|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2016/C 078/2
|
Case C-529/14: Order of the Court of 17 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — YARA Brunsbüttel GmbH v Hauptzollamt Itzehoe (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Article 2(4)(b) — Dual use of energy products — Concept — Energy product used for the heat treatment of waste and exhaust gases)
|
2
|
|
2016/C 078/3
|
Joined Cases C-53/15 P to C-56/15 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 December 2015 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (C-53/15 P), Trefilerías Quijano SA, (C-54/15 P), Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC SL, (C-55/15 P), Global Steel Wire SA (C-56/15 P) v European Commission (Appeals — Competition — European prestressing steel market — Commission decision adjusting the amount of the fines imposed on certain undertakings and fixing a new period for the payment of those fines — Other undertakings whose fines remained unchanged having no interest in bringing proceedings — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
|
3
|
|
2016/C 078/4
|
Case C-153/15 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2015 — Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Restrictive measures taken against Iran — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Admissibility — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
3
|
|
2016/C 078/5
|
Case C-651/15 P: Appeal brought on 4 December 2015 by Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO), Adolf Krämer GmbH & Co. KG, AgO Argentum GmbH, and other parties against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2015 in Case T-360/13: Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV e.a. v European Commission
|
4
|
|
2016/C 078/6
|
Case C-669/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Versailles (France) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Électricité Réseau Distribution France SA (ERDF) v Axa Corporate Solutions SA and Ombrière Le Bosc SAS
|
5
|
|
2016/C 078/7
|
Case C-682/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg) lodged on 18 December 2015 — Berlioz Investment Fund S.A. v Directeur de l’administration des Contributions directes
|
6
|
|
2016/C 078/8
|
Case C-683/15: Action brought on 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
|
7
|
|
2016/C 078/9
|
Case C-696/15 P: Appeal brought on 23 December 2015 by the Czech Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 8 October 2015 in Joined Cases T-659/13 and T-660/13 –Czech Republic v Commission
|
8
|
|
2016/C 078/10
|
Case C-699/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 24 December 2015 — Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Brockenhurst College
|
9
|
|
2016/C 078/11
|
Case C-59/15: Order of the President of the Court of 1 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Catanzaro — Italy) — Esse Di Emme Costruzioni Srl v Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Calabria, Ministero della Giustizia — Dipartimento Affari di Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze
|
10
|
|
2016/C 078/12
|
Case C-71/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Kendrion NV, supported by: European Commission
|
10
|
|
2016/C 078/13
|
Case C-77/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Luigi Marcuccio
|
10
|
|
2016/C 078/14
|
Case C-125/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH, Groupe Gascogne SA, supported by: European Commission
|
11
|
|
2016/C 078/15
|
Case C-132/15 P: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — Court of Justice of the European Union v European Commission, Aalberts Industries NV
|
11
|
|
2016/C 078/16
|
Case C-192/15: Order of the President of the Court of 9 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — T.D. Rease, P. Wullems v College bescherming persoonsgegevens
|
11
|
|
2016/C 078/17
|
Case C-366/15: Order of the President of the Court of 30 November 2015 — European Commission v Romania
|
11
|
|
2016/C 078/18
|
Case C-470/15: Order of the President of the Court of 15 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Lufthansa Cargo AG v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu
|
12
|
|
2016/C 078/19
|
Case C-485/15: Order of the President of the Court of 15 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Aeroporto Valerio Catullo di Verona Villafranca SpA v Società per l’Aeroporto Civile di Bergamo-Orio al Serio SpA (SACBO SpA), Società Aeroporto Brescia e Montichiari SpA (Abem SpA) and Others
|
12
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2016/C 078/20
|
Case T-404/12: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Toshiba v Commission (Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — New decision taken following annulment in part of the initial decision by the Court — Fines — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement)
|
13
|
|
2016/C 078/21
|
Case T-409/12: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Mitsubishi Electric v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — New decision taken following annulment in part of the initial decision by the Court — Fines — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Erroneous application — Starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement — Deterrence multiplier)
|
13
|
|
2016/C 078/22
|
Case T-94/13: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Ntouvas v ECDC (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Reports procedure — Career development report — 2010 appraisal procedure — Dismissal of the action at first instance — Time-limit for submission of the defence — Extension — Exceptional circumstances — Article 39(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal — Lawfulness of the appraisal procedure)
|
14
|
|
2016/C 078/23
|
Case T-397/13: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Tilly-Sabco v Commission (Agriculture — Export refund — Poultry meat — Implementing regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 — Action for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern — Admissibility — Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Legitimate expectations)
|
15
|
|
2016/C 078/24
|
Case T-434/13: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Doux v Commission (Agriculture — Export refund — Poultry meat — Implementing Regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 — Action for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern — Admissibility — Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Legitimate expectations)
|
16
|
|
2016/C 078/25
|
Case T-549/13: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — France v Commission (Agriculture — Export refund — Poultry meat — Fixing the refund at EUR 0 — Obligation to state reasons — Possibility for the Commission to confine itself to a standard set of reasoning — Commission’s standard practice in fixing refunds — Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Non-exhaustive nature of the criteria laid down)
|
16
|
|
2016/C 078/26
|
Case T-535/14: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — The Cookware Company v OHIM — Fissler (VITA+VERDE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark VITA+VERDE — Earlier word mark VITAVIT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
17
|
|
2016/C 078/27
|
Case T-663/14: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM (BIG BINGO) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark BIG BINGO — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
18
|
|
2016/C 078/28
|
Case T-297/15 P: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Coedo Suárez v Council (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary measures — Removal from post and reduction of the invalidity allowance — Dismissal of the action at first instance — Error of law — Duty to state reasons)
|
18
|
|
2016/C 078/29
|
Case T-318/15: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Zitro IP v OHIM (TRIPLE BONUS) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark TRIPLE BONUS — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
19
|
|
2016/C 078/30
|
Case T-522/15: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2015 — CCPL and Others v Commission (Interim proceedings — Competition — Retail food packaging — Decision imposing fines — Bank guarantee — Application for a stay of execution — Fumus boni juris — Urgency — Balance of interests)
|
20
|
|
2016/C 078/31
|
Case T-652/15: Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Liedtke/Parliament
|
21
|
|
2016/C 078/32
|
Case T-697/15: Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Bergbräu v OHIM — Vilser Privatbrauerei (VILSER BERGBRÄU)
|
22
|
|
2016/C 078/33
|
Case T-732/15: Action brought on 14 December 2015 — ICA Laboratories e.a. v Commission
|
22
|
|
2016/C 078/34
|
Case T-744/15: Action brought on 21 December 2015 — Puro v OHIM (‘smartline’)
|
23
|
|
2016/C 078/35
|
Case T-747/15: Action brought on 22 December 2015 — EDF v Commission
|
24
|
|
2016/C 078/36
|
Case T-748/15: Action brought on 21 December 2015 — Gauff v OHIM — H.P. Gauff Ingenieure (Gauff)
|
26
|
|
2016/C 078/37
|
Case T-753/15: Action brought on 18 December 2015 — Guccio Gucci v OHIM — Guess? IP Holder (Representation of four interlaced letters G)
|
26
|
|
2016/C 078/38
|
Case T-766/15: Action brought on 28 December 2015 — Labeyrie v OHIM — Delpeyrat (Representation of a sowing of golden fish on a blue background)
|
27
|
|
2016/C 078/39
|
Case T-767/15: Action brought on 28 December 2015 — Labeyrie v OHIM — Delpeyrat (Representation of a sowing of light coloured fish on a dark background)
|
28
|
|
2016/C 078/40
|
Case T-768/15: Action brought on 28 December 2015 — RP Technik v OHIM — Tecnomarmi (RP ROYAL PALLADIUM)
|
29
|
|
2016/C 078/41
|
Case T-769/15: Action brought on 29 December 2015 — SeNaPro v OHIM — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)
|
30
|
|
2016/C 078/42
|
Case T-773/15: Action brought on 23 December 2015 — BBY Solutions v OHIM — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY)
|
31
|
|
2016/C 078/43
|
Case T-775/15: Action brought on 29 December 2015 — EK/servicegroup v OHIM (FERLI)
|
32
|
|
2016/C 078/44
|
Case T-776/15: Action brought on 30 December 2015 — Meissen Keramik v OHIM (MEISSEN KERAMIK)
|
32
|
|
2016/C 078/45
|
Case T-2/16: Action brought on 4 January 2016 — K&K Group v OHIM — Pret a Manger (Europe) (Pret A Diner)
|
33
|
|
2016/C 078/46
|
Case T-3/16: Action brought on 4 January 2016 — Allstate Insurance v OHIM (DRIVEWISE)
|
34
|
|
2016/C 078/47
|
Case T-11/16: Action brought on 18 January 2016 — De Masi v Commission
|
34
|
|
2016/C 078/48
|
Case T-335/13: Order of the General Court of 9 December 2015 — BT Limited Belgian Branch v Commission
|
35
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2016/C 078/49
|
Case F-61/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Proia v Commission (Civil Service — Member of contract staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Conditions laid down in Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Usual residence prior to the entry into service — Period of study followed by a traineeship and successive employment contracts in the State of employment — Presumed intention of the member of staff concerned to move the permanent centre of his interests from the start of his studies in the State of employment — Absence)
|
36
|
