<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><ORDER xmlns:fmx="http://opoce" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-05.21-20110601.xd"><BIB.ORDER><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ2011ENB.1001051101.case.xml"><NO.CASE>C-313/10</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>62010CO0313</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0031.0002</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST.ECR>I-10543</PAGE.FIRST.ECR><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST.ECR>I-10545</PAGE.LAST.ECR><PAGE.TOTAL>3</PAGE.TOTAL><AUTHOR>CJ</AUTHOR></BIB.ORDER><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>ORDER OF <DATE ISO="20111025">25. 10. 2011</DATE> — CASE C-313/10</LEFT><RIGHT>JANSEN</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Order of the president of the second chamber of the court</HT></P><P><DATE ISO="20111025">25 October 2011</DATE><NOTE NUMBERING="ARAB" TYPE="FOOTNOTE" NOTE.ID="E0001"><P>Language of the case: German.</P></NOTE></P></TI></TITLE><ORDER.INIT><P>In Case C-313/10,</P><P>REFERNCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Landesarbeitsgericht Köln (Germany), made by decision of <DATE ISO="20100413">13 April 2010</DATE>, received at the Court on <DATE ISO="20100629">29 June 2010</DATE>, in the proceedings</P></ORDER.INIT><PARTIES><PLAINTIFS><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Land Nordrhein-Westfalen</HT></P></PLAINTIFS><AGAINST>v</AGAINST><DEFENDANTS><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Sylvia Jansen,</HT></P></DEFENDANTS></PARTIES><?PAGE NO="I-10544"?><PREAMBLE.GEN><PREAMBLE.INIT><P>THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER OF THE COURT,</P><P>after hearing the Advocate General, N. Jääskinen,</P></PREAMBLE.INIT><PREAMBLE.FINAL>makes the following</PREAMBLE.FINAL></PREAMBLE.GEN><CONTENTS.ORDER><GR.SEQ LEVEL="1"><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Order</HT></P></TI></TITLE><NP><NO.P>1</NO.P><TXT>By letter of <DATE ISO="20111006">6 October 2011</DATE>, received at the Registry of the Court on <DATE ISO="20111013">13 October 2011</DATE>, the Landesarbeitsgericht Köln (Higher Labour Court, Cologne) informed the Court that the dispute in the main proceedings had become devoid of purpose and that, consequently, it was withdrawing its reference for a preliminary ruling.</TXT></NP><NP><NO.P>2</NO.P><TXT>In those circumstances, the present case must be removed from the Register of the Court.</TXT></NP><NP><NO.P>3</NO.P><TXT>Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable.</TXT></NP></GR.SEQ><?PAGE NO="I-10545"?><JURISDICTION><INTRO><P>On those grounds,</P><P>the President of the Second Chamber of the Court</P><P>hereby orders:</P></INTRO><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Case C-313/10 is removed from the Register of the Court.</HT></P></JURISDICTION></CONTENTS.ORDER><SIGNATURE.CASE><P>Luxembourg, <DATE ISO="20111025">25 October 2011</DATE>.</P><P>A. Calot Escobar</P><P>J.N. Cunha Rodrigues</P><P>Registrar</P><P>President of the Second Chamber</P></SIGNATURE.CASE></ORDER>