|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice of the European Union
|
|
|
2019/C 328/02
|
Case C-411/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 27 May 2019 — WWF Italia o.n.l.u.s. and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS)
|
2
|
|
2019/C 328/03
|
Case C-415/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Blumar SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate
|
3
|
|
2019/C 328/04
|
Case C-416/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Roberto Abate SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate
|
4
|
|
2019/C 328/05
|
Case C-417/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2019 — Commerciale Gicap SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate
|
4
|
|
2019/C 328/06
|
Case C-419/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 29 May 2019 — Irideos S.p.A. v Poste Italiane S.p.A.
|
5
|
|
2019/C 328/07
|
Case C-431/19 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2019 by Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 March 2019 in Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16 Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commission
|
6
|
|
2019/C 328/08
|
Case C-432/19 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2019 by Inpost S.A. against the judgment of the General Court delivered on 19 March 2019 in Joined Cases T-282/16 and T-283/16 Inpost Paczkomaty and Inpost v Commission
|
7
|
|
2019/C 328/09
|
Case C-434/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Poste Italiane SpA v Riscossione Sicilia SpA — tax-collection agency for the province of Palermo and the other provinces of Sicily
|
8
|
|
2019/C 328/10
|
Case C-435/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Agenzia delle entrate — Riscossione v Poste Italiane SpA
|
9
|
|
2019/C 328/11
|
Case C-438/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 11 June 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Frontline Digital GmbH
|
10
|
|
2019/C 328/12
|
Case C-443/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 7 June 2019 — Vodafone España S.A.U. v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa
|
11
|
|
2019/C 328/13
|
Case C-448/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 12 June 2019 — WT v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Guadalajara
|
12
|
|
2019/C 328/14
|
Case C-452/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 12 June 2019 — YV v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
|
13
|
|
2019/C 328/15
|
Case C-455/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 12 June 2019 — BX v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
|
14
|
|
2019/C 328/16
|
Case C-469/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 19 June 2019 — All in One Star Ltd
|
15
|
|
2019/C 328/17
|
Case C-477/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2019 — IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien
|
15
|
|
2019/C 328/18
|
Case C-482/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 6 de Ceuta (Spain) lodged on 24 June 2019 — JF, KG v Bankia SA
|
17
|
|
2019/C 328/19
|
Case C-492/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2019 — OK
|
18
|
|
2019/C 328/20
|
Case C-493/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2019 — PL
|
19
|
|
2019/C 328/21
|
Case C-494/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 26 June 2019 — QM
|
20
|
|
2019/C 328/22
|
Case C-502/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 1 July 2019 — Criminal proceedings against Oriol Junqueras Vies
|
21
|
|
2019/C 328/23
|
Case C-509/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) lodged on 4 July 2019 — BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG v Hauptzollamt München
|
22
|
|
2019/C 328/24
|
Case C-516/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 9 July 2019 — NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH
|
22
|
|
2019/C 328/25
|
Case C-520/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě (Czech Republic) lodged on 9 July 2019 — ARMOSTAV MÍSTEK s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství
|
23
|
|
2019/C 328/26
|
Case C-526/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 9 July 2019 — Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation
|
24
|
|
2019/C 328/27
|
Case C-528/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 10 July 2019 — F-AG v Tax Office Y
|
25
|
|
2019/C 328/28
|
Case C-530/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 July 2019 — NM, acting as insolvency administrator in the insolvency proceedings concerning the assets of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON
|
25
|
|
2019/C 328/29
|
Case C-535/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 12 July 2019 — A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija
|
26
|
|
2019/C 328/30
|
Case C-539/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 15 July 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Telefonica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG
|
27
|
|
2019/C 328/31
|
Case C-543/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 16 July 2019 — Jebsen & Jessen (GmbH & Co.) KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg
|
28
|
|
2019/C 328/32
|
Case C-556/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 22 July 2019 — Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la transition écologique et solidaire
|
28
|
|
2019/C 328/33
|
Case C-562/19 P: Appeal brought on 2 July 2019 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court of the European Union (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) on 16 May 2019 in Cases T-836/16 and T-624/17 Republic of Poland v European Commission
|
29
|
|
2019/C 328/34
|
Case C-570/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 26 July 2019 — Irish Ferries Ltd v National Transport Authority
|
30
|
|
2019/C 328/35
|
Case C-578/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 30 July 2019 — X v Kuoni Travel Ltd
|
32
|
|
2019/C 328/36
|
Case C-579/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 30 July 2019 — R (on the application of Association of Independent Meat Suppliers and another) v The Food Standards Agency
|
33
|
|
2019/C 328/37
|
Case C-615/19 P: Appeal brought on 16 August 2019 by John Dalli against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-399/17: Dalli v Commission
|
34
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2019/C 328/38
|
Case T-406/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2019 — Mahmoudian v Council (Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly suffered as a result of the inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage)
|
36
|
|
2019/C 328/39
|
Case T-522/15: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — CCPL and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Attributability of unlawful conduct — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Ceiling of the fine — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Ability to pay)
|
37
|
|
2019/C 328/40
|
Case T-8/16: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events organised by two computer manufacturers — Breach of essential procedural requirements and of the rights of the defence — Jurisdiction of the Commission — Geographic scope of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Principle of good administration — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
|
38
|
|
2019/C 328/41
|
Joined Case T-244/16 and T-285/17: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
|
38
|
|
2019/C 328/42
|
Case T-805/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — IPPT PAN v Commission and REA (Arbitration clause — Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Decision to recover by offsetting claims of the European Union arising from the performance of a contract — Effective judicial protection — Right to refer to the Ombudsman — Financial regulation — Debts which are certain — Legitimate expectations — Principle of non-discrimination — Principle of sound administration — Misuse of powers — Contractual liability — Audit report — Eligible costs)
|
39
|
|
2019/C 328/43
|
Case T-894/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Air France v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Measures implemented by France in favour of Marseille Provence Airport and airlines using the airport — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Investment subsidies — Differentiation between airport charges applicable to national and international flights — Reduced airport charges to encourage flights from the new Marseille Provence terminal 2 — Lack of individual concern — No substantial effect on the competitive position — Inadmissibility)
|
40
|
|
2019/C 328/44
|
Case T-291/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Transdev and Others v Commission (State aid — State aid scheme implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies granted by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1(b)(i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589 — Obligation to state reasons)
|
41
|
|
2019/C 328/45
|
Case T-292/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Île-de-France Region v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France Region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Selective nature — Article 107(1) TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589)
|
42
|
|
2019/C 328/46
|
Case T-309/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Optile v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)
|
43
|
|
2019/C 328/47
|
Case T-330/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Ceobus and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the Île-de-France region — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Article 107 TFEU — Article 108 TFEU — Article 1, (b) (i) and (v) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Limitation period — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)
|
43
|
|
2019/C 328/48
|
Case T-331/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Steifer v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Pension entitlement acquired before entry into service of the EU — Transfer to the EU scheme — Grant of additional seniority — Reimbursement of the amount of pension entitlement not taken into account in the scheme for the calculation of annuities of pension of the EU — No new and substantial facts — No excusable error — Liability — Inadmissibility)
|
44
|
|
2019/C 328/49
|
Case T-738/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — STIF-IDF v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by the STIF-IDF — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Offsetting of costs involved in the discharging of public service obligations — Article 107(1), TFEU — Obligation to state reasons)
|
45
|
|
2019/C 328/50
|
Case T-53/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Germany v Commission (Approximation of laws — Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 — Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 — Construction products — Harmonised standards EN 13341:2005 + A1:2011 and EN 12285-2:2005 — Obligation to state reasons)
|
46
|
|
2019/C 328/51
|
Case T-95/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Complaint — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact)
|
46
|
|
2019/C 328/52
|
Case T-274/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
|
47
|
|
2019/C 328/53
|
Case T-285/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted with regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation on the Council to check that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in observance of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection)
|
48
|
|
2019/C 328/54
|
Case T-289/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted with regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation on the Council to check that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in observance of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection)
|
49
|
|
2019/C 328/55
|
Case T-349/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Hauzenberger v EUIPO (TurboPerformance) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark TurboPerformance — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
50
|
|
2019/C 328/56
|
Case T-397/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Hugo’s Hotel v EUIPO — H'ugo's (HUGO’S BURGER Bar) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark HUGO’S BURGER Bar — Earlier EU word mark H’ugo’s — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
50
|
|
2019/C 328/57
|
Case T-482/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — XF v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Temporary change of place of employment — Change of residence)
|
51
|
|
2019/C 328/58
|
Case T-480/16: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2019 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Amedei (For you) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark For you — Decision to reject the application for registration based on absolute grounds for refusal — No longer any locus standi — No need to adjudicate)
|
52
|
|
2019/C 328/59
|
Case T-158/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — Scaloni and Figini v Commission (Action for damages — Resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Directive 2014/59/EU and Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 — State Aid — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
52
|
|
2019/C 328/60
|
Case T-544/18: Order of the General Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2019 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission (Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Notification of a change in the national allocation table for Germany for the period from 2013 to 2020 — Request to change the national allocation table recorded in the European Union Transaction Log — Action for failure to act — Instruction given during the proceedings by the Commission to the central administration — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
53
|
|
2019/C 328/61
|
Case T-660/18: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2019 — VodafoneZiggo Group v Commission (Action for annulment — Electronic communications — Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC — Wholesale provision of fixed access — Joint significant market power — Specific regulatory obligations imposed on operators — Draft measure made accessible by the national regulatory authority — Comments of the Commission — Second phase of the procedure not opened — Act not open to challenge — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility)
|
54
|
|
2019/C 328/62
|
Case T-662/18: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2019 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark twistpac — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
55
|
|
2019/C 328/63
|
Case T-674/18: Order of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Vattenfall Europe Nuclear Energy v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — 16th Law amending the Law on Nuclear Energy (Atomgesetz) — Implementation of a judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) — Companies operating nuclear power stations — Cessation of operation — Financial compensation for the amounts of electricity not generated — Letter from the Commission — No requirement for formal notification under Article 108(3) TFEU — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
|
55
|
|
2019/C 328/64
|
Case T-687/18: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility)
|
56
|
|
2019/C 328/65
|
Case T-176/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — 3V Sigma v ECHA (Application for interim measures — REACH — UVASORB HEB — Evaluation procedure — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
|
57
|
|
2019/C 328/66
|
Case T-280/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Highgate Capital Management v Commission (Interim relief — State aid — Application for interim measures — No need to adopt the interim measures requested — Lack of jurisdiction — Inadmissibility)
|
58
|
|
2019/C 328/67
|
Case T-355/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions (Interim relief — Civil service — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)
|
58
|
|
2019/C 328/68
|
Case T-367/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2019 — Camerin v Commission (Interim measures — Civil Service — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
|
59
|
|
2019/C 328/69
|
Case T-480/19: Action brought on 8 July 2019 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB
|
59
|
|
2019/C 328/70
|
Case T-510/19: Action brought on 17 July 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Device of a jumping animal)
|
61
|
|
2019/C 328/71
|
Case T-517/19: Action brought on 19 July 2019 — Homoki v Commission
|
62
|
|
2019/C 328/72
|
Case T-525/19: Action brought on 25 July 2019 — Intering and Others v Commission
|
64
|
|
2019/C 328/73
|
Case T-537/19: Action brought on 30 July 2019 — DK v GSA
|
65
|
|
2019/C 328/74
|
Case T-538/19: Action brought on 30 July 2019 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon v Commission
|
66
|
|
2019/C 328/75
|
Case T-539/19: Action brought on 30 July 2019 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission
|
67
|
|
2019/C 328/76
|
Case T-552/19: Action brought on 7 August 2019 — Malacalza Investimenti v ECB
|
68
|
|
2019/C 328/77
|
Case T-555/19: Action brought on 9 August 2019 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)
|
70
|
|
2019/C 328/78
|
Case T-556/19: Action brought on 9 August 2019 — Republic of Cyprus v EUIPO — Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)
|
71
|
|
2019/C 328/79
|
Case T-557/19: Action brought on 9 August 2019 — Seven v EUIPO (7Seven)
|
72
|
|
2019/C 328/80
|
Case T-559/19: Action brought on 12 August 2019 — Julius Sämann v EUIPO — Maharishi Vedic University (Representation of a tree)
|
72
|
|
2019/C 328/81
|
Case T-561/19: Action brought on 13 August 2019 — Lípidos Santiga v Commission
|
73
|
|
2019/C 328/82
|
Case T-570/19: Action brought on 16 August 2019 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO (Shape of a braided cheese)
|
74
|
|
2019/C 328/83
|
Case T-571/19: Action brought on 16 August 2019 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO (Shape of a braided cheese)
|
75
|
|
2019/C 328/84
|
Case T-572/19: Action brought on 16 August 2019 — Muratbey Gida v EUIPO (Shape of a braided cheese)
|
75
|
|
2019/C 328/85
|
Case T-577/19: Action brought on 19 August 2019 — Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO — Schafft (Leinfelder)
|
76
|
|
2019/C 328/86
|
Case T-305/17: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2019 — Red Bull v EUIPO (Representation of a parallelogram composed of two fields in different colours)
|
77
|
|
2019/C 328/87
|
Case T-227/18: Order of the General Court of 11 July 2019 — Microsemi Europe and Microsemi v Commission
|
77
|
