<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1991ENA.0500245301.case.xml"><NO.CASE>C-201/90</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61990C0201</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0016.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>2454</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>2454</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR MISCHO — CASE C-201/90</LEFT><RIGHT>BUTON AND VINICOLA EUROPEA</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of the Advocate General</HT></P></TI></TITLE><P>Mr Advocate General Jean Mischo delivered his Opinion on <DATE ISO="19910307">7 March 1991</DATE>.<NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001" NUMBERING="STAR"><P>Original language: French.</P></NOTE> He proposed that the Court should rule as follows:</P><QUOT.S LEVEL="1"><NP><NO.P><QUOT.START ID="QS0001" REF.END="QE0001" CODE="2018"/>1.</NO.P><TXT>Consideration of the first question has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2541/84 of <DATE ISO="19840904">4 September 1984</DATE> fixing a countervailing charge on imports into other Member States of ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin produced in France, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 644/85 of <DATE ISO="19850312">12 March 1985</DATE>.</TXT></NP><NP><NO.P>2.</NO.P><TXT>Regulation (EEC) No 2541/84 must be interpreted as meaning that a countervailing charge has to be levied on alcohol processed into a finished product in a free zone without being subjected to a special customs procedure and which is intended to circulate within the Community.<QUOT.END ID="QE0001" REF.START="QS0001" CODE="2019"/></TXT></NP></QUOT.S></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>