|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2011/C 186/02
|
Case C-249/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu ringkonnakohus — Estonia) — Novo Nordisk AS v Ravimiamet (Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Advertising — Medical journal — Information not included in the summary of product characteristics)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/03
|
Case C-267/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Articles 56 EC and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Restrictions — Direct taxation — Non-resident taxpayers — Obligation to appoint a tax representative)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/04
|
Case C-305/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad — Recovery)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/05
|
Case C-316/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH (Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Prohibition on the advertising to the general public of medicinal products available only on prescription — Definition of ‘advertising’ — Information communicated to the competent authority — Information accessible on the internet)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/06
|
Case C-375/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Republic of Poland) — Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA (Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 5 — Abuse of a dominant position — Powers of the competition authorities of the Member States to find that there has been no breach of Article 102 TFEU)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/07
|
Case C-384/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris — France) — Prunus SARL, Polonium SA v Directeur des services fiscaux (Direct taxation — Free movement of capital — Article 64 TFEU — Legal persons established in a non-Member State — Ownership of immovable property located in a Member State — Tax on the market value of that property — Refusal of exemption — Assessment with regard to overseas countries and territories — Combating tax evasion — Joint and several liability)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/08
|
Case C-434/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom)) — Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Freedom of movement for persons — Article 21 TFEU — Directive 2004/38/EC — ‘Beneficiary’ — Article 3(1) — National who has never made use of his right of free movement and has always resided in the Member State of his nationality — Effect of being a national of another Member State — Purely internal situation)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/09
|
Case C-537/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal — United Kingdom) — Ralph James Bartlett, Natalio Gonzalez Ramos, Jason Michael Taylor v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Mobility component of Disability Living Allowance — Separate benefit — Special non-contributory benefit — Non-exportability)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/10
|
Case C-137/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — European Communities v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Articles 207(2) EC and 282 EC — Representation of the European Communities before the national courts — Powers conferred on the Commission — Delegation of the power of representation to other Community institutions — Conditions)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/11
|
Case C-200/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Contract relating to Community support for a project in the context of the ‘eContent’ programme — Termination of the contract by the Commission — Reimbursement of eligible costs — Grounds of the judgment of the General Court)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/12
|
Case C-206/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 4(1)(a) — Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 — Article 7(2) — German Länder benefits for the blind, the deaf and the disabled — Residence qualification)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/13
|
Case C-265/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Chemicals — Registration, evaluation, authorisation of those substances and restrictions applicable to them — REACH Regulation — Article 126 — System of penalties in the event of infringement of the provisions of the REACH Regulation — Lack of implementation within the period prescribed)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/14
|
Case C-61/11 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Trento — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Hassen El Dridi alias Karim Soufi (Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Articles 15 and 16 — National legislation providing for a prison sentence for illegally staying third-country nationals in the event of refusal to obey an order to leave the territory of a Member State — Compatibility)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/15
|
Case C-258/10: Order of the Court of 4 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Dâmbovița — Romania) — Nicușor Grigore v Regia Națională a Pădurilor Romsilva — Direcția Silvică București (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Notion of ‘working time’ — ‘Notion ofmaximum weekly working time’ — Forest ranger subject, under the terms of his employment contract and the applicable collective agreement, to flexible working time of 8 hours per day and 40 hours per week — National legislation holding him liable for any damage suffered in the section of forest under his control — Classification — Effect of overtime on the remuneration and financial compensation of the person concerned)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/16
|
Case C-273/10: Order of the Court of 18 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (Spain)) — David Montoya Medina v Fondo de Garantia Salarial and Universidad de Alicante (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Entitlement to triennial seniority bonuses — Principle of non-discrimination)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/17
|
Case C-370/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative mark EDUCA Memory game — Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national and international word marks MEMORY — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) — Relative grounds for refusal)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/18
|
Case C-95/11: Action brought on 28 February 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/19
|
Case C-132/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Austria) lodged on 18 March 2011 — Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH v Betriebsrat Bord der Tyrolean Airways Tiroler Luftfahrt Gesellschaft mbH
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/20
|
Case C-138/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), lodged on 21 March 2011 — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/21
|
Case C-153/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 March 2011 — OOD Klub v Director of the Varna Office ‘Appeals and the Administration of Enforcement’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/22
|
Case C-164/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — European Commission v French Republic
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/23
|
Case C-179/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 18 April 2011 — CIMADE, Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigrés (GISTI) v Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-Mer, des Collectivités Territoriales et de l’Immigration
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/24
|
Case C-181/11 P: Appeal brought on 15 April 2011 by Compañía Española de Tabaco en Rama, S.A. (Cetarsa) against the judgment delivered on 3 February 2011 in Case T-33/05, Compañía Española de Tabaco en Rama, S.A. v European Commission
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/25
|
Case C-184/11: Action brought on 18 April 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/26
|
Case C-186/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 20 April 2011 — Stanleybet International Ltd, William Hill Organisation Ltd and William Hill plc v Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon and Ipourgos Politismou
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/27
|
Case C-189/11: Action brought on 20 April 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/28
|
Case C-198/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 April 2011 by Lan Airlines S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 February 2011 in Case T-194/09 Lan Airlines S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/29
|
Case C-408/10: Order of the President of the Court of 1 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/30
|
Case C-517/10: Order of the President of the Court of 9 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias — Spain) — María Luisa Gómez Cueto v Administración del Estado
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/31
|
Case C-563/10: Order of the President of the Court of 11 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — Kashayar Khavand v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2011/C 186/32
|
Case T-1/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Buczek Autmotive v Commission (State aid — Restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Recovery of public debts — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of State aid — Private investor criterion)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/33
|
Case T-145/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2011 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Atlas Air (ATLAS) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community trade mark ATLAS — Earlier Benelux trade mark atlasair — Formal requirements — Lodging of a statement setting out the grounds for the action — Suspension of the administrative procedure — Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Rule 20(7) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/34
|
Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Communauté d'agglomération du Douasis v Commission (State aid — Construction of railway equipment — Repayable advances — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Alteration of heads of claim — Rights of defence — Obligation to state reasons — State resources — Whether State held responsible — Criterion of private investor — Undertaking in difficulties)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/35
|
Case T-299/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Elf Aquitaine v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in sodium chlorate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA — Imputability of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Principle that penalties must fit the offence — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Presumption of innocence — Principle of sound administration — Principle of legal certainty — Misuse of powers — Fines — Aggravating circumstance — Deterrence — Mitigating circumstance — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/36
|
Case T-343/08: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Arkema France v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in sodium chlorate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 EEA — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Imputability of the infringement — Fines — Aggravating circumstance — Repeat infringement — Mitigating circumstance — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/37
|
Case T-203/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (Olymp) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark OLYMP — Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/38
|
Case T-204/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (OLYMP) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark OLYMP — Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/39
|
Case T-341/09: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Txakoli de Álava and Others v OHIM (TXAKOLI) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community collective verbal mark TXAKOLI — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 66(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/40
|
Case T-460/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights — Earlier national figurative mark CheapFlights — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/41
|
Case T-461/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights with a black aeroplane) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights with a black aeroplane — Earlier international figurative mark CheapFlights — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/42
|
Case T-464/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Commission v New Acoustic Music and Hildibrandsdottir (Arbitration clause — Contract for financial assistance concluded under the ‘Culture 2000’ Framework Programme — Implementation of the action entitled ‘European Music Roadwork’ — Non-performance of the contract — Repayment of part of the amounts advanced — Partial inadmissibility of the action — Procedure by default — Legal aid)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/43
|
Case T-488/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2011 — Jager & Polacek v OHIM (REDTUBE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark REDTUBE — Earlier unregistered national mark Redtube — Failure to pay the opposition fee within the prescribed period — Decision deeming the opposition non-existent — Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 — Protection of legitimate expectations — Rule 17 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Ex parte proceedings — Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 — Rule 18 of Regulation No 2868/95 — Legal nature of a communication from OHIM informing a party that an opposition has been found to be admissible — Rule of parallelism of procedural requirements and of the actus contrarius — Article 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/44
|
Case T-7/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2011 — Diagnostiko kai Therapeftiko Kentro Athinon ‘Ygeia’ v OHIM (υγεία) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark υγεία — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character and descriptive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/45
|
Case T-41/10: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — SIMS — École de ski internationale v OHIM — SNMSF (esf école du ski français) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark esf école du ski français — Absolute grounds for refusal — State emblem — Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 6ter of the Paris Convention — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/46
|
Case T-74/10: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2011 — Flaco Geräte v OHIM — Delgado Sámchez (FLACO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark FLACO — Earlier national word mark FLACO — Relative ground for refusal — Identical goods — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Request for proof of genuine use of the earlier mark submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/47
|
Case T-187/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2011 — Emram v OHIM — Guccio Gucci (G) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark G — Earlier national and Community figurative marks G — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/48
|
Case T-402/09 P: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Rules on insurance against the risk of accident and occupational disease for officials of the European Communities — Procedure for the recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/49
|
Case T-195/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 May 2011 — Cahier and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission (Interim proceedings — Non-contractual liability — Application for interim measures — Inadmissible in part — Want of urgency)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/50
|
Case T-197/11 P: Appeal brought on 1 April 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 January 2011 in Case F-121/07 Strack v Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/51
|
Case T-203/11: Action brought on 28 March 2011 — Transports Schiocchet — Excursions v Council and Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/52
|
Case T-205/11: Action brought on 7 April 2011 — Germany v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/53
|
Case T-209/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — MB System v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/54
|
Case T-215/11: Action brought on 12 April 2011 — ADEDI and Others v Council of the European Union
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/55
|
Case T-222/11: Action brought on 20 April 2011 — Rautenbach v Council and Commission
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/56
|
Case T-235/11: Action brought on 29 April 2011 — Spain v Commission
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/57
|
Case T-238/11 P: Appeal brought on 4 May 2011 by Luigi Marcuccio against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 February 2011 in Case F-81/09, Marcuccio v Commission
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/58
|
Case T-338/10: Order of the General Court of 13 May 2011 — Commission v Tornasol Films
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/59
|
Case T-88/11: Order of the General Court of 4 May 2011 — BIA Separations v Commission
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2011/C 186/60
|
Case F-17/11: Action brought on 22 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/61
|
Case F-27/11: Action brought on 20 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/62
|
Case F-31/11: Action brought on 26 March 2011 — ZZ v CEDEFOP
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/63
|
Case F-40/11: Action brought on 5 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/64
|
Case F-42/11: Action brought on 9 April 2011 — Honnefelder v European Commission
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/65
|
Case F-44/11: Action brought on 13 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/66
|
Case F-45/11: Action brought on 14 April 2011 — ZZ v EIB
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/67
|
Case F-46/11: Action brought on 14 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/68
|
Case F-49/11: Action brought on 18 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/69
|
Case F-50/11: Action brought on 19 April 2011 — ZZ v Parliament
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/70
|
Case F-52/11: Action brought on 24 April 2011 — ZZ v EIB
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 186/71
|
Case F-53/11: Action brought on 2 May 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
37
|
|
|
|
