|
V Announcements
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
2015/C 155/02
|
Case C-266/13: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — L. Kik v Staatssecretaris van Finaciën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — National of a Member State, in which he resides, employed on a pipe-laying vessel flying the flag of another third State — Person initially employed by an undertaking established in the Netherlands and subsequently by an undertaking established in Switzerland — Work performed, in succession, on the continental shelf adjacent to a third State, in international waters and in the part of the continental shelf adjacent to certain Member States — Scope ratione personae of Regulation No 1408/71 — Determination of the legislation applicable)
|
2
|
2015/C 155/03
|
Case C-286/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG v European Commission (Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market — Coordination in the setting of quotation prices — Obligation to state reasons — Belated statement of reasons — Belated submission of evidence — Rights of defence — Principle of equality of arms — Principles governing the establishment of the facts — Distortion of the facts — Assessment of the evidence — Market structure — Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object — Burden of proof — Calculation of the fine — Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account — Sales of the same bananas counted twice)
|
3
|
2015/C 155/04
|
Case C-510/13: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — E.ON Földgáz Trade Zrt v Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in natural gas — Directive 2003/55/EC — Article 25 — Directive 2009/73/EC — Articles 41 and 54 — Temporal application — Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 — Article 5 — Capacity allocation mechanisms and congestion management procedures — Decision of a regulatory authority — Right to bring an action — Action brought by a company holding a natural gas transmission authorisation — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to effective judicial protection against a decision of a regulatory authority)
|
4
|
2015/C 155/05
|
Case C-533/13: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin — Finland) — Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Öljytuote ry, Shell Aviation Finland Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2008/104/EC — Temporary agency work — Article 4(1) — Prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work — Justification — Grounds of general interest — Obligation to review — Scope)
|
5
|
2015/C 155/06
|
Case C-672/13: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — OTP Bank Nyrt v Magyar Állam, Magyar Államkincstár (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Housing aid granted prior to the accession of Hungary to the European Union to certain categories of household — Payment of the aid by credit institutions in exchange for a State guarantee — Article 108(3) TFEU — Measure not previously notified to the European Commission — Unlawfulness)
|
5
|
2015/C 155/07
|
Case C-182/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT — Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 — Likelihood of confusion)
|
6
|
2015/C 155/08
|
Case C-39/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Wuppertal (Germany) lodged on 2 February 2015 — Hartmut Frenzel v Resort Marina Oolderhuuske BV
|
7
|
2015/C 155/09
|
Case C-40/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 2 February 2015 — Minister Finansów v BRE Ubezpieczenia Sp. z o.o., established in Warsaw
|
7
|
2015/C 155/10
|
Case C-42/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Dunajská Streda (Slovakia) lodged on 2 February 2015 — Home Credit Slovakia a.s. v Klára Bíróová
|
8
|
2015/C 155/11
|
Case C-51/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Celle (Germany) lodged on 6 February 2015 — Remondis GmbH & Co. KG Region Nord v Region Hannover
|
10
|
2015/C 155/12
|
Case C-61/15 P: Appeal brought on 11 February 2015 by Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 in Case T-102/13 Heli-Flight GmbH & Co. KG v European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
|
11
|
2015/C 155/13
|
Case C-72/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) (United Kingdom) made on 18 February 2015 — OJSC Rosneft Oil Company v Her Majesty's Treasury, Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, The Financial Conduct Authority
|
12
|
2015/C 155/14
|
Case C-73/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 18 February 2014 — SC Vicdantrans SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj Napoca prin Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bihor, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu
|
14
|
2015/C 155/15
|
Case C-80/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 20 February 2015 — Robert Fuchs AG v Hauptzollamt Lörrach
|
14
|
2015/C 155/16
|
Case C-92/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2015 — Sven Mathys v De Grave Antverpia NV
|
15
|
2015/C 155/17
|
Case C-125/15 P: Appeal brought on 11 March 2015 by the Court of Justice of the European Union against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 2 February 2015 in Case T-577/14 Gascogne Sack Deutschland and Gascogne v European Union
|
15
|
2015/C 155/18
|
Case C-126/15: Action brought on 12 March 2015 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
|
16
|
2015/C 155/19
|
Case C-128/15: Action brought on 13 March 2015 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union
|
17
|
2015/C 155/20
|
Case C-139/15 P: Appeal brought on 24 March 2015 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2015 in Case T-109/12 Kingdom of Spain v Commission
|
18
|
2015/C 155/21
|
Case C-140/15 P: Appeal brought on 24 March 2015 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2015 in Case T-111/12 Spain v Commission
|
19
|
|
General Court
|
|
2015/C 155/22
|
Case T-556/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Slovenská pošta v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Slovakian traditional mail and hybrid mail services markets — Decision finding an infringement of Article 86(1) EC in conjunction with Article 82 EC — Exclusive right to distribute hybrid mail — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Extension of a monopoly — Article 86(2) EC — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations)
|
20
|
2015/C 155/23
|
Case T-297/09: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EASA (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Supply of IT services — Classification of a tenderer in second or third position in the cascade procedure — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability)
|
21
|
2015/C 155/24
|
Case T-538/11: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Belgium v Commission (State aid — Public health — Aid granted to finance screening tests for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) in bovine animals — Decision declaring aid to be partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Adversely affecting act — Admissibility — Notion of advantage — Notion of selectivity)
|
22
|
2015/C 155/25
|
Case T-563/12: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Central Bank of Iran v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to reputation — Proportionality)
|
22
|
2015/C 155/26
|
Case T-378/13: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Apple and Pear Australia and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM — Carolus C. (English pink) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark English pink — Earlier Community word mark PINK LADY and earlier Community figurative mark Pink Lady — Obligation to state reasons — Duty of diligence — Decisions by a Community trade mark court — No res judicata)
|
23
|
2015/C 155/27
|
Case T-456/13: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Sea Handling v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Obligation to carry out a concrete and individual examination — Overriding public interest — Partial access)
|
24
|
2015/C 155/28
|
Case T-551/13: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Radecki v OHIM — Vamed (AKTIVAMED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AKTIVAMED — Earlier national figurative mark VAMED — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
25
|
2015/C 155/29
|
Case T-581/13: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM — Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB — Earlier Community figurative trade marks BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Duty to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
25
|
2015/C 155/30
|
Case T-596/13: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Emsibeth v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Nael) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Nael — Earlier Community word mark Mc Neal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
26
|
2015/C 155/31
|
Case T-72/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2015 — Bateaux mouches v OHIM (BATEAUX MOUCHES) (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark BATEAUX MOUCHES — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
27
|
2015/C 155/32
|
Case T-132/14: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2015 — Albis Plastic v OHIM — IQAP Masterbatch Group (ALCOLOR) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
|
27
|
2015/C 155/33
|
Case T-383/14 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2015 — Europower v Commission (Interim measures — Public works contracts — Tendering procedure — Construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant — Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Prima facie case — Lack of urgency)
|
28
|
2015/C 155/34
|
Case T-82/15: Action brought on 20 February 2015 — InAccess Networks Integrated Systems v Commission
|
28
|
2015/C 155/35
|
Case T-94/15: Action brought on 19 February 2015 — Binca Seafoods v Commission
|
30
|
2015/C 155/36
|
Case T-99/15: Action brought on 26 February 2015 — Sfera Joven v OHIM — Las banderas del Mediterráneo (NOOSFERA)
|
31
|
2015/C 155/37
|
Case T-100/15: Action brought on 27 February 2015 — Dextro Energy v Commission
|
31
|
2015/C 155/38
|
Case T-104/15: Action brought on 25 February 2015 — Militos Symvouleftiki/Commission
|
32
|
2015/C 155/39
|
Case T-113/15: Action brought on 4 March 2015 — RFA International v Commission
|
33
|
2015/C 155/40
|
Case T-126/15: Action brought on 18 March 2015 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Grup Supeco Maxor (Supeco)
|
34
|
2015/C 155/41
|
Case T-129/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE 2 PAY)
|
35
|
2015/C 155/42
|
Case T-130/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE TO PAY)
|
35
|
2015/C 155/43
|
Case T-135/15: Action brought on 26 March 2015 — Italy v Commission
|
36
|
2015/C 155/44
|
Case T-594/13: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2015 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)
|
37
|
2015/C 155/45
|
Case T-598/13: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2015 — Sanctuary Brands v OHIM — Richter International (TAILORBYRD)
|
38
|
2015/C 155/46
|
Case T-260/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Vattenfall Europe Mining and Others v Commission
|
38
|
2015/C 155/47
|
Case T-263/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products and Others v Commission
|
38
|
2015/C 155/48
|
Case T-271/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Styron Deutschland v Commission
|
38
|
2015/C 155/49
|
Case T-274/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Lech-Stahlwerke v Commission
|
38
|
2015/C 155/50
|
Case T-291/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — egeplast international v Commission
|
39
|
2015/C 155/51
|
Case T-302/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Buderus Guss v Commission
|
39
|
2015/C 155/52
|
Case T-303/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Polyblend v Commission
|
39
|
2015/C 155/53
|
Case T-304/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Sun Alloys Europe v Commission
|
39
|
2015/C 155/54
|
Case T-306/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Polymer-Chemie v Commission
|
39
|
2015/C 155/55
|
Case T-307/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — TechnoCompound v Commission
|
40
|
2015/C 155/56
|
Case T-308/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Neue Halberg-Guss v Commission
|
40
|
2015/C 155/57
|
Case T-309/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Mat Foundries Europe v Commission
|
40
|
2015/C 155/58
|
Case T-310/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Fritz Winter Eisengießerei v Commission
|
40
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
2015/C 155/59
|
Case F-124/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — CW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Action for annulment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Internal Rules for the Advisory Committee on Harassment and its Prevention in the Workplace — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Manifest errors of assessment — None — Role and powers of the Advisory Committee on Harassment and its Prevention in the Workplace — Option for an official to approach the Committee — Action for damages)
|
41
|
2015/C 155/60
|
Case F-6/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 23 March 2015 — Borghans v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Survivor’s pension — First paragraph of Article 27 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Divorced spouse of a deceased member of the permanent staff — Existence of alimony on the date of death of the member of the permanent staff — Article 42 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Time-limits for applying for payment of pension entitlements)
|
41
|
2015/C 155/61
|
Case F-26/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — CN v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Request for assistance — Psychological harassment)
|
42
|
2015/C 155/62
|
Case F-38/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — Coedo Suárez v Council (Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary action — Revocation and reduction of the invalidity allowance — Proportionality of the penalty — Manifest error of assessment — Concept of conduct of the official throughout his career — Adhering to working hours)
|
43
|
2015/C 155/63
|
Case F-41/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — CW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Staff report — Manifest errors of assessment — Misuse of powers — Psychological harassment — Decision to award one merit point)
|
43
|
2015/C 155/64
|
Case F-143/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 March 2015 — Singou v Council (Civil Service — Contract staff — Rejection of a complaint of psychological harassment — Non-renewal of contract — No claim — Manifestly inadmissible)
|
44
|