|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2014/C 212/02
|
Case C-184/11: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 May 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Judgment of the Court finding a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-implementation — Article 260 TFEU — State aid — Recovery — Unlawful aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Individual aid granted under that scheme — Pecuniary penalty)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/03
|
Case C-97/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 May 2014 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS (Appeal — Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative mark representing a locking device — No distinctive character — Partial invalidity — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(b))
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/04
|
Case C-131/12: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja González (Personal data — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of such data — Directive 95/46/EC — Articles 2, 4, 12 and 14 — Material and territorial scope — Internet search engines — Processing of data contained on websites — Searching for, indexing and storage of such data — Responsibility of the operator of the search engine — Establishment on the territory of a Member State — Extent of that operator’s obligations and of the data subject’s rights — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7 and 8)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/05
|
Case C-359/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Michael Timmel v Aviso Zeta AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2003/71/EC — Article 14(2)(b) — Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 — Articles 22(2) and 29(1) — Base prospectus — Supplements to the prospectus — Final terms — Time and method of publication of required information — Conditions for publication in electronic form)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/06
|
Case C-480/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Minister van Financiën v X BV (Community Customs Code — Scope of Articles 203 and 204(1)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — External transit procedure — Customs debt incurred through non-fulfilment of an obligation — Belated presentation of the goods at the office of destination — Sixth VAT Directive — Article 10(3) — Link between the incurring of customs debt and the incurring of VAT debt — Concept of taxable transactions)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/07
|
Case C-521/12: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands)) — T.C. Briels and Others v Minister van Infrastructuur en Milieu (Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(3) and (4) — Conservation of natural habitats — Special areas of conservation — Assessment of the implications for a protected site of a plan or project — Authorisation for a plan or project on a protected site — Compensatory measures — Natura 2000 site Vlijmens Ven, Moerputten & Bossche Broek — Project on the route of the A2 ‘s-Hertogenbosch-Eindhoven motorway)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/08
|
Case C-90/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2014 — 1. garantovaná a.s. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Total turnover in the preceding business year)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/09
|
Case C-135/13: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Szatmári Malom Kft v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve (Agriculture — EAFRD — Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Articles 20, 26 and 28 — Support for the modernisation of agricultural holdings and support for adding value to agricultural and forestry products — Eligibility conditions — Competence of the Member States — Support for the modernisation of existing mill capacity — Mills replaced with a single new mill, with no increase in capacity — Not included — Principle of equal treatment)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/10
|
Case C-297/13: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — Data I/O GmbH v Hauptzollamt München (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tariff classification — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Section XVI, note 2 — Headings 8422, 8456, 8473, 8501, 8504, 8543, 8544 and 8473 — Concepts of ‘parts’ and ‘articles’ — Parts and accessories (motors, power supplies, lasers, generators, cables and heat sealers) intended for programming systems — No precedence of heading 8473 over other headings of Chapters 84 or 85)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/11
|
Case C-337/13: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-magyarországi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 90 — Reduction of the taxable amount — Extent of obligations of Member States — Direct effect)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/12
|
Case C-142/14 P: Appeal brought on 24 March 2014 by The Sunrider Corporation against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 23 January 2014 in Case T-221/12: The Sunrider Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/13
|
Case C-144/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Maramureș (Romania) lodged on 26 March 2014 — Cabinet Medical Veterinar Dr. Tomoiagă Andrei v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca prin Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Maramureș
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/14
|
Case C-161/14: Action brought on 4 April 2014 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/15
|
Case C-172/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Inalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie (Romania) lodged on 7 April 2014 — ING Pensii Societate de Administrare a unui Fond de Pensii Administrat Privat SA v Consiliul Concurenței
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/16
|
Case C-174/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 9 April 2014 — Saudaçor — Sociedade Gestora de Recursos e Equipamentos de Saúde dos Açores S.A. v Fazenda Pública
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/17
|
Case C-181/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2014 — Criminal proceedings against G
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/18
|
Case C-186/14 P: Appeal brought on 14 April 2014 by ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Ostrava a.s. and others against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2014 in Case T-528/09: Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/19
|
Case C-193/14 P: Appeal brought on 15 April 2014 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 January 2014 in Case T-528/09: Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/20
|
Case C-205/14: Action brought on 24 April 2014 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/21
|
Case C-206/14: Action brought on 24 April 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/22
|
Case C-227/14 P: Appeal brought on 7 May 2014 by LG Display Co. Ltd, LG Display Taiwan Co., Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 27/02/2014 in Case T-128/11: LG Display Co. Ltd, LG Display Taiwan Co., Ltd v European Commission
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/23
|
Case C-231/14 P: Appeal brought on 8 May 2014 by InnoLux Corp., formerly Chimei InnoLux Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 27/02/2014 in Case T-91/11: InnoLux Corp., formerly Chimei InnoLux Corp. v European Commission
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/24
|
Case C-234/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 12 May 2014 — SIA ‘Ostas celtnieks’ v Talsu novada pašvaldība, Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/25
|
Case C-236/14: Action brought on 12 May 2014 — European Commission v Ireland
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2014/C 212/26
|
Case T-519/09: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Toshiba v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Power transformers market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Market-sharing agreement — Proof of distancing from the cartel — Restriction of competition — Effect on trade — Barriers to entry — Fines — Basic amount — Reference year — Section 18 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Use of a notional market share in the EEA market)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/27
|
Case T-447/11: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Catinis v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to an OLAF investigation concerning the implementation of a project for the modernisation of infrastructure in Syria — Access refused — Exception concerning the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/28
|
Case T-553/11: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2014 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of services relating to IT infrastructure and applications for the ECB — Rejection of the application — Action for annulment — Act open to challenge — Admissibility — Criteria for selecting candidates — Compliance of an application with the conditions laid down in the call for applications — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to exercise the power to ask for clarification in relation to an application — Manifest errors of assessment — Misuse of powers — Action for damages)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/29
|
Case T-599/11: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Eni v OHIM — Emi (IP) (ENI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENI — Earlier Community figurative mark EMI — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial refusal of registration)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/30
|
Case T-633/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — Guangdong Kito Ceramics and Others v Council (Dumping — Imports of ceramic tiles originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Non-cooperation — Necessary information — Time-limits provided — Facts available — Article 18(1) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/31
|
Case T-347/12 P: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Mocová v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed term contract — Decision not to renew — Rejection of the complaint — Obligation to state reasons — Ground given in the decision rejecting the complaint)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/32
|
Case T-368/12 P: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Commission v Macchia (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision of non-renewal — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — First paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Concept of ‘interests of the service’ — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita — Principle of the right to be heard)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/33
|
Case T-406/12 P: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — BG v Ombudsman (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary measures — Penalty of removal from post without loss of entitlement to a retirement pension — Preliminary investigation pending before a national court when the decision ordering removal from the post was adopted — Equal treatment — Prohibition on dismissal during maternity leave)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/34
|
Case T-553/12: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Bateaux mouches v OHIM (Community trade mark — Application for figurative Community trade mark BATEUAX-MOUCHES — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/35
|
Case T-61/13: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2014 — Melt Water v OHIM (NUEVA) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark NUEVA — Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Ambiguity in a language version — Uniform interpretation — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Excusable error — Obligations of care and diligence)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/36
|
Case T-95/13: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — Walcher Meßtechnik v OHIM (HIPERDRIVE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark HIPERDRIVE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/37
|
Case T-228/13: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — NIIT Insurance Technologies v OHIM (EXACT) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark EXACT — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Article 56 TFEU)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/38
|
Case T-207/12 P P: Order of the General Court of 12 May 2014 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Act following a request to place a document on the file compiled for the purposes of examining the application for recognition of an incident suffered by the appellant — Absence of act having adverse effect — preparatory act — Informative measure — Article 94(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal — Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/39
|
Case T-359/13: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Spain Doce 13 v OHIM — Ovejero Jiménez and Becerra Guibert (VICTORIA DELEF) (Community trade mark — Registration refused in part — No need to adjudicate)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/40
|
Case T-567/13: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Sharp v OHIM (BIG PAD) (Community trademark — Application for Community figurative mark BIG PAD — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive nature — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/41
|
Case T-203/14: Action brought on 31 March 2014 — Mo Industries v OHIM (Splendid)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/42
|
Case T-205/14: Action brought on 27 March 2014 — Schroeder v Council and Commission
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/43
|
Case T-206/14: Action brought on 27 March 2014 — Hüpeden v Council and Commission
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/44
|
Case T-226/14: Action brought on 15 April 2014 — Commission v McCarron Poultry
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/45
|
Case T-238/14: Action brought on 11 April 2014 — EGBA and RGA v Commission
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/46
|
Case T-239/14: Action brought on 20 April 2014 — Monard v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/47
|
Case T-251/14: Action brought on 22 April 2014 — Promarc Technics v OHIM — PIS (Part of doors)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/48
|
Case T-315/14: Action brought on 5 May 2014 — Hipp v OHIM — Nestlé Nutrition (Praebiotik)
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/49
|
Case T-319/14: Action brought on 30 April 2014 — Drogenhilfe Köln Projekt v OHIM (Rauschbrille)
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/50
|
Case T-320/14: Action brought on 5 May 2014 — Sephora v OHIM — Mayfield Trading (Representation of two vertical lines)
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/51
|
Case T-321/14: Action brought on 12 May 2014 — Volkswagen v OHIM (STREET)
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/52
|
Case T-328/14: Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Jannatian v Council
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/53
|
Case T-338/14: Action brought on 19 May 2014 — UNIC v Commission
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/54
|
Case T-342/14 P: Appeal brought on 19 May 2014 by CR against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 March 2014 in Case F-128/12, CR v Parliament
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/55
|
Case T-353/14: Action brought on 23 May 2014 — Italy v Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2014/C 212/56
|
Case F-9/14: Action brought on 1 February 2014 — ZZ v EIB
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/57
|
Case F-38/14: Action brought on 21 April 2014 — ZZ v Council
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/58
|
Case F-42/14: Action brought on 6 May 2014 — ZZ v Commission
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/59
|
Case F-44/14: Action brought on 16 May 2014 — ZZ v Council
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/60
|
Case F-45/14: Action brought on 19 May 2014 — ZZ v Commission
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/61
|
Case F-46/14: Action brought on 20 May 2014 — ZZ v Commission
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2014/C 212/62
|
Case F-47/14: Action brought on 20 May 2014 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission
|
47
|
|
|
|
