|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2010/C 161/02
|
Case C-92/07: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Standstill and non-discrimination rules — Obligation to pay charges in order to obtain or extend a residence permit — Proportionality of the charges to be paid — Comparison with charges paid by citizens of the Union — Article 9 of the Association Agreement — Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol — Articles 10(1) and 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council)
|
2
|
|
2010/C 161/03
|
Case C-246/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 April 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Articles 10 EC and 300(1) EC — Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants — Unilateral proposal by a Member State to list a substance in Annexe A to that convention)
|
3
|
|
2010/C 161/04
|
Case C-423/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 93/37/EEC — Articles 3 and 11 — Public works concession contracts — Obligations regarding advertising — Extent of the obligations — Contract notice — Description of the object of the concession and of the location of the works — Additional works not expressly set out in the contract notice or in the tender specifications — Principle of equal treatment)
|
3
|
|
2010/C 161/05
|
Case C-160/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Public service contracts — Articles 43 EC and 49 EC — Directives 92/50/EEC and 2004/18/EC — Public emergency services — Emergency ambulance and qualified patient transport services — Obligation of transparency — Article 45 EC — Activities connected with the exercise of official authority — Article 86(2) EC — Services of general economic interest)
|
4
|
|
2010/C 161/06
|
Case C-230/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Dansk Transport og Logistik v Skatteministeriet (Community Customs Code — Articles 202, 215(1) and (3), 217(1) and point (d) of the first paragraph of Article 233 — Notion of goods which are ‘seized and simultaneously or subsequently confiscated’ — Regulation implementing the Customs Code — Article 867a — Directive 92/12/EEC — Articles 5(1) and (2), 6, 7(1), 8 and 9 — Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 7, 10(3) and 16(1) — Unlawful introduction of goods — Transport of goods with a TIR carnet — Seizure and destruction — Determination of the Member State in which the customs debt is incurred and VAT and excise duty become chargeable — Extinction of the customs and tax debt)
|
4
|
|
2010/C 161/07
|
Case C-265/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Federutility, Assogas, Libarna Gas SpA, Collino Commercio SpA, Sadori Gas SpA, Egea Commerciale, E.On Vendita Srl, Sorgenia SpA v Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas (Directive 2003/55/EC — Internal market in natural gas — State intervention on the price for the supply of natural gas after 1 July 2007 — Public service obligations of undertakings operating in the gas sector)
|
6
|
|
2010/C 161/08
|
Case C-340/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the House of Lords — United Kingdom) — The Queen, M and Others v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Article 2(2) — Prohibition of making funds available to the persons listed in Annex I to that regulation — Scope — Social security and social assistance benefits paid to the spouse of a person included in Annex I)
|
6
|
|
2010/C 161/09
|
Case C-346/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2010 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2001/80/EC — Pollution and nuisance — Combustion plants — Limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air — Directive not applied to the Lynemouth power plant (United Kingdom))
|
7
|
|
2010/C 161/10
|
Case C-446/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Solgar Vitamin’s France, Valorimer SARL, Christian Fenioux, L’Arbre de Vie SARL, Source Claire, Nord Plantes EURL, RCS Distribution, Ponroy Santé, Syndicat de la Diététique et des Compléments Alimentaires v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Emploi, Ministre de la Santé, de la Jeunesse et des Sports, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche (Directive 2002/46/EC — Approximation of laws of the Member States relating to food supplements — Vitamins and minerals which may be used in the manufacture of food supplements — Maximum amounts — Harmonisation at European Union level — None — Competence of the Member States — Rules to be complied with and criteria to take into consideration when setting those amounts — National legislation setting those amounts — Setting the amount at zero)
|
8
|
|
2010/C 161/11
|
Case C-486/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Innsbruck — Austria) — Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v Land Tirol (Social policy — Framework agreements on part-time work and on fixed-term work — Disadvantageous provisions provided for by national legislation for contractual public servants working part-time, on a casual basis, or under a fixed term contract — Principle of equal treatment)
|
9
|
|
2010/C 161/12
|
Case C-510/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Vera Mattner v Finanzamt Velbert (Free movement of capital — Articles 56 EC and 58 EC — Gift tax — Land on which a building has been constructed — Allowance to be set against the taxable value — Different treatment of residents and non-residents)
|
10
|
|
2010/C 161/13
|
Joined Cases C-536/08 and C-539/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X (C-536/08), fiscale eenheid Facet BV/Facet Trading BV (C-539/08) (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 17(2) and (3) — Article 28b(A)(2) — Right to deduction — Transitional arrangements for the taxation of trade between Member States — Place of the intra-Community acquisitions of goods)
|
10
|
|
2010/C 161/14
|
Case C-62/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry v Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 94 — Financial inducements to medical practices which prescribe certain medicinal products to their patients — Public health authorities — Doctors — Freedom to prescribe)
|
11
|
|
2010/C 161/15
|
Case C-82/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Dimos Agiou Nikolaou Kritis v Ipourgos Agrotikis Anaptixis kai Trofimon (Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 — Monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the European Union — Definitions — Terms ‘forest’ and ‘other wooded land’ — Field of application)
|
11
|
|
2010/C 161/16
|
Case C-102/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze — Italy) — Camar Srl v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (International agreements — Yaoundé Convention — Fourth ACP-EEC Lomé Convention — Standstill clause — Internal taxation — Bananas)
|
12
|
|
2010/C 161/17
|
Case C-122/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece)) — Enosi Efopliston Aktoploïas and Others v Ipourgos Emporikis Naftilias, Ipourgos Aigaiou (Maritime transport — Maritime cabotage — Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 — Temporary exemption from the implementation of that regulation — Obligation on Member States to refrain from adopting, before expiry of the period of exemption, provisions liable seriously to compromise the application of that regulation)
|
12
|
|
2010/C 161/18
|
Case C-123/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — Roeckl Sporthandschuhe GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt München (Common Customs Tariff — Tariff headings — Combined nomenclature classification of riding gloves — Heading 3926 — Heading 6116)
|
13
|
|
2010/C 161/19
|
Case C-124/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Smit Reizen BV v Minister van Verkeer en Waterstaat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulations (EEC) Nos 3820/85 and 3821/85 — Road transport — Obligation to record — Rest periods and other periods of work — Time spent in travelling to the place where a vehicle fitted with recording equipment is taken over — Meaning of ‘operating centre’)
|
13
|
|
2010/C 161/20
|
Case C-374/09 P: Appeal brought on 23 September 2009 by Constantin Hârsulescu against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 22 July 2009 in Case T-234/09 Hârsulescu v Romania
|
14
|
|
2010/C 161/21
|
Case C-109/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 March 2010 by Solvay SA against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber) on 17 December 2009 in Case T-57/01 Solvay v Commission
|
14
|
|
2010/C 161/22
|
Case C-110/10 P: Appeal brought on 1 March 2010 by Solvay SA against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber) on 17 December 2009 in Case T-58/01 Solvay v Commission
|
16
|
|
2010/C 161/23
|
Case C-124/10 P: Appeal brought on 8 March 2010 by the Commission against the judgment delivered on 15 December 2009 in Case T-156/04 Électricité de France (EDF) v Commission
|
16
|
|
2010/C 161/24
|
Case C-125/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany) lodged on 9 March 2010 — Merck & Co Inc v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
|
17
|
|
2010/C 161/25
|
Case C-134/10: Action brought on 15 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
|
18
|
|
2010/C 161/26
|
Case C-136/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curte de Apel Târgu-Mureș (Romania) lodged on 15 March 2010 — Daniel Ionel Obreja v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu
|
18
|
|
2010/C 161/27
|
Case C-140/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 17 March 2010 — Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens
|
19
|
|
2010/C 161/28
|
Case C-141/10: Action brought on 16 March 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands
|
19
|
|
2010/C 161/29
|
Case C-148/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Brussel, lodged on 29 March 2010 — Express Line NV v Belgisch Instituut voor Postdiensten en Telecommunicatie
|
20
|
|
2010/C 161/30
|
Case C-150/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 29 March 2010 — Bureau d’Intervention et de Restitution Belge (BIRB) v Beneo Orafti SA
|
21
|
|
2010/C 161/31
|
Case C-151/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen — Afdeling Hasselt (Belgium), lodged on 31 March 2010 — Dai Cugini NV v Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid
|
22
|
|
2010/C 161/32
|
Case C-155/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom made on 2 April 2010 — Williams and others v British Airways plc
|
23
|
|
2010/C 161/33
|
Case C-158/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad Van State (Netherlands), lodged on 6 April 2010 — Johan van Leendert Holding BV v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
|
24
|
|
2010/C 161/34
|
Case C-159/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Gerhard Fuchs v Land Hessen
|
24
|
|
2010/C 161/35
|
Case C-160/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Peter Köhler v Land Hessen
|
26
|
|
2010/C 161/36
|
Case C-162/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Ireland made on 7 April 2010 — Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd v Ireland and the Attorney General
|
28
|
|
2010/C 161/37
|
Case C-163/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Isernia (Italy) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Aldo Patriciello
|
28
|
|
2010/C 161/38
|
Case C-164/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio (Italy) lodged on 2 April 2010 — Emanuele Ferazzoli v Ministero dell’Interno
|
29
|
|
2010/C 161/39
|
Case C-165/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Cosmia Barberio v Ministero dell’Interno
|
29
|
|
2010/C 161/40
|
Case C-166/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Patrizia Banchetti v Ministero dell’Interno
|
30
|
|
2010/C 161/41
|
Case C-167/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Andrea Palomba v Ministero dell’Interno
|
30
|
|
2010/C 161/42
|
Case C-168/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Michele Fanelli v Ministero dell’Interno
|
30
|
|
2010/C 161/43
|
Case C-169/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Sandra Castronovo v Ministero dell’Interno
|
31
|
|
2010/C 161/44
|
Case C-170/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Mirko De Filippo v Ministero dell'Interno
|
31
|
|
2010/C 161/45
|
Case C-171/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Andrea Sacripanti v Ministero dell’Interno
|
32
|
|
2010/C 161/46
|
Case C-172/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Emiliano Orru' v Ministero dell’Interno
|
32
|
|
2010/C 161/47
|
Case C-173/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Fabrizio Cariulo v Ministero dell’Interno
|
32
|
|
2010/C 161/48
|
Case C-174/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Paola Tonachella v Ministero dell’Interno
|
33
|
|
2010/C 161/49
|
Case C-175/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Pietro Calogero v Ministero dell’Interno
|
33
|
|
2010/C 161/50
|
Case C-176/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Danilo Spina v Ministero dell’Interno
|
34
|
|
2010/C 161/51
|
Case C-178/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș (Romania) lodged on 17 March 2010 — Ministerul Finanțelor și Economiei, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Mureș, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Mureș v SC Darmi SRL
|
34
|
|
2010/C 161/52
|
Case C-179/10: Action brought on 9 April 2010 — European Commission v France
|
35
|
|
2010/C 161/53
|
Case C-188/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 16 April 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Aziz Melki
|
35
|
|
2010/C 161/54
|
Case C-189/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 16 April 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Sélim Abdeli
|
36
|
|
2010/C 161/55
|
Case C-191/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 19 April 2010 — Rastelli Davide et C. v Jean-Charles Hidoux, in his capacity as liquidator appointed by the court for Médiasucre International
|
36
|
|
2010/C 161/56
|
Case C-196/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 22 April 2010 — Paderborner Brauerei Haus Cramer KG v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
|
37
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2010/C 161/57
|
Jointed Cases T-303/06 and T-337/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — UniCredito Italiano v OHIM — Union Investment Privatfonds (UNIWEB) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for Community word marks UNIWEB and UniCredit Wealth Management — Earlier national word marks UNIFONDS and UNIRAK and earlier national figurative mark UNIZINS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
38
|
|
2010/C 161/58
|
Case T-392/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Union Investment Privatfonds v OHIM — Unicre-Cartão International De Crédito (unibanco) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for the figurative Community mark unibanco — Prior national figurative marks UniFLEXIO, UniVARIO and UniZERO — Late production of documents — Discretion conferred by Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
38
|
|
2010/C 161/59
|
Case T-388/07: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2010 — Comune di Napoli v Commission (ERDF — Reduction in assistance — Urban pilot project for the development of a telematic network for the city of Naples — Notion of ‘irregularity’ — Eligible expenses)
|
39
|
|
2010/C 161/60
|
Case T-109/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Freixenet v OHIM (Shape of a frosted white bottle) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark representing a frosted white bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
|
39
|
|
2010/C 161/61
|
Case T-110/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Freixenet v OHIM (Shape of a frosted black matt bottle) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark representing a frosted black matt bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
|
40
|
|
2010/C 161/62
|
Case T-586/08: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2010 — Kerma v OHIM (BIOPIETRA) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark BIOPIETRA — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
40
|
|
2010/C 161/63
|
Case T-22/09: Judgment of the General Court of 15 April 2010 — Katjes Fassin v OHIM (shape of a panda face) (Community trade mark — Refusal of registration by the examiner — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to rule)
|
40
|
|
2010/C 161/64
|
Case T-18/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 30 April 2010 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council (Applications for interim measures — Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 — Trade in seal products — Ban on import and sale — Exception in favour of Inuit communities — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Admissibility — Prima facie case — No urgency)
|
41
|
|
2010/C 161/65
|
Case T-103/10 P (R): Order of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Parliament v U (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Dismissal decision — Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union in an application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)
|
41
|
|
2010/C 161/66
|
Case T-429/09: Action brought on 21 October 2009 — Campailla v Commission
|
42
|
|
2010/C 161/67
|
Case T-510/09 P: Appeal brought on 12 April 2010 by V against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 21 October 2009 in Case F-33/08 V v Commission
|
42
|
|
2010/C 161/68
|
Case T-15/10: Action brought on 25 January 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission
|
43
|
|
2010/C 161/69
|
Case T-154/10: Action brought on 2 April 2010 — France v European Commission
|
43
|
|
2010/C 161/70
|
Case T-158/10: Action brought on 9 April 2010 — Dow Chemical v Council
|
44
|
|
2010/C 161/71
|
Case T-159/10: Action brought on 9 April 2010 — Air France v OHIM (Representation of a parallelogram)
|
45
|
|
2010/C 161/72
|
Case T-162/10: Action brought on 13 April 2010 — Niki Luftfahrt GmbH v Commission
|
45
|
|
2010/C 161/73
|
Case T-163/10: Action brought on 7 April 2010 — Entegris v OHIM — Optimize Technologies (OPTIMIZE TECHNOLOGIES)
|
46
|
|
2010/C 161/74
|
Case T-164/10: Action brought on 13 April 2010 — Pioneer Hi-Bred International v Commission
|
46
|
|
2010/C 161/75
|
Case T-167/10: Action brought on 7 April 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
|
47
|
|
2010/C 161/76
|
Case T-168/10: Action brought on 15 April 2010 — Commission v SEMEA
|
48
|
|
2010/C 161/77
|
Case T-170/10: Action brought on 19 April 2010 — CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice
|
48
|
|
2010/C 161/78
|
Case T-172/10: Action brought on 8 April 2010 — Colas v OHIM — García-Teresa Gárate (BASE-SEAL)
|
49
|
|
2010/C 161/79
|
Case T-175/10: Action brought on 15 April 2010 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO)
|
50
|
|
2010/C 161/80
|
Case T-176/10: Action brought on 15 April 2010 — Seven v OHIM — Seven For All Mankind (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND)
|
50
|
|
2010/C 161/81
|
Case T-177/10: Action brought on 19 April 2010 — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission
|
51
|
|
2010/C 161/82
|
Case T-178/10: Action brought on 21 April 2010 — Spain v Commission
|
52
|
|
2010/C 161/83
|
Case T-179/10: Action brought on 21 April 2010 — Zitro IP v OHIM — Show Ball Informática (BINGO SHOWALL)
|
53
|
|
2010/C 161/84
|
Case T-180/10: Action brought on 16 April 2010 — Nickel Institute v Commission
|
53
|
|
2010/C 161/85
|
Case T-182/10: Action brought on 19 April 2010 — AISCAT v Commission
|
54
|
|
2010/C 161/86
|
Case T-188/10: Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2010 — DTL v OHIM — Gestión de Recursos y Soluciones Empresariales (Solaria)
|
55
|
|
2010/C 161/87
|
Case T-190/10: Action brought on 22 April 2010 — Egan and Hackett v Parliament
|
55
|
|
2010/C 161/88
|
Case T-200/10: Action brought on 29 April 2010 — Avery Dennison Corp. v OHIM — Dennison Hesperia (AVERY DENNISON)
|
56
|
|
2010/C 161/89
|
Case T-109/04: Order of the General Court of 16 April 2010 — DB Schenker Rail Deutschland v Commission
|
56
|
|
2010/C 161/90
|
Case T-511/08: Order of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Unity OSG FZE v Council
|
56
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2010/C 161/91
|
Case F-19/10: Action brought on 29 March 2010 — Marsili v Commission
|
57
|
|
2010/C 161/92
|
Case F-21/10: Action brought on 31 March 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission
|
57
|
|
2010/C 161/93
|
Case F-23/10: Action brought on 16 April 2010 — Allen v Commission
|
58
|
|
2010/C 161/94
|
Case F-24/10: Action brought on 21 April 2010 — Kaskarelis v Commission
|
58
|
|
2010/C 161/95
|
Case F-25/10: Action brought on 28 April 2010 — AG(*) v Parliament
|
58
|
