<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-05.00-20081231.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ2007ENA.0800695701.case.xml"><NO.CASE>C-318/05</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>62005C0318</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0004.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST.ECR>6961</PAGE.FIRST.ECR><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST.ECR>6961</PAGE.LAST.ECR><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT><IE/></LEFT><RIGHT>COMMISSION v GERMANY</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of Advocate General</HT></P><P><HT TYPE="UC">Stix-Hackl</HT></P><P>delivered on <DATE ISO="20060921">21 September 2006</DATE><NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001"><P>Original language: German.</P></NOTE></P></TI></TITLE><P>(See Case <REF.DOC.ECR EDITION="GEN" NO.CASE="C-76/05" YEAR="2007" PAGE.ECR="I-6849">C-76/05 [2007] ECR I-6849</REF.DOC.ECR>)</P></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>