|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2012/C 126/02
|
Case C-524/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2012 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Common system of value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 296 to 298 — Common flat-rate scheme for farmers — Flat-rate compensation percentage set at nil rate)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/03
|
Case C-596/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 March 2012 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Value Added Tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Application of reduced VAT rates to transactions concerning equidae and in particular to horses)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/04
|
Case C-251/11: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Rennes — France) — Martial Huet v Université de Bretagne occidentale (Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5(1) — Successive fixed-term employment contracts — Measures to prevent the abuse of such contracts — Conversion of the previous fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration — Obligation to reproduce in identical terms the principal clauses of the previous fixed-term contract)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/05
|
Case C-227/11: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem — Netherlands) — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff positions — Network analysers — Classification — Legal value of a classification opinion of the World Customs Organisation)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/06
|
Case C-16/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gyulai Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 13 January 2012 — HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt. v Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/07
|
Case C-33/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 24 January 2012 — Körös-Vidéki Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Igazgatóság v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/08
|
Case C-38/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 26 January 2012 — Felső-Tisza-vidéki Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Igazgatóság v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/09
|
Case C-64/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 8 February 2012 — A. Schlecker, trading under the name, ‘Firma Anton Schlecker’, other party: M.J. Boedeker
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/10
|
Case C-65/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 8 February 2012 — Leidseplein Beheer B.V. and Others, other parties: Red Bull GmbH and Others
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/11
|
Case C-79/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 14 February 2012 — SC Mora IPR SRL v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Directia Județeană pentru Accize și Operațiuni Vamali Sibiu
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/12
|
Case C-81/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 14 February 2012 — Asociația ACCEPT v Consiliul Național pentru Combaterea Discriminării
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/13
|
Case C-83/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Minh Khoa V o
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/14
|
Case C-88/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Roermond (Netherlands), lodged on 20 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Jibril Jaoo
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/15
|
Case C-90/12: Action brought on 21 February 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/16
|
Case C-97/12 P: Appeal brought on 23 February 2012 by Louis Vuitton Malletier against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2011 in Case T-237/10: Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/17
|
Case C-98/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 February 2012 — Wim J. J. Slot v 3 H Camping-Center Heinsberg GmbH
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/18
|
Case C-127/12: Action brought on 7 March 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/19
|
Case C-135/12: Action brought on 9 March 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/20
|
Joined Cases C-328/10 to C-333/10: Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2012 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Sezione Terza (Italy)) — Enipower SpA (C-328/10), ENI SpA (C-329/10), Edison Trading SpA (C-330/10), E.On Produzione SpA (C-331/10), Edipower SpA (C-332/10), E.On Energy Trading SpA (C-333/10) v Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gás (C-328/10 to C-333/10), Cassa Conguaglio per il Settore Elettrico (C-329/10) intervening parties: Terna Rete Elettrica Nazionale SpA (C-328/10, C-329/10, C-331/10 and C-332/10), Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (C-328/10 and C-329/10), Gestore dei Servizi Elettrici SpA (C-331/10)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2012/C 126/21
|
Case T-192/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Comité de défense de la viticulture charentaise v Commission (Competition — Decision rejecting a complaint — No Community interest — Scope of the complaint — Competence of the author of the act — Obligation to state reasons)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/22
|
Case T-288/08: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2012 — Cadila Healthcare v OHIM — Novartis (ZYDUS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ZYDUS — Earlier Community word mark ZIMBUS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/23
|
Case T-379/08: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2012 — Mustang v OHIM — Decathlon (Wavy line) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a figurative Community mark representing a wavy line — Earlier national and international figurative trade marks representing a white wavy line on a black background — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/24
|
Case T-391/08: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia v Commission (State aid — Shipbuilding — Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Misuse of aid)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/25
|
Case T-450/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Coverpla v OHIM — Heinz-Glas (Phial) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a bottle — Prior design — Ground for invalidity — Disclosure of prior design — Absence of novelty — Articles 5 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/26
|
Case T-236/09: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — External service provision for development, studies and support of information systems — Rejection of a tenderer’s bids — Obligation to state reasons — Equal treatment — Transparency — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/27
|
Case T-32/10: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Ella Valley Vineyards v OHIM — HFP (ELLA VALLEY VINEYARDS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ELLA VALLEY VINEYARDS — Earlier national and Community trade marks ELLE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of association — Link between the signs — Reputation — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/28
|
Case T-172/10: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Colas v OHIM — García-Teresa Gárate and Bouffard Vicente (BASE-SEAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark BASE-SEAL — Earlier national figurative marks representing a diamond shape — Earlier national and international figurative marks COLAS — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/29
|
Case T-417/10: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Cortés del Valle López v OHIM (¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA) (Community trade mark — Application for Community figurative mark ¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA — Absolute ground for refusal — Trade mark contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/30
|
Joined Cases T-441/10 P to T-443/10 P: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2012 — Kurrer and Others v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Classification in grade — Transitional rules for classification in grade on recruitment — Article 5(4) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Principle of equal treatment)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/31
|
Case T-207/11: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ISENSE — Earlier national word mark EyeSense — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/32
|
Case T-127/09: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2012 — Abdulrahim v Council and Commission (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Removal of the interested party from the list of persons and entities concerned — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Claim for damages — Causal link — None)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/33
|
Case T-153/10: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2012 — Schneider España de Informática, SA v European Commission (Customs union — Importation of colour television sets assembled in Turkey — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for waiver of post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties and for remission of those duties — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Commission decision rejecting that application — Annulment by the national court of decisions taken by national authorities ordering post-clearance entry of import duties in the accounts — No need to adjudicate)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/34
|
Case T-573/10: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Octapharma Pharmazeutika v EMA (Medicinal products for human use — Changes to a plasma master file (PMF) — Fees payable to the EMA — Act with adverse effects — Measure merely confirmatory — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/35
|
Case T-126/11 P: Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Social security — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Act adversely affecting an official — Implied refusal — Duty to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/36
|
Case T-183/11: Order of the General Court of 27 February 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Jacinto (My Little Bear) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Expiry of the earlier national mark — Action devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/37
|
Case T-531/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — Hamas v Council
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/38
|
Case T-84/12: Action brought on 31 January 2012 — Uspaskich v Parliament
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/39
|
Case T-89/12: Action brought on 17 February 2012 — Repsol YPF v OHIM — Ajuntament de Roses (R)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/40
|
Case T-91/12: Action brought on 23 February 2012 — Flying Holding and Others v Commission
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/41
|
Case T-92/12: Action brought on 23 February 2012 — Gas v OHIM — Grotto (GAS)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/42
|
Case T-93/12: Action brought on 23 February 2012 — Gas v OHIM — Grotto (BLUE JEANS GAS)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/43
|
Case T-95/12 P: Appeal brought on 28 February 2012 by Willem Stols against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 December 2011 in Case F-51/08 RENV Stols v Council
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/44
|
Case T-109/12: Action brought on 7 March 2012 — Spain v Commission
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/45
|
Case T-110/12: Action brought on 27 February 2012 — Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction v Council
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/46
|
Case T-111/12: Action brought on 7 March 2012 — Spain v Commission
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/47
|
Case T-116/12: Action brought on 12 March 2012 — Tioxide Europe and Others v Council
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2012/C 126/48
|
Case F-11/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 February 2012 — Bouillez and Others v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 promotion exercise — Refusal of promotion — Consideration of comparative merits of officials in the AST function group following their career stream — Obligation on an institution not to apply a provision giving effect to the Staff Regulations which is tainted by illegality)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/49
|
Case F-23/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 February 2012 — AY v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 promotion exercise — Consideration of comparative merits — Failure to take into account further training and certification — Error of law)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/50
|
Case F-3/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 February 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Accident — Request for a document to be placed on the accident file — Request refused — Measure not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/51
|
Case F-31/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 March 2012 — BI v Cedefop (Civil service — Time-limit for bringing proceedings — Language of rejection of complaint)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/52
|
Case F-102/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/53
|
Case F-47/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9 February 2012 — Zur Oven-Krockhaus v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/54
|
Case F-53/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 January 2012 — Kedzierski v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 126/55
|
Case F-96/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 February 2012 — Makaronidis v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
