|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2019/C 103/06
|
Case C-221/18 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2018 — Électricité de France (EDF) v European Commission, French Republic (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — First decision of the European Commission — State aid measure incompatible with the internal market — Annulment by the General Court of the European Union — Confirmation by the Court of Justice of the European Union — Second decision of the Commission — State aid measure incompatible with the internal market — Dismissal of the application for annulment — Article 266 TFEU — Infringement of the principle of res judicata attaching to the first judgment of the General Court — Distortion of evidence — Failure of the General Court to have regard for the Commission’s obligations of diligent and impartial investigation — Failure to state reasons — Classification of the measure — New or existing aid)
|
6
|
|
2019/C 103/07
|
Case C-561/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — Solvay Chemicals GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
|
6
|
|
2019/C 103/08
|
Case C-674/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 October 2018 — EM v TMD Friction GmbH
|
7
|
|
2019/C 103/09
|
Case C-675/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 30 October 2018 — FL v TMD Friction EsCo GmbH
|
9
|
|
2019/C 103/10
|
Case C-719/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 15 November 2018 — Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni
|
11
|
|
2019/C 103/11
|
Case C-760/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Lasithiou (Greece) lodged on 4 December 2018 — M.V. and Others v Local Authority Municipality of Agios Nikolaos
|
12
|
|
2019/C 103/12
|
Case C-827/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Kamenz (Germany) lodged on 24 December 2018 — MC v ND
|
13
|
|
2019/C 103/13
|
Case C-17/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 10 January 2019 — Bouygues travaux publics, Elco construct Bucarest, Welbond armatures
|
14
|
|
2019/C 103/14
|
Case C-19/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 11 January 2019 — État belge v Pantochim SA, in liquidation
|
15
|
|
2019/C 103/15
|
Case C-29/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht (Germany) lodged on 16 January 2019 — ZP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit
|
15
|
|
2019/C 103/16
|
Case C-30/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 10 January 2019 — Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB
|
16
|
|
2019/C 103/17
|
Case C-35/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 21 January 2019 — BU v État belge
|
17
|
|
2019/C 103/18
|
Case C-46/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-316/14: Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council
|
17
|
|
2019/C 103/19
|
Case C-69/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2019 by Credito Fondiario SpA against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) made on 19 November 2018 in Case T-661/16, Credito Fondiario v SRB
|
18
|
|
2019/C 103/20
|
Case C-157/17: Order of the President of the Court of 12 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, other parties: Nederlandse Orde van Belastingadviseurs, Loyens Loeff NV
|
20
|
|
2019/C 103/21
|
Case C-76/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: French Republic
|
20
|
|
2019/C 103/22
|
Case C-77/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: French Republic
|
20
|
|
2019/C 103/23
|
Case C-79/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria, supported by: French Republic
|
21
|
|
2019/C 103/24
|
Case C-206/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, French Republic
|
21
|
|
2019/C 103/25
|
Case C-487/18: Order of the President of the Court of 17 December 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
|
21
|
|
2019/C 103/26
|
Case C-685/18: Order of the President of the Court of 21 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Minister for Justice and Equality v ND
|
21
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2019/C 103/27
|
Case T-177/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2019 — Mema v CPVO (Braeburn 78 (11078)) (New varieties of plants — Application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78 (11078) — Designation of another examination office — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Obligation to state reasons)
|
22
|
|
2019/C 103/28
|
Case T-487/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Pensions — 2008 Reform — Increase in the rate of contributions — Subsequent pay slips — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)
|
22
|
|
2019/C 103/29
|
Case T-11/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — RK v Council (Civil service — Officials — Article 42c of the Staff Regulations — Placing official on leave in the interests of the service — Equal treatment — Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of age — Manifest error of assessment — Right to be heard — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Responsibility)
|
23
|
|
2019/C 103/30
|
Case T-117/17: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2019 — Proximus v Council (Public service contracts — Negotiated procedure — Most economically advantageous tender — Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer — Discretion of a contracting authority — Lawfulness of the evaluation method — Principle of sound financial management)
|
24
|
|
2019/C 103/31
|
Case T-166/17: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2019 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sensation contract concluded within the context of the sixth framework programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the defendant for the recovery of sums advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests)
|
24
|
|
2019/C 103/32
|
Case T-198/17: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2019 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Actibio contract concluded within the context of the seventh framework programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the defendant for the recovery of sums advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests)
|
25
|
|
2019/C 103/33
|
Case T-215/17: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Pear Technologies v EUIPO — Apple (PEAR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative trade mark PEAR — Earlier EU figurative trade mark depicting an apple — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
26
|
|
2019/C 103/34
|
Case T-287/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Swemac Innovation v EUIPO — SWEMAC Medical Appliances (SWEMAC) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SWEMAC — Earlier national company name or trade name SWEMAC Medical Appliances AB — Relative ground for refusal — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court)
|
27
|
|
2019/C 103/35
|
Case T-290/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2019 –Stavytskyi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation to state reasons — Plea of illegality — Principle of proportionality — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Principle ne bis in idem)
|
27
|
|
2019/C 103/36
|
Case T-336/17: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — The GB Foods v EUIPO — Yatecomeré (YATEKOMO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark YATEKOMO — National figurative mark yatecomeré — Admissibility of new information seeking to substantiate the accuracy of a well-known fact — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
28
|
|
2019/C 103/37
|
Case T-461/17: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — TN v ENISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Notice of vacancy — Head of Unit post — Inclusion on the reserve list — Acceptance of the offer of employment — Withdrawal of the offer of employment — Conditions of employment — Character references — Article 12 of the CEOS — Manifest error of assessment — Processing of personal data — Right to be heard — Liability)
|
29
|
|
2019/C 103/38
|
Case T-549/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Duym v Council (Civil service — Officials — Appointment to a post of head of unit — Vacancy notice — Rejection of an application — Appointment of another candidate — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Interests of the service — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of non-discrimination)
|
30
|
|
2019/C 103/39
|
Case T-559/17: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Abdulkarim v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Temporal adjustment of the effects of annulment)
|
30
|
|
2019/C 103/40
|
Case T-580/17: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — Karp v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Classification — Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Premature complaint — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility — Autonomy of remedies — Non-renewal of a contract as a member of the auxiliary contract staff covering maternity leave — Obligation to state reasons — Successive fixed-term contracts — Abuse of rights — Right to be heard — Liability)
|
31
|
|
2019/C 103/41
|
Case T-604/17: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Thun v EUIPO (Fish) (Community design — Registered Community design — Failure to apply for renewal — Removal of the design from the register on expiry of registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Cumulative conditions — Duty of due care — Delegation of power — Loss of a right)
|
32
|
|
2019/C 103/42
|
Case T-656/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO — Jacob (Dr. Jacob’s essentials) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials — Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL — Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
33
|
|
2019/C 103/43
|
Case T-667/17: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Alkarim for Trade and Industry v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Error of assessment — Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment)
|
33
|
|
2019/C 103/44
|
Case T-766/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Eglo Leuchten v EUIPO — Di-Ka (Lamp) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a lighting fitting — Ground for invalidity — Earlier Community design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
|
34
|
|
2019/C 103/45
|
Case T-767/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Eglo Leuchten v EUIPO — Briloner Leuchten (Lamp) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a light fitting — Ground for invalidity — Earlier design — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
|
35
|
|
2019/C 103/46
|
Case T-785/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2019 — Ilhan v EUIPO — Time Gate (BIG SAM SPORTSWEAR COMPANY) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark BIG SAM SPORTSWEAR COMPANY — Earlier word mark SAM — Relative ground for refusal — Extinction of rights due to acquiescence — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court — Article 54(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 61(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
36
|
|
2019/C 103/47
|
Case T-789/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — TecAlliance v EUIPO — Siemens (TecDocPower) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark TecDocPower — Earlier EU word and figurative marks TECDOC and TecDoc — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of earlier marks — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
36
|
|
2019/C 103/48
|
Case T-800/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2019 — Brown Street Holdings v EUIPO — Enesan (FIGHT LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark FIGHT LIFE — Earlier EU word mark FIGHT FOR LIFE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))
|
37
|
|
2019/C 103/49
|
Case T-79/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2019 — Bekat v EUIPO — Borbet (ARBET) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative EU mark ARBET — Prior national word mark BORBET — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
38
|
|
2019/C 103/50
|
Case T-88/18: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2019 — Gruppo Armonie v EUIPO (ARMONIE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark ARMONIE — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
38
|
|
2019/C 103/51
|
Case T-97/18: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — DeepMind Technologies v EUIPO (STREAMS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark STREAMS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Previous EUIPO practice)
|
39
|
|
2019/C 103/52
|
Case T-181/18: Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2019 — Multifit v EUIPO (TAKE CARE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark TAKE CARE — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
39
|
|
2019/C 103/53
|
Case T-256/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2019 — Arezzo Indústria e Comércio v EUIPO (SCHUTZ) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SCHUTZ — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
|
40
|
|
2019/C 103/54
|
Case T-332/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — Marry Me Group v EUIPO (MARRY ME) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark MARRY ME — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
40
|
|
2019/C 103/55
|
Case T-333/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2019 — Marry Me Group v EUIPO (marry me) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark marry me — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
41
|
|
2019/C 103/56
|
Case T-427/18: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (SATISFYERMEN) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark SATISFYERMEN — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
42
|
|
2019/C 103/57
|
Case T-149/16: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2019 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v Commission (Action for annulment — Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 — Lis pendens — Inadmissibility)
|
42
|
|
2019/C 103/58
|
Case T-624/16 TO: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — L’Huillier v Gollnisch and Parliament (Third-party proceedings — Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene — Inadmissibility)
|
43
|
|
2019/C 103/59
|
Case T-687/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 21 January 2019 — Pilatus Bank v ECB (Application for interim measures — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency)
|
43
|
|
2019/C 103/60
|
Case T-735/18: Action brought on 14 December 2018 — Aquind/ACER
|
44
|
|
2019/C 103/61
|
Case T-741/18: Action brought on 18 December 2018 — ZZ v ECB
|
46
|
|
2019/C 103/62
|
Case T-763/18: Action brought on 30 December 2018 — Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi v European Commission
|
47
|
|
2019/C 103/63
|
Case T-13/19: Action brought on 8 January 2019 — Czech Republic v Commission
|
48
|
|
2019/C 103/64
|
Case T-25/19: Action brought on 11 January 2019 — AD v ECHA
|
49
|
|
2019/C 103/65
|
Case T-31/19: Action brought on 15 January 2019 — AF v FRA
|
50
|
|
2019/C 103/66
|
Case T-32/19: Action brought on 17 January 2019 — Harrington Padrón v Council
|
50
|
|
2019/C 103/67
|
Case T-38/19: Action brought on 21 January 2019 — Portugal v Commission
|
51
|
|
2019/C 103/68
|
Case T-43/19: Action brought on 24 January 2019 WV v EEAS
|
52
|
|
2019/C 103/69
|
Case T-47/19: Action brought on 23 January 2019 — Dansk Erhverv v Commission
|
53
|
|
2019/C 103/70
|
Case T-48/19: Action brought on 28 January 2019 — smart things solutions v EUIPO — Samsung Electronics (smart:)things)
|
54
|
|
2019/C 103/71
|
Case T-49/19: Action brought on 28 January 2019 — View v EUIPO (CREATE DELIGHTFUL HUMAN ENVIRONMENTS)
|
55
|
|
2019/C 103/72
|
Case T-50/19: Action brought on 28 January 2019 — Casual Dreams v EUIPO — López Fernández (Dayaday)
|
55
|
|
2019/C 103/73
|
Case T-51/19: Action brought on 29 January 2019 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler Sanayi Ve Ticaret (apiheal)
|
57
|
|
2019/C 103/74
|
Case T-53/19: Action brought on 31 January 2019 — SBS Bilimsel Çözümler Sanayi Ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Laboratorios Ern (apiheal)
|
58
|
|
2019/C 103/75
|
Case T-56/17: Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — PO and Others v SEAE
|
59
|
|
2019/C 103/76
|
Case T-479/17: Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — PO v EEAS
|
59
|
|
2019/C 103/77
|
Case T-727/17: Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — PP and Others v EEAS
|
59
|
|
2019/C 103/78
|
Case T-180/18: Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — VJ v EEAS
|
60
|
|
2019/C 103/79
|
Case T-494/18: Order of the General Court of 31 January 2019 — PO v EEAS
|
60
|
