<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1991ENA.1000593701.case.xml"><NO.CASE>C-19/91</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61991C0019</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0006.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>5938</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>5938</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION> <CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR GULMANN — CASE C-19/91</LEFT><RIGHT>COMMISSION v BELGIUM</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of the Advocate General</HT></P></TI></TITLE><P>Mr Advocate General Gulmann delivered his Opinion on <DATE ISO="19911105">5 November 1991</DATE>.<NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001" NUMBERING="STAR"><P>Original language: Danish.</P></NOTE> He proposed that the Court should declare that, by failing to comply with the judgment of the Court of <DATE ISO="19880524">24 May 1988</DATE> in Case 307/86, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the EEC Treaty, and that the Kingdom of Belgium should be ordered to pay the costs.</P></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>