<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><CONCLUSION xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-04.cj-20080212.xd"><BIB.CONCLUSION><REF.CASE FILE="ECRCJ1989ENA.0400101701.case.xml"><NO.CASE>192/88</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61988C0192</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0011.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST>1018</PAGE.FIRST><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST>1018</PAGE.LAST><PAGE.TOTAL>1</PAGE.TOTAL></BIB.CONCLUSION><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>OPINION OF MR VAN GERVEN — CASE 192/88</LEFT><RIGHT>TURNER v COMMISSION</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><CONTENTS.CONCLUSION><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Opinion of the Advocate General</HT></P></TI></TITLE><P>Mr Advocate General Van Gerven delivered his Opinion on <DATE ISO="19890214">14 February 1989</DATE>.<NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001" NUMBERING="STAR"><P>Original language: Dutch.</P></NOTE> He proposed that the Court should:</P><LIST TYPE="ARAB"><ITEM><NP><NO.P>(1)</NO.P><TXT>dismiss the first head of claim as inadmissible;</TXT></NP></ITEM><ITEM><NP><NO.P>(2)</NO.P><TXT>declare that there was no need to give a decision on the second head of claim;</TXT></NP></ITEM><ITEM><NP><NO.P>(3)</NO.P><TXT>order the Commission to bear its own costs and one-quarter of the applicant's costs.</TXT></NP></ITEM></LIST></CONTENTS.CONCLUSION></CONCLUSION>