|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2020/C 27/02
|
Joined Cases C-609/17 and C-610/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin — Finland) — Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry (C-609/17) and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Satamaoperaattorit ry (C-610/17) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Article 153 TFEU — Minimum safety and health requirements for the organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 7 — Right to paid annual leave of at least 4 weeks — Article 15 — Provisions of national legislation and collective agreements more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers — Workers incapable of working during a period of paid annual leave due to illness — Refusal to carry over that leave where not carrying over that leave does not reduce the actual duration of the paid annual leave below 4 weeks — Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Inapplicable where there is no implementation of EU law for the purposes of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
|
2
|
|
2020/C 27/03
|
Case C-198/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — CeDe Group AB v KAN sp. z o.o., in liquidation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Articles 4 and 6 — Insolvency proceedings — Applicable law — European order for payment procedure — Failure to pay a contractual claim before bankruptcy — Exception of set-off based on a contractual claim arising prior to bankruptcy)
|
3
|
|
2020/C 27/04
|
Joined Cases C-203/18 and C-374/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberve-waltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Landgericht Köln — Germany) — Deutsche Post AG, Klaus Leymann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-203/18) and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V. v Deutsche Post AG (C-374/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Road transport — Social legislation — Vehicles used to deliver items as part of the universal postal service — Exceptions — Vehicles partly used for such delivery — Directive 97/67/EC — Article 3(1) — ‘Universal service’ — Concept)
|
4
|
|
2020/C 27/05
|
Case C-379/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Land Berlin (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Directive 2009/12/EC — Articles 3 and 6 — Article 11(1) and (7) — Airport charges — Protection of airport users’ rights — Whether it is possible for the airport managing body to agree charges lower than those approved by the independent supervisory authority — Remedies available to an airport user — Collateral challenge before a civil court giving judgment on the basis of equitable criteria)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 27/06
|
Case C-400/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Infohos v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 13A(1)(f) — Exemptions — Supply of services by independent groups of persons — Services supplied to members and non-members)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 27/07
|
Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — A. K. v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v Sąd Najwyższy, (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Non-discrimination on the ground of age — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) — Article 9(1) — Right to a remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial protection — Principle of judicial independence — Creation of a new chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court) with jurisdiction inter alia for cases of retiring the judges of that court — Chamber formed by judges newly appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on a proposal of the National Council of the Judiciary — Independence of that council — Power to disapply national legislation not in conformity with EU law — Primacy of EU law)
|
6
|
|
2020/C 27/08
|
Case C-678/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Designs — Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Article 90(1) — Provisional and protective measures — Jurisdiction of national courts of first instance — Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts designated in that provision)
|
7
|
|
2020/C 27/09
|
Case C-706/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen — Belgium) — X v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 5(4) — Decision concerning the application for family reunification — Consequences of failure to comply with the time limit for taking a decision — Automatic issue of a residence permit)
|
8
|
|
2020/C 27/10
|
Case C-737/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019 — Portuguese Republic v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Portuguese Republic)
|
9
|
|
2020/C 27/11
|
Case C-270/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 March 2019 by WB against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 23 January 2019 in Case T-579/18 WB v Commission
|
9
|
|
2020/C 27/12
|
Case C-271/19 P: Appeal brought on 28 March 2019 by WB against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 23 January 2019 in Case T-329/18 WB v Commission
|
10
|
|
2020/C 27/13
|
Case C-373/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 13 May 2019 — Finanzamt München III v Dubrovin & Tröger GbR — Aquatics
|
10
|
|
2020/C 27/14
|
Case C-593/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Außenstelle Graz) (Austria) lodged on 5 August 2019 — SK Telecom Co. Ltd.
|
11
|
|
2020/C 27/15
|
Case C-607/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 12 August 2019 — Husqvarna AB v Lidl E-Commerce International GmbH & Co. KG
|
11
|
|
2020/C 27/16
|
Case C-641/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 30 August 2019 — EU v PE Digital GmbH
|
12
|
|
2020/C 27/17
|
Case C-685/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankenthal (Germany) lodged on 17 September 2019 — OK v Daimler AG
|
13
|
|
2020/C 27/18
|
Case C-703/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 24 September 2019 — J.K. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach
|
14
|
|
2020/C 27/19
|
Case C-707/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 23 September 2019 — K.S. v A.B.
|
15
|
|
2020/C 27/20
|
Case C-769/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 21 October 2019 — Criminal proceedings against UC and TD
|
16
|
|
2020/C 27/21
|
Case C-770/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 21 October 2019 — Myflyright GmbH v SunExpressGünes Ekspres Havacilik A
|
16
|
|
2020/C 27/22
|
Case C-772/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 October 2019 — Bartosch Airport Supply Services
|
17
|
|
2020/C 27/23
|
Case C-775/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 22 October 2019 — 5th AVENUE Products Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Singen
|
17
|
|
2020/C 27/24
|
Case C-784/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 22 October 2019 — ‘TEAM POWER EUROPE’ EOOD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite — Varna
|
18
|
|
2020/C 27/25
|
Case C-785/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken (Germany) lodged on 23 October 2019 — Koch Media GmbH v HC
|
19
|
|
2020/C 27/26
|
Case C-792/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 28 October 2019 — TUIfly GmbH v EUflight.de GmbH
|
20
|
|
2020/C 27/27
|
Case C-797/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 24 October 2019 — B-GmbH v D Tax Office
|
21
|
|
2020/C 27/28
|
Case C-800/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 30 October 2019 — SM v Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG
|
22
|
|
2020/C 27/29
|
Case C-801/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 31 October 2019 — FRANCK d.d., Zagreb v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak
|
23
|
|
2020/C 27/30
|
Case C-807/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 November 2019 — ‘DSK Bank’ EAD and ‘FrontEx International’
|
24
|
|
2020/C 27/31
|
Case C-824/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 November 2019 — TC, UB v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia, VA
|
24
|
|
2020/C 27/32
|
Case C-830/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium) lodged on 15 November 2019 — C.J. v Région wallonne
|
25
|
|
2020/C 27/33
|
Case C-848/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 November 2019 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 10 September 2019 in Case T-883/16, Republic of Poland v European Commission
|
26
|
|
2020/C 27/34
|
Case C-862/19 P: Appeal brought on 26 November 2019 by the Czech Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case T-629/17 Czech Republic v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2020/C 27/35
|
Case T-607/15: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Yieh United Steel v Commission (Dumping — Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in China and Taiwan — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429 — Article 2(3) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Article 2(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(1) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Calculation of the normal value — Calculation of the production cost — Sales of the like product intended for consumption on the domestic market of the exporting country)
|
29
|
|
2020/C 27/36
|
Case T-808/17: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Pethke v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal report — Regularity of appraisal procedures and appraisal appeal procedures — Requirement for the appeal assessor to be impartial)
|
30
|
|
2020/C 27/37
|
Case T-644/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopiderm) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
30
|
|
2020/C 27/38
|
Case T-658/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Representation of a chequered gingham pattern) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
31
|
|
2020/C 27/39
|
Case T-665/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Soundio v EUIPO — Telefónica Germany (Vibble) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Vibble — Earlier German word mark vybe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
|
32
|
|
2020/C 27/40
|
Case T-726/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Mélin v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules governing expenses and allowances payable to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to provide the annex to the decision ordering recovery)
|
32
|
|
2020/C 27/41
|
Case T-736/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Runnebaum Invest v EUIPO — Berg Toys Beheer (Bergsteiger) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
|
33
|
|
2020/C 27/42
|
Case T-672/18: Order of the General Court of 22 November 2019 — Pyke v EUIPO — Paglieri (CLIOMAKEUP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
|
34
|
|
2020/C 27/43
|
Case T-525/19 RII: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2019 — Intering and Others v Commission (Interim measures — Programme entitled ‘EU Support to clean air in Kosovo’ — Tendering procedure EuropeAid/140043/DH/WKS/XK — Decision rejecting the suspension of operation of the decision to exclude an applicant from the further tendering procedure — New application for interim measures — Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility)
|
35
|
|
2020/C 27/44
|
Case T-730/19: Action brought on 25 October 2019 – PNB Banka and Others v ECB
|
35
|
|
2020/C 27/45
|
Case T-732/19: Action brought on 25 October 2019 – PNB Banka and Others v SRB
|
36
|
|
2020/C 27/46
|
Case T-740/19: Action brought on 31 October 2019 – Laird v Commission
|
38
|
|
2020/C 27/47
|
Case T-741/19: Action brought on 31 October 2019 – Sedgwick Overseas v Commission
|
39
|
|
2020/C 27/48
|
Case T-742/19: Action brought on 31 October 2019 – Chemring Group and CHG Overseas v Commission
|
41
|
|
2020/C 27/49
|
Case T-743/19: Action brought on 31 October 2019 – Hyperion Insurance Group and HIG Finance v Commission
|
43
|
|
2020/C 27/50
|
Case T-745/19: Action brought on 31 October 2019 – Spirax-Sarco Engineering and Spirax-Sarco Overseas v Commission
|
44
|
|
2020/C 27/51
|
Case T-747/19: Action brought on 31 October 2019 – DS Smith and DS Smith International v Commission
|
46
|
|
2020/C 27/52
|
Case T-748/19: Action brought on 1 November 2019 – The Vitec Group v Commission
|
48
|
|
2020/C 27/53
|
Case T-751/19: Action brought on 4 November 2019 – Reckitt Benckiser Investments and Others v Commission
|
49
|
|
2020/C 27/54
|
Case T-752/19: Action brought on 5 November 2019 – Inchcape v Commission
|
51
|
|
2020/C 27/55
|
Case T-754/19: Action brought on 7 November 2019 – Stagecoach Group v Commission
|
53
|
|
2020/C 27/56
|
Case T-755/19: Action brought on 6 November 2019 – BBA International Investments v Commission
|
54
|
|
2020/C 27/57
|
Case T-756/19: Action brought on 7 November 2019 – WPP Jubilee and Others v Commission
|
56
|
|
2020/C 27/58
|
Case T-758/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – W.S. Atkins International v Commission
|
57
|
|
2020/C 27/59
|
Case T-759/19: Action brought on 8 November 2019 – Yalwen v Commission
|
59
|
|
2020/C 27/60
|
Case T-777/19: Action brought on 12 November 2019 — CAPA and Others v Commission
|
61
|
|
2020/C 27/61
|
Case T-791/19: Action brought on 15 November 2019 — Sped-Pro S.A. v Commission
|
61
|
|
2020/C 27/62
|
Case T-801/19: Application lodged on 20 November 2019 — DTE Systems v EUIPO — Speed-Buster (PedalBox +)
|
63
|
|
2020/C 27/63
|
Case T-805/19: Action brought on 21 November 2019 — Ultrasun v EUIPO (ultrasun)
|
64
|
|
2020/C 27/64
|
Case T-806/19: Action brought on 21 November 2019 — Govern d'Andorra v EUIPO (Andorra)
|
64
|
|
2020/C 27/65
|
Case T-808/19: Action brought on 25 November 2019 — Silgan International und Silgan Closures v Commission
|
65
|
|
2020/C 27/66
|
Case T-809/19: Action brought on 22 November 2019 — Liga Nacional de Fútbol Profesional v EUIPO (El Clasico)
|
66
|
|
2020/C 27/67
|
Case T-814/19: Action brought on 22 November 2019 – Nutravita v EUIPO – Pegaso (nutravita Healthy Mind, Body & Soul.)
|
67
|
|
2020/C 27/68
|
Case T-817/19: Action brought on 27 November 2019 – Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO – OmniVision (Hydrovision)
|
68
|
|
2020/C 27/69
|
Case T-818/19: Action brought on 27 November 2019 – Dvectis CZ v EUIPO – Yado (Support pillows)
|
69
|
|
2020/C 27/70
|
Case T-819/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 – Man and Machine v EUIPO – Bim Freelance (bim ready)
|
70
|
|
2020/C 27/71
|
Case T-821/19: Action brought on 2 December 2019 — Herlyn and Beck v EUIPO — Brillux (B.home)
|
70
|
|
2020/C 27/72
|
Case T-822/19: Action brought on 3 December 2019 — Asoliva and Anierac v Commission
|
71
|
|
2020/C 27/73
|
Case T-189/18: Order of the General Court of 25 November 2019 – Lipitalia 2000 and Assograssi v Commission
|
72
|
|
2020/C 27/74
|
Case T-290/19: Order of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO (Representation of two curved red lines arranged one above the other)
|
72
|
