|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2012/C 049/02
|
Case C-27/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — French Republic v People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Common Position 2001/931/CFSC — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Freezing of funds applicable to a group included in a list drawn up, revised and amended by the Council of the European Union — Rights of the defence)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/03
|
Case C-28/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 28 EC and 29 EC — Free movement of goods — Measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports and exports — Transport — Directives 96/62/EC and 1999/30/EC — Sectoral traffic prohibition for lorries of over 7,5 tonnes carrying certain goods — Air quality — Protection of health and the environment — Principle of proportionality — Consistency)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/04
|
Case C-271/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of capital — Scope — Open pension funds — Limitation on the investment of capital assets outside the Member State concerned — Proportionality)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/05
|
Case C-318/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — A2A SpA, formerly ASM Brescia SpA v European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Aid granted to public utilities — Tax exemptions — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Standing — Legal interest — Article 87 EC — Concept of ‘aid’ — Article 88 EC — Concept of ‘new aid’ — Article 10 EC — Duty of loyal cooperation — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 1 and 14 — Lawfulness of a recovery order — Principle of legal certainty — Duty to state reasons)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/06
|
Case C-319/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — ACEA SpA v Iride Spa, formerly AEM SpA, European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Aid granted to public utilities — Tax exemptions — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Standing — Legal interest — Article 87 EC — Concept of ‘aid’ — Article 88 EC — Concept of ‘new aid’ — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 1 and 14 — Lawfulness of a recovery order — Duty to state reasons)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/07
|
Case C-320/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — A2A SpA, formerly AEM SpA v European Commission (Appeals — State aid — Aid granted to public utilities — Tax exemptions — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Standing — Legal interest — Article 87 EC — Concept of ‘aid’ — Article 88 EC — Concept of ‘new aid’ — Article 10 EC — Duty of loyal cooperation — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 1 and 14 — Lawfulness of a recovery order — Principle of legal certainty — Duty to state reasons)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/08
|
Case C-329/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 — Iride SpA, formerly Azienda Mediterranea Gas e Acqua SpA v European Commission, A2A SpA, formerly ASM Brescia SpA (Appeal — State aid — Aid granted to public utilities — Tax exemptions — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Standing — Legal interest)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/09
|
Case C-242/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Enel Produzione SpA v Autorità per l’energia elettrica e il gas (Directive 2003/54/EC — Internal market in electricity — Electricity generating installations essential to the operation of the electricity system — Obligation to submit tenders on the national electricity exchange market in accordance with the limits and criteria laid down by the electricity transmission and distribution system operator — Dispatching and balancing service — Public service obligations)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/10
|
Case C-250/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Haltergemeinschaft LBL GbR v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf (Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Article 14(1)(b) — Exemption of energy products used as fuel for the purpose of air navigation — Fuel provided by a person chartering out an aircraft used by charterers of the aircraft for their flights for purposes other than the supply of air services for consideration)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/11
|
Case C-316/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Danske Svineproducenter v Justitsministeriet (Second paragraph of Article 288 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Protection of animals during transport — Transport by road of domestic animals of the porcine species — Minimum height of compartments — Inspection during a journey — Loading density — Right of Member States to adopt detailed standards)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/12
|
Case C-366/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Air Transport Association of America, American Airlines Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., United Airlines Inc. v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Directive 2008/101/EC — Inclusion of aviation activities in that scheme — Validity — Chicago Convention — Kyoto Protocol — EU-United States Air Transport Agreement — Principles of customary international law — Legal effects thereof — Whether they may be relied upon — Extraterritoriality of European Union law — Meaning of ‘charges’, ‘fees’ and ‘taxes’)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/13
|
Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) and from the High Court of Ireland — United Kingdom, Ireland) — N. S. (C-411/10) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. (C-493/10), A. S. M., M. T., K. P., E. H. v Refugee Applications Commissioner, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (European Union law — Principles — Fundamental rights — Implementation of European Union law — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment — Common European Asylum System — Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Concept of ‘safe countries’ — Transfer of an asylum seeker to the Member State responsible — Obligation — Rebuttable presumption of compliance, by that Member State, with fundamental rights)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/14
|
Joined Cases C-424/10 and C-425/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Tomasz Ziolkowski (C-424/10), Barbara Szeja, Maria-Magdalena Szeja, Marlon Szeja (C-425/10) v Land Berlin (Freedom of movement for persons — Directive 2004/38/EC — Right of permanent residence — Article 16 — Legal residence — Residence based on national law — Period of residence completed before the accession to the European Union of the State of origin of the citizen concerned)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/15
|
Case C-465/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-mer, des Collectivités territoriales et de l’Immigration v Chambre de commerce et d’industrie de l’Indre (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the European Union’s financial interests — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 — Article 3 — Structural Funds — Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 — Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 — Contracting authority in receipt of a subsidy from the Structural Funds — Failure to comply with public procurement rules by the recipient of an ERDF subsidy — Basis for the obligation to recover European Union subsidies in the case of an irregularity — Concept of ‘irregularity’ — Concept of ‘continuous irregularity’ — Conditions for recovery — Limitation period — Longer national limitation periods — Principle of proportionality)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/16
|
Case C-482/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti — Sezione Giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana — Italy) — Teresa Cicala v Regione Siciliana (National administrative procedure — Administrative acts — Obligation to state reasons — Possibility of failure to state reasons being remedied during legal proceedings against an administrative act — Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU and Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/17
|
Case C-495/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon v Thomas Dutrueux, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie du Jura (Directive 85/374/EEC — Liability for defective products — Scope — National rules requiring public healthcare establishments to pay compensation, even when they are not at fault, for damage sustained by a patient as a result of the failure of equipment or products used in the course of treatment)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/18
|
Case C-499/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge — Belgium) — Vlaamse Oliemaatschappij NV v FOD Financiën (Sixth VAT Directive — Persons liable to pay tax — Third party jointly and severally liable — Warehousing arrangements other than customs warehousing — Joint and several liability of the warehouse-keeper of the goods and the taxable person who owns the goods — Good faith or lack of fault or negligence of the warehouse-keeper)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/19
|
Case C-503/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — Evroetil AD v Direktor na Agentsia ‘Mitnitsi’ (Directive 2003/30/EC — Article 2(2)(a) — Concept of bioethanol — Product obtained from biomass, undenatured and with an ethyl alcohol content of over 98,5 % — Relevance of actual use as a biofuel — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification of bioethanol for the purpose of collecting excise duties — Directive 2003/96/EC — Energy products — Directive 92/83/EEC — First indent of Article 20 and Article 27(1)(a) and (b) — Concept of ethyl alcohol — Exemption from the harmonised duty — Denaturing)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/20
|
Case C-507/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against X (Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA — Standing of victims in criminal proceedings — Protection of vulnerable persons — Hearing of minors as witnesses — Special measure for early taking of evidence — Refusal by the Public Prosecutor to request the judge in charge of preliminary investigations to hear a witness)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/21
|
Case C-72/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Mohsen Afrasiabi, Behzad Sahabi, Heinz Ulrich Kessel (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 — Article 7(3) and (4) — Supply and installation of a sintering furnace in Iran — Concept of ‘indirectly making available’ an ‘economic resource’ to persons, entities and bodies listed in Annexes IV and V to that regulation — Concept of ‘circumvention’ of the prohibition on making that resource available)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/22
|
Case C-519/10: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari — Italy) — Giovanni Colapietro v Ispettorato Centrale Repressioni Frodi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 92(1), 103(1) and the second subparagraph of 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Wine sector — Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and Regulation (EC) No 343/94 — Answer to the question admitting of no reasonable doubt — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/23
|
Case C-67/11 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 October 2011 — DTL Corporación, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Gestión de Recursos y Soluciones Empresariales SL (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Opposition procedure — Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Solaria’ and earlier national figurative mark containing the word element ‘Solartia’ — Registration refused in part — Likelihood of confusion — Request for a stay of the proceedings before the General Court — Failure to lodge the request in good time)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/24
|
Case C-585/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 24 November 2011 — Philipp Seeberger v Studentenwerk Heidelberg
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/25
|
Case C-592/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 November 2011 — Anssi Ketelä
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/26
|
Case C-618/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 1 December 2011 — TVI Televisão Independente, SA v Fazenda Pública
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/27
|
Case C-619/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) of 30 November 2011 — Patricia Dumont de Chassart v ONAFTS — Office national des allocations familiales pour travailleurs salariés
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/28
|
Case C-629/11 P: Appeal brought on 8 December 2011 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 September 2011 in Case T-298/09: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/29
|
Case C-637/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul (Portugal) lodged on 12 December 2011 — TVI Televisão Independente SA v Fazenda Pública
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/30
|
Case C-647/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 December 2011 by Dimos Peramatos against the judgment delivered by the General Court (First Chamber) on 12 October 2011 in Case T-312/07 Dimos Peramatos v European Commission
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/31
|
Case C-650/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia), lodged on 19 December 2011 — Ilgvars Brunovskis v Lauku atbalsta dienests
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/32
|
Case C-652/11 P: Appeal brought on 19 December 2011 by Mindo Srl against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 5 October 2011 in Case T-19/06: Mindo Srl v European Commission
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/33
|
Case C-654/11 P: Appeal brought on 20 December 2011 by Transcatab SpA, in liquidation, against the judgment delivered on 5 October 2011 in Case T-39/06 Transcatab v Commission
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/34
|
Case C-656/11: Action brought on 21 December 2011 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/35
|
Case C-659/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 27 December 2011 — TVI Televisão Independente SA v Fazenda Pública
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/36
|
Case C-356/10: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 22 November 2011 — European Commission v Ireland
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/37
|
Case C-535/10 P: Order of the President of the Court of 14 November 2011 — 4care AG v Office For Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade marks and designs), Laboratorios Diafarm, SA
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/38
|
Case C-568/10: Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2011 — European Commission v Austrian Republic
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/39
|
Case C-582/10: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 22 November 2011 — European Commission v Austrian Republic
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2012/C 049/40
|
Case T-462/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 January 2012 — Storck v OHIM — RAI (Ragolizia) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Ragolizia — Earlier Community word mark FAVOLIZIA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/41
|
Case T-311/09 P: Order of the General Court of 13 December 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Social security — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Decision of the Commission refusing 100 % reimbursement of certain medical expenses incurred by the applicant — Distortion — Duty to state reasons — Investigation — Act adversely affecting the appellant — Authority of res judicata — Lis pendens — Confirmatory act)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/42
|
Case T-202/10: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2011 — Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission (State aid — Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations — Existing aid — Decision accepting Member State’s commitments — Action for annulment — Not individually concerned — Inadmissibility)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/43
|
Case T-203/10: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2011 — Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission (State aid — Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations — Existing aid — Decision accepting Member State’s commitments — Decision declaring new aid compatible — Action for annulment — Not individually concerned — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/44
|
Case T-285/11: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Gooré v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Action manifestly unfounded)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/45
|
Case T-593/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2011 — Al-Chihabi v Council (Interim relief — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for interim measures — No urgency — No serious and irreparable damage)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/46
|
Case T-595/11 P: Appeal brought on 24 November 2011 by A against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 September 2011 in Case F-12/09, A v Commission
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/47
|
Case T-626/11: Action brought on 2 December 2011 — Sky Deutschland and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen v Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/48
|
Case T-627/11: Action brought on 2 December 2011 — ATMvision v European Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/49
|
Case T-628/11: Action brought on 5 December 2011 — Biogas Nord v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/50
|
Case T-629/11: Action brought on 5 December 2011 — Biogas Nord Anlagenbau v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/51
|
Case T-630/11 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2011 by Peter Strobl against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 September 2011 in Case F-56/05 Strobl v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/52
|
Case T-638/11: Action brought on 12 December 2011 — European Dynamics Belgium and Others v European Medicines Agency
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/53
|
Case T-639/11: Action brought on 14 December 2011 — Heads! v OHIM (HEADS)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/54
|
Case T-641/11 P: Appeal brought on 8 December 2011 by Harald Mische against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 September 2011 in Case F-70/05 Mische v Commission
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/55
|
Case T-642/11 P: Appeal brought on 8 December 2011 by Harald Mische against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 September 2011 in Case F-93/05 Mische v Parliament
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/56
|
Case T-643/11: Action brought on 15 December 2011 — Crown Equipment (Suzhou) and Crown Gabelstapler v Council
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/57
|
Case T-661/11: Action brought on 21 December 2011 — Italy v Commission
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/58
|
Case T-662/11: Action brought on 28 December 2011 — Müller v OHIM — Loncar (Sunless)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/59
|
Case T-6/12: Action brought on 5 January 2012 — Godrej Industries and V V F v Council
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2012/C 049/60
|
Case T-523/11: Order of the President of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Maxima Grupė v OHIM — Bodegas Maximo (MAXIMA PREMIUM)
|
33
|
|
|
|
