|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice of the European Union
|
|
|
2019/C 172/03
|
Case C-54/18: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Piemonte — Italy) — Cooperativa Animazione Valdocco S.C.S. Impresa Sociale Onlus v Consorzio Intercomunale Servizi Sociali di Pinerolo, Azienda Sanitaria Locale To3 di Collegno e Pinerolo (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Review procedures – Directive 89/665/EEC – Articles 1 and 2c – Action brought against decisions to allow tenderers to participate in, or to exclude them from, a tendering procedure – Time limit for applying for review – 30-day time limit – National legislation excluding the possibility to plead the illegality of an admission decision in an action brought against subsequent decisions – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection)
|
3
|
|
2019/C 172/04
|
Case C-373/18: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Penafiel — Portugal) — Prosa — Produtos e Serviços Agrícolas v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Indirect taxes on the raising of capital – Directive 69/335/EEC – Articles 4 and 7 – Incorporation of a capital company – Stamp duty in force on 1 July 1984 – Subsequent abolition of that stamp duty, followed by its reintroduction)
|
4
|
|
2019/C 172/05
|
Case C-489/18: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Farmland Kft. v Földművelésügyi Miniszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Direct support schemes – Single payment scheme – Single area payment application – Criteria – Lawful user of agricultural land)
|
5
|
|
2019/C 172/06
|
Case C-689/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Patron — Greece) — XT v Elliniko Dimosio (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Internal taxation – Prohibition of discriminatory taxation – Luxury tax – Motor vehicles – Exemption from tax depending on the date on which the goods first entered into service in the taxing Member State – No account taken of the date on which the goods first entered into service in another Member State)
|
5
|
|
2019/C 172/07
|
Case C-8/19 PPU: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against RH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 4 – Public references to guilt – Pre-trial detention decision – Remedies – Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of that decision – Observance of the presumption of innocence – Article 267 TFEU – Article 47, second paragraph, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to have a case heard within a reasonable time. – National legislation restricting the powers of the national courts to make a request to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling or obliging them to adjudicate without waiting for the answer to that request – Disciplinary sanctions for failure to comply with that legislation)
|
6
|
|
2019/C 172/08
|
Case C-755/18 P: Appeal brought on 30/11/2018 by Harry Shindler and Others against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 26 November 2018 in Case T-458/17 Shindler and Others v Council
|
7
|
|
2019/C 172/09
|
Case C-88/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Zărnești (Romania) lodged on 7 February 2019 — Asociația ‘Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor’ v TM, UN and Asociația DMPA
|
7
|
|
2019/C 172/10
|
Case C-96/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Niederösterreich (Austria) lodged on 8 February 2019 — VO v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Tulln
|
8
|
|
2019/C 172/11
|
Case C-101/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 February 2019 — Deutsche Homöopathie-Union (DHU) Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
|
9
|
|
2019/C 172/12
|
Case C-102/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 11 February 2019 — Deutsche Homöopathie-Union (DHU) Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
|
10
|
|
2019/C 172/13
|
Case C-108/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 11 February 2019 — Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București, Administrația Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenți
|
10
|
|
2019/C 172/14
|
Case C-112/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Aachen (Germany) lodged on 12 February 2019 — Marvin M. v Kreis Heinsberg
|
11
|
|
2019/C 172/15
|
Case C-118/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 15 February 2019 — ZS v PVA Landesstelle Salzburg
|
12
|
|
2019/C 172/16
|
Case C-134/19 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2019 by Bank Refah Kargaran against the judgment delivered on 10 December 2018 in Case T-552/15, Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
|
12
|
|
2019/C 172/17
|
Case C-135/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 20 February 2019 — Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v CW
|
14
|
|
2019/C 172/18
|
Case C-157/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Ehab Makhlouf against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-409/16 Makhlouf v Council
|
15
|
|
2019/C 172/19
|
Case C-158/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Razan Othman against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-416/16 Othman v Council
|
16
|
|
2019/C 172/20
|
Case C-159/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2019 by Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2018 in Case T-411/16 Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council
|
17
|
|
2019/C 172/21
|
Case C-182/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 26 February 2019 — Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
|
18
|
|
2019/C 172/22
|
Case C-208/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz (Austria) lodged on 4 March 2019 — NK v Ms and AS
|
19
|
|
2019/C 172/23
|
Case C-217/19: Action brought on 8 March 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Finland
|
20
|
|
2019/C 172/24
|
Case C-231/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 15 March 2019 — Blackrock Investment Management (UK) Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
|
21
|
|
2019/C 172/25
|
Case C-235/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (United Kingdom) made on 18 March 2019 — United Biscuits (Pensions Trustees) Limited, United Biscuits Pension Investments Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
|
22
|
|
2019/C 172/26
|
Case C-239/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 20 March 2019 — Eli Lilly and Company v Genentech Inc.
|
22
|
|
2019/C 172/27
|
Case C-510/17: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 24 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava — Slovakia) — ML
|
23
|
|
2019/C 172/28
|
Case C-564/17: Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium, supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Estonia, Ireland, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic, Italian Republic, Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Hungary
|
23
|
|
2019/C 172/29
|
Case C-569/17: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 13 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Japan Tobacco International SA, Japan Tobacco International France SAS v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics, Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé
|
24
|
|
2019/C 172/30
|
Case C-657/17: Order of the President of the Court of 25 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Hussein Mohamad Hussein, other party: Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl
|
24
|
|
2019/C 172/31
|
Case C-277/18: Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 14 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo de Círculo de Lisboa — Portugal) — Henkel Ibérica Portugal, Unipessoal Lda v Comissão de Segurança de Serviços e Bens de Consumo
|
24
|
|
2019/C 172/32
|
Case C-368/18: Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 30 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Justice de paix du troisième canton de Charleroi — Belgium) — Frank Casteels v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd
|
25
|
|
2019/C 172/33
|
Case C-399/18: Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Vereniging Gasopslag Nederland, TAQA Onshore BV, TAQA Piek Gas BV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt, other party: Gas Transport Services BV
|
25
|
|
2019/C 172/34
|
Case C-498/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — ZW v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
|
25
|
|
2019/C 172/35
|
Case C-614/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 February 2019 — European Commission v Slovak Republic
|
26
|
|
2019/C 172/36
|
Case C-660/18: Order of the President of the Court of 8 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin — Germany) — Sundair GmbH v WV, XU, YT, ZS
|
26
|
|
2019/C 172/37
|
Case C-701/18: Order of the President of the Court of 31 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg — Germany) — Geld-für-Flug GmbH v Ryanair DAC
|
26
|
|
2019/C 172/38
|
Case C-750/18: Order of the President of the Court of 8 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — A, B v C
|
27
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2019/C 172/39
|
Cases T-251/17 and T-252/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Robert Bosch v EUIPO (Simply. Connected.) (EU trade mark – Applications for the EU figurative marks Simply. Connected. – Relative ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Scope of the examination which has to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 64 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
28
|
|
2019/C 172/40
|
Case T-480/17: Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2019 — Greece v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Greece – One-off and flat-rate financial corrections – Cross compliance – Monitoring of statutory management requirements – Risk analysis – Assessment of the financial loss – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality)
|
29
|
|
2019/C 172/41
|
Case T-492/17: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2019 — Fleig v EEAS (Civil Service – Contract staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Termination with notice – Grounds for termination – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Interests of the service – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to have regard to the welfare of staff – Principle of sound administration – Articles 30 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Procedural issue – Publication on the Internet of documents included in the file relating to the proceedings before the General Court – Article 17 of the Staff Regulations)
|
29
|
|
2019/C 172/42
|
Case T-562/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — dm-drogerie markt v EUIPO — Albea Services (ALBÉA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ALBÉA – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Word mark Balea – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
30
|
|
2019/C 172/43
|
Case T-611/17: Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2019 — All Star v EUIPO — Carrefour Hypermarchés (Shape of a shoe sole) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a shoe sole – Well known facts – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of defence – Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rejection of the request to hold a hearing before the Board of Appeal – Article 77 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
31
|
|
2019/C 172/44
|
Case T-779/17: Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — United Wineries v EUIPO — Compañía de Vinos Miguel Martín (VIÑA ALARDE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VIÑA ALARDE – Earlier national word mark ‘ALARDE’ – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Identity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
32
|
|
2019/C 172/45
|
Case T-804/17: Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO (Representation of two facing arches) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing two facing arches – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
33
|
|
2019/C 172/46
|
Case T-259/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Zakłady Chemiczne ‘Siarkopol’ Tarnobrzeg v EUIPO — EuroChem Agro (Unifoska) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Unifoska – Earlier EU word mark NITROFOSKA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
33
|
|
2019/C 172/47
|
Case T-186/18: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2019 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission (Actions for annulment – State aid – Aid scheme for renewable energies – Preliminary examination procedure – Decision finding the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action brought by recipients – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility)
|
34
|
|
2019/C 172/48
|
Case T-190/18: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2019 — Solwindet las Lomas v Commission (Actions for annulment – State aid – Aid scheme for renewable energies – Preliminary examination procedure – Decision finding the aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a recipient – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility)
|
35
|
|
2019/C 172/49
|
Case T-631/18: Order of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Herholz v EUIPO (#) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark # – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Claim for alteration – Manifest inadmissibility)
|
36
|
|
2019/C 172/50
|
Case T-157/19: Action brought on 8 March 2019 –Șanli v Council
|
36
|
|
2019/C 172/51
|
Case T-161/19: Action brought on 11 March 2019 — Deutsche Telekom v Parliament and Council
|
37
|
|
2019/C 172/52
|
Case T-162/19: Action brought on 11 March 2019 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Parliament and Council
|
38
|
|
2019/C 172/53
|
Case T-171/19: Action brought on 20 March 2019 — Hebberecht v EEAS
|
39
|
|
2019/C 172/54
|
Case T-173/19: Action brought on 22 March 2019 — AV and AW v Parliament
|
40
|
|
2019/C 172/55
|
Case T-176/19: Action brought on 25 March 2019 — 3V Sigma/ECHA
|
41
|
|
2019/C 172/56
|
Case T-182/19: Action brought on 28 March 2019 — Puma v EUIPO (SOFTFOAM)
|
42
|
|
2019/C 172/57
|
Case T-184/19: Action brought on 27 March 2019 — Aurea Biolabs v EUIPO — Avizel (AUREA BIOLABS)
|
43
|
|
2019/C 172/58
|
Case T-185/19: Action brought on 28 March 2019 — Public.Resource.Org and Right to Know v Commission
|
44
|
|
2019/C 172/59
|
Case T-187/19: Action brought on 29 March 2019 — Glaxo Group v EUIPO (colour mark purple)
|
45
|
|
2019/C 172/60
|
Case T-188/19: Action brought on 1 April 2019 — United Kingdom v Commission
|
46
|
