Annex VIII: Background information for potential restoration targets

Table of Contents

Annex VIII-a: WETLANDS    

Introduction    

Wetland coverage in the EU    

Conservation status and trends    

Pressures    

Condition of habitats    

Carbon stock and sequestration    



Annex VIII-a: WETLANDS

Introduction

This paper provides information derived from the Member States' reports and assessments under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. It is a background information to help identify possible restoration targets for the 'legal binding instrument' under the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2030.

The 'wetlands' group includes, 28 Annex I habitat types (see Table 1): all peatlands (71xx, 72xx, 73xx), several coastal wetlands and halophytic (salt) habitats, wet heaths, and wet forests (excluding alluvial and riparian forests 1 ).

Table 1 – Wetland Annex I habitat types selected

Coastal and salt habitats (11 types)

Mires, bogs and fens (12 types)

1130

Estuaries

7110

Active raised bogs

1140

Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide

7120

Degraded raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration

1150

Coastal lagoons

7130

Blanket bogs

1310

Salicornia and other annuals colonizing mud and sand

7140

Transition mires and quaking bogs

1320

Spartina swards (Spartinion maritimae)

7150

Depressions on peat substrates of the Rhynchosporion

1330

Atlantic salt meadows (Glauco-Puccinellietalia maritimae)

7160

Fennoscandian mineral-rich springs and springfens

1340

Inland salt meadows

7210

Calcareous fens with Cladium mariscus and species of the Caricion davallianae

1410

Mediterranean salt meadows (Juncetalia maritimi)

7220

Petrifying springs with tufa formation (Cratoneurion)

1420

Mediterranean and thermo-Atlantic halophilous scrubs (Sarcocornetea fruticosi)

7230

Alkaline fens

1530

Pannonic salt steppes and salt marshes

7240

Alpine pioneer formations of the Caricion bicoloris-atrofuscae

1650

Boreal Baltic narrow inlets

7310

Aapa mires

Wet heaths and peat grassland (3 types)

7320

Palsa mires

4010

Northern Atlantic wet heaths with Erica tetralix

Wet forests (2 types)

4020

Temperate Atlantic wet heaths with Erica ciliaris and Erica tetralix

9080

Fennoscandian deciduous swamp woods

6460

Peat grasslands of Troodos

91D0

Bog woodland



Wetland coverage in the EU

The 28 habitat types selected cover close to 174 400 km2 (4.5 % of the EU terrestrial area 2 ); this excludes areas reported by Romania, which are known to be largely overestimated 3 .

The data available from Corine Land Cover 4 and from the Ecosystems Map of Europe 5 do not allow a straightforward comparison between the total area of wetlands in the EU and the area covered by Annex I wetlands. This is mainly due to the nomenclatures used and the spatial resolution of the datasets. A comparison between these data sources – excluding wet heaths and wet forests – is given in Table 2 below.

Table 2 – Wetland areas (km2) from different sources (EU27)

Corine Land Cover 2018 (level 3)

Inland & coastal wetlands, coastal waters

85 809

411 – Inland marshes

10 347

412 – Peat bogs

54 554

421 – Salt marshes

3 402

422 – Salines

539

423 – Intertidal flats

8 592

521 – Coastal lagunes

5 893

522 – Estuaries

2 482

Ecosystems map (level 3)

D - Mires, bogs and fens, marshes, estuaries and lagunes

68 646

D1 - Raised and blanket bogs

15 245

D2 - Valley mires, poor fens and transition mires

2 096

D3 - Aapa, palsa and polygon mires

37 766

D4 - Base-rich fens and calcareous spring mires

464

D5 - Sedge and reedbeds, normally without free-standing water

4 827

D6 - Inland saline and brackish marshes and reedbeds

717

X1 – Estuaries

2 282

X2 – Coastal lagunes

5 249

The largest areas of wetlands, particularly peatlands, occur in northern and central Europe (see Map 1). The Member States with the biggest areas of wetlands – and higher proportion – are Finland (15 %), Sweden (15 %), Denmark (15 %), Ireland (9 %), Estonia (8 %), and the Netherlands (6 %); most Member States have less than 1 % of their territory covered by Annex I wetland habitats.

Two Member States reported very small wetland areas – less than 1 km2: Malta (0.3 km2) and Luxembourg (0.1 km2).

Table 3 gives the areas and proportion of wetlands for each Member State, including coverage by Natura 2000. Maps illustrating the distribution of different Annex I wetland habitats in the EU are available in Annex A.

From the 174 400 km2 of wetlands (excluding Romania), only 30 % is estimated to be inside the Natura 2000 network (about 52 400 km2); this may be an underestimation since reports from Member States were not comprehensive on this regard. The coverage by Natura 2000 varies according to the wetland sub-group, from 56 % for 'coastal and salt habitats' to 11 % for 'wet forests'. The proportion of habitats per sub-group of wetlands and their coverage is detailed in Table 4.

Coverage by Natura 2000 also greatly varies according to the Member State: from over 90 % (Germany, Portugal 6 , Cyprus and Slovenia) to less than 25 % (Austria, Denmark and Sweden) (Table 3).

The relatively low overall coverage of wetlands by Natura 2000 can also be explained by the fact that the Member States with the largest wetland areas (peatlands in particular) reported very low proportions in the network (Sweden = 11 %, Finland = 26 %). However, many Member States reported over 75 % of wetlands area inside Natura 2000 (Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Slovenia).



Map 1 – Distribution of the 28 Annex I wetland habitats in the EU

Source: Distribution maps (10 km x 10 km) delivered by Member States under Article 17 reporting (period 2013-2018)


Note: the shades of brown indicate the number of habitat types per 10 km x 10 km grid cell.



Table 3 – Area and proportion of wetlands per Member State

 

Member State area (km2)

In the Member State

Proportion of the wetland area (%)

Inside Natura 2000

 

Wetland area (km2)

Wetland area (%)

Wetland area

% wetland area

Austria

83 944

181.8

0.2

0.10

64.9

35.7

Belgium

30 683

169.4

0.6

0.10

134.5

79.4

Bulgaria

110 995

117.2

0.1

0.07

89.4

76.3

Croatia

55 590

95.0

0.2

0.05

(5 896.2) (#)

100.0

Cyprus

9 249

6.9

0.1

0.00

5.1

74.1

Czechia

78 874

197.8

0.3

0.11

135.2

68.4

Denmark

44 162

6 402.8

14.5

3.67

1 536.7

24.0

Estonia

45 382

3 624.8

8.0

2.08

2 627.7

72.5

Finland

338 004

52 060.0

15.4

29.86

13 447.3

25.8

France

551 881

11 969.4

2.2

6.87

3 962.2

33.1

Germany

362 177

6 743.5

1.9

3.87

6 191.8

91.8

Greece

132 014

1 612.1

1.2

0.92

645.7

40.1

Hungary

93 012

2 415.6

2.6

1.39

2 163.1

89.5

Ireland

70 699

5 979.9

8.5

3.43

3 872.6

64.8

Italy

301 321

2 147.8

0.7

1.23

1 420.5

66.1

Latvia

64 590

2 394.7

3.7

1.37

1 157.0

48.3

Lithuania

65 289

1 689.5

2.6

0.97

1 046.6

61.9

Luxembourg

2 595

0.1

0.0

0.00

0.0

68.7

Malta

316

0.3

0.1

0.00

0.1

50.8

Netherlands

39 898

2 394.2

6.0

1.37

2 074.2

86.6

Poland

312 683

2 242.9

0.7

1.29

1 842.2

82.1

Portugal

92 378

691.2

0.7

0.40

1 264.6

183.0

Romania (*)

238 404

34 260.5

14.4

(1 793.8)

5.2

Slovakia

49 026

36.6

0.1

0.02

20.4

55.8

Slovenia

20 274

20.4

0.1

0.01

19.1

93.7

Spain

506 222

2 511.7

0.5

1.44

1 430.3

56.9

Sweden

450 110

68 647.0

15.3

39.37

7 288.6

10.6

Total

4 149 772

208 612.9

5.0

54 233.6

26.0

Total
(without Romania)

3 911 772

174 352.5

4.5

 

52 439.8

30.1

Notes: Member States with more than 4.5 % (the EU average) of their terrestrial area covered by wetlands are highlighted; (*) areas reported by Romania are overestimated; (#) area of a few habitats inside Natura 2000 clearly wrong (e.g., 1140 = 5 896.2 km2), therefore, this value was excluded.

Table 4 – Area and proportion of wetlands per sub-group

 

Inside Natura 2000

EU27
excluding Romania

Area (km2)

Wetland area (km2)

% wetland area

Coastal and salt habitats

37 780

20 967

56

1130

7 505

3 581

48

1140

13 620

7 067(#)

52

1150

10 052

4 420

44

1310

433

498

100(*)

1320

159

265

100(*)

1330

1 119

947

85

1340

38

27

72

1410

813

866

100(*)

1420

867

906

100(*)

1530

2 505

2 246

90

1650

670

145

22

Wet heaths

3 828

2 004

52

4010

2 651

1 518

57

4020

1 177

486

41

6460

0.02

0.02

100

Bogs, mires and fens

86 738

24 180

28

7110

8 086

3 682

46

7120

1 162

660

57

7130

2 817

1 781

63

7140

31 674

4 141

13

7150

219

152

70

7160

96

27

28

7210

656

378

58

7220

814

70

9

7230

4 691

1 328

28

7240

78

69

89

7310

36 020

11 376

32

7320

425

516

122

Wet forests

46 006

5 289

11

9080

1 422

633

45

91D0

44 585

4 657

10

TOTAL

174 352

52 440

23

Note: (#) does not include the wrong value (5 800 km2) reported by Croatia; (*) percentage over 100 % due to inconsistencies in data reported

Conservation status and trends

The vast majority (89 % of assessments) of the 28 wetland habitats at the EU level have an unfavourable conservation status (38 % poor and 51 % bad). Only 9 % have a good conservation status. There are some differences between the different habitat groups (Figure 1): 'wet forests' has the highest proportion of good status (13 %) and the 'coastal and salty habitats' the worst status (92 % unfavourable).

Among the wetland habitat assessments that do not have a good status, more than half have a deteriorating trend (51 %) while only 7 % have an improving trend. An additional 28 % maintain their unfavourable status; the conservation status trend is unknow for 13 % of the assessments. The wetland group with the worst conservation status trends are 'bogs, mires and fens' (66 % deteriorating); 'wet heaths' have the higher proportion of improving trends (13 %) (Figure 2).

Figure 1 – Conservation status at the EU level per wetland type (in percentage)

Note: Number of assessments per group shown in brackets.

Figure 2 – Conservation status trends at the EU level per wetland type
(in percentage)

Note: Number of assessments/habitats per region shown in brackets.

Details on conservation status and conservation status trends for each Member State are given in Table 5.

Table 5 – Conservation status and trends of wetland habitats in the Member States (in percentage)

Member State

FV

U1-

U1+

U1=

U1x

U2-

U2+

U2=

U2x

XX

AT (19)

5

21

21

11

42

BE (21)

5

5

29

43

19

BG (20)

5

10

40

45

CY (3)

100

CZ (12)

8

8

33

50

DE (40)

25

18

20

23

13

3

DK (30)

7

7

3

3

33

7

20

20

EE (14)

50

7

29

7

7

ES (36)

3

25

28

11

11

8

14

FI (22)

36

18

5

14

18

5

5

FR (52)

2

12

2

27

17

17

6

13

4

GR (11)

18

9

9

45

9

9

HR (18)

28

11

22

17

22

HU (6)

17

33

50

IE (17)

12

29

6

47

6

IT (31)

10

10

6

26

3

23

6

10

3

3

LT (12)

25

33

8

33

LU (3)

67

33

LV (13)

8

8

46

8

8

23

MT (4)

25

75

NL (14)

21

21

36

7

14

PL (21)

5

14

5

24

10

19

14

5

5

PT (29)

14

34

10

28

10

3

RO (25)

40

16

32

4

4

4

SE (40)

23

10

15

28

20

5

SI (19)

37

16

26

11

11

SK (12)

8

25

33

25

8

Notes: FV = good, U1 = poor, U2 = bad, XX = unknown conservation status
'-' = deteriorating, '+' = improving, '=' = stable, 'x' = unknown conservation status trend; number of assessments per Member State shown in brackets.

Pressures

Wetland habitats are subject to a wide diversity of pressures resulting in their degradation and extirpation. According to Member States reports under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, the top three groups of pressures (in percentage of the total) are:

-Modification of hydrology and hydro-morphology with close to 28 % of all pressures; this includes e.g., drainage, water abstraction and dams

-Pollution from different origins with 18 %; from these, near half is originated from agriculture and forestry activities, about 13 % from residential, industrial and recreational activities and over 37 % from mixed sources

-Habitat management, with over 17 %; these include inadequate agricultural practices like under or overgrazing, mowing, harvesting (65 %), forestry like logging and burning (15 %) and fish and shellfish activities (17 %).

Equally important is the group 'conversion and land use change' with near 15 % of all reported pressures; this includes conversion of wetlands to other land uses (about 45 %) and development of infrastructure (near 55 %).

Figure 3 – Pressures reported for wetlands habitats (in percentage)

Note: based on pressures reported as 'high-ranking'

Condition of habitats

Member States reported on the condition of habitat types under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. This data can be used to estimate the area of wetlands assessed as degraded (condition not-good) therefore, requiring restoration.

The area of wetland habitats that would need to be restored, i.e., improved condition, is at least 27 100 km2, representing 16 % of the total wetland area reported (the values exclude Romania). However, the condition of habitats reported as 'unknown' (or not reported) is almost 84 300 km2 (48 % of the total area). This means that the area requiring restoration is much bigger than 27 100 km2; for example, assuming that half of the 'unknown' area is in a not-good condition, the area to be restored would be over 69 200 km2 or 111 400 km2 if all the 'unknown' is assumed to be in a 'not-good' condition (64 % of the total wetland area). Table 6 gives information for each of the 28 wetland habitats (excluding Romania) and Table 7 the condition areas and percentage for each of the Member States.

In addition to the habitat condition, Member States also reported on the 'favourable reference areas' 7 . Comparing this area with the actual habitat area allows to estimate how much area of the habitat would need to be re-created to achieve a good distribution and area of the habitat. Based on this data, it is estimated that a strict minimum of 3 100 km2 would need to be re-created to achieve a ‘favourable area’:

-271 km2 of coastal and salty habitats

-170 km2 of wet heaths

-1 716 km2 of bogs, mires and fens

-973 km2 of wet forests

However, these values are much higher since several Member States did not provide enough information in their reports to allow a more realistic estimation.



Table 6 – Condition of wetlands per Annex I habitat type

Condition (area in km2)

Condition (in percentage)

Habitat area

Good

Not-good

Unknown

Good

Not-good

Unknown

Wetlands

174 352.5

62 950.6

27 123.6

84 278.2

36

16

48

Coastal and salt habitats

37 780.0

10 494.8

7 896.9

19 388.3

28

21

51

1130

7 504.6

958.2

2 673.0

3 873.4

13

36

52

1140

13 619.8

4 650.1

1 148.0

7 821.6

34

8

57

1150

10 052.4

1 347.7

2 496.6

6 208.1

13

25

62

1310

433.3

355.2

30.6

47.4

82

7

11

1320

159.0

120.1

25.9

12.9

76

16

8

1330

1 118.7

684.0

390.6

44.1

61

35

4

1340

37.5

11.9

6.9

18.7

32

18

50

1410

812.8

159.8

85.7

567.3

20

11

70

1420

866.4

561.8

133.3

171.4

65

15

20

1530

2 505.4

1 573.5

608.7

323.3

63

24

13

1650

670.0

72.5

297.5

300.0

11

44

45

Wet heaths

3 828.4

857.9

1 564.5

1 405.9

22

41

37

4010

2 651.4

521.8

1 526.2

603.4

20

58

23

4020

1 176.9

336.2

38.3

802.5

29

3

68

6460

0.02

0.02

0.00

0.00

100

0

0

Bogs, mires and fens

86 738.1

47 556.2

9 330.8

29 851.0

55

11

34

7110

8 086.2

2 481.0

926.4

4 678.7

31

11

58

7120

1 161.7

289.8

537.8

334.0

25

46

29

7130

2 817.0

1 468.4

1 325.0

23.5

52

47

1

7140

31 674.4

25 001.3

3 553.6

3 119.5

79

11

10

7150

218.9

125.5

41.9

51.5

57

19

24

7160

95.8

47.9

33.0

15.0

50

34

16

7210

656.5

406.5

188.9

61.1

62

29

9

7220

813.9

45.2

21.5

747.3

6

3

92

7230

4 691.3

2 577.1

789.7

1 324.6

55

17

28

7240

77.7

60.1

13.8

3.9

77

18

5

7310

36 020.0

14 980.0

1 548.0

19 492.0

42

4

54

7320

424.7

73.5

351.2

0.0

17

83

0

Wet forests

46 006.1

4 041.7

8 331.4

33 632.9

9

18

73

9080

1 421.5

371.4

270.5

779.6

26

19

55

91D0

44 584.6

3 670.3

8 060.9

32 853.3

8

18

74

Notes: Areas reported by Romania excluded from the table.

Table 7 – Condition of Annex I wetlands per Member State

 

Wetland area (km2)

 

Percentage

Member State

Total

Good

Not-good

Unknown

Good

Not-good

Unknown

AT

181.8

41.5

26.8

113.5

23

15

62

BE

169.4

8.9

17.1

143.5

5

10

85

BG

117.2

0.0

0.0

117.1

0

0

100

CY

6.9

4.3

2.7

0.0

62

39

0

CZ

197.8

153.4

17.1

27.3

78

9

14

DE

6 743.5

4 103.7

1 773.1

866.6

61

26

13

DK

6 402.8

289.7

1 382.0

4 731.1

5

22

74

EE

3 624.8

2 813.4

464.2

347.2

78

13

10

ES

2 511.7

390.0

481.5

1 640.1

16

19

65

FI

52 060.0

3 301.7

8 413.2

40 345.1

6

16

77

FR

11 969.4

2 069.1

787.6

9 112.6

17

7

76

GR

1 612.1

278.6

260.5

1 073.1

17

16

67

HR

95.0

6.0

0.2

88.8

6

0

93

HU

2 415.6

1 570.3

602.9

242.4

65

25

10

IE

5 979.9

2 453.1

3 526.8

0.0

41

59

0

IT

2 147.8

1 106.2

191.4

850.2

52

9

40

LT

1 689.5

524.7

77.0

1 087.8

31

5

64

LU

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

0

16

84

LV

2 394.7

1 166.4

366.8

861.5

49

15

36

MT

0.3

0.1

0.2

0.0

31

73

-4

NL

2 394.2

119.0

559.9

1 715.3

5

23

72

PL

2 242.9

543.5

1 702.3

-2.9

24

76

0

PT

691.2

215.2

338.2

137.9

31

49

20

RO (*)

34 260.5

26 001.9

2 250.5

6 008.0

76

7

18

SE

68 647.0

41 768.8

6 125.2

20 753.1

61

9

30

SI

20.4

16.5

3.4

0.4

81

17

2

SK

36.6

6.8

3.4

26.4

19

9

72

(*) areas reported by Romania largely overestimated



Carbon stock and sequestration

Literature on carbon stock and sequestration rates of wetlands is rather diverse and numbers for the individual habitats widely vary across the different studies. However, for many habitats values could still only be attributed by expert assessment.

Coastal and salty habitats listed in Annex I are reported to have high carbon sequestration rates but are relatively low in carbon storage. Covering less than 22% of the wetland area their share to the sequestration potential is about 45%. The contribution to the carbon stocks is less than 5%.

Wet heaths, bogs, mires, fens and wet forests are characterized by relatively low sequestration rates as productivity of the vegetation in wetlands is often relatively low. In contrast, carbon storage is usually very high as they are mostly characterized by peat soils which are very rich in organic soil carbon. In Europe, agriculture on drained peat soils is responsible for a large part of the total greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. In the EU27, – where peat soils cover more than 3 % of the agricultural area – these peat soils contribute 25 % to the annual greenhouse gas emissions associated with agricultural land use. Member States reported under the LULUCF Regulation that managed wetlands (mostly on peat soils) are net sources of CO2, with increasing emissions to the atmosphere by 5 % between 2000 and 2012.

Despite carbon sequestration rates of most peatland habitats reach only 50 % or less compared to forests (<1.5 tC/ha*yr compared to ca 2.6 tC/ha*yr), carbon stocks in peatland habitats are twice that high (260 t/ha compared to 130 t/ha) as they continuously accumulate carbon over centuries. The area of peatlands reported under Annex I of the Habitat Directive covers almost 137 000 km2. The respective potential annual carbon sequestration rate would be around 10.25 Mio tonnes equivalent to about 38 Mio tons of CO2, but only if habitats are in good condition. In principle, coastal and salty habitats would contribute another 30 Mio tons of CO2-equivalent but currently available data indicates that most of this carbon is not stored in the respective habitats.

Overall, the carbon storage potential of wetland habitats is estimated between 1.6 Gt and 4.7 Gt of carbon, if habitats are in good condition (Table 8).



Table 8 – Carbon stock and sequestration of Annex I wetlands

EU27
excluding Romania

Wetland area (km2)

Total Carbon Stock (Mt)

Potential carbon sequestration rate (Mt y-1)

EU27

min

max

mean

Coastal and salt habitats

37 780

0.00

283.35

8.37

1130

7 505

0.00

56.28

1.69

1140

13 620

0.00

102.15

3.06

1150

10 052

0.00

75.39

2.26

1310

433

0.00

3.25

0.13

1320

159

0.00

1.19

0.05

1330

1 119

0.00

8.39

0.34

1340

38

0.00

0.28

0.01

1410

813

0.00

6.10

0.24

1420

867

0.00

6.50

0.06

1530

2 505

0.00

18.79

0.38

1650

670

0.00

5.03

0.15

Wet heaths and peat grasland

3 828

28.71

173.60

0.87

4010

2 651

19.88

39.77

0.20

4020

1 177

8.83

17.66

0.09

6460

0.02

0.00

116.18

0.58

Bogs. mires and fens

86 738

917.77

2 490.80

6.51

7110

8 086

60.65

181.94

0.61

7120

1 162

8.72

26.15

0.09

7130

2 817

21.13

63.38

0.21

7140

31 674

237.56

712.67

2.38

7150

219

1.64

8.21

0.02

7160

96

0.72

3.60

0.01

7210

656

4.92

14.76

0.05

7220

814

0.00

6.11

0.06

7230

4 691

35.18

105.55

0.35

7240

78

0.59

1.76

0.01

7310

36 020

540.30

1 350.75

2.70

7320

425

6.38

15.94

0.03

Wet forests

46 006

690.11

1 725.26

3.45

9080

1 422

21.33

53.33

0.11

91D0

44 585

668.78

1 671.94

3.34

TOTAL

174 352

1 636.58

4 673.01

19.19

Note: areas reported by Romania note included

Annex A

Map 2 – Distribution of Annex I coastal and salt habitats
(1130, 1140, 1150, 1310, 1320, 1330, 1340, 1410, 1420, 1530, 1650)

Note: the shades of brown indicate the number of habitat types per 10 km x 10 km grid cell.



Map 3 – Distribution of Annex I wet heaths (4010, 4020) and peat grassland (6460)

Note: the shades of brown indicate the number of habitat types per 10 km x 10 km grid cell. Macaronesian islands not shown in the map.



Map 4 – Distribution of Annex I bogs, mires and fens
(7110, 7120, 7130, 7140, 7150, 7160, 7210, 7220, 7230, 7240, 7310, 7320)

Note: the shades of brown indicate the number of habitat types per 10 km x 10 km grid cell.
Macaronesian islands not shown in the map.

Map 5 – Distribution of Annex I wet forests (9080, 91D0)

Note: the shades of brown indicate the number of habitat types per 10 km x 10 km grid cell.
Macaronesian islands not shown in the map.

(1)

These have been included in the group 'river, lake and alluvial/riparian habitats'.

(2)

Area of habitats calculated from the area reported by Member States as 'best estimate' or 'average of minimum/maximum'

(3)

The average total area of wetlands reported by Romania is 34 261 km2

(4)

  https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/land-cover-and-change-statistics  

(5)

  https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/biodiversity/mapping-europes-ecosystems  

(6)

But there is an issue with the areas reported: coverage by Natura 2000 is 183 %

(7)

The surface area in a given biogeographical region considered the minimum necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the habitat type; this should include necessary areas for restoration or development for those habitat types for which the present coverage is not sufficient to ensure long-term viability