|
V Announcements
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
2022/C 284/03
|
Case C-353/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de l’Entreprise du Hainaut, division de Charleroi — Belgium) — Skeyes v Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 — Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 — Air traffic service provider — Decision to close airspace — Exercise of public powers — Airspace user — Airlines — Right to appeal against a decision to close airspace — Article 58 TFEU — Freedom to provide services in the field of transport — Articles 16 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom to conduct a business — Right to an effective remedy)
|
6
|
2022/C 284/04
|
Case C-587/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Ligebehandlingsnævnet, acting on behalf of A v HK/Danmark, HK/Privat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 3(1)(a) and (d) — Scope — Post of elected sector convenor of an organisation of workers — Statutes of that organisation under which only members under the age of 60 or 61 on the date of the election are eligible to stand as sector convenor)
|
7
|
2022/C 284/05
|
Case C-589/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — JR v Austrian Airlines AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17(1) — Liability of air carriers for death or injury sustained by passengers — Concept of ‘accident’ causing death or injury — Bodily injury suffered during disembarkation — Article 20 — Exoneration of air carrier from liability — Concept of ‘damage suffered caused or contributed to by the negligence or other wrongful act or omission of that injured passenger’ — Fall of passenger not holding on to the handrail of a mobile disembarkation stairway)
|
7
|
2022/C 284/06
|
Case C-617/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen — Germany) — Proceedings brought by T.N., N.N. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Measures relating to the law on succession — Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Articles 13 and 28 — Validity of the declaration concerning the waiver of succession — Heir resident in a Member State other than that of the court having jurisdiction to rule on the succession — Declaration made before the court of the Member State in which that heir has his or her habitual residence)
|
8
|
2022/C 284/07
|
Case C-43/21: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí, Městská část Ďáblice, Spolek pro Ďáblice (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2010/75/EU — Article 3(9) — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Procedure for amending a permit — Participation of the public concerned — Concept of ‘substantial change’ to the installation — Extension of the duration of operation of a landfill)
|
9
|
2022/C 284/08
|
Case C-112/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X BV v Classic Coach Company vof, Y, Z (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 5 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Article 6(2) — Limitation of the effects of the trade mark — Impossibility for the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent a third party from using, in the course of trade, an earlier right applying in a particular locality — Requirements — Concept of ‘earlier right’ — Trade name — Proprietor of a later trade mark with an even earlier right — Relevance)
|
9
|
2022/C 284/09
|
Case C-122/21: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — Get Fresh Cosmetics Limited v Valstybinė vartotojų teisių apsaugos tarnyba (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 87/357/EEC — Article 1(2) — Scope — Non-food products that may be confused with foodstuffs — Concept — Risk of suffocation, poisoning, or the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract — No presumption of danger — Proof)
|
10
|
2022/C 284/10
|
Case C-196/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov — Romania) — SR v EW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents — Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 — Article 5 — Translation of the document — Translation costs borne by the applicant — Concept of ‘applicant’ — Service, by the court before which proceedings have been brought, of judicial documents on interveners in the proceedings)
|
11
|
2022/C 284/11
|
Case C-299/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 — EM v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — European Parliament — Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 7 — Transfer — Article 12 and Article 12a(3) — Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ — Failure to assign tasks — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Request for assistance — Loss or harm — Compensation)
|
11
|
2022/C 284/12
|
Case C-28/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 12 January 2022 — TL, WE v Getin Noble Bank S.A.
|
12
|
2022/C 284/13
|
Case C-108/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 16 February 2022 — C. Sp. z o.o. (currently in liquidation) v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
|
13
|
2022/C 284/14
|
Case C-114/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 18 February 2022 — Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie v W. Sp. z o.o.
|
13
|
2022/C 284/15
|
Case C-140/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 25 February 2022 — SM, KM v mBank S.A.
|
14
|
2022/C 284/16
|
Case C-146/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 1 March 2022 — YD v Dyrektor Krajowej informacji Skarbowej
|
15
|
2022/C 284/17
|
Case C-225/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Krakowie (Poland) lodged on 31 March 2022 — ‘R’ S.A. v AW ‘T’ sp. z o.o.
|
15
|
2022/C 284/18
|
Case C-258/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2022 — Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung
|
16
|
2022/C 284/19
|
Case C-260/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 19 April 2022 — Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v Corint Media GmbH
|
17
|
2022/C 284/20
|
Case C-264/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa (Portugal) lodged on 20 April 2022 — Fonds de Garantie des Victimes des Actes de Terrorisme et d’Autres Infractions (FGTI) v Victoria Seguros S.A.
|
18
|
2022/C 284/21
|
Case C-297/22 P: Appeal brought on 3 May 2022 by United Parcel Service, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 23 February 2022 in Case T-834/17, United Parcel Service v Commission
|
18
|
2022/C 284/22
|
Case C-330/22: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 16 May 2022 — Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland and the Attorney General
|
19
|
2022/C 284/23
|
Case C-339/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 24 May 2022 — BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v Aktiebolaget Electrolux
|
20
|
|
General Court
|
|
2022/C 284/24
|
Case T-481/17: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking Union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Adoption of a resolution scheme by the SRB in respect of Banco Popular Español — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Right to be heard — Right to property — Obligation to state reasons — Articles 18, 20 and 24 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014)
|
21
|
2022/C 284/25
|
Case T-510/17: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Del Valle Ruíz and Others v Commission and SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking Union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail — Adoption by the SRB of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español — Right to be heard — Delegation of power — Right to property — Obligation to state reasons — Articles 18 and 20 and Article 21(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014)
|
22
|
2022/C 284/26
|
Case T-245/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca v Commission (Safeguard measures — Market for steel products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Threat of serious injury — Manifest error of assessment — Initiation of a safeguard investigation — Competence of the Commission — Rights of the defence)
|
23
|
2022/C 284/27
|
Case T-251/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Wieland-Werke v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for rolled products and pre-rolled strip made of copper and copper alloys — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Commitments — Relevant market — Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence)
|
23
|
2022/C 284/28
|
Case T-296/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Foz v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to pursue an economic activity — Misuse of powers — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial — Determination of listing criteria)
|
24
|
2022/C 284/29
|
Case T-479/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Eurobolt and Others v Commission (Dumping — Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia — Compliance with a judgment of the Court of Justice — Article 266 TFEU — Re-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Non-retroactivity — Effective judicial protection — Principle of good administration — Competence of the author of the act)
|
25
|
2022/C 284/30
|
Case T-577/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Condor; rescue aid) (State aid — German air transport market — Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty — Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group — Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself — Risk of disruption to an important service)
|
25
|
2022/C 284/31
|
Case T-593/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Service of general economic interest — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Rescue aid — Compatibility with the internal market — Period of six months — Extension — Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty — Tax exemption — Advantage — Selective nature — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Excessive duration of the procedure — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of good administration)
|
26
|
2022/C 284/32
|
Case T-601/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Service of general economic interest — Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Interest accrued — Limitation period — New aid — Incompatibility with the internal market — Effects of a cartel on the market — Excessive duration of the procedure — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of good administration)
|
27
|
2022/C 284/33
|
Case T-632/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — OG v EDA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — EDA staff — Vacancy notice — Head of Unit post — Rejection of application — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Transparency — Objectivity — Principle of sound administration — Infringement of the vacancy notice — Manifest error of assessment — Liability — Non-material harm)
|
27
|
2022/C 284/34
|
Case T-723/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Prigozhin v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya — Freezing of funds — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union — Initial inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Errors of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Foreseeability of acts of the European Union)
|
28
|
2022/C 284/35
|
Case T-754/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Cristescu v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Acts contrary to the dignity of the office — Preliminary assessment — Administrative investigation — Mandate entrusted to IDOC — Data protection — Principe of impartiality — Principe of sound administration — Disciplinary procedure — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary penalty of reprimand — Procedural irregularity — Reasonable time — Extenuating circumstances)
|
29
|
2022/C 284/36
|
Case T-253/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Aquino v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Staff Committee of the Parliament — Election of the president of the Staff Committee — Annulment of the election — Liability)
|
29
|
2022/C 284/37
|
Case T-256/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Domator24.com Paweł Nowak v EUIPO — Siwek and Didyk (Armchair) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered community design representing an armchair — Earlier community design — Proof of disclosure — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
|
30
|
2022/C 284/38
|
Case T-316/21: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Worldwide Machinery v EUIPO — Scaip (SUPERIOR MANUFACTURING) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark SUPERIOR MANUFACTURING — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
30
|
2022/C 284/39
|
Case T-435/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — TK v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2020 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 15 — Comparing merits — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)
|
31
|
2022/C 284/40
|
Case T-512/19: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Del Valle Ruiz and Others v SRB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español — No ex post definitive valuation of Banco Popular Español — Lack of direct concern — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
32
|
2022/C 284/41
|
Case T-212/21: Order of the General Court of 19 May 2022 — Groschopp v EUIPO (Sustainability through Quality) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
32
|
2022/C 284/42
|
Case T-248/21: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2022 — Fibrecycle v EUIPO — (BACK-2-NATURE) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
33
|
2022/C 284/43
|
Case T-328/21: Order of the General Court of 2 May 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty — Importer — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Act not of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
|
33
|
2022/C 284/44
|
Case T-331/21: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — mBank v EUIPO — European Merchant Bank (EMBANK European Merchant Bank) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
34
|
2022/C 284/45
|
Case T-374/21: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2022 — documentus Deutschland v EUIPO — Reisswolf (REISSWOLF) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
|
34
|
2022/C 284/46
|
Case T-452/21: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — Thomas Henry v EUIPO (MATE MATE) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
35
|
2022/C 284/47
|
Case T-497/21: Order of the General Court of 10 May 2022 — Girardi v EUIPO (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Representation before EUIPO — Notification of a deficiency in the power to act as a representative before EUIPO — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility)
|
36
|
2022/C 284/48
|
Case T-527/21: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2022 — Abenante and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — EU Digital COVID Certificate — Freedom of movement for persons — Restrictions — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
|
36
|
2022/C 284/49
|
Case T-534/21: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — VP v Cedefop (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Temporary staff — Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period — Decision not to renew — Action for annulment and for damages — Actionable measure — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
37
|
2022/C 284/50
|
Case T-585/21: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Zásilkovna v Commission (State aid — Compensation granted for the provision of the universal service obligation in the postal sector — Complaint — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
|
38
|
2022/C 284/51
|
Case T-586/21: Order of the General Court of 13 May 2022 — Swords v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Refusal of access to documents on the basis of the protection of the purpose of investigations — Confirmatory application — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
38
|
2022/C 284/52
|
Case T-637/21: Order of the General Court of 10 May 2022 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (ART CLASS) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
|
39
|
2022/C 284/53
|
Case T-654/21: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2022 — Eurecna v Commission (Action for annulment — Public supply contracts — EDF — ‘Territorial strategies for innovation (TSI)’ contract — OLAF investigation — Registration in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) database — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
|
40
|
2022/C 284/54
|
Case T-661/21: Order of the General Court of 12 May 2022 — ClientEarth v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Aarhus Convention — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Impact assessment report and other documents relating to a legislative initiative in the environmental field — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
40
|
2022/C 284/55
|
Case T-676/21: Order of the General Court of 10 May 2022 — Target Brands v EUIPO– The a.r.t. company b&s (art class) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
|
41
|
2022/C 284/56
|
Case T-695/21: Order of the General Court of 13 April 2022 — Alauzun and Others v Commission (Action for annulment and for failure to act — Public health — Medicinal products for human use — Conditional marketing authorisation for mRNA-technology vaccines — Lack of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Delay — No invitation to act — Position taken — No interest in bringing proceedings — Lack of direct concern — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility — Request for the Court to issue directions — Lack of jurisdiction)
|
41
|
2022/C 284/57
|
Case T-17/22: Order of the General Court of 2 June 2022 — Tóth v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — OLAF investigation concerning the public lighting activities of Élios Innovatív — Application for access to the final investigation report — Implied refusal of access — Express decision to grant access adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
42
|
2022/C 284/58
|
Case T-193/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — OT v Council (Interim relief — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Application for interim measures — No prima facie case — No urgency)
|
43
|
2022/C 284/59
|
Case T-196/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 3 June 2022 — Mariani v Parliament (Interim measures — Institutional law — Member of Parliament — Exclusion from taking part in election observation delegations of the Parliament — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
|
43
|
2022/C 284/60
|
Case T-268/22: Action brought on 16 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
|
44
|
2022/C 284/61
|
Case T-269/22: Action brought on 16 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
|
44
|
2022/C 284/62
|
Case T-278/22: Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
|
45
|
2022/C 284/63
|
Case T-279/22: Action brought on 17 May 2022 — Biogen Netherlands v Commission
|
46
|
2022/C 284/64
|
Case T-299/22: Action brought on 23 May 2022 — Sattvica v EUIPO — Herederos de Diego Armando Maradona (DIEGO MARADONA)
|
47
|
2022/C 284/65
|
Case T-306/22: Action brought on 24 May 2022 — Fun Factory v EUIPO — I Love You (love you so much)
|
47
|
2022/C 284/66
|
Case T-312/22: Action brought on 25 May 2022 — QC and Others v EUIPO — Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski (RED BRAND CHICKEN)
|
48
|
2022/C 284/67
|
Case T-316/22: Action brought on 27 May 2022 — QC and Others v EUIPO — Przedsiębiorstwo Drobiarskie Grzegorz Wyrębski (BLUE BRAND CHICKEN)
|
49
|
2022/C 284/68
|
Case T-317/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — PF v Parliament
|
50
|
2022/C 284/69
|
Case T-320/22: Action brought on 24 May 2022 — Scania CV v EUIPO (V8)
|
50
|
2022/C 284/70
|
Case T-322/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Unsa Énergie v Commission
|
51
|
2022/C 284/71
|
Case T-324/22: Action brought on 27 May 2022 — Ecoalf Recycled Fabrics v EUIPO (BECAUSE THERE IS NO PLANET B)
|
52
|
2022/C 284/72
|
Case T-325/22: Action brought on 30 May 2022 — Nurel v EUIPO — FKuR Property (Terylene)
|
52
|
2022/C 284/73
|
Case T-327/22: Action brought on 31 May 2022 — PS v EEAS
|
53
|
2022/C 284/74
|
Case T-335/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — Khudaverdyan v Council
|
54
|
2022/C 284/75
|
Case T-336/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — PN v Court of Justice of the European Union
|
55
|
2022/C 284/76
|
Case T-339/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — Chocolates Lacasa Internacional v EUIPO — Esquitino Madrid (Conguitos)
|
55
|
2022/C 284/77
|
Case T-340/22: Action brought on 8 June 2022 — Etablissements Nicolas v EUIPO — St. Nicolaus (NICOLAS)
|
56
|
2022/C 284/78
|
Case T-342/22: Action brought on 9 June 2022 — Oxyzoglou v Commission
|
57
|
2022/C 284/79
|
Case T-343/22: Action brought on 9 June 2022 — Mozelsio v Commission
|
58
|
2022/C 284/80
|
Case T-349/22: Action brought on 10 June 2022 — Hacker-Pschorr Bräu v EUIPO — Vandělíková (HACKER SPACE)
|
59
|
2022/C 284/81
|
Case T-693/21: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — NJ v Commission
|
60
|
2022/C 284/82
|
Case T-803/21: Order of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — NQ v Council and Others
|
60
|
2022/C 284/83
|
Case T-80/22: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — OF v Commission
|
60
|