|
6.10.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 235/21 |
Action brought on 2 August 2007 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-298/07)
(2007/C 235/39)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Form of order sought
|
— |
annul Memorandum No 04980 of 22 May 2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands, concerning payments made by the Commission which differ from the amount requested; Ref. DOCUP Ob. 2 ‘Lazio’ 2000-2006 (No CCI 2000 IT 16 2DO 009); |
|
— |
annul Memorandum No 05108 of 25 May 2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands, concerning certification of the intermediate statement of expenses and claim for payment; Ref. DOCUP Veneto Ob. 2 2000-2006 (No CCI 2000 IT 16 2DO 005); |
|
— |
annul Memorandum No 05452 of 4 June 2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands, concerning payments made by the Commission which differ from the amount requested; Ref. DOCUP Piemonte 2000-2006 (No CCI 2000 IT 16 2DO 007); |
|
— |
annul Memorandum No 05665 of 8 June 2007 of the European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy — Programmes and projects in Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta and the Netherlands, concerning payments made by the Commission which differ from the amount requested; Ref. Regional operational programme ‘Campania’ 2000-2006 (No CCI 1999 IT 16 1PO 007); |
|
— |
annul all connected and prior acts and, consequently, order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-345/04 Italian Republic v Commission (1).
(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004, p. 55.