|
14.4.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 109/16 |
Action brought on 23 January 2012 — Région Poitou-Charentes v Commission
(Case T-31/12)
2012/C 109/37
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Région Poitou-Charentes (Poitiers, France) (represented by: J. Capiaux, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the European Commission decision of 18 November 2011 refusing to close the Community initiative programme INTERREG III B ‘Atlantic Area’ 2000/2006 (reference CCI No 2001 RG 16 0 PC 006) adopted by the European Commission. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging the unlawfulness of the Commission decision, in so far as the signatory of the measure was not entitled to a delegated right of signature. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging disregard of essential procedural requirements, the Commission not being compliant with the mandatory time-limit imposed by Article 37(1) of Regulation No 1260/1999 (1) for stating its reasons why the applicant's final report was unsatisfactory. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging errors of law:
|
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging inadequate reasons for the contested decision. |
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging an abuse of power, the Commission having taken into account a ground which by its nature is extraneous to European interests in order to refuse to close the initiative programme in question. |
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1).