|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2012/C 355/02
|
Case C-38/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 49 TFEU — Tax legislation — Transfer of residence for tax purposes — Transfer of assets — Immediate exit tax)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/03
|
Case C-43/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias — Greece) — Nomarchiaki Aftodioikisi Aitoloakarnanias and Others v Ipourgos Perivallontos and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directives 85/337/EEC, 92/43/EEC, 2000/60/EC and 2001/42/EC — Community action in the field of water policy — Diversion of the course of a river — Meaning of the time-limit for production of river basin management plans)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/04
|
Case C-262/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Döhler Neuenkirchen GmbH v Hauptzollamt Oldenburg (Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 204(1)(a) — Inward processing procedure — System of suspension — Incurrence of a customs debt — Non-fulfilment of an obligation to supply the bill of discharge within the prescribed period)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/05
|
Case C-28/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Eurogate Distribution GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 204(1)(a) — Customs warehousing procedure — Customs debt incurred through non-fulfilment of an obligation — Delayed entry in stock records of information concerning the removal of goods from a customs warehouse)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/06
|
Case C-36/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Pioneer Hi Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali (Agriculture — Genetically modified organisms — Council Directive 2002/53/EC — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue — Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 — Article 20 — Existing products — Directive 2001/18/EC — Article 26a — Measures to avoid the unintended presence of genetically modified organisms — National measures prohibiting the cultivation of genetically modified organisms accepted for inclusion in the common catalogue and authorised as existing products pending measures based on Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/07
|
Case C-150/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 1999/37/EC — Registration documents for vehicles — Vehicles previously registered in another Member State — Change of ownership — Requirement of a roadworthiness test — Requirement of production of a certificate of conformity — Roadworthiness test carried out in another Member State — Non-recognition — Lack of justification)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/08
|
Case C-190/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Daniela Mühlleitner v Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi (Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 15(1)(c) — Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/09
|
Case C-273/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Baranya Megyei Bíróság — Hungary) — Mecsek-Gabona Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 138(1) — Conditions of exemption for intra-Community transactions characterised by the obligation on the purchaser to ensure, as from the time of their loading, the transport of the goods of which it disposes as owner — Obligation on the vendor to prove that the goods have physically left the territory of the Member State of supply — Removal from the register, with retroactive effect, of the customer’s VAT identification number)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/10
|
Case C-380/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg)) — DI. VI. Finanziaria SAPA di Diego della Valle & C. v Administration des contributions en matière d’impôts (Freedom of establishment — Article 49 TFEU — Tax legislation — Capital tax — Conditions for granting a reduction in capital tax — Situation where a company is no longer liable to capital tax following transfer of its seat to another Member State — Restriction — Justification — Overriding reasons in the public interest)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/11
|
Joined Cases C-422/11 P and C-423/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej and Republic of Poland v European Commission (Appeals — Actions for annulment — Rejection of the appeal as inadmissible — Representation before the Courts of the European Union — Lawyer — Independence)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/12
|
Case C-278/12 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — A. Adil v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 — Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — Articles 20 and 21 — Abolition of border control at internal borders — Checks within the territory — Measures having an equivalent effect to border checks — National legislation authorising checks of identity, nationality and residence status by officials responsible for border surveillance and monitoring of foreign nationals in a 20 kilometre area extending from the common border with other State parties to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Checks intended to combat illegal residence — Legislation laying down certain conditions and guarantees concerning, inter alia, the frequency and intensity of the checks)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/13
|
Case C-373/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Prešov Regional Court) lodged on 3 August 2012 — G.I.C. Cash, a.s. v Marián Gunčaga
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/14
|
Case C-392/12 P: Appeal brought on 22 August 2012 by Fruit of the Loom, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 21 June 2012 in Case T-514/10: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/15
|
Case C-398/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Fermo (Italy) lodged on 29 August 2012 — Criminal proceedings against M
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/16
|
Case C-411/12: Action brought on 7 September 2012 — European Commission v Italian Republic
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/17
|
Case C-414/12 P: Appeal brought on 13 September 2012 by Bolloré against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Second Chamber) on 27 June 2012 in Case T-372/10 Bolloré v Commission
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/18
|
Case C-421/12: Action brought on 13 September 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/19
|
Case C-423/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm, Migrationsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 September 2012 — Flora May Reyes v Migrationsverket
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/20
|
Case C-427/12: Action brought on 19 September 2012 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/21
|
Case C-432/12 P: Appeal brought on 24 September 2012 by Leifheit AG against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2012 in Case T-334/10 Leifheit AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/22
|
Case C-433/12 P: Appeal brought on 26 September 2012 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 3 July 2012 in Case T-27/12 Marcuccio v Court of Justice
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2012/C 355/23
|
Case T-343/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Shell Petroleum and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Joint control — Fines — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Repeated infringement — Duration of the infringement — Rights of the defence — Unlimited jurisdiction — Conduct of the undertaking during the administrative procedure)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/24
|
Case T-344/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Total v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/25
|
Case T-347/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Nynäs Petroleum and Nynas Belgium v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value — Equal treatment)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/26
|
Case T-348/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Total Nederland v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Continuous nature of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/27
|
Case T-351/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Groep v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/28
|
Case T-352/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Infra v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/29
|
Case T-353/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Vermeer Infrastructuur v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/30
|
Case T-354/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — BAM NBM Wegenbouw and HBG Civiel v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fines — Duration of the infringement)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/31
|
Case T-355/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke BAM Groep v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Duration of the infringement)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/32
|
Case T-356/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/33
|
Case T-357/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fine — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Absence of cooperation — Commission's powers of investigation — Right to the assistance of a lawyer — Misuse of powers — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Duration of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/34
|
Case T-359/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans Infrastructuur v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Burden of proof — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/35
|
Case T-360/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/36
|
Case T-361/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ballast Nedam v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Effects in relation to third parties of a judgment annulling a measure)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/37
|
Case T-362/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ballast Nedam Infra v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Proof of the infringement — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Production of new pleas in the course of proceedings — Unlimited jurisdiction)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/38
|
Case T-370/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Kuwait Petroleum and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/39
|
Case T-82/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Guardian Industries and Guardian Europe v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for flat glass in the EEA — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Evidence of the infringement — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Exclusion of captive sales — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/40
|
Case T-535/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Tuzzi fashion v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (Emidio Tucci) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Earlier national word mark and international registration TUZZI — Earlier company name Tuzzi fashion GmbH — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 and Article 62(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 and Article 64(2) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Examination of the facts by the adjudicatory body of its own motion — Article 74 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Article 79 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/41
|
Case T-139/09: Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — France v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ seeking to support the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Co-financing by a public institution and by voluntary contributions from farmers’ organisations — Arguments not raised during the administrative procedure — Duty to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/42
|
Case T-243/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Fedecom v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Joint financing by a public body and by voluntary contributions from producer organisations — Arguments contrary to the facts submitted during the administrative proceedings — Operating aid — Legitimate expectation)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/43
|
Case T-328/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Producteurs de légumes de France v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Legitimate expectation — Material error in the calculation of the amounts to be recovered)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/44
|
Case T-357/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Pucci International v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (Emidio Tucci) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Earlier Community figurative and national word and figurative marks Emilio Pucci and EMILIO PUCCI — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/45
|
Case T-373/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Pucci International (Emidio Tucci) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Earlier Community figurative and national word and figurative marks Emilio Pucci and EMILIO PUCCI — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/46
|
Case T-387/09: Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — Applied Microengineering v Commission (Fifth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration — Contracts concerning the projects ‘Formation of a New Design House for MST’ and ‘Assessment of a New Anodic Bonder’ — Recovery of part of the financial contribution paid — Enforceable decision — Decision amending the contested decision during the proceedings — Legal basis of the action — Nature of the pleas put forward — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Principle of sound administration)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/47
|
Case T-465/09: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — Jurašinović v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to reports of European Union observers present in Croatia from 1 to 31 August 1995 — Refusal to grant access — Risk of undermining the protection of international relations — Previous disclosure)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/48
|
Case T-39/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Pucci International (PUCCI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark PUCCI — Earlier national figurative and word marks Emidio Tucci and E. TUCCI — Application for the earlier Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) and Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/49
|
Case T-63/10: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — Jurašinović v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia during proceedings — Refusal to grant access — Risk of undermining the protection of international relations — Risk of undermining the protection of judicial proceedings and legal advice)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/50
|
Case T-160/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — J v Parliament (Right of petition — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to take no further action — Action for annulment — Duty to state reasons — Petition not falling within an area of activity of the European Union)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/51
|
Case T-215/10: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2012 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Cotton — Aid to the least well-off — Rural development — Effectiveness of supervision — Proportionality)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/52
|
Case T-257/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Force of res judicata — Duty to state reasons)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/53
|
Case T-303/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Wam Industriale v Commission (State aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Execution of a judgment of the General Court — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration — Duty to exercise diligence — Duty of care)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/54
|
Case T-312/10: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2012 — ELE.SI.A v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sixth multiannual framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) — Contract concerning the ‘I-Way, Intelligent, co-operative system in cars for road safety’ project — Termination of the contract — Request for repayment of the financial contribution paid — Damages — Action seeking to obtain the full financial contribution requested and to challenge the request for repayment — Counterclaim)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/55
|
Case T-584/10: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2012 –Yilmaz v OHIM — Tequila Cuervo (TEQUILA MATADOR HECHO EN MEXICO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark TEQUILA MATADOR HECHO EN MEXICO — Earlier national and international word marks MATADOR — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/56
|
Case T-501/10: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2012 — TI Media Broadcasting and TI Media v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Italian pay-TV market — Decision modifying the commitments attached to a decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the EEA agreement — Call for tenders for the award of digital terrestrial television frequencies in Italy — Action devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Inadmissibility)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/57
|
Case T-52/12 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 September 2012 — Greece v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Compensation payments made in 2008 and 2009 by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of the decision — Prima facie case — Urgency — Weighing up of interests)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/58
|
Case T-162/12: Action brought on 25 September 2012 — CW v Council
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/59
|
Case T-363/12: Action brought on 8 August 2012 — Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC natural beauty)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/60
|
Case T-364/12: Action brought on 8 August 2012 — Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC Kindii)
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/61
|
Case T-379/12: Action brought on 21 August 2012 — Electric Bike World v OHIM — Brunswick (LIFECYCLE)
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/62
|
Case T-382/12: Action brought on 24 August 2012 — Kampol v OHIM — Colmol (Nobel)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/63
|
Case T-383/12: Action brought on 24 August 2012 — Ferienhäuser zum See v OHIM — Sunparks Groep (Sun Park Holidays)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/64
|
Case T-386/12: Action brought on 30 August 2012 — Elite Licensing v OHIM — Aguas De Mondariz Fuente del Val (elite BY MONDARIZ)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/65
|
Case T-390/12: Action brought on 5 September 2012 — Lifted Research and LRG Europe/OHIM — Fei Liangchen (Lr geans)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/66
|
Case T-391/12: Action brought on 5 September 2012 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Unipapel Industria Comercio y Servicios (UNITED OFFICE)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/67
|
Case T-393/12: Action brought on 4 September 2012 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/68
|
Case T-395/12: Action brought on 4 September 2012 — Fetim v OHIM — Solid Floor (Solidfloor The professional's choice)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/69
|
Case T-407/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (Ubee Interactive)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/70
|
Case T-408/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (ubee)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/71
|
Case T -410/12: Action brought on 6 September 2012 — Vitaminaqua Ltd v OHIM
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/72
|
Case T-415/12: Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Xeda International and Others v Commission
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/73
|
Case T-416/12: Action brought on 20 September 2012 — HP Health Clubs Iberia v OHIM — Shiseido (ZENSATIONS)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/74
|
Case T-422/12: Action brought on 26 September 2012 — Kappa Filter Systems v OHIM (THE FUTURE HAS ZERO EMISSIONS)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/75
|
Case T-423/12: Action brought on 27 September 2012 — Skype v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (skype)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/76
|
Case T-425/12: Action brought on 26 September 2012 — Sport Eybl & Sports Experts v OHIM — Elite Licensing (e)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/77
|
Case T-430/12: Action brought on 2 October 2012 — Heinrich v OHIM — Commission (European Network Rapid Manufacturing)
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/78
|
Case T-583/10: Order of the General Court of 26 September 2012 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM TeliaSonera Denmark (Nuance de magenta)
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/79
|
Case T-452/11: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/80
|
Case T-484/11: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2012 — Skyhawke Technologies v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting and Sky IP International (SKYCADDIE)
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/81
|
Case T-60/12: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/82
|
Case T-116/12: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Tioxide Europe and Others v Council
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/83
|
Case T-212/12: Order of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ålands Industrihus v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2012/C 355/84
|
Case F-86/12: Action brought on 9 August 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 355/85
|
Case F-97/12: Action brought on 17 September 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
39
|
|
|
|
