|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2011/C 226/02
|
Joined Cases C-65/09 and C-87/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Amtsgericht Schorndorf (Germany)) — Gebr. Weber GmbH v Jürgen Wittmer (C-65/09), Ingrid Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH (Consumer protection — Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees — Directive 1999/44/EC — Article 3(2) and (3) — Replacement of defective goods as the only remedy — Defective goods already installed by the consumer — Obligation on the seller to remove the defective goods and install the replacement goods — Absolute lack of proportionality — Consequences)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/03
|
Joined Cases C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P and C-76/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ (C-71/09 P), Hotel Cipriani Srl (C-73/09 P), Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) (C-76/09 P) v Coopservice — Servizi di fiducia Soc. coop. rl, European Commission, Italian Republic (Appeals — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Locus standi — Interest in bringing an action — Objection of lis alibi pendens — State aid — Multisectoral aid scheme — Reductions in social security contributions — Decision 2000/394/EC — Compensatory nature — Whether intra-Community trade affected — Impact on competition — Extent of control — Burden of proof — Duty to state reasons — Article 87(2)(b) and (3)(b) to (d) EC — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 14 and 15)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/04
|
Case C-383/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Habitats Directive — Inadequacy of measures taken to protect the species Cricetus cricetus (European hamster) — Deterioration of habitats)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/05
|
Case C-401/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Central Bank (Appeal — Admissibility — Power of attorney — Consortium — Public contracts — Negotiated procedure — IT consultancy and IT development services — Rejection of the tender — Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Interest in bringing proceedings — Ground for exclusion — Permit required by national law — Obligation to state reasons)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/06
|
Case C-409/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal)) — José Maria Ambrósio Lavrador, Maria Cândida Olival Ferreira Bonifácio v Companhia de Seguros Fidelidade-Mundial SA (Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC and 90/232/EEC — Right to compensation by means of compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Conditions for limitation — Victim’s contribution to his own loss or injury — Liability for risk — Provisions applicable to a child third party who is the victim of an accident)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/07
|
Case C-465/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya — Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (C-465/09 P and C-468/09 P), Territorio Histórico de Álava — Diputación Foral de Álava (C-466/09 P and C-469/09 P), Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa — Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa (C-467/09 P and C-470/09 P) v European Commission, Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco, Comunidad autónoma de La Rioja, Confederación Empresarial Vasca (Confebask) (Appeals — State aid — Action for annulment — Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC — Subsequent final decisions finding that State aid schemes implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in Álava, Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa were not compatible with the common market — Corporation tax exemptions — Lis pendens — Concept of ‘authorised aid’ — Legitimate expectations — Compliance with a reasonable time-limit — No notification)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/08
|
Case C-52/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Eleftheri tileorasi AE ‘ALTER CHANNEL’, Konstantinos Giannikos v Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis, Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis (Directive 89/552/EEC — Television broadcasting activities — Article 1(d) — ‘Surreptitious advertising’ — Intentional nature — Presentation of cosmetic dental treatment during a television broadcast)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/09
|
Case C-87/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Vicenza (Italy)) — Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA (Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — Article 5(1)(b), first indent — Court of the place of performance of the contractual obligation on which the application is based — Sale of goods — Place of delivery — Contract containing the clause ‘Delivered Ex Works’)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/10
|
Case C-115/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővarosi Bíróság (Hungary)) — Bábolna Mezőgazdasági Termelő, Fejlesztő és Kereskedelmi Zrt. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve (Common agricultural policy — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Complementary direct national aid — Conditions for grant)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/11
|
Case C-285/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Campsa Estaciones de Servicio SA v Administración del Estado (Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 11A(1) and 27 — Taxable amount — Extension of the rules on application for private use to transactions between connected parties where prices are patently lower than open market prices)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/12
|
Case C-351/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)) — Zollamt Linz Wels v Laki DOOEL (Community Customs Code — Regulation implementing the Customs Code — Articles 555(1)(c) and 558(1) — Vehicle which has entered the customs territory under the temporary importation procedure with total relief from import duties — Vehicle used for internal traffic — Unlawful use — Incurring of a customs debt — National authorities competent to levy customs duties)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/13
|
Case C-361/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Intercommunale Intermosane SCRL, Fédération de l’industrie et du gaz v État belge (Internal market — Technical standards and regulations — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and rules on Information Society services — Minimum safety requirements for certain old electrical installations at places of work)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/14
|
Case C-458/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 98/83/EC — Water intended for human consumption — Incomplete and incorrect transposition)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/15
|
Case C-171/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 11 April 2011 — Fra.bo S.p.A. v Deutsche Vereinigung des Gas- und Wasserfaches e.V. (DVGW) — Technisch-Wissenschaftlicher Verein
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/16
|
Case C-172/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany), lodged on 11 April 2011 — Georges Erny v Daimler AG — Werk Wörth
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/17
|
Case C-174/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 13 April 2011 — Finanzamt Steglitz v Ines Zimmermann
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/18
|
Case C-176/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 April 2011 — HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem d.d. Nova Gorica and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sreco in turizem d.d. v Bundesminister für Finanzen
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/19
|
Case C-194/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1, Oviedo (Spain) lodged on 27 April 2011 — Susana Natividad Martínez Álvarez v Consejería de la Presidencia, Justicia e Igualdad del Principado de Asturias
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/20
|
Case C-206/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 2 May 2011 — Georg Köck v Schutzverband gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/21
|
Case C-212/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 9 May 2011 — Jyske Bank Gibraltar Limited v Administración del Estado
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/22
|
Case C-216/11: Action brought on 10 May 2011 — European Commission v French Republic
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/23
|
Case C-227/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 16 May 2011 — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/24
|
Case C-237/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — French Republic v European Parliament
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/25
|
Case C-238/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — French Republic v European Parliament
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/26
|
Case C-239/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 May 2011 by Siemens AG against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 March 2011 in Case T-110/07 Siemens AG v European Commission
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/27
|
Case C-250/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės (Lithuania) lodged on 20 May 2011 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė, Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/28
|
Case C-255/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Geldern (Germany) lodged on 24 May 2011 — Nadine Büsch and Björn Siever v Ryanair Ltd
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/29
|
Case C-258/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 26 May 2011 — Peter Sweetman, Ireland, Attorney General, Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government v An Bord Pleanala
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/30
|
Case C-260/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 25 May 2011 — Regina on the application of David Edwards, Lilian Pallikaropoulos v Environment Agency, First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/31
|
Case C-263/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 26 May 2011 — Ainārs Rēdlihs v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/32
|
Case C-267/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 May 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Third Chamber) on 22 March 2011 in Case T-369/07 Republic of Latvia v European Commission
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/33
|
Case C-270/11: Action brought on 31 May 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/34
|
Case C-277/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland (Ireland) made on 6 June 2011 — MM v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/35
|
Case C-279/11: Action brought on 1 June 2011 — European Commission v Ireland
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/36
|
Case C-312/11: Action brought on 20 June 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2011/C 226/37
|
Case T-185/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Air liquide v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/38
|
Case T-186/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Solvay v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Concepts of ‘agreement’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Access to the file — Fines — Leniency Notice — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/39
|
Case T-191/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — FMC Foret v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Presumption of innocence — Rights of the defence — Fines — Attenuating circumstances)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/40
|
Case T-192/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Caffaro v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Limitation period — Differential treatment — Duration of the infringement — Attenuating circumstances)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/41
|
Case T-194/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — SNIA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Acquisition of a company liable for the infringement — Rights of the defence — Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/42
|
Case T-195/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Solvay Solexis v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of infringement — Concept of ‘agreement’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Access to the file — Fines — Equal treatment — Leniency Notice — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/43
|
Case T-196/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Edison v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/44
|
Case T-197/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — FMC v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/45
|
Case T-235/07: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Bavaria v European Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands beer market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Proof of the infringement — Access to the file — Fines — Principle of equal treatment — Reasonable period)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/46
|
Case T-240/07: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Heineken Nederland and Heineken v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands beer market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Proof of the infringement — Access to the file — Fines — Principle of equal treatment — Reasonable period)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/47
|
Case T-199/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Ziegler v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Appreciable effect on trade — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/48
|
Joined Cases T-204/08 and T-212/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Team Relocations and Others v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/49
|
Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Gosselin Group and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Concept of an undertaking — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity — Duration)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/50
|
Case T-210/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Verhuizingen Coppens v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid-rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Burden of proof)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/51
|
Case T-211/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Putters International v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity — Duration)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/52
|
Case T-76/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Mundipharma v OHIM — Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ‘FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI’ — Earlier Community figurative ‘markmundipharma’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/53
|
Case T-309/09: Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Sanyō Denki v OHIM — Telefónica 02 Germany (eneloop) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/54
|
Case T-272/11: Action brought on 25 May 2011 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/55
|
Case T-273/11: Action brought on 30 May 2011 — Régie Networks and NRJ Global v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/56
|
Case T-297/11: Action brought on 10 June 2011 — Buzzi Unicem v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/57
|
Case T-301/11: Action brought on 16 June 2011 — Ben Ali v Council
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/58
|
Case T-304/11: Action brought on 16 June 2011 — Alumina v Council
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/59
|
Case T-316/11: Action brought on 17 June 2011 — Kadio Morokro v Council
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/60
|
Case T-356/09: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2011 — Commission v Association Fédération Club B2A
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2011/C 226/61
|
Case F-23/11: Action brought on 3 March 2011 — ZZ v Council
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/62
|
Case F-56/11: Action brought on 12 May 2011 — ZZ v European Commission
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/63
|
Case F-61/11: Action brought on 27 May 2011 — ZZ v FRONTEX
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 226/64
|
Case F-63/11: Action brought on 1 June 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
32
|
|
|
|
