|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2020/C 61/02
|
Case C-16/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Michael Dobersberger v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 56 and 57 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Directive 96/71/EC — Applicability — Article 1(3)(a) — Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services — Provision of services on board international trains — National rules imposing administrative obligations in relation to the posting of workers)
|
2
|
|
2020/C 61/03
|
Case C-168/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — Pensions-Sicherungs-Verein VVaG v Günther Bauer (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Directive 2008/94/EC — Article 8 — Supplementary pension schemes — Protection of entitlement to old-age benefits — Minimum guaranteed level of protection — Former employer’s obligation to offset a reduction in an occupational old-age pension — External pension institution — Direct effect)
|
3
|
|
2020/C 61/04
|
Case C-176/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Club de Variedades Vegetales Protegidas v Adolfo Juan Martínez Sanchís (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community plant variety rights — Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Article 13(2) and (3) — Effects of community plant variety rights — Cumulative protection scheme — Planting of variety constituents and harvesting the fruit — Distinction between acts effected in respect of variety constituents and those concerning harvested material — Concept of ‘unauthorised use of variety constituents’ — Article 95 — Provisional protection)
|
4
|
|
2020/C 61/05
|
Case C-263/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag — Netherlands) — Nederlands Uitgeversverbond, Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV, Tom Kabinet Holding BV, Tom Kabinet Uitgeverij BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) — Right of communication to the public — Making available — Article 4 — Distribution right — Exhaustion — Electronic books (e-books) — Virtual market for ‘second-hand’ e-books)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 61/06
|
Case C-360/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar sector — Production levy — Effectiveness — Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid — Applicability of national rules on limitation periods — Principle of effectiveness)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 61/07
|
Case C-386/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Coöperatieve Producentenorganisatie en Beheersgroep Texel UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulations (EU) Nos 1303/2013, 1379/2013 and 508/2014 — Fishery and aquaculture producer organisations — Production and marketing plans — Financial support for the preparation and implementation of those plans — Conditions of eligibility of costs — Discretion of the Member States — No possibility under national law to apply for financial support)
|
6
|
|
2020/C 61/08
|
Case C-389/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Brussels Securities SA v État Belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 90/435/EEC — Prevention of double taxation — First indent of Article 4(1) — Prohibition on taxing profits received — Inclusion of the dividend distributed by the subsidiary in the parent company’s tax base — Deduction of the dividend distributed from the parent company’s tax base and the indefinite carrying forward of the surplus to the following tax years — The order in which tax deductions on profits are to be applied — Loss of a tax advantage)
|
7
|
|
2020/C 61/09
|
Case C-390/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de grande instance de Paris — France) — Criminal proceedings against X (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/31/EC — Information society services — Directive 2006/123/EC — Services — Connection of hosts, whether businesses or individuals, with accommodation to rent with persons seeking that type of accommodation — Qualification — National legislation imposing certain restrictions on the exercise of the profession of real estate agent — Directive 2000/31/EC — Article 3(4)(b), second indent — Obligation to give notification of measures restricting the freedom to provide information society services — Failure to give notification — Enforceability — Criminal proceedings with an ancillary civil action)
|
8
|
|
2020/C 61/10
|
Case C-442/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — European Central Bank v Espírito Santo Financial (Portugal), SGPS, SA (Appeal — Refusal to grant access to decisions of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) — Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the ECB — Article 10.4 — Confidentiality of the proceedings of meetings — Outcome of deliberations — Possibility of disclosure — Decision 2004/258/EC — Access to ECB documents — Article 4(1)(a) — Confidentiality of proceedings — Undermining of the protection of the public interest)
|
9
|
|
2020/C 61/11
|
Case C-447/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovak Republic) — UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State)
|
10
|
|
2020/C 61/12
|
Joined Cases C-477/18 and C-478/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Exportslachterij J. Gosschalk en Zn. BV (C-477/18), Compaxo Vlees Zevenaar BV, Ekro BV, Vion Apeldoorn BV, Vitelco BV (C-478/18) v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 — Article 27(1) and (4) — Points 1 and 2 of Annex VI — Official controls on feed and food — Financing — Fees payable in relation to official controls — Calculation — Definition of ‘staff involved in the official controls’ — Inclusion of administrative and support staff — Possibility of charging for quarter-hour periods requested by the slaughterhouse for the purposes of official controls but not worked — Conditions)
|
11
|
|
2020/C 61/13
|
Case C-523/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Engie Cartagena SL v Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica, formerly Ministerio de Industria, Energía y Turismo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Common rules — Directive 2003/54/EC — Article 3(2) — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3(2) — Public service obligations — Meaning — National rules — Financing of energy efficiency plans — Designation of electricity generating undertakings — Mandatory contribution)
|
12
|
|
2020/C 61/14
|
Case C-532/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — GN, represented for legal purposes by HM v ZU, acting as administrator in the insolvency of Niki Luftfahrt GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Montreal Convention — Article 17(1) — Air carrier liability in the event of accidents — Concept of ‘accident’ — Aircraft in flight — Spillage of a cup of coffee placed on the tray table of a seat — Bodily injuries caused to the passenger)
|
13
|
|
2020/C 61/15
|
Case C-582/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — Viscas Corp. v European Commission and Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Determining the relative weight of the European and non-European members in the cartel — Participation of European undertakings in the cartel at several levels — Principle of equal treatment)
|
13
|
|
2020/C 61/16
|
Case C-589/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd v European Commission, Viscas Corp. (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Determination of the value of sales — Principle of equal treatment)
|
14
|
|
2020/C 61/17
|
Case C-590/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — Fujikura Ltd v European Commission, Viscas Corp. (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Determination of the relative weight of the European and non-European participants in the cartel — Participation of European undertakings at several levels of the cartel — Principle of equal treatment)
|
15
|
|
2020/C 61/18
|
Case C-666/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — IT Development SAS v Free Mobile SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Legal protection of computer programs — Directive 2009/24/EC — Software licence agreement — Unauthorised modification of the source code of a computer program by a licensee in breach of the licence agreement — Action for infringement brought by the author of the program against the licensee — Nature of the applicable liability regime)
|
15
|
|
2020/C 61/19
|
Case C-715/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven eV v Finanzamt Cuxhaven (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98 — Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services — Point 12 of Annex III — Reduced rate of VAT applicable to the letting of places on camping or caravan sites — Question of whether that reduced rate is applicable to the letting of boat moorings in a marina — Comparison with the letting of premises and sites for the parking of vehicles — Equal treatment — Principle of fiscal neutrality)
|
16
|
|
2020/C 61/20
|
Case C-752/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Germany) — Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality)
|
17
|
|
2020/C 61/21
|
Case C-696/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Mr Andreas Hauzenberger against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 11 July 2019 in Case T-349/18, Andreas Hauzenberger v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
|
17
|
|
2020/C 61/22
|
Case C-855/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 22 November 2019 — G. Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy
|
18
|
|
2020/C 61/23
|
Case C-866/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 27 November 2019 — SC v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych I Oddział w Warszawie Wydział Realizacji Umów Międzynarodowych
|
19
|
|
2020/C 61/24
|
Case C-903/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 10 December 2019 — DQ v Ministre de la transition écologique et solidaire, Ministre de l’action et des comptes publics
|
20
|
|
2020/C 61/25
|
Case C-906/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 11 December 2019 — FO v Ministère public
|
21
|
|
2020/C 61/26
|
Case C-911/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 13 December 2019 — Fédération bancaire française (FBF) v Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR)
|
21
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2020/C 61/27
|
Case T-812/14 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — BPC Lux 2 and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by the Portuguese authorities for the resolution of the financial institution Banco Espírito Santo — Creation and capitalisation of a Bridge Bank — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Lack of standing — Inadmissibility)
|
23
|
|
2020/C 61/28
|
Case T-14/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Greece v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Decoupled direct aid — Flat-rate financial correction — Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 12 of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 — Obligation to state reasons — Assessment of the damage — Proportionality)
|
24
|
|
2020/C 61/29
|
Case T-67/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Probelte v Commission (Plant protection products — Active substance 8-hydroxyquinoline — Request for amendment of the conditions of approval — Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling — Right to be heard — Legitimate expectations — Manifest error of assessment)
|
24
|
|
2020/C 61/30
|
Case T-211/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Vanda Pharmaceuticals v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fanaptum — iloperidone — Commission refusal decision — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Equal treatment)
|
25
|
|
2020/C 61/31
|
Case T-457/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Zotkov v Commission (Civil Service — Contractual agents — Remuneration — Family benefits — Request to treat a person as a dependent child — Conditions of grant — Factors to take into account in the calculation of maintenance expenditure — Error in law)
|
26
|
|
2020/C 61/32
|
Case T-501/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Currency One v EUIPO — Cinkciarz.pl (CINKCIARZ) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark CINKCIARZ — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Pejorative term relating to the goods or services at issue)
|
27
|
|
2020/C 61/33
|
Case T-509/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Czech Republic v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Applicable time periods between multiple visits by the national control authorities — Announcement of on-the-spot checks — Implied notice — Articles 25 and 26 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 — Flat rate financial correction)
|
27
|
|
2020/C 61/34
|
Case T-589/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Vins el Cep v EUIPO — Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien (MIM NATURA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark MIM NATURA — Earlier international word and figurative registrations MM and MM and earlier national word mark MUMM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
28
|
|
2020/C 61/35
|
Case T-624/18: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Gres de Aragón v EUIPO (GRES ARAGÓN) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law)
|
29
|
|
2020/C 61/36
|
Case T-647/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — ZQ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of the request — Reasonable time — Absence of prima facie evidence — Obligation to state reasons — Liability)
|
30
|
|
2020/C 61/37
|
Case T-690/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Vieta Audio (Vita) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Vita — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Res judicata)
|
30
|
|
2020/C 61/38
|
Case T-729/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Lloyd Shoes (LLOYD) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark LLOYD — Earlier EU figurative mark LLOYD’S — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
31
|
|
2020/C 61/39
|
Case T-743/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Japan Tobacco v EUIPO — I.J. Tobacco Industry (I.J. TOBACCO INDUSTRY) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark I.J. TOBACCO INDUSTRY — Earlier EU figurative mark JTi — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
32
|
|
2020/C 61/40
|
Case T-28/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Karlovarské minerální vody v EUIPO — Aguas de San Martín de Veri (VERITEA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark VERITEA — Earlier EU word mark VERI — AGUA PURA DEL PIRINEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)
|
33
|
|
2020/C 61/41
|
Case T-40/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Amigüitos pets & life v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect — Earlier EU word mark ONE — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
33
|
|
2020/C 61/42
|
Case T-54/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO (BIANCOFINO) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark BIANCOFINO — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
34
|
|
2020/C 61/43
|
Case T-69/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Südwestdeutsche Salzwerke v EUIPO (Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
35
|
|
2020/C 61/44
|
Case T-175/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft v EUIPO (eVoter) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark eVoter — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
36
|
|
2020/C 61/45
|
Case T-270/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Amazon Technologies v EUIPO (ring) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ring — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
36
|
|
2020/C 61/46
|
Case T-188/16: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — repowermap.org v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Work mark REPOWER — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
37
|
|
2020/C 61/47
|
Case T-394/18: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2019 — Kipper v Commission (Independent service provider for the Commission (free-lance) — Application for social benefits granted to officials in category B — Lack of jurisdiction)
|
38
|
|
2020/C 61/48
|
Case T-756/18: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — AG v Europol (Action for annulment — Civil service — Decision (EU) 2015/1889 on the dissolution of the Europol pension fund — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility)
|
38
|
|
2020/C 61/49
|
Case T-763/18: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Allegedly unlawful aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market — Time limit for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Knowledge acquired — Proof — Duty of diligence — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
|
39
|
|
2020/C 61/50
|
Case T-12/19: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Nowhere v EUIPO — Junguo Ye (APE TEES) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
40
|
|
2020/C 61/51
|
Case T-66/19: Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Vlaamse Gemeenschap and Vlaamse Gewest v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Internal market — Fundamental freedoms — Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 — Establishment of a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services — Sub-national authority — Standing to bring proceedings — Individual concern — Inadmissibility)
|
40
|
|
2020/C 61/52
|
Case T-74/19: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark DENIM HUNTER — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
41
|
|
2020/C 61/53
|
Case T-154/19: Order of the General Court of 20 December 2019 — ZU v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Mission expenses — Act not open to challenge — Act not adversely affecting an official — Irregular nature of the pre-litigation procedure — Premature action — Inadmissibility)
|
42
|
|
2020/C 61/54
|
Case T-192/19: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Ceramica Flaminia v EUIPO — Ceramica Cielo (goclean) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark goclean — Revocation of the contested decision — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
43
|
|
2020/C 61/55
|
Case T-210/19: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — Societá Agricola Tenuta di Rimale and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Common agricultural policy — Binding rules relating to the regulation of the supply of cheese benefiting from a protected designation of origin — Refusal of the application for the adoption of implementing acts — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)
|
43
|
|
2020/C 61/56
|
Case T-297/19: Order of the General Court of 20 December 2019 — Dragomir v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Rule of law — Independence of the judiciary — Right to a fair trial — Protection of personal data — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure that Romania fulfils its obligations — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
44
|
|
2020/C 61/57
|
Case T-319/19: Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme — Regulatory act — Deadline for bringing an action — Out of time — Act not open to challenge — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility)
|
45
|
|
2020/C 61/58
|
Case T-360/19: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Jalkh v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — European Parliament legislative resolution — Act not open to challenge — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility)
|
46
|
|
2020/C 61/59
|
Case T-654/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — FF v Commission (Interim relief — Law governing the institutions — Liability of the European Union — Photograph of a man used as a health warning — Action for damages — Application for interim measures — Necessity — Inadmissibility)
|
46
|
|
2020/C 61/60
|
Case T-411/18: Action brought on 13 December 2019 – WM v Commission
|
47
|
|
2020/C 61/61
|
Case T-827/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 – Gaspar v Commission
|
48
|
|
2020/C 61/62
|
Case T-846/19: Action brought on 12 December 2019 — Golden Omega v Commission
|
48
|
|
2020/C 61/63
|
Case T-851/19: Action brought on 16 December 2019 – Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO – Sakkari (SAKKATTACK)
|
49
|
|
2020/C 61/64
|
Case T-857/19: Action brought on 13 December 2019 — Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union
|
50
|
|
2020/C 61/65
|
Case T-862/19: Action brought on 18 December 2019 — Brasserie St Avold v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)
|
51
|
|
2020/C 61/66
|
Case T-863/19: Action brought on 19 December 2019 — Production Christian Gallimard v EUIPO — Éditions Gallimard (PCG CALLIGRAM CHRISTIAN GALLIMARD)
|
52
|
|
2020/C 61/67
|
Case T-864/19: Action brought on 17 December 2019 – AI and Others v ECDC
|
53
|
|
2020/C 61/68
|
Case T-865/19: Action brought on 18 December 2019 – Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission
|
53
|
|
2020/C 61/69
|
Case T-869/19: Action brought on 20 December 2019 — Tetra v EUIPO — Neusta next (Wave)
|
54
|
|
2020/C 61/70
|
Case T-876/19: Action brought on 23 December 2019 – Broadcom/Commission
|
55
|
|
2020/C 61/71
|
Case T-877/19: Action brought on 23 December 2019 — Einkaufsbüro Deutscher Eisenhändler v EUIPO — Tigges (TOOLINEO)
|
56
|
|
2020/C 61/72
|
Case T-878/19: Action brought on 23 December 2019 — Bende v EUIPO — Julius-K9 (K-9)
|
57
|
|
2020/C 61/73
|
Case T-879/19: Action brought on 30 December 2019 – Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO – Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials)
|
57
|
|
2020/C 61/74
|
Case T-884/19: Action brought on 30 December 2019 — Marc Folschette and Others v Commission
|
58
|
|
2020/C 61/75
|
Case T-886/19: Action brought on 28 December 2019 — Design Light & Led Made in Europe and Design Luce & Led Made in Italy v Commission
|
59
|
|
2020/C 61/76
|
Case T-15/20: Action brought on 10 January 2020 – Skyliners v EUIPO – Sky (SKYLINERS)
|
60
|
|
2020/C 61/77
|
Case T-16/20: Action brought on 10 January 2020 – Hub Culture v EUIPO – PayPal (VEN)
|
61
|
|
2020/C 61/78
|
Case T-270/18: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — O'Flynn and Others v Commission
|
62
|
