|
6.8.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 193/28 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 25 May 2005
in Case T-443/03 Sociedad Operadora de Telecomunicaciones de Castilla y León, SA (Retecal) and Others v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(Competition - Concentrations - Complaint concerning an alleged failure by the Spanish authorities to fulfil their obligations - Decision to take no further action on the complaint - Inadmissibility)
(2005/C 193/46)
Language of the case: Spanish
In Case T-443/03: Sociedad Operadora de Telecomunicaciones de Castilla y León, SA (Retecal), established in Boecillo (Spain), Euskaltel, SA, established in Zamudio-Vizcaya (Spain), Telecable de Asturias, SA, established in Oviedo (Spain), R Cable y Telecomunicaciones Galicia, SA, established in La Coruña (Spain), Tenaria, SA, established in Cordovilla (Spain), represented by J. Jiménez Laiglesia, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: F. Castillo de la Torre, with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by the Kingdom of Spain (Agent: L. Fraguas Gadea), by Sogecable, SA, established in Tres Cantos, Madrid (Spain), represented by S. Martínez Lage and H. Brokelmann, lawyers, and by Telefónica, SA, established in Madrid, represented initially by M. Merola and S. Moreno Sánchez, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Merola — action seeking the annulment of the decision of the Commission of 21 October 2003 to take no further action on the applicants' complaint of an alleged infringement by the Spanish authorities of Article 9(8) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (corrected version, OJ 1990 L 257, p. 13) in the context of the concentration between Vía Digital and Sogecable (Case COMP/M.2845 — Sogecable/Canal Satélite Digital/Vía Digital) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Švaby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 25 May 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
The applicants shall bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Commission, by Telefónica, SA and by Sogecable, SA. |
|
3. |
The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs. |