. Papasavvas, President, I. Labucka, E. Bieliūnas (Rapporteur), V. Kreuschitz and I.S. Forrester, Judges,</P><P>Registrar: E. Coulon,</P></PREAMBLE.INIT><PREAMBLE.FINAL>makes the following</PREAMBLE.FINAL></PREAMBLE.GEN><?PAGE NO="2"?><CONTENTS.ORDER><GR.SEQ LEVEL="1"><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Order</HT></P></TI></TITLE><NP.ECR IDENTIFIER="NP0001"><NO.P>1</NO.P><TXT>The Court delivered a judgment on <REF.DOC.ECR><DATE ISO="20170607">7 June 2017</DATE> (<NAME.CASE><HT TYPE="ITALIC">Guardian Europe</HT> v <HT TYPE="ITALIC">European Union</HT></NAME.CASE>, <NO.CASE>T‑673/15</NO.CASE>, <NO.ECLI ECLI="ECLI:EU:T:2017:377">EU:T:2017:377</NO.ECLI></REF.DOC.ECR>).</TXT></NP.ECR><NP.ECR IDENTIFIER="NP0002"><NO.P>2</NO.P><TXT>In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes found in paragraph 64 of that judgment.</TXT></NP.ECR></GR.SEQ><JURISDICTION><INTRO><P>On those grounds,</P><P>THE GENERAL COURT (Third Chamber, Extended Composition)</P><P>hereby orders:</P></INTRO><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">In paragraph 64 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, <QUOT.START CODE="2018" REF.END="QE0001" ID="QS0001"/>… by virtue of abuse of process<QUOT.END REF.START="QS0001" CODE="2019" ID="QE0001"/> must be read instead of <QUOT.START CODE="2018" REF.END="QE0002" ID="QS0002"/>… by virtue of misuse of powers<QUOT.END REF.START="QS0002" CODE="2019" ID="QE0002"/>.</HT></P></JURISDICTION></CONTENTS.ORDER><SIGNATURE.CASE><P>Luxembourg, <DATE ISO="20190903">3 September 2019</DATE>.</P><SIGNATORY><P>E. Coulon</P><P>Registrar</P></SIGNATORY><SIGNATORY><P>S. Papasavvas</P><P>President</P></SIGNATORY></SIGNATURE.CASE></ORDER>