|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2010/C 328/02
|
Case C-222/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2002/22/EC (‘Universal Service’ Directive) — Electronic communications — Networks and services — Article 12 — Costing of universal service obligations — Social component of universal service — Article 13 — Financing of universal service obligations — Determination of whether an ‘unfair burden’ exists)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/03
|
Case C-389/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium)) — Base NV, Euphony Benelux NV, Mobistar SA, Uninet International NV, T2 Belgium NV, KPN Belgium NV v Ministerraad (Electronic communications — Directive 2002/21/EC (‘Framework’ Directive) — Articles 2(g), 3 and 4 — National regulatory authority — National legislature acting as national regulatory authority — Directive 2002/22/EC (‘Universal Service’ Directive) — Networks and services — Article 12 — Costing of universal service obligations — Social component of universal service — Article 13 — Financing of universal service obligations — Determination of whether an ‘unfair burden’ exists)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/04
|
Case C-512/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 October 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 49 EC — Social security — Medical treatment proposed in another Member State and requiring the use of major medical equipment — Requirement of prior authorisation — Planned treatment provided in another Member State — Difference in the levels of cover in force in the Member State of affiliation and in the Member State of stay, respectively — Insured person’s right to assistance by the competent institution to supplement that of the institution of the Member State of stay)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/05
|
Case C-515/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium)) — Criminal proceedings against Vítor Manuel dos Santos Palhota, Mário de Moura Gonçalves, Fernando Luis das Neves Palhota, Termiso Limitada (Freedom to provide services — Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU — Posting of workers — Restrictions — Employers established in another Member State — Registration of prior declaration of posting — Social or labour documents — Equivalent to those provided for under the law of the host Member State — Copy — Keeping available to the national authorities)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/06
|
Joined Cases C-53/09 and C-55/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 October 2010 (References for a preliminary ruling from the House of Lords, United Kingdom) — Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Loyalty Management UK Ltd (C-53/09), Baxi Group Ltd (C-55/09) (Sixth VAT Directive — Taxable amount — Sales promotion scheme — Loyalty rewards scheme allowing customers to earn points from traders and to redeem them for loyalty rewards — Payments made by the operator of the scheme to redeemers supplying the loyalty rewards — Payments made by the trader to the operator of the scheme supplying the loyalty rewards)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/07
|
Case C-154/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 October 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2002/22/EC — Electronic communications — Networks and services — Articles 3(2) and 8(2) — Designation of undertakings responsible for universal service obligations — Incorrect transposition)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/08
|
Case C-162/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom)) — Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Taous Lassal (Reference for preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for persons — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 16 — Right of permanent residence — Temporal application — Periods completed before the date of transposition)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/09
|
Case C-173/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Georgi Ivanov Elchinov v Natsionalna zdravnoosiguritelna kasa (Social security — Freedom to provide services — Sickness insurance — Hospital treatment provided in another Member State — Prior authorisation — Conditions of application of the second subparagraph of Article 22(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Methods of reimbursement to the insured person of hospital expenses incurred in another Member State — Obligation on a lower court to comply with the directions of a higher court)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/10
|
Case C-222/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Republic of Poland)) — Kronospan Mielec sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Rzeszowie (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 9(2)(c) and (e) — Research and development work carried out by engineers — Determination of the place where services are supplied)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/11
|
Case C-224/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Martha Nussbaumer (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 92/57/EEC — Implementation of minimum safety and health requirements on temporary and mobile construction sites — Article 3 — Requirement to appoint a coordinator for safety and health matters and draw up a safety and health plan)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/12
|
Case C-382/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās Tiesas Senāts — Republic of Latvia) — Stils Met SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Chapter 73 — Steel strands, ropes and cables — Heading 7312 — TARIC code — Error in the tariff classification — Release of goods for free circulation — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Anti-dumping duties — Fine of an amount equal to the total anti-dumping duties)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/13
|
Case C-49/10: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/1/EC — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Requirements for the granting of permits for existing installations — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/14
|
Case C-127/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 October 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/42/EC on machinery — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/15
|
Case C-400/10 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland)) — J. McB. v L. E. (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility — The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Children whose parents are not married — Father’s rights of custody — Interpretation of ‘rights of custody’ — General principles of law and Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/16
|
Case C-142/10 P: Appeal brought on 17 March 2010 by Francisco Pérez Guerra against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 11 February 2010 in Case T-3/10 Pérez Guerra v BNP Paribas and Spain
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/17
|
Case C-290/10 P: Appeal brought on 10 June 2010 by Franssons Verkstäder AB against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 May 2010 in Case T-98/10: Franssons Verkstäder v OHIM and Lindner Recyclingtech (Chaff Cutters)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/18
|
Case C-368/10: Action brought on 22 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/19
|
Case C-371/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 26 July 2010 — National Grid Indus BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Rijnmond (kantoor Rotterdam)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/20
|
Case C-387/10: Action brought on 2 August 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/21
|
Case C-428/10: Action brought on 27 August 2010 — European Commission v French Republic
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/22
|
Case C-436/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 13 September 2010 — Belgian State — SPF Finances v BLM SA
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/23
|
Case C-438/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 13 September 2010 — Lilia Druțu v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/24
|
Case C-439/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 13 September 2010 — SC DRA SPEED Srl v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/25
|
Case C-440/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 13 September 2010 — SC SEMTEX Srl v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/26
|
Case C-441/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 13 September 2010 — Ioan Anghel v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Bacău
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/27
|
Case C-451/10 P: Appeal brought on 15 September 2010 by Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 July 2010 in Joined Cases T-568/08 and T-573/08 M6 and TF1 v Commission
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/28
|
Case C-453/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov lodged on 16 September 2010 — Jana Pereničová, Vladislav Perenič v S.O.S. financ, spol. sro
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/29
|
Case C-455/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands), lodged on 17 September 2010 — G.A.P. Peeters-van Maasdijk v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/30
|
Case C-456/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 17 September 2010 — Asociación Nacional De Expendedores De Tabaco y Timbre (ANETT) v Administración Del Estado
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/31
|
Case C-460/10 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 July 2010 in Case T-401/09 Marcuccio v Court of Justice
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/32
|
Case C-463/10 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2010 by Deutsche Post AG against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 July 2010 in Case T-570/08 Deutsche Post AG v European Commission
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/33
|
Case C-467/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Gießen (Germany) lodged on 28 September 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Baris Akyüz
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/34
|
Case C-470/10: Action brought on 28 September 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/35
|
Case C-471/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Salzburg lodged on 28 September 2010 — Martin Wohl and Ildiko Veres v Magistrat der Stadt Salzburg, Other party: Finanzamt Salzburg-Stadt
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/36
|
Case C-473/10: Action brought on 29 September 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Hungary
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/37
|
Case C-475/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 October 2010 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 July 2010 in Case T-571/08 Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/38
|
Case C-476/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Vorarlberg (Austria) lodged on 1 October 2010 — ‘projektart’ Errichtungsges mbH, Eva Maria Pepic and Herbert Hilbe v Grundverkehrs-Landeskommission Vorarlberg
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/39
|
Case C-477/10 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2010 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 7 July 2010 in Case T-111/07: Agrofert Holding a.s. v European Commission
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/40
|
Case C-479/10: Action brought on 5 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/41
|
Case C-480/10: Action brought on 5 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/42
|
Case C-482/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti, Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana (Italy) lodged on 6 October 2010 — Teresa Cicala v Regione Siciliana
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/43
|
Case C-483/10: Action brought on 6 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/44
|
Case C-485/10: Action brought on 8 October 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/45
|
Case C-497/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 18 October 2010 — Barbara Mercredi v Richard Chaffe
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2010/C 328/46
|
Joined Cases T-135/06 to T-138/06: Judgment of the General Court of 29 September 2010 — Al-Faqih v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Combating terrorism — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban — Freezing of funds — Fundamental rights — Right to respect for property, right to be heard and right to effective judicial review)
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/47
|
Joined Cases T-230/08 and T-231/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2010 — Asenbaum v OHIM (WIENER WERKSTÄTTE) (Community trade mark — Applications for Community word mark WIENER WERKSTÄTTE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/48
|
Case T-439/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 October 2010 — Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus — Documents emanating from a third party — Partial refusal of access — Action for annulment — Time-limit for action — Inadmissibility — Objection of illegality — Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Duty to give reasons)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/49
|
Case T-474/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 October 2010 — Umbach v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a contract concluded under the TACIS programme — Request for access concerning a dispute between the applicant and the Commission before a Belgian civil court — Partial refusal of access — Request for access based on the principles deriving from the EU Treaty — Overriding public interest)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/50
|
Case T-69/09: Order of the General Court of 5 October 2010 — Provincie Groningen and Provincie Drenthe v Commission (Annulment action — ERDF — Decision reducing the financial assistance and ordering the partial repayment of the sums paid — Regional body — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/51
|
Case T-415/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 October 2010 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy (Application for interim measures — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/52
|
Case T-431/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2010 — Nencini v Parliament (Interim measures — Member of the European Parliament — Recovery of allowances paid in reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses and of travel costs — Application for stay of execution — Lack of urgency)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/53
|
Case T-280/09: Action brought on 13 August 2010 — Morte Navarro v Parliament
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/54
|
Case T-403/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM — Felmar (BRIGHTON)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/55
|
Case T-404/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — National Lottery Commission v OHIM — Mediatek Italia and De Gregorio (Representation of a hand)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/56
|
Case T-416/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — Yoshida Metal Industry v OHMI — Pi-Design and Others (surface covered with black circles)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/57
|
Case T-434/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Václav Hrbek trading as BODY-HF v OHMI — The Outdoor Group (ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/58
|
Case T-439/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Fulmen v Council
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/59
|
Case T-440/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Mahmoudian v Council
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/60
|
Case T-441/10 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2010 by Christian Kurrer against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 8 July 2010 in Case F-139/06, Kurrer v Commission
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/61
|
Case T-442/10 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2010 by Salvatore Magazzu against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 8 July 2010 in Case F-126/06, Magazzu v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/62
|
Case T-443/10 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2010 by Stefano Sotgia against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 8 July 2010 in Case F-130/06, Sotgia v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/63
|
Case T-448/10: Action brought on 23 September 2010 — Apple v OHMI — Iphone Media (IPH IPHONE)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/64
|
Case T-452/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — ClientEarth v Council
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/65
|
Case T-453/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/66
|
Case T-454/10: Action brought on 30 September 2010 — Anicav v Commission
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/67
|
Case T-458/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — McBride v Commission
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/68
|
Case T-459/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — McBride v Commission
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/69
|
Case T-460/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Mullglen v Commission
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/70
|
Case T-461/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Boyle v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/71
|
Case T-462/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Flaherty v Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/72
|
Case T-463/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Ocean Trawlers v Commission
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/73
|
Case T-464/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Fitzpatrick v Commission
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/74
|
Case T-465/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — McHugh v Commission
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/75
|
Case T-466/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Hannigan v Commission
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/76
|
Case T-467/10: Action brought on 27 September 2010 — Murphy v Commission
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/77
|
Case T-475/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Portugal v Commission
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/78
|
Case T-483/10: Action brought on 8 October 2010 — The Pukka Luggage Company v OHIM — Jesus Miguel Azpiroz Arruti (PUKKA)
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/79
|
Case T-484/10: Action brought on 14 October 2010 — Gas Natural Fenosa SDG v Commission
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/80
|
Case T-486/10: Action brought on 14 October 2010 — Iberdrola v Commission
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/81
|
Case T-490/10: Action brought on 14 October 2010 — Endesa and Endesa Generación v Commission
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/82
|
Case T-492/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Melli Bank v Council
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/83
|
Case T-493/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Persia International Bank v Council
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/84
|
Case T-494/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Bank Saderat Iran v Council
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/85
|
Case T-495/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Bank Saderat v Council
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/86
|
Case T-496/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Bank Mellat v Council
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/87
|
Case T-497/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Divandari v Council
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/88
|
Case T-280/07: Order of the General Court of 7 October 2010 — Sepracor v OHIM — Laboratorios Ern (LEVENIA)
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/89
|
Case T-441/07: Order of the General Court of 5 October 2010 — Ryanair v Commission
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/90
|
Case T-140/10: Order of the General Court of 7 October 2010 — Söns v OHIM — Settimio (GREAT CHINA WALL)
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2010/C 328/91
|
Case F-29/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Vivier v Commission (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Classification in grade — Grades laid down in the call for applications — Amendment of the rules governing classification of staff — Transitional provisions — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Application by analogy)
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/92
|
Case F-36/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Gudrun Schulze v European Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Classification in step — Article 32 of the Staff Regulations — Articles 2, 5 and 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Discrimination on grounds of age — Equal pay for work of equal value — Principle of good administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/93
|
Case F-41/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Jacobs v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Classification in grade under the new, less favourable rules — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/94
|
Case F-76/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Torijano Montero v Council (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Candidates placed on a reserve list of a competition published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Classification in grade under the new, less favourable rules — Article 5 of the Staff Regulations — Article 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Principle of equality — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Proportionality)
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/95
|
Case F-107/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Toth v Commission (Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — Classification in grade — Grades laid down in the call for applications — Amendment of the rules governing classification of members of the temporary staff after publication of the call for applications — Classification in grade under the new, less favourable rules — Transitional provisions — Application by analogy — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Proportionality — Principle of good administration)
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/96
|
Case F-20/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — de Luca v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Officials advancing to a higher function group by open competition — Candidate placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules — Article 5(2) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/97
|
Case F-29/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — Lebedef and Jones v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — First subparagraph of Article 3(5) and Article 9 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Weighting — Equal treatment)
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/98
|
Case F-86/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 14 October 2010 — W v Commission (Civil Service — Contractual agents — Remuneration — Family benefits — Couple of persons of the same sex — Household allowance — Condition governing the grant — Access to legal marriage — Notion — Article 1(2)(c)(iv) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/99
|
Case F-89/10: Action brought on 28 September 2010 — Bovagnet v Commission
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/00
|
Case F-93/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Blessemaille v Parliament
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 328/01
|
Case F-95/10: Action brought on 8 October 2010 — Eberhard Bömcke v EIB
|
62
|
|
|
|
