|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2011/C 089/02
|
Case C-449/09: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD (The first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Right of the proprietor of a mark to oppose the first placing into circulation within the EEA, without his consent, of goods bearing that mark)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/03
|
Case C-73/10 P: Order of the Court of 16 November 2010 — Internationale Fruchtimport Gesellschaft Weichert GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Commission Decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC — Action for annulment — Time-limit — Action brought out of time — Reasons justifying derogation from the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Right of access to a court — Principles of legality and proportionality — Appeal clearly unfounded)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/04
|
Case C-156/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 December 2010 — Karen Goncharov v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), DSB (Appeals — Community trade mark — Marks consisting of acronyms — Earlier trade mark DSB — Word sign ‘DSBW’ — Opposition proceedings — Relative ground for refusal — Examination of the likelihood of confusion — Visual similarity — Aural similarity — Inadmissibility — Assessment of the facts)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/05
|
Case C-204/10 P: Order of the Court of 23 November 2010 — Enercon GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Hasbro, Inc. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word mark ENERCON — Opposition of the proprietor of the word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON — Refusal to register — Likelihood of confusion)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/06
|
Case C-216/10 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2010 — Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Applus Servicios Technológicos SL (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 73, 74 and 79 — Figurative mark A+ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark AirPlus International — Opposition rejected)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/07
|
Case C-352/10: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo — Spain) — Angel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros SAE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/08
|
Case C-583/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 13 December 2010 — The United States of America v Christine Nolan
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/09
|
Case C-586/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 15 December 2010 — Bianca Kücük v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/10
|
Case C-588/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Polish Republic) lodged on 14 December 2010 — Minister Finansów v Kraft Foods Polska S.A.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/11
|
Case C-589/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku (Polish Republic) lodged on 14 December 2010 — Janina Wencel v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w Białymstoku
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/12
|
Case C-591/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 14 December 2010 — Littlewoods Retail Ltd and others v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue and Customs
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/13
|
Case C-602/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Călărași (Romania) lodged on 21 December 2010 — SC Volksbank România SA v Autoritatea Națională pentru Protecția Consumatorilor — Comisariatul Județean pentru Protecția Consumatorilor Călărași (CJPC)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/14
|
Case C-604/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 21 December 2010 — Football Dataco Limited, Football Association Premier League Ltd, Football League Limited, Scottish Premier League Limited, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Limited v Yahoo UK Limited, Stan James (Abingdon) Limited, Stan James PLC, Enetpulse APS
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/15
|
Case C-607/10: Action brought on 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/16
|
Case C-609/10 P: Appeal brought on 23 December 2010 by Dieter C. Umbach against the judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 21 October 2010 in Case T-474/08 Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/17
|
Case C-616/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ‘s Gravenhage (Netherlands) lodged on 29 December 2010 — Solvay S.A. v Honeywell Fluorine Products Europe B.V. Honeywell Belgium N.V. Honeywell Europe N.V.
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/18
|
Case C-629/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) made on 24 December 2010 — TUI Travel plc, British Airways plc, easyJet Airline Co. Ltd, International Air Transport Association, The Queen v Civil Aviation Authority
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/19
|
Case C-630/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 24 December 2010 — University of Queensland, CSL Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/20
|
Case C-18/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 12 January 2011 — The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Philips Electronics UK Ltd
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/21
|
Case C-33/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Administrative Court (Finland) lodged on 21 January 2011 — A Oy
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/22
|
Case C-36/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Second Chamber (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2011 — Pioneer HI-Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/23
|
Case C-349/09: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 14 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/24
|
Case C-486/09: Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/25
|
Case C-80/10: Order of the President of the Court of 12 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/26
|
Case C-251/10 P: Order of the President of the Court of 9 November 2010 — KEK Diavlos v European Commission
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/27
|
Case C-315/10: Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal)) — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, CSN Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl (Portugal) SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/28
|
Case C-353/10: Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/29
|
Case C-394/10: Order of the President of the Court of 17 November 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/30
|
Case C-398/10: Order of the President of the Court of 3 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2011/C 089/31
|
Case T-33/05: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cetarsa v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market-sharing — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Equal treatment — Principle of proportionality — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Cooperation)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/32
|
Case T-205/07: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Publication on EPSO’s website of a Call for expressions of interest to constitute a database of candidates to be recruited as contractual agents — Publication in three official languages — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 82 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants — Regulation No 1)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/33
|
Case T-157/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2011 — Paroc v OHIM (INSULATE FOR LIFE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark INSULATE FOR LIFE — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Merely confirmatory decision — Partial inadmissibility)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/34
|
Case T-584/08: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Cantiere Navale De Poli v Commission (State aid — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding — Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/35
|
Case T-3/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding — Alteration planned by the Italian authorities to an aid scheme previously authorised by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/36
|
Case T-194/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2011 — Lan Airlines v OHIM — Air Nostrum (LÍNEAS AÉREAS Del MEDITERRÁNEO LAM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LINEAS AEREAS DEL MEDITERRANEO LAM — Earlier Community word and figurative marks LAN — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/37
|
Case T-222/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2011 — Ineos Healthcare v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (ALPHAREN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ALPHAREN — Earlier national word marks ALPHA D3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009))
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/38
|
Case T-299/09 and T-300/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Gühring v OHIM (Combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Examination of the facts of the Court’s own motion — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/39
|
Case T-136/10: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2011 — M v EMA (Action for damages — Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Referral back to the Civil Service Tribunal)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/40
|
Case T-587/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — Interspeed v Commission
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/41
|
Case T-588/10: Action brought on 29 December 2010 — Hellenic Republic v Commission
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/42
|
Case T-2/11: Action brought on 4 January 2011 — Portugal v Commission
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/43
|
Case T-43/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo PTE v Commission
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/44
|
Case T-50/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, black, beige, dark red and light red coloured checked pattern)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/45
|
Case T-56/11: Action brought on 25 January 2011 — SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/46
|
Case T-58/11 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2011 by Michel Nolin against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 December 2010 in Case F-82/09, Nolin v Commission
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/47
|
Case T-59/11: Action brought on 31 January 2011 — ISOTIS v Commission
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/48
|
Case T-61/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Vermop Salmon v OHIM — Leifheit (Clean Twist)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/49
|
Case T-64/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/50
|
Case T-66/11: Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Present Service Ullrich v OHIM — Punt-Nou (babilu)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/51
|
Case T-69/11: Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Truvo Belgium v OHIM — AOL (Truvo)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/52
|
Case T-76/11: Action brought on 2 February 2011 — Spain v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2011/C 089/53
|
Case T-416/06: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2011 — Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2011/C 089/54
|
Case F-60/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 February 2011 — Chiavegato v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
