Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2009 — Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-230/01 to T-232/01 and T-267/01 to T-269/01) (1)

(State aid - Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State - Reduction of the tax base for corporation tax - Decisions declaring aid schemes incompatible with the common market and requiring recovery of aid paid out - Trade association - Admissibility - Withdrawal of a plea in law - Classification as new aid or as existing aid - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Principle of legal certainty - Principle of proportionality)

2009/C 256/34

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants in Case T-230/01: Territorio Histórico de Álava — Diputación Foral de Álava (Spain); and Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco (Spain) (represented initially by: R. Falcón Tella, and subsequently by M. Morales Isasi and I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández, lawyers)

Applicants in Case T-231/01: Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya — Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (Spain); and Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco (represented initially by: R. Falcón Tella, and subsequently by M. Morales Isasi and I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández, lawyers)

Applicants in Case T-232/01: Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa — Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa (Spain); and Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco (represented initially by: R. Falcón Tella, and subsequently by M. Morales Isasi and I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández, lawyers)

Applicant in Cases T-267/01 to T-269/01: Confederación Empresarial Vasca (Confebask) (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: M. Araujo Boyd, L. Ortiz Blanco and V. Sopeña Blanco, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: J. Buendía Sierra, and subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants in Case T-230/01: Cámara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Álava (Spain) (represented by: I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández and M. Morales Isasi, lawyers); and Confederación Empresarial Vasca (Confebask) (Bilbao) (represented initially by: M. Araujo Boyd and R. Sanz, and subsequently by Araujo Boyd, L. Ortiz Blanco and V. Sopeña Blanco, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the applicants in Case T-231/01: Cámara Oficial de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Vizcaya (Spain) (represented by: I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández and M. Morales Isasi, lawyers); and Confederación Empresarial Vasca (Confebask) (Bilbao) (represented initially by: M. Araujo Boyd and R. Sanz, and subsequently by Araujo Boyd, L. Ortiz Blanco and V. Sopeña Blanco, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the applicants in Case T-232/01: Cámara Oficial de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Guipúzcoa (Spain) (represented by: I. Sáenz-Cortabarría Fernández and M. Morales Isasi, lawyers); and Confederación Empresarial Vasca (Confebask) (Bilbao) (represented initially by: M. Araujo Boyd and R. Sanz, and subsequently by Araujo Boyd, L. Ortiz Blanco and V. Sopeña Blanco, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Comunidad Autónoma de la Rioja (Spain) (represented initially by: A. Bretón Rodríguez, J. Criado Gámez and I. Serrano Blanco, lawyers)

Re:

Application in Cases T-230/01 and T-267/01 for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/892/EC of 11 July 2001 on the State aid scheme applied by Spain to certain newly established firms in Álava (OJ 2002 L 314, p. 1); application in Cases T-231/01 and T-268/01 for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/806/EC of 11 July 2001 on the State aid scheme applied by Spain to certain newly established firms in Vizcaya (OJ 2002 L 279, p. 35), and application in Cases T-232/01 and T-269/01 for annulment of the Commission decision 2002/894/EC of 11 July 2001 on the State aid scheme applied by Spain to certain newly established firms in Guipúzcoa (OJ 2002 L 174, p. 31).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

(1)  OJ C 348, 8.12.2001.