ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.226.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 226

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 54
30 July 2011


Notice No

Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 226/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 219, 23.7.2011

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2011/C 226/02

Joined Cases C-65/09 and C-87/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Amtsgericht Schorndorf (Germany)) — Gebr. Weber GmbH v Jürgen Wittmer (C-65/09), Ingrid Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH (Consumer protection — Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees — Directive 1999/44/EC — Article 3(2) and (3) — Replacement of defective goods as the only remedy — Defective goods already installed by the consumer — Obligation on the seller to remove the defective goods and install the replacement goods — Absolute lack of proportionality — Consequences)

2

2011/C 226/03

Joined Cases C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P and C-76/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ (C-71/09 P), Hotel Cipriani Srl (C-73/09 P), Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) (C-76/09 P) v Coopservice — Servizi di fiducia Soc. coop. rl, European Commission, Italian Republic (Appeals — Actions for annulment — Admissibility — Locus standi — Interest in bringing an action — Objection of lis alibi pendens — State aid — Multisectoral aid scheme — Reductions in social security contributions — Decision 2000/394/EC — Compensatory nature — Whether intra-Community trade affected — Impact on competition — Extent of control — Burden of proof — Duty to state reasons — Article 87(2)(b) and (3)(b) to (d) EC — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 14 and 15)

3

2011/C 226/04

Case C-383/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Habitats Directive — Inadequacy of measures taken to protect the species Cricetus cricetus (European hamster) — Deterioration of habitats)

3

2011/C 226/05

Case C-401/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Central Bank (Appeal — Admissibility — Power of attorney — Consortium — Public contracts — Negotiated procedure — IT consultancy and IT development services — Rejection of the tender — Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Interest in bringing proceedings — Ground for exclusion — Permit required by national law — Obligation to state reasons)

4

2011/C 226/06

Case C-409/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal)) — José Maria Ambrósio Lavrador, Maria Cândida Olival Ferreira Bonifácio v Companhia de Seguros Fidelidade-Mundial SA (Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC and 90/232/EEC — Right to compensation by means of compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Conditions for limitation — Victim’s contribution to his own loss or injury — Liability for risk — Provisions applicable to a child third party who is the victim of an accident)

4

2011/C 226/07

Case C-465/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya — Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (C-465/09 P and C-468/09 P), Territorio Histórico de Álava — Diputación Foral de Álava (C-466/09 P and C-469/09 P), Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa — Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa (C-467/09 P and C-470/09 P) v European Commission, Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco, Comunidad autónoma de La Rioja, Confederación Empresarial Vasca (Confebask) (Appeals — State aid — Action for annulment — Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC — Subsequent final decisions finding that State aid schemes implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in Álava, Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa were not compatible with the common market — Corporation tax exemptions — Lis pendens — Concept of ‘authorised aid’ — Legitimate expectations — Compliance with a reasonable time-limit — No notification)

5

2011/C 226/08

Case C-52/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Eleftheri tileorasi AE ‘ALTER CHANNEL’, Konstantinos Giannikos v Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis, Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis (Directive 89/552/EEC — Television broadcasting activities — Article 1(d) — ‘Surreptitious advertising’ — Intentional nature — Presentation of cosmetic dental treatment during a television broadcast)

5

2011/C 226/09

Case C-87/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Vicenza (Italy)) — Electrosteel Europe SA v Edil Centro SpA (Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — Article 5(1)(b), first indent — Court of the place of performance of the contractual obligation on which the application is based — Sale of goods — Place of delivery — Contract containing the clause ‘Delivered Ex Works’)

6

2011/C 226/10

Case C-115/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővarosi Bíróság (Hungary)) — Bábolna Mezőgazdasági Termelő, Fejlesztő és Kereskedelmi Zrt. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve (Common agricultural policy — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Complementary direct national aid — Conditions for grant)

6

2011/C 226/11

Case C-285/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)) — Campsa Estaciones de Servicio SA v Administración del Estado (Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 11A(1) and 27 — Taxable amount — Extension of the rules on application for private use to transactions between connected parties where prices are patently lower than open market prices)

7

2011/C 226/12

Case C-351/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)) — Zollamt Linz Wels v Laki DOOEL (Community Customs Code — Regulation implementing the Customs Code — Articles 555(1)(c) and 558(1) — Vehicle which has entered the customs territory under the temporary importation procedure with total relief from import duties — Vehicle used for internal traffic — Unlawful use — Incurring of a customs debt — National authorities competent to levy customs duties)

7

2011/C 226/13

Case C-361/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Intercommunale Intermosane SCRL, Fédération de l’industrie et du gaz v État belge (Internal market — Technical standards and regulations — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and rules on Information Society services — Minimum safety requirements for certain old electrical installations at places of work)

8

2011/C 226/14

Case C-458/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2011 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 98/83/EC — Water intended for human consumption — Incomplete and incorrect transposition)

8

2011/C 226/15

Case C-171/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 11 April 2011 — Fra.bo S.p.A. v Deutsche Vereinigung des Gas- und Wasserfaches e.V. (DVGW) — Technisch-Wissenschaftlicher Verein

9

2011/C 226/16

Case C-172/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany), lodged on 11 April 2011 — Georges Erny v Daimler AG — Werk Wörth

9

2011/C 226/17

Case C-174/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 13 April 2011 — Finanzamt Steglitz v Ines Zimmermann

10

2011/C 226/18

Case C-176/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 April 2011 — HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem d.d. Nova Gorica and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sreco in turizem d.d. v Bundesminister für Finanzen

10

2011/C 226/19

Case C-194/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 1, Oviedo (Spain) lodged on 27 April 2011 — Susana Natividad Martínez Álvarez v Consejería de la Presidencia, Justicia e Igualdad del Principado de Asturias

10

2011/C 226/20

Case C-206/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 2 May 2011 — Georg Köck v Schutzverband gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb

11

2011/C 226/21

Case C-212/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 9 May 2011 — Jyske Bank Gibraltar Limited v Administración del Estado

11

2011/C 226/22

Case C-216/11: Action brought on 10 May 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

11

2011/C 226/23

Case C-227/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 16 May 2011 — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat

12

2011/C 226/24

Case C-237/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — French Republic v European Parliament

12

2011/C 226/25

Case C-238/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — French Republic v European Parliament

13

2011/C 226/26

Case C-239/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 May 2011 by Siemens AG against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 March 2011 in Case T-110/07 Siemens AG v European Commission

13

2011/C 226/27

Case C-250/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės (Lithuania) lodged on 20 May 2011 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė, Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

14

2011/C 226/28

Case C-255/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Geldern (Germany) lodged on 24 May 2011 — Nadine Büsch and Björn Siever v Ryanair Ltd

15

2011/C 226/29

Case C-258/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 26 May 2011 — Peter Sweetman, Ireland, Attorney General, Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government v An Bord Pleanala

15

2011/C 226/30

Case C-260/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 25 May 2011 — Regina on the application of David Edwards, Lilian Pallikaropoulos v Environment Agency, First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

16

2011/C 226/31

Case C-263/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 26 May 2011 — Ainārs Rēdlihs v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

16

2011/C 226/32

Case C-267/11 P: Appeal brought on 30 May 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Third Chamber) on 22 March 2011 in Case T-369/07 Republic of Latvia v European Commission

17

2011/C 226/33

Case C-270/11: Action brought on 31 May 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

17

2011/C 226/34

Case C-277/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland (Ireland) made on 6 June 2011 — MM v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

18

2011/C 226/35

Case C-279/11: Action brought on 1 June 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

18

2011/C 226/36

Case C-312/11: Action brought on 20 June 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

19

 

General Court

2011/C 226/37

Case T-185/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Air liquide v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

20

2011/C 226/38

Case T-186/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Solvay v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Concepts of ‘agreement’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Access to the file — Fines — Leniency Notice — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

20

2011/C 226/39

Case T-191/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — FMC Foret v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Presumption of innocence — Rights of the defence — Fines — Attenuating circumstances)

21

2011/C 226/40

Case T-192/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Caffaro v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Limitation period — Differential treatment — Duration of the infringement — Attenuating circumstances)

21

2011/C 226/41

Case T-194/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — SNIA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Acquisition of a company liable for the infringement — Rights of the defence — Consistency between the statement of objections and the contested decision — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

21

2011/C 226/42

Case T-195/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Solvay Solexis v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of infringement — Concept of ‘agreement’ and ‘concerted practice’ — Access to the file — Fines — Equal treatment — Leniency Notice — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

22

2011/C 226/43

Case T-196/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Edison v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

22

2011/C 226/44

Case T-197/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — FMC v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

22

2011/C 226/45

Case T-235/07: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Bavaria v European Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands beer market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Proof of the infringement — Access to the file — Fines — Principle of equal treatment — Reasonable period)

23

2011/C 226/46

Case T-240/07: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Heineken Nederland and Heineken v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands beer market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Proof of the infringement — Access to the file — Fines — Principle of equal treatment — Reasonable period)

23

2011/C 226/47

Case T-199/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Ziegler v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Appreciable effect on trade — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

24

2011/C 226/48

Joined Cases T-204/08 and T-212/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Team Relocations and Others v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)

24

2011/C 226/49

Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Gosselin Group and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Concept of an undertaking — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity — Duration)

24

2011/C 226/50

Case T-210/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Verhuizingen Coppens v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid-rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Burden of proof)

25

2011/C 226/51

Case T-211/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Putters International v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity — Duration)

25

2011/C 226/52

Case T-76/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Mundipharma v OHIM — Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ‘FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI’ — Earlier Community figurative ‘markmundipharma’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

26

2011/C 226/53

Case T-309/09: Order of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Sanyō Denki v OHIM — Telefónica 02 Germany (eneloop) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

26

2011/C 226/54

Case T-272/11: Action brought on 25 May 2011 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin)

26

2011/C 226/55

Case T-273/11: Action brought on 30 May 2011 — Régie Networks and NRJ Global v Commission

27

2011/C 226/56

Case T-297/11: Action brought on 10 June 2011 — Buzzi Unicem v Commission

28

2011/C 226/57

Case T-301/11: Action brought on 16 June 2011 — Ben Ali v Council

29

2011/C 226/58

Case T-304/11: Action brought on 16 June 2011 — Alumina v Council

29

2011/C 226/59

Case T-316/11: Action brought on 17 June 2011 — Kadio Morokro v Council

30

2011/C 226/60

Case T-356/09: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2011 — Commission v Association Fédération Club B2A

30

 

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 226/61

Case F-23/11: Action brought on 3 March 2011 — ZZ v Council

31

2011/C 226/62

Case F-56/11: Action brought on 12 May 2011 — ZZ v European Commission

31

2011/C 226/63

Case F-61/11: Action brought on 27 May 2011 — ZZ v FRONTEX

32

2011/C 226/64

Case F-63/11: Action brought on 1 June 2011 — ZZ v Commission

32


EN