|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice of the European Union
|
|
|
2019/C 288/02
|
Case C-524/16: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti, Italy) — Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale v Francesco Faggiano (Reference for a preliminary ruling — No need to adjudicate)
|
2
|
|
2019/C 288/03
|
C-406/17 to C-408/17 and C-417/17: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 May 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Acea Energia SpA (C-406/17), Green Network SpA (C-407/17), Enel Energia SpA (C-408/17) v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Autorità per l'Energia Elettrica il Gas e il Sistema Idrico, Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni C-406/17, C-407/18 and C-408/17), Hera Comm Srl (C-417/17) v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Autorità per l’Energia Elettrica, il Gas e il Sistema Idrico (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market — Directive 2009/72/EC — Internal market in electricity — Directive 2009/73/EC — Internal market in natural gas — Directive 2011/83/EU — Aggressive commercial practices — Conclusion of contracts for electricity and natural gas supply which were not requested by consumers — Conclusion of distance or off-premises supply contracts in breach of consumer rights — Competent authority to penalise such conduct)
|
3
|
|
2019/C 288/04
|
Case C-8/18: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas — Lithuania) — TE, UD, YB, ZC v Luminor Bank AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom to provide services — Markets in financial instruments — Natural person who has acquired a derivative financial instrument from a bank — Classification of that person within the meaning of EU law)
|
4
|
|
2019/C 288/05
|
Case C-367/18: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — María Teresa Aragón Carrasco and Others v Administración del Estado (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Comparability of situations — Justification — Clause 5 — Compensation in the event of termination for an objective reason of an employment contract for an indefinite period — No compensation upon the termination of the post of workers employed as auxiliary staff)
|
5
|
|
2019/C 288/06
|
Case C-425/18: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte, Italy) — Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Società Cooperativa (CNS) v Gruppo Torinese Trasporti Gtt SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Award of public works contracts in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 45(2), first subparagraph, (d) — Grounds for exclusion — Grave professional misconduct — Infringement of the competition rules)
|
6
|
|
2019/C 288/07
|
Case C-525/18 P: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2019 — Marion Le Pen v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — European Parliament — Rules governing the expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid)
|
7
|
|
2019/C 288/08
|
Case C-665/18: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Pólus Vegas Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — Games of chance — National taxes on the operation of slot machines in amusement arcades — National legislation increasing the amount of a tax five-fold and introducing an additional tax)
|
7
|
|
2019/C 288/09
|
Joined Cases C-789/18 and 790/18: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — AQ and Others (C-789/18) and ZQ (C-790/18) v Corte dei Conti, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Inps-Gestione (C-789/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Civil service — Cumulation of emoluments from activities as employed or self-employed persons in the service of one or more State entities — National legislation providing for a ceiling to such cumulation — Purely internal situation — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
8
|
|
2019/C 288/10
|
Case C-827/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kamenz — Germany) — MC v ND (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Lugano II Convention — Article 22(1) — Proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property — Restitution of the proceeds from the rental of a property before the transfer of ownership)
|
9
|
|
2019/C 288/11
|
Case C-9/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the question referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
9
|
|
2019/C 288/12
|
Case C-26/19: Order of the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2019 (request for preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Modena — Italy) — Azienda USL di Modena v Comune di Sassuolo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — State aid — National health service — Exemption from property tax — Immovable property leased to a commercial company constituted with blended capital active in the health sector in competition with other healthcare establishments exclusively constituted with private capital)
|
10
|
|
2019/C 288/13
|
Case C-105/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Serron — Greece) — WP v Trapeza Peiraios AE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Powers and obligations of the national court — Order for payment procedure — Granting of the application to have that order set aside — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
11
|
|
2019/C 288/14
|
Case C-78/19 P: Appeal brought on 31 January 2019 by WL against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Ninth Chamber) on 29 November 2018 in Case T-493/17, WL v ERCEA
|
11
|
|
2019/C 288/15
|
Case C-121/19 P: Appeal brought on 15 February 2019 by Edison SpA against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 December 2018 in Case T-471/17, Edison v EUIPO (EDISON)
|
12
|
|
2019/C 288/16
|
Case C-294/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 10 April 2019 — Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Tulcea v SC Piscicola Tulcea SA
|
13
|
|
2019/C 288/17
|
Case C-302/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 11 April 2019 — Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale v WS
|
13
|
|
2019/C 288/18
|
Case C-303/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 11 April 2019 — Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale v VR
|
14
|
|
2019/C 288/19
|
Case C-304/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 12 April 2019 — Ira Invest SRL v Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Tulcea
|
15
|
|
2019/C 288/20
|
Case C-326/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 23 April 2019 — EB v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others
|
15
|
|
2019/C 288/21
|
Case C-329/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 23 April 2019 — Condominio di Milano v Eurothermo SpA
|
16
|
|
2019/C 288/22
|
Case C-334/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2019 — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF
|
17
|
|
2019/C 288/23
|
Case C-355/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Pitești (Romania) lodged on 6 May 2019 — Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ and OL v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Procurorul General al României
|
18
|
|
2019/C 288/24
|
Case C-357/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 6 May 2019 — Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Direcția Națională Anticorupție, PM, RO, SP, TQ v QN, UR, VS, WT, Autoritatea Națională pentru Turism, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală, SC Euro Box Promotion SRL
|
19
|
|
2019/C 288/25
|
Case C-364/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Galați (Romania) lodged on 7 May 2019 — XU and Others v S.C. Credit Europe Ipotecar IFN S.A. and Credit Europe Bank NV
|
19
|
|
2019/C 288/26
|
Case C-365/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2019 — FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg
|
20
|
|
2019/C 288/27
|
Case C-374/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 13 May 2019 — HF v Finanzamt Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
|
21
|
|
2019/C 288/28
|
Case C-380/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 15 May 2019 — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Deutsche Apotheker- und Ärztebank eG
|
22
|
|
2019/C 288/29
|
Case C-381/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 15 May 2019 — SC Banca E S.A. v G.D.
|
22
|
|
2019/C 288/30
|
Case C-397/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 22 May 2019 — AX v Statul Român — Ministerul Finanțelor Publice
|
23
|
|
2019/C 288/31
|
Case C-398/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 23 May 2019 — BY
|
24
|
|
2019/C 288/32
|
Case C-405/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 24 May 2019 — Vos Aannemingen BVBA v Belgische Staat
|
25
|
|
2019/C 288/33
|
Case C-407/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 24 May 2019 — Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV, General Services Antwerp NV v Belgische Staat
|
26
|
|
2019/C 288/34
|
Case C-422/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 May 2019 — Johannes Dietrich v Hessischer Rundfunk
|
28
|
|
2019/C 288/35
|
Case C-423/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 May 2019 — Norbert Häring v Hessischer Rundfunk
|
28
|
|
2019/C 288/36
|
Case C-424/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 29 May 2019 — Cabinet de avocat UR v Administrația Sector 3 a Finanțelor Publice prin Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București and Others
|
29
|
|
2019/C 288/37
|
Case C-427/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 June 2019 — Joint-stock insurance company ‘Bulstrad Vienna Insurance Group’ AD v Insurance company ‘Olympic’
|
30
|
|
2019/C 288/38
|
Case C-429/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Germany) lodged on 5 June 2019 — Remondis GmbH v Abfallzweckverband Rhein-Mosel-Eifel
|
31
|
|
2019/C 288/39
|
Case C-430/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj (Romania) lodged on 3 June 2019 — SC C. F. SRL v A. J. F. P. M., D. G. R. F. P. C.
|
31
|
|
2019/C 288/40
|
Case C-473/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vänersborgs tingsrätt, mark- och miljödomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 18 June 2019 — Föreningen Skydda Skogen
|
32
|
|
2019/C 288/41
|
Case C-474/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vänersborgs tingsrätt, mark- och miljödomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 18 June 2019 — Naturskyddsföreningen i Härryda, Göteborgs Ornitologiska Förening
|
34
|
|
2019/C 288/42
|
Case C-476/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Göteborg (Sweden) lodged on 19 June 2019 — Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket v Combinova AB
|
35
|
|
2019/C 288/43
|
Case C-483/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 24 June 2019 — Ville de Verviers v J
|
36
|
|
2019/C 288/44
|
Case C-490/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 26 June 2019 — Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS
|
37
|
|
2019/C 288/45
|
Case C-633/17: Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Gmalieva s.r.o., Manfred Naderhirn, in the presence of: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann von Linz-Land
|
37
|
|
2019/C 288/46
|
Case C-167/18: Order of the President of the Court of 17 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias — Spain) — Unión Insular de CC.OO. de Lanzarote v Swissport Spain Aviation Services Lanzarote S.L.
|
38
|
|
2019/C 288/47
|
Case C-188/18: Order of the President of the Court of 12 April 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, French Republic
|
38
|
|
2019/C 288/48
|
Case C-562/18: Order of the President of the Court of 13 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Sens — France) — X
|
38
|
|
2019/C 288/49
|
Case C-633/18 P: Order of the President of the Court of 10 May 2019 — Apple Distribution International v European Commission, supported by: French Republic
|
39
|
|
2019/C 288/50
|
C-643/18: Order of the President of the of the Court of 12 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — British Airways plc v MF
|
39
|
|
2019/C 288/51
|
Case C-149/19: Order of the President of the Court of 12 June 2019 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava V — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against R.B.
|
39
|
|
2019/C 288/52
|
Case C-244/19: Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — GB v Decker KFZ-Handels u. -Reparatur GmbH, Volkswagen AG
|
40
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2019/C 288/53
|
Case T-353/15: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — NeXovation v Commission (State aid — Individual aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex for the construction of a leisure park, hotels and restaurants as well as for the organisation of motor races — Decision finding the aid to be incompatible with the internal market — Decision finding that the reimbursement of the aid found to be incompatible does not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex — Action for annulment — No substantial effect on competitive position — Inadmissibility — Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage — Action for annulment — Interested party — Legal interest in bringing an action — Admissibility — Breach of procedural rights — No difficulties that would have required the initiation of a formal investigation procedure — Complaint — Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid found to be incompatible — Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process — Diligent and impartial examination — Obligation to state reasons)
|
41
|
|
2019/C 288/54
|
Case T-373/15: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — Ja zum Nürburgring v Commission (State aid — Individual aid in favour of the Nürburgring complex for the construction of a leisure park, hotels and restaurants as well as for the organisation of motor races — Decision finding the aid to be incompatible with the internal market — Decision finding that the reimbursement of the aid found to be incompatible does not concern the new owner of the Nürburgring complex — Action for annulment — No substantial effect on competitive position — Association — Status of negotiator — Inadmissibility — Decision finding no State aid after the preliminary examination stage — Action for annulment — Interested party — Legal interest in bringing an action — Admissibility — Breach of procedural rights of interested parties — No difficulties that would have required the initiation of a formal investigation procedure — Complaint — Sale of the assets of the beneficiaries of the State aid found to be incompatible — Open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration)
|
42
|
|
2019/C 288/55
|
Case T-405/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2019 — Fulmen v Council (Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Freezing of funds — Compensation for harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following the inclusion and retention of its name on lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures — Material damage — Non-material damage)
|
43
|
|
2019/C 288/56
|
Case T-466/16: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2019 — NRW. Bank v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Setting of the ex ante contribution for 2016 — Time limit for bringing an action — Delay — Article 76 of the Rules of procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility)
|
44
|
|
2019/C 288/57
|
Case T-20/17: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Hungary v Commission (State aid — Hungarian tax on the turnover from the broadcasting or publication of advertisements — Progressivity of tax rates — Deduction from the basis of assessment of the tax of 50 % of the losses carried forward for companies not generating a profit in 2013 — Decision characterising the measures as aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Condition relating to selectivity)
|
45
|
|
2019/C 288/58
|
Case T-307/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — adidas v EUIPO — Shoe Branding Europe (Representation of three parallel stripes) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes — Absolute grounds for invalidity — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Form of use unable to be taken into account — Form that differs from the form under which the mark has been registered by significant variations — Inversion of the colour scheme)
|
46
|
|
2019/C 288/59
|
Case T-28/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — Marriott Worldwide v EUIPO — AC Milan (AC MILAN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark AC MILAN — Earlier EU word marks AC and AC HOTELS BY MARRIOTT and earlier EU figurative mark AC HOTELS MARRIOTT — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the mark AC — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
47
|
|
2019/C 288/60
|
Case T-213/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — Brita v EUIPO (Shape of a faucet) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a faucet — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
47
|
|
2019/C 288/61
|
Case T-334/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Bodegas Altún v EUIPO — Codorníu (ANA DE ALTUN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ANA DE ALTUN — Earlier national figurative mark ANNA — Relative ground for refusal — Reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
48
|
|
2019/C 288/62
|
Case T-340/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2019 — Gibson Brands v EUIPO — Wilfer (Shape of a guitar body) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a guitar body — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
49
|
|
2019/C 288/63
|
Case T-366/18: Judgment of the General Court of 13 June 2019 — Pet King Brands v EUIPO — Virbac (SUIMOX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SUIMOX — Earlier EU word mark ZYMOX — Obligation to state reasons — Notification of a decision of the Board of Appeal — Good faith and diligence on the part of the addressee — Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
50
|
|
2019/C 288/64
|
Case T-377/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2019 — Intercept Pharma and Intercept Pharmaceuticals v EMA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents held by EMA containing information submitted by the applicants in the context of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Ocaliva — Decision to grant a third party access to a document — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)
|
51
|
|
2019/C 288/65
|
Case T-479/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — Multifit v EUIPO (Premiere) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Premiere — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
51
|
|
2019/C 288/66
|
Case T-569/18: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2019 — W. Kordes’ Söhne Rosenschulen v EUIPO (Kordes’ Rose Monique) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Kordes’ Rose Monique — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark consisting of a plant variety denomination — Essential elements — Article 7(1)(m) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(m) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
52
|
|
2019/C 288/67
|
Case T-384/19: Action brought on 20 June 2019 — Parliament v AXA Assurances Luxembourg and Others
|
53
|
|
2019/C 288/68
|
Case T-386/19: Action brought on 24 June 2019 — CQ v Court of Auditors
|
55
|
|
2019/C 288/69
|
Case T-387/19: Action brought on 26 June 2019 — DF and DG v EIB
|
56
|
|
2019/C 288/70
|
Case T-399/19: Action brought on 25 June 2019 — Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo v Commission
|
57
|
|
2019/C 288/71
|
Case T-401/19: Action brought on 27 June 2019 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe)
|
58
|
|
2019/C 288/72
|
Case T-402/19: Action brought on 27 June 2019 — Brillux v EUIPO — Synthesa Chemie (Freude an Farbe)
|
59
|
|
2019/C 288/73
|
Case T-406/19: Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Cocilovo v Parliament
|
60
|
|
2019/C 288/74
|
Case T-407/19: Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Speroni v Parliament
|
61
|
|
2019/C 288/75
|
Case T-408/19: Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Mezzaroma v Parliament
|
62
|
|
2019/C 288/76
|
Case T-409/19: Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Di Meo v Parliament
|
62
|
|
2019/C 288/77
|
Case T-410/19: Action brought on 28 June 2019 — Di Lello Finuoli v Parliament
|
63
|
|
2019/C 288/78
|
Case T-494/19: Action brought on 7 July 2019 — CupoNation v EUIPO (Cyber Monday)
|
64
|
|
2019/C 288/79
|
Case T-495/19: Action brought on 8 July 2019 — Romania v Commission
|
64
|
|
2019/C 288/80
|
Case T-500/19: Action brought on 10 July 2019 — Coravin v EUIPO — Cora (CORAVIN)
|
65
|
|
2019/C 288/81
|
Case T-503/19: Action brought on 5 July 2019 — Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO (XOXO)
|
66
|
|
2019/C 288/82
|
Case T-506/19: Action brought on 15 July 2019 — Workspace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis (UMA WORKSPACE)
|
67
|
