<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1990ENA.0200026101.case.xml"><NO.CASE>C-279/87</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61987C0279</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0007.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>262</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>262</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR VAN GERVEN — CASE C-279/87</LEFT><RIGHT>TIPP-EX v COMMISSION</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P>Opinion of the Advocate General</P></TI></TITLE><P>Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on <DATE ISO="19890601">1 June 1989</DATE>.<NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001" NUMBERING="STAR"><P>Original language: Dutch.</P></NOTE> He proposed that the Court should:</P><LIST TYPE="roman"><ITEM><NP><NO.P>(i)</NO.P><TXT>dismiss the application;</TXT></NP></ITEM><ITEM><NP><NO.P>(ii)</NO.P><TXT>order the applicant to pay the costs.</TXT></NP></ITEM></LIST></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>