<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><JUDGMENT xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://formex.publications.europa.eu/schema/formex-05.00-20081231.xd"><BIB.JUDGMENT><REF.CASE FILE="ECRT12001ENA.0900258101.case.xml"><NO.CASE>T-335/99</NO.CASE></REF.CASE><NO.CELEX>61999A0335</NO.CELEX><NO.SEQ>0008.0001</NO.SEQ><PAGE.FIRST.ECR>2585</PAGE.FIRST.ECR><PAGE.SEQ>1</PAGE.SEQ><PAGE.LAST.ECR>2588</PAGE.LAST.ECR><PAGE.TOTAL>4</PAGE.TOTAL><AUTHOR>T</AUTHOR></BIB.JUDGMENT><CURR.TITLE><LEFT>JUDGMENT OF <DATE ISO="20010919">19. 9. 2001</DATE> — CASE T-335/99</LEFT><RIGHT>HENKEL v OHIM (RECTANGULAR TABLET, RED AND WHITE)</RIGHT></CURR.TITLE><TITLE><TI><P><HT TYPE="UC">Judgment of the Court of First Instance</HT> (Second Chamber)</P><P><DATE ISO="20010919">19 September 2001</DATE><NOTE NOTE.ID="E0001" NUMBERING="STAR"><P>Language of the case: German.</P></NOTE></P></TI></TITLE><JUDGMENT.INIT><P>In Case T-335/99,</P></JUDGMENT.INIT><PARTIES><PLAINTIFS><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Henkel KGaA,</HT> established in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by H.-F. Wissel and C. Osterrieth, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg,</P><PARTY.STATUS>applicant,</PARTY.STATUS></PLAINTIFS><AGAINST>v</AGAINST><DEFENDANTS><P><HT TYPE="BOLD">Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM),</HT> represented by A. von Mühlendahl, D. Schennen and S. Laitinen, acting as Agents,</P><PARTY.STATUS>defendant,</PARTY.STATUS></DEFENDANTS></PARTIES><?PAGE NO="II-2586"?><P>ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of <DATE ISO="19990921">21 September 1999</DATE> (Case R-70/1993-3), which was notified to the applicant on <DATE ISO="19990928">28 September 1999</DATE>,</P><PREAMBLE><PREAMBLE.INIT><P>THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Second Chamber),</P><P>composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President, A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges,</P><P>Registrar: D. Christensen, Administrator,</P></PREAMBLE.INIT><GR.VISA><VISA>having regard to the application lodged at the Registry of the Court on <DATE ISO="19991126">26 November 1999</DATE>,</VISA><VISA>having regard to the response lodged at the Registry of the Court on <DATE ISO="20000217">17 February 2000</DATE>,</VISA><VISA>further to the hearing on <DATE ISO="20010405">5 April 2001</DATE>,</VISA></GR.VISA><?PAGE NO="II-2587"?><PREAMBLE.FINAL><P>gives the following</P></PREAMBLE.FINAL></PREAMBLE><CONTENTS.JUDGMENT><GR.SEQ LEVEL="1"><TITLE><TI><P>Judgment<NOTE NOTE.ID="E0002"><P>The facts, arguments of the parties and grounds of this judgment are identical or similar to those in the judgment in Case <REF.DOC.ECR EDITION="GEN" NO.CASE="T-337/99" YEAR="2001" PAGE.ECR="II-2597">T-337/99 <HT TYPE="ITALIC">Henkel</HT> v <HT TYPE="ITALIC">OHM</HT> (red and white round tablet) [2001] ECR II-2597, ECR II-2601</REF.DOC.ECR>. The only differences between the judgments are accounted for by the appearance of the three-dimensional trade marks for which registration was sought, namely, in this case, the shape of a rectangular tablet with two layers, one white and the other red.</P></NOTE></P></TI></TITLE><P>...</P></GR.SEQ><JURISDICTION><INTRO><P>On those grounds,</P><P>THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber),</P><P>hereby:</P></INTRO><LIST TYPE="ARAB"><ITEM><NP><NO.P>1.</NO.P><TXT>Dismisses the action;</TXT></NP></ITEM><?PAGE NO="II-2588"?><ITEM><NP><NO.P>2.</NO.P><TXT>Orders the parties to bear their own costs.</TXT></NP></ITEM></LIST></JURISDICTION></CONTENTS.JUDGMENT><SIGNATURE.CASE><P>Meij</P><P>Potocki</P><P>Pirrung</P><P>Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on <DATE ISO="20010919">19 September 2001</DATE>.</P><SIGNATORY><P>H.Jung</P><P>Registrar</P></SIGNATORY><SIGNATORY><P>A.W.H. Meij</P><P>President</P></SIGNATORY></SIGNATURE.CASE></JUDGMENT>