<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1980ENA.0400193701.case.xml"><NO.CASE>1/80</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61980C0001</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0026.0002</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>1948</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>1948</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR WARNER — CASE 1/80</LEFT><RIGHT>FNROM v SALMON</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of Mr Advocate general Warner</HT></P><P><HT TYPE="UC">delivered on <DATE ISO="19800522">22 May 1980</DATE></HT></P></TI></TITLE><P><HT TYPE="ITALIC">My Lords,</HT></P><P>I am so entirely in agreement with what the Commission has said that no purpose would be served in my asking the Court for time to reflect.</P><P>I propose that the Court reply to the question referred to it by simply saying that Article 28 (4) of Regulation No 3 is incompatible with Article 51 of the Treaty and is consequently invalid.</P></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>