|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2011/C 080/02
|
Case C-382/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria)) — Michael Neukirchinger v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen (Air transport — Licence for the organisation of commercial balloon flights — Article 12 EC — Condition of residence or company seat — Administrative sanctions)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/03
|
Case C-90/09 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2011 — General Química SA, Repsol Química SA, Repsol YPF SA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Rubber chemicals sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Group of undertakings — Joint and several liability of a parent company for infringements of the competition rules committed by its subsidiaries — Attribution of liability to the parent company at the head of a group)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/04
|
Case C-155/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 12 EC, 18 EC, 39 EC and 43 EC — Articles 4, 28 and 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Tax legislation — Conditions for exemption from transfer tax on the first purchase of immoveable property — Exemption granted solely to persons residing in Greece and to persons of Greek origin not residing in Greece at the date of purchase)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/05
|
Case C-168/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Industrial and commercial property — Directive 98/71/EC — Legal protection of designs — Article 17 — Obligation concerning the cumulation of design protection with copyright protection — National law precluding copyright protection or rendering it unenforceable for a certain period in the case of designs which entered the public domain before the entry into force of the law — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/06
|
Case C-463/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla La Mancha (Spain)) — CLECE SA v María Socorro Martín Valor, Ayuntamiento de Cobisa (Social policy — Directive 2001/23/EC — Transfers of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Concept of ‘transfer’ — Cleaning — Cleaning carried out directly by a municipal authority with recruitment of new staff)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/07
|
Case C-489/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Vandoorne NV v Belgische Staat (Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 11.C(1) and 27(1) and (5) — Taxable amount — Simplification measures — Manufactured tobacco — Tax labels — Single charge of VAT at source — Intermediate supplier — Total or partial non-payment of the price — Refusal to refund VAT)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/08
|
Case C-490/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2011 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 49 EC — Freedom to provide services — Non-reimbursement of costs relating to laboratory analyses and tests carried out in Member States other than the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg — National rules not providing for acceptance of liability in the form of a reimbursement of the costs paid for such analyses and tests — National rules making acceptance of liability for health care benefits subject to compliance with the conditions laid down by those rules)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/09
|
Case C-92/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 January 2011 — Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan and composed of elements individually devoid of any distinctive character — Figurative sign ‘BEST BUY’)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/10
|
Case C-559/08 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 September 2010 — Deepak Rajani (Dear!Net Online) v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Artoz-Papier AG (Appeal — Community trade mark — Word mark ATOZ — Opposition by the proprietor of the international word mark ARTOZ — Refusal of registration)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/11
|
Case C-342/09 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 October 2010 — Victor Guedes — Indústria e Comércio SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Consorci de l’Espai Rural de Gallecs, established in Gallecs (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) — Figurative mark Gallecs — Opposition by the proprietor of the national figurative marks GALLO, GALLO AZEITE NOVO, Azeite Novo and the Community figurative mark GALLO — Rejection of the opposition — Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/12
|
Case C-459/09 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 September 2010 — Dominio de la Vega, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Ambrosio Velasco SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Application for Community figurative mark DOMINIO DE LA VEGA — Earlier Community figurative mark PALACIO DE LA VEGA — Existence of a likelihood of confusion in part of the territory of the European Union — Assessment of the similarity between the marks — Dominant element)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/13
|
Case C-487/09: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Inmogolf SA v Dirección General de Tributos de la Consejería de Economia y Hacienda de la Comunidad Autónoma de Murcia (Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 69/335/EEC — Indirect taxes — Raising of capital — Transfer of securities — Capital of a company mostly made up of immovable property)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/14
|
Case C-532/09 P: Order of the Court of 4 October 2010 — Vladimir Ivanov v European Commission (Appeal — Action for non-contractual liability — Loss of an opportunity for recruitment — Abuse of process — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/15
|
Joined Cases C-74/10 P and C-75/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2010 — European Renewable Energies Federation ASBL v European Commission (Appeal — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice — Representation of a party by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/16
|
Case C-84/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 October 2010 — Longevity Health Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Merck KGaA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word sign ‘Kids Vits’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark VITS4KIDS — Level of attention of the relevant public — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Right to be heard)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/17
|
Case C-290/10 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 — Franssons Verkstäder AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Lindner Recyclingtech GmbH (Appeal — Action before the General Court against a decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Time-limit allowed for bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility due to delay — Appeal clearly unfounded)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/18
|
Case C-513/10 P: Appeal brought on 14 October 2010 by Dimitris Platis against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 30 September 2010 in Case T-311/10 Dimitris Platis v Council and Greece
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/19
|
Case C-587/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 December 2010 — Vogtländische Straßen- Tief und Rohrleitungsbau GmbH (VSTR) v Finanzamt Plauen; other participant: Bundesministerium der Finanzen
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/20
|
Case C-594/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 December 2010 — T.G. van Laarhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/21
|
Case C-600/10: Action brought on 16 December 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/22
|
Case C-603/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče (Slovenia) lodged on 21 December 2010 — Pelati d.o.o. v Republic of Slovenia
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/23
|
Case C-613/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy) lodged on 30 December 2010 — Danilo Debiasi v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Parma
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/24
|
Case C-622/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance, Namur (Belgium) lodged on 22 December 2010 — Rémi Paquot v État Belge — SPF Finances
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/25
|
Case C-623/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium) lodged on 22 December 2010 — Adrien Daxhelet v État Belge — SPF Finances
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/26
|
Case C-7/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo (Italy) lodged on 5 January 2011 — Public Prosecutor v Fabio Caronna
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/27
|
Case C-12/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Dublin Metropolitan District Court (Ireland) made on 10 January 2011 — Danise McDonagh v Ryanair Ltd
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/28
|
Case C-14/11 P: Appeal brought on 11 January 2011 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 27 October 2010 in Case T-24/05: Alliance One International, Inc. (formerly Standard Commercial Corp.), Standard Commercial Tobacco Company, Inc., Trans-Continental Leaf Tobacco Corp. Ltd v European Commission
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/29
|
Case C-20/11: Action brought on 13 January 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/30
|
Case C-22/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 January 2011 — Finnair Oyj v Timy Lassooy
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/31
|
Case C-37/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — European Commission v Czech Republic
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/32
|
Case C-455/09: Order of the President of the Court of 22 September 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/33
|
Case C-525/09: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 28 September 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2011/C 080/34
|
Case T-437/09: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2011 — Oyster Cosmetics v OHIM — Kadabell (Oyster cosmetics) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Oyster cosmetics — Earlier Community figurative mark Kadus oystra AUTO STOP PROTECTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/35
|
Case T-54/07: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2011 — Vtesse Networks Ltd v Commission (Application for annulment — State aid — Telecommunications — Tax on non-domestic property of undertakings in the United Kingdom — Decision finding that the measure at issue does not constitute aid — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/36
|
Case T-586/10: Action brought on 22 December 2010 — Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 v OHMI — Parfums Givenchy (only givenchy)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/37
|
Case T-592/10: Action brought on 27 December 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Technisynthese (BTS)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/38
|
Case T-593/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Ruan (B)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/39
|
Case T-596/10: Action brought on 28 December 2010 — Almunia Textil v OHIM — FIBA Europe (EuroBasket)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/40
|
Case T-597/10: Action brought on 27 December 2010 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul International (BIESUL)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/41
|
Case T-598/10: Action brought on 27 December 2010 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul International (LINEASUL)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/42
|
Case T-14/11: Action brought on 11 January 2011 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/43
|
Case T-23/11: Action brought on 17 January 2011 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — BA&SH (ba&sh)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/44
|
Case T-24/11: Action brought on 19 January 2011 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/45
|
Case T-25/11: Action brought on 17 January 2011 — Germans Boada v OHIM (Shape of a ceramics cutter)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/46
|
Case T-29/11: Action brought on 14 January 2011 — Technische Universität Dresden v Commission
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/47
|
Case T-33/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Peeters Landbouwmachines v OHIM — Fors MW (BIGAB)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/48
|
Case T-34/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Canon Europa v Commission
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/49
|
Case T-35/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Kyocera Mita Europe v Commission
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/50
|
Case T-36/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Japan Airlines v Commission
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/51
|
Case T-39/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Cargolux Airlines v Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/52
|
Case T-40/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Lan Airlines and Lan Cargo v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/53
|
Case T-42/11: Action brought on 19 January 2011 — Universal v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/54
|
Case T-44/11: Action brought on 17 January 2011 — Italy v Commission
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/55
|
Case T-45/11: Action brought on 21 January 2011 — Italy v Commission
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/56
|
Case T-46/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/57
|
Case T-48/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — British Airways v Commission
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/58
|
Case T-54/11: Action brought on 27 January 2011 — Spain v Commission
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/59
|
Case T-57/11: Action brought on 27 January 2011 — Castelnou Energía v Commission
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 080/60
|
Case T-399/07: Order of the General Court of 25 January 2011 — Basell Polyolefine v Commission
|
34
|
|
|
|
