|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2020/C 77/02
|
Case C-274/14: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Central — Spain) — Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Independence of the national body concerned — Irremovability of the members — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
|
2
|
|
2020/C 77/03
|
Case C-175/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency, European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (Eucope) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)
|
2
|
|
2020/C 77/04
|
Case C-177/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 14 de Madrid — Spain) — Almudena Baldonedo Martín v Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Compensation if the employment relationship is terminated — Articles 151 and 153 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Difference of treatment based on whether a public or private regime, within the meaning of national law, governs the employment relationship)
|
3
|
|
2020/C 77/05
|
Case C-178/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 — MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (EMA) (Appeal — Access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Article 4(3) — Protection of the decision-making process — Documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a veterinary medicinal product — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents — General presumption of confidentiality — No obligation for an EU institution, body, office or agency to apply a general presumption of confidentiality)
|
4
|
|
2020/C 77/06
|
Case C-578/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Energiavirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3 — Consumer protection — Article 37 — Tasks and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party’ — Right to appeal against a decision of the regulatory authority — Complaint made by a household customer against an electricity distribution system operator)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 77/07
|
Case C-814/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Ursa Major Services BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 — Article 55(1) — Financial contribution by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) — Eligibility of expenditure — Condition — Expenditure actually paid by the beneficiaries — Meaning)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 77/08
|
Case C-29/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht — Germany) — ZP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Unemployment benefits — Calculation — Failure to take account of the final salary received in the Member State of residence — Reference period not of sufficient duration — Salary received following the employment relationship coming to an end — Person having previously been active as an employed person in Switzerland)
|
6
|
|
2020/C 77/09
|
Case C-32/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — AT v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Citizenship of the Union — Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 17(1)(a) — Right of permanent residence — Acquisition before completion of a continuous period of five years of residence — Workers who, at the time they stop working, have reached the age for entitlement to an old age pension)
|
7
|
|
2020/C 77/10
|
Case C-506/18 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 — European Parliament v Erik Josefsson (Appeal — Civil service — Temporary staff — European Parliament — Termination of the contract — Agreement intended to resolve the dispute between the parties — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
8
|
|
2020/C 77/11
|
Case C-613/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Tributário de Lisboa — Portugal) — State of Canada v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Restrictions on the free movement of capital to or from a third country — Direct taxation — Tax on the revenue of legal persons — Profits distributed by companies resident in the territory of Portugal — Reduction in the tax base)
|
8
|
|
2020/C 77/12
|
Case C-47/19: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — HA v Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(h) to (j) — Various exemptions connected with children or young persons, school or university education — Surfing and sailing courses for schools and universities — Class trip)
|
9
|
|
2020/C 77/13
|
Case C-813/19 PPU: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence — France) — execution of a European arrest warrant in respect of MN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — Effective judicial protection)
|
10
|
|
2020/C 77/14
|
Case C-58/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Mykola Yanovych Azarov against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-247/17, Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union
|
11
|
|
2020/C 77/15
|
Case C-236/19 P: Appeal brought on 15 March 2019 by István Szécsi and Nóra Somossy against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 16 January 2019 in Case T-331/18, István Szécsi und Nóra Somossy v European Commission
|
11
|
|
2020/C 77/16
|
Case C-315/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gericht Erster Instanz Eupen (Belgium) lodged on 16 April 2019 — YU v Wallonische Region
|
12
|
|
2020/C 77/17
|
Case C-461/19 P: Appeal brought on 7 June 2019 by All Star CV against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 29 March 2019 in Case T-611/17 All Star v EUIPO — Carrefour Hypermarchés
|
12
|
|
2020/C 77/18
|
Case C-513/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 5 July 2019 — P. J. v (X) S.A.
|
13
|
|
2020/C 77/19
|
Case C-548/19 P: Appeal brought on 17 July 2019 by Laurence Bonnafous against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 June 2019 in Case T-614/17 Bonnafous v EACEA
|
13
|
|
2020/C 77/20
|
Case C-550/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 17 July 2019 — EV v Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.A. and Acciona Agua, S.A.
|
14
|
|
2020/C 77/21
|
Case C-586/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-179/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot
|
15
|
|
2020/C 77/22
|
Case C-587/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-180/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot
|
15
|
|
2020/C 77/23
|
Case C-588/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-181/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot
|
16
|
|
2020/C 77/24
|
Case C-589/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-182/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot
|
16
|
|
2020/C 77/25
|
Case C-590/19 P: Appeal brought on 1 August 2019 by L’Oréal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 19 June 2019 in Case T-183/16 RENV, L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot
|
17
|
|
2020/C 77/26
|
Case C-664/19 P: Appeal brought on 4 September 2019 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 26 June 2019 in Case T-117/18 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO
|
17
|
|
2020/C 77/27
|
Case C-761/19: Action brought on 17 October 2019 — European Commission v Hungary
|
17
|
|
2020/C 77/28
|
Case C-805/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — CT v VINI GmbH
|
19
|
|
2020/C 77/29
|
Case C-810/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 4 November 2019 — Flightright GmbH v Qatar Airways
|
19
|
|
2020/C 77/30
|
Case C-815/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 6 November 2019 — Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen
|
20
|
|
2020/C 77/31
|
Case C-825/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Finanzgericht (Germany) lodged on 12 November 2019 — Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt
|
21
|
|
2020/C 77/32
|
Case C-826/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 13 November 2019 — WZ v Austrian Airlines AG
|
22
|
|
2020/C 77/33
|
Case C-844/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 November 2019 — CS v Finanzamt Graz-Stadt
|
23
|
|
2020/C 77/34
|
Case C-868/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany) lodged on 27 November 2019 — M-GmbH v Finanzamt für Körperschaften
|
23
|
|
2020/C 77/35
|
Case C-875/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2019 by FV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019 in Case T-27/18 RENV, FV v Council
|
24
|
|
2020/C 77/36
|
Case C-877/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 November 2019 by FV against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 September 2019 in Case T-153/17, FV v Council
|
25
|
|
2020/C 77/37
|
Case C-894/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by the European Parliament against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 in Case T-47/18, UZ v Parliament
|
26
|
|
2020/C 77/38
|
Case C-896/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti Ċivili Prim’Awla — Ġurisdizzjoni Kostituzzjonali (Malta) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru
|
27
|
|
2020/C 77/39
|
Case C-905/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 11 December 2019 — EP v Kreis Groß-Gerau
|
28
|
|
2020/C 77/40
|
Case C-927/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 18 December 2019 — ‘Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras’ UAB, other parties: ‘Ecoservice Klaipėda’ UAB, ‘Klaipėdos autobusų parkas’ UAB, ‘Parsekas’ UAB, ‘Klaipėdos transportas’ UAB
|
28
|
|
2020/C 77/41
|
Case C-930/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers (Belgium) lodged on 20 December 2019 — X v Belgian State
|
30
|
|
2020/C 77/42
|
Case C-940/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 30 December 2019 — Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France, Confédération des Syndicats médicaux français, Fédération des Syndicats pharmaceutiques de France, Syndicat des Biologistes, Syndicat des Médecins libéraux, Union dentaire, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Chirurgiens-Dentistes, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Masseurs-Kinésithérapeutes, Conseil national de l’Ordre des Infirmiers v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation, Premier ministre
|
31
|
|
2020/C 77/43
|
Case C-948/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 31 December 2019 — UAB ‘Manpower Lit’ v E.S., M.L., M.P., V.V. and R.V.
|
32
|
|
2020/C 77/44
|
Case C-950/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 17 December 2019 — A
|
33
|
|
2020/C 77/45
|
Case C-3/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rīgas rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 7 January 2020 — Criminal proceedings against AB, CE, SIA ‘MM investīcijas’
|
33
|
|
2020/C 77/46
|
Case C-4/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 January 2020 — ‘Alti’ OOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Plovdiv pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite
|
34
|
|
2020/C 77/47
|
Case C-24/20: Action brought on 17 January 2020 – European Commission v Council of the European Union
|
35
|
|
2020/C 77/48
|
Case C-115/18: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Saint-Brieuc — Chambre détachée de Guingamp — France) — Procureur de la République v Tugdual Carluer, Yann Latouche, Dominique Legeard, Thierry Leleu, Dimitri Pinschof, Brigitte Plunian, Rozenn Marechal
|
36
|
|
2020/C 77/49
|
Case C-297/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by Humbert Jörg Köfler, Wolfgang Leitner, Joachim Schönbeck, Wolfgang Semper v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal, interested party: Finanzpolizei
|
36
|
|
2020/C 77/50
|
Case C-712/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, AR, BS v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei
|
37
|
|
2020/C 77/51
|
Case C-713/18: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by ZR, BS, AR v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei
|
37
|
|
2020/C 77/52
|
Case C-138/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld, interested party: Finanzpolizei
|
37
|
|
2020/C 77/53
|
Case C-139/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DY
|
38
|
|
2020/C 77/54
|
Case C-154/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the l’Eparchiako Dikastirio Larnakas — Cyprus) — Kypriaki Kentriki Archi v GA
|
38
|
|
2020/C 77/55
|
Case C-227/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — Proceedings brought by DX v Bürgermeister der Stadt Graz, interested party: Finanzpolizei
|
38
|
|
2020/C 77/56
|
Case C-334/19: Order of the President of the Court of 18 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF
|
39
|
|
2020/C 77/57
|
Case C-672/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers — Belgium) — X v État belge
|
39
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2020/C 77/58
|
Joined Cases T-786/16 and T-224/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — PV v Commission (Civil service — Civil servants — Psychological harassment — Bundle of decisions adopted by the Commission adversely affecting the applicant — Applications for assistance — Disciplinary procedure — Revocation — Withdrawal of the revocation — New disciplinary procedure — Fresh revocation)
|
40
|
|
2020/C 77/59
|
Case T-168/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — CBA Spielapparate- und Restaurantbetrieb v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the administrative procedure concerning alleged State aid implemented by the Austrian authorities in favour to concession holders pursuant to the law on gaming — Refusal to grant access — Plea relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Overriding public interest — Obligation to state reasons — Plea of illegality)
|
41
|
|
2020/C 77/60
|
Case T-19/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Lithuania v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Lithuania — One-off and flat-rate financial corrections — Rural development — Cross-compliance control system — Administrative control — On-the-spot check — Quality of the checks — Quality of the applicants — Artificial conditions — Reasonableness of the costs — Expenditure incurred through projects — Risk analysis — Risk factors — Tolerance regarding penalties which is not provided for under EU legislation — Assessment and penalty system which is too lenient — Annual statistical control data)
|
42
|
|
2020/C 77/61
|
Case T-292/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Portugal v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Portugal — Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Definition of national courts)
|
43
|
|
2020/C 77/62
|
Case T-402/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aquino and Others v Parliament (Civil service — Strike action by interpreters — Measures for the requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — No legal basis — Liability — Non-material damage)
|
43
|
|
2020/C 77/63
|
Case T-598/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Grupo Textil Brownie v EUIPO — The Guide Association (BROWNIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark BROWNIE — Earlier national word marks BROWNIES, BROWNIE, Brownies and Brownie — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
44
|
|
2020/C 77/64
|
Case T-697/18: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO — Titlbach (ALTISPORT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALTISPORT — Earlier international and EU word marks ALDI — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Comparison of the goods and services — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
45
|
|
2020/C 77/65
|
Case T-42/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Volkswagen v EUIPO (CROSS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark CROSS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1)of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
46
|
|
2020/C 77/66
|
Case T-239/19: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — Vinos de Arganza v EUIPO — Nordbrand Nordhausen (ENCANTO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ENCANTO — Earlier national word mark BELCANTO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
47
|
|
2020/C 77/67
|
Case T-336/19: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — BZ v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal for obviously inadequate work — Proportionality — Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Liability)
|
47
|
|
2020/C 77/68
|
Case T-559/19: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Julius Sämann v EUIPO — Maharishi Vedic University (Representation of a tree) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a tree — Earlier EU and international figurative marks representing an ‘arbre magique’ (magic tree) — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
48
|
|
2020/C 77/69
|
Case T-751/18: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — Daimler v Commission (Action for annulment — Withdrawal of certified CO2 savings — Eco-innovations scheme — Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory measure — Inadmissibility)
|
49
|
|
2020/C 77/70
|
Case T-125/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Clem & Jo Optique v EUIPO — C&A (C&J) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
|
50
|
|
2020/C 77/71
|
Case T-128/19: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2020 — Hemp Foods Australia v EUIPO — Cabrejos (Sativa) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — No recording of the change in ownership in the international register — No locus standi — Inadmissibility)
|
50
|
|
2020/C 77/72
|
Case T-161/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Deutsche Telekom v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market for electronic communications — Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Legislative act — Applicant not individually concerned — Inadmissibility)
|
51
|
|
2020/C 77/73
|
Case T-162/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market for electronic communications — Retail price charged to consumers for regulated intra-EU communications — Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 — Legislative act — Applicants not individually concerned — Inadmissibility)
|
52
|
|
2020/C 77/74
|
Case T-671/19: Action brought on 1 October 2019 – Qualcomm v Commission
|
53
|
|
2020/C 77/75
|
Case T-870/19: Action brought on 20 December 2019 – Worldwide Spirits Supply v EUIPO – Melfinco (CLEOPATRA QUEEN)
|
54
|
|
2020/C 77/76
|
Case T-3/20: Action brought on 3 January 2020 — Forbo Financial Services v EUIPO — Windmöller (Canoleum)
|
55
|
|
2020/C 77/77
|
Case T-8/20: Action brought on 8 January 2020 — Czech Republic v Commission
|
56
|
|
2020/C 77/78
|
Case T-32/20: Action brought on 14 January 2020 — Buxadé Villalba and Others v Parliament
|
56
|
|
2020/C 77/79
|
Case T-34/20: Action brought on 20 January 2020 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission
|
58
|
|
2020/C 77/80
|
Case T-38/20: Action brought on 23 January 2020 – Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24)
|
59
|
|
2020/C 77/81
|
Case T-41/20: Action brought on 24 January 2020 — Di Bernardo v Commission
|
60
|
|
2020/C 77/82
|
Case T-45/20: Action brought on 27 January 2020 – KRBL v EUIPO – P.K. Overseas (INDIA SALAM Pure Basmati Rice)
|
60
|
|
2020/C 77/83
|
Case T-35/18: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2020 — La Marchesiana v EUIPO — Marchesi 1824 (MARCHESI)
|
61
|
|
2020/C 77/84
|
Case T-139/18: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2020 — Avio v Commission
|
62
|
|
2020/C 77/85
|
Case T-606/19: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2020 — Bartolomé Alvarado and Grupo Preciados Place v EUIPO — Alpargatas (ALPARGATUS PASOS ARTESANALES)
|
62
|
