<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1989ENA.0600204101.case.xml"><NO.CASE>164/88</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61988C0164</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0019.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>2042</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>2042</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR VAN GERVEN — CASE 164/88</LEFT><RIGHT>MINISTERE PUBLIC v RISPAL AND OTHERS</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of the Advocate General</HT></P></TI></TITLE><P>Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on <DATE ISO="19890316">16 March 1989</DATE>.<NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001" NUMBERING="STAR"><P>Original language: French.</P></NOTE> He concluded that the Court should rule as follows:</P><P>Heading 97.03 of the Common Customs Tariff, as annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3000/80, must be interpreted as covering articles known as <QUOT.START ID="QS0001" REF.END="QE0001" CODE="2018"/>magic cubes<QUOT.END ID="QE0001" REF.START="QS0001" CODE="2019"/>.</P></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>