|
V Announcements
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
2016/C 136/2
|
Case C-604/14 P: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 January 2016 — Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl v European Commission, Italian Republic (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — State aid — Aid granted by the Italian Republic in favour of Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl — Reimbursement by the Equalisation Fund of part of the electricity costs invoiced to that company by its supplier — Incompatibility with the common market — Advantage — European Commission required to undertake an economic analysis)
|
2
|
2016/C 136/3
|
Case C-103/15 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 January 2016 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v European Commission (Appeal — Access to EU institution documents — Actions in areas interesting developing countries — Refusal to grant access to certain documents of the file concerning contract ‘LIEN 97-2011’ — Execution of a judgment of the General Court)
|
2
|
2016/C 136/4
|
Case C-194/15: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino — Italy) — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Direct taxation — Imposition of dividends — Bilateral agreement on double taxation — Judicial double taxation)
|
3
|
2016/C 136/5
|
Case C-251/15 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2016 — Emsibeth SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Community trade mark — Application for registration of the figurative mark Nael — Opposition by the proprietor of prior Community word mark Mc Neal — Refusal of registration — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Determination of the relevant public — Assessment of the comparison of the goods, the similarity of the signs and the likelihood of confusion)
|
4
|
2016/C 136/6
|
Case C-382/15 P: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Skype Ultd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd (Appeal — Community trade mark — No need to adjudicate)
|
4
|
2016/C 136/7
|
Case C-383/15 P: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Skype Ultd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd (Appeal — Community trade mark — No need to adjudicate)
|
5
|
2016/C 136/8
|
Case C-384/15 P: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2016 — Skype Ultd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc, Sky IP International Ltd (Appeal — Community trade mark — No need to adjudicate)
|
5
|
2016/C 136/9
|
Case C-397/15: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Itzehoe — Germany) — Raffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG v Gerhild Lukath (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations — First Protocol concerning the interpretation by the Court of the Rome Convention — Articles 1 and 2(a) and (b) — National courts entitled to make a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
|
6
|
2016/C 136/10
|
Case C-170/15 P: Appeal brought on 14 April 2015 by Enercon GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 January 2015 in Case T-655/13, Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
|
6
|
2016/C 136/11
|
Case C-701/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 31 December 2015 — Malpensa Logistica Europa SpA v SEA — Società Esercizi Aeroportuali SpA
|
7
|
2016/C 136/12
|
Case C-3/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 4 January 2016 — Lucio Cesare Aquino v Belgische Staat
|
7
|
2016/C 136/13
|
Case C-9/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kehl (Germany) lodged on 7 January 2016 — Criminal proceedings against A
|
8
|
2016/C 136/14
|
Case C-26/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 18 January 2016 — Santogal M-Comércio e Reparação de Automóveis Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
|
9
|
2016/C 136/15
|
Case C-29/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stralsund (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2016 — HanseYachts AG v Port D’Hiver Yachting SARL, Société Maritime Côte D’Azur, Companie Generali IARD SA
|
10
|
2016/C 136/16
|
Case C-31/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 18 January 2016 — Visser Vastgoed Beleggingen BV v Raad van de gemeente Appingedam
|
11
|
2016/C 136/17
|
Case C-34/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 21 January 2016 — Manuel González Poyato and Ana Belén Tovar García v Banco Popular Español, S.A.
|
12
|
2016/C 136/18
|
Case C-39/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 25 January 2016 — Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat
|
13
|
2016/C 136/19
|
Case C-48/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Dunajská Streda (Slovak Republic) lodged on 27 January 2016 — ERGO Poisťovňa, a.s. v Alžbeta Barlíková
|
14
|
2016/C 136/20
|
Case C-49/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 27 January 2016 — Unibet International Limited v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Központi Hivatala
|
15
|
2016/C 136/21
|
Case C-51/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 28 January 2016 — Stryker EMEA Supply Chain Services BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond
|
15
|
2016/C 136/22
|
Case C-52/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 29 January 2016 — ‘SEGRO’ Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Sárvári Járási Földhivatala
|
16
|
2016/C 136/23
|
Case C-72/16: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 10 February 2016 — Prospector Offshore Drilling SA, Prospector Rig 1 Contracting Company SARL, Prospector Rig 5 Contracting Company SARL, Ensco plc, Ensco Offshore UK Limited, Rowan Companies plc, Rowan Cayman Limited, v Her Majesty's Treasury, Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
|
17
|
2016/C 136/24
|
Case C-80/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 12 February 2016 — ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine v Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l'Énergie
|
18
|
2016/C 136/25
|
Case C-83/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 February 2016 — Heta Asset Resolution Bulgaria OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna
|
19
|
2016/C 136/26
|
Case C-105/16 P: Appeal brought on 19 February 2016 by the Republic of Poland against the judgment delivered by the General Court on 3 December 2015 in Case T-367/13, Republic of Poland v European Commission
|
20
|
2016/C 136/27
|
Case C-60/14: Order of the President of the Court of 28 January 2016 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
|
22
|
2016/C 136/28
|
Case C-610/14: Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 18 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Helena Kolcunová v Provident Financial s. r. o.
|
22
|
2016/C 136/29
|
Case C-204/15: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — Proceedings brought by Valsts ieņēmumu dienests; other party: SIA Latspas
|
23
|
2016/C 136/30
|
Case C-306/15: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2016 — European Commission v Romania
|
23
|
2016/C 136/31
|
Case C-445/15: Order of the President of the Court of 5 February 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of Nutricia Limited v Secretary of State for Health
|
23
|
2016/C 136/32
|
Case C-522/15 P: Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM), Ori Martin SA
|
23
|
|
General Court
|
|
2016/C 136/33
|
Case T-40/09: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — Selecciones Americanas (VOGUE CAFÉ) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Community word mark VOGUE CAFÉ — Earlier national figurative marks Vogue and VOGUE studio and application for the Community figurative mark VOGUE — Genuine use of earlier marks — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
24
|
2016/C 136/34
|
Case T-251/12: Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — EGL and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Price fixing — Surcharges and charging mechanisms affecting the final price — Definition of the market — Effect on trade between Member States — Cooperation — Partial immunity from a fine)
|
24
|
2016/C 136/35
|
Case T-254/12: Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — Kühne + Nagel International and Others v European Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Surcharges and charging mechanisms affecting the final prices — Whether trade between Member States affected — Errors of assessment — Duration of the infringement — Amount of the fine — Point 13 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Mitigating circumstances — Proportionality — Rights of the defence)
|
25
|
2016/C 136/36
|
Case T-264/12: Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — UTi Worldwide and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Surcharges and tariff mechanisms having an impact on the final price of services — Errors of assessment — Proof — Whether trade between Member States affected — Appreciable effect on competition — Amount of the fine — Gravity of the infringement — Proportionality — Joint and several liability — Unlimited jurisdiction)
|
26
|
2016/C 136/37
|
Case T-265/12: Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — Schenker v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Price fixing — Surcharges and charging mechanisms affecting the final price — Evidence contained in an application for immunity — Protection of the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and clients — Code of Conduct rules on duty of loyalty and prohibition on double representation — Fiduciary duties — Whether trade between Member States affected — Whether unlawful conduct can be attributed — Choice of companies — Fines — Proportionality — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Equal treatment — Cooperation — Settlement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
|
27
|
2016/C 136/38
|
Case T-267/12: Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — Deutsche Bahn and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Price fixing — Surcharges and charging mechanisms affecting the final price — Evidence contained in an application for immunity — Protection of the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and clients — Code of Conduct rules on the duty of loyalty and prohibition on double representation — Fiduciary duties — Whether unlawful conduct can be attributed — Choice of companies — Fines — Proportionality — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Equal treatment — Cooperation — Partial immunity from a fine — Unlimited jurisdiction — Settlement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
|
27
|
2016/C 136/39
|
Case T-270/12: Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — Panalpina World Transport (Holding) and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — International air freight forwarding services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Price fixing — Surcharges and charging mechanisms affecting the final price — Fines — Proportionality — Gravity of the infringement — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons — Settlement — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines)
|
28
|
2016/C 136/40
|
Case T-15/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Simet v Commission (State Aid — retroactive public service compensation granted by the Italian authorities — Interregional coach transport services provided between 1987 and 2003 — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Maintenance of a public service obligation — Grant of compensation — Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69)
|
29
|
2016/C 136/41
|
Case T-79/14: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — Secop v Commission (State aid — Rescuing firms in difficulty — Aid in the form of a State guarantee — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Procedural rights of the interested parties)
|
29
|
2016/C 136/42
|
Case T-538/14: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — Peri v OHIM (Multiprop) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Multiprop — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
|
30
|
2016/C 136/43
|
Case T-557/14: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — BrandGroup v OHIM — Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele (SPEZOOMIX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SPEZOOMIX — Earlier Community word mark Spezi — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
30
|
2016/C 136/44
|
Case T-675/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Spain v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain — Flat rate financial corrections — Specific financial corrections — Extension of the financial correction to a period after the communication provided for in Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006)
|
31
|
2016/C 136/45
|
Case T-778/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2016 — Ugly v OHIM — Group Lottuss (COYOTE UGLY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark COYOTE UGLY — Relative grounds for refusal — Revocation of the earlier Community word mark — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No non-registered mark — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Rejection of the opposition)
|
32
|
2016/C 136/46
|
Case T-846/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2016 — Spokey v OHIM — Leder Jaeger (SPOKeY) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark SPOKeY — Earlier Community word mark SPOOKY — Declaration of partial invalidity — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Examination of evidence — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
32
|
2016/C 136/47
|
Case T-61/15: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2016 — 1&1 Internet v OHIM — Unoe Bank (1e1) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark 1e1 — Earlier national word mark UNO E and earlier figurative mark unoe — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
33
|
2016/C 136/48
|
Joined Cases T-279/15 to T-282/15: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2016 — Pirelli Tyre v OHIM (Tyre treads and Others) (Community design — Community design representing tyre treads and pneumatic tyres for vehicle wheels — Failure to apply for renewal of the design and cancellation of the design upon expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum and application for renewal of the design)
|
34
|
2016/C 136/49
|
Case T-82/15: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — InAccess Networks Integrated Systems v Commission (Seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) — Grant agreement for the Atraco project — Debit notes and decisions contained in letters — No need to adjudicate in part — Contractual nature of the dispute — Partial inadmissibility)
|
34
|
2016/C 136/50
|
Case T-296/15: Order of the General Court of 16 February 2016 — Industrias Químicas del Vallés v Commission (Action for annulment — Plant protection products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 — Establishing a list of candidates for substitution — Inclusion of metalaxyl on that list — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
|
35
|
2016/C 136/51
|
Case T-33/16: Action brought on 26 January 2016 — TestBioTech v Commission
|
36
|
2016/C 136/52
|
Case T-80/16: Action brought on 23 February 2016 — Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland v EMA
|
37
|
2016/C 136/53
|
Case T-82/16: Action brought on 23 February 2016 — International Gaming Projects v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (TRIPLE EVOLUTION)
|
38
|
2016/C 136/54
|
Case T-85/16: Action brought on 17 February 2016 — Shoe Branding Europe v EUIPO — adidas (Position of two parallel stripes on a shoe)
|
39
|
2016/C 136/55
|
Case T-86/16: Action brought on 23 February 2016 — Codorníu v EUIPO — Bodegas Altun (ANA DE ALTUN)
|
40
|
2016/C 136/56
|
Case T-87/16: Action brought on 26 February 2016 — Eurofast v Commission
|
40
|
2016/C 136/57
|
Case T-88/16: Action brought on 26 February 2016 — Opko Ireland Global Holdings v EUIPO — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN)
|
41
|
2016/C 136/58
|
Case T-91/16: Action brought on 29 February 2016 — Italy v Commission
|
42
|
2016/C 136/59
|
Case T-93/16: Action brought on 26 February 2016 — Rheinmetall Waffe Munition v EUIPO (VANGUARD)
|
43
|
2016/C 136/60
|
Case T-98/14: Order of the General Court of 2 March 2016 — Société générale v Commission
|
44
|
2016/C 136/61
|
Case T-646/14: Order of the General Court of 29 February 2016 — Micula and Others v Commission
|
44
|
2016/C 136/62
|
Case T-843/14: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Gascogne Sack Deutschland and Gascogne v European Union
|
44
|
2016/C 136/63
|
Case T-58/15: Order of the General Court of 16 February 2016 — Ludwig Bertram v OHIM — Seni Vita (Sanivita)
|
45
|
2016/C 136/64
|
Case T-177/15: Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Grandel v OHIM — Beautyge Beauty Group (Beautygen)
|
45
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
2016/C 136/65
|
Case F-3/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — Frieberger and Vallin v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Pensions — Reform of the Staff Regulations — Regulation No 1023/2013 — Article 22 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Raising of the retirement age — Repayment of contributions to the EU pension scheme — Article 26 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Recalculation of the bonus relating to pension rights)
|
46
|
2016/C 136/66
|
Case F-59/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — FX v Commission (Civil service — Temporary staff — Severance grant — Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Termination of service)
|
47
|
2016/C 136/67
|
Case F-60/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — Ruiz Molina v OHIM (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — OHIM staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Clause terminating the contract in the event that the member of staff is not included on a reserve list of a competition — Termination of the contract pursuant to the termination clause — Date on which the termination clause takes effect — Open Competition OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13)
|
47
|
2016/C 136/68
|
Case F-83/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2016 — Pujante Cuadrupani v GSA (Civil service — Recruitment — Temporary staff — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Action for annulment brought against both the dismissal decision and the confirmatory dismissal decision — Whether admissible — Third paragraph of Article 14 of the CEOS — Misuse of powers and abuse of process — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Consultation of the Joint Evaluation Committee — Opinion based on examining written material without hearing the applicant — No infringement of the rights of the defence)
|
48
|
2016/C 136/69
|
Case F-84/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — Loescher v Council (Civil service — Officials — Union representative — Put at the disposal of a trade union or staff association — 2014 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Comparative merits — No obligation under the Staff Regulations to provide for a specific method for assessing the comparative merits of staff put at the disposal of trade union or professional associations — Taking into account of staff reports — Assessment of the level of responsibilities held — Evidence — Review of a manifest error of assessment)
|
49
|
2016/C 136/70
|
Case F-25/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 February 2016 — McArdle v Commission
|
49
|
2016/C 136/71
|
Case F-56/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 February 2016 — McArdle v Commission
|
49
|
2016/C 136/72
|
Case F-29/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 February 2016 — Wisniewski v Commission
|
50
|
2016/C 136/73
|
Case F-38/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 March 2016 — FJ v Parliament
|
50
|