|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2013/C 086/02
|
Case C-12/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Dublin Metropolitan District Court — Ireland) — Denise McDonagh v Ryanair Ltd (Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Notion of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Obligation to provide assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight due to ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Volcanic eruption leading to the closure of air space — Eruption of the Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/03
|
Case C-26/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium)) — Belgische Petroleum Unie VZW and Others v Belgische Staat (Directive 98/70/EC — Quality of petrol and diesel fuels — Articles 3 to 5 — Environmental specifications for fuels — Directive 98/34/EC — Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services — Articles 1 and 8 — Concept of ‘technical regulation’ — Obligation to communicate draft technical regulations — National rules requiring petroleum companies placing petrol and/or diesel fuels on the market in the same calendar year also to place on the market a quantity of biofuels)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/04
|
Case C-175/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Ireland — Ireland) — H.I.D., B.A. v Refugee Applications Commissioner, Refugee Appeals Tribunal, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General (Request for a preliminary ruling — Common European Asylum System — Application by a national of a third country seeking refugee status — Directive 2005/85/EC — Article 23 — Possibility of prioritising the processing of asylum applications — National procedure applying a prioritised procedure for the examination of applications by persons belonging to a certain category defined on the basis of nationality or country of origin — Right to an effective judicial remedy — Article 39 of Directive 2005/85 — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ within the meaning of that article)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/05
|
Case C-301/11: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (Tax legislation — Transfer of a residence for tax purposes — Freedom of establishment — Article 49 TFEU — Taxation of unrealised capital gains — Immediate exit tax)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/06
|
Case C-394/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia — Bulgaria) — Valeri Hariev Belov v CHEZ Elektro Balgaria AD and Others (Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of ‘national court’ — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/07
|
Case C-396/11: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța — Romania) — Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Constanța — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against Ciprian Vasile Radu (Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant and surrender procedures between Member States — European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of prosecution — Grounds for refusing execution)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/08
|
Case C-642/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna — Bulgaria) — Stroy trans EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Right of deduction — Refusal — Article 203 — Entry of the VAT on the invoice — Chargeability — Existence of a taxable transaction — Identical determination in respect of the issuer of the invoice and its recipient — Necessity)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/09
|
Case C-643/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna — Bulgaria) — LVK — 56 EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ — Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Right of deduction — Refusal — Article 203 — Entering of the VAT on the invoice — Chargeability — Existence of a taxable transaction — Identical determination in respect of the issuer of the invoice and its recipient — Necessity)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/10
|
Case C-496/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 6 November 2012 — Spoločenstvo vlastníkov bytov MYJAVA v Podtatranská vodárenská prevádzková spoločnosť, a.s.
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/11
|
Case C-595/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2012 — Loredana Napoli v Ministero della Giustizia — Dipartimento Amministrazione Penitenziaria
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/12
|
Case C-597/12 P: Appeal brought on 19 December 2012 by Isdin, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 October 2012 in Case T-366/11: Bial-Portela & Ca, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/13
|
Case C-599/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium) lodged on 20 December 2012 — JETAIR NV, BTW-eenheid BTWE Travel4you v FOD FINANCIËN
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/14
|
Case C-604/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 27 December 2012 — HN v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/15
|
Case C-617/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) Patents Court (United Kingdom) made on 18 December 2012 — Astrazeneca AB v Comptroller-General of Patents
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/16
|
Case C-11/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany) lodged on 10 January 2013 — Bayer CropScience AG
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/17
|
Case C-17/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 14 January 2013 — Alpina River Cruises GmbH and Nicko Tours GmbH v Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti — Capitaneria di Porto di Chioggia
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/18
|
Case C-19/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 15 January 2013 — Ministero dell’Interno v Fastweb S.p.a.
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/19
|
Case C-20/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2013 — Daniel Unland v Land Berlin
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/20
|
Case C-22/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli (Italy) lodged on 17 January 2013 — Mascolo v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/21
|
Case C-35/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2013 — ASS.I.CA. and Kraft Foods Italia SpA v Associazioni fra produttori per la tutela del ‘Salame Felino’ and Others
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/22
|
Case C-54/13 P: Appeal brought on 31 January 2013 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 21 November 2012 in Case T-270/08 Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2013/C 086/23
|
Case T-269/00: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Sagar v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/24
|
Case T-272/00: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Barbini and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/25
|
Case T-273/00: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Unindustria and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Reductions in social security contributions for undertakings in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and imposing the recovery of the aid paid — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/26
|
Case T-368/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Travetanche Injection v Commission (Application for interim measures — Dismissal of the main action — No need to adjudicate)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/27
|
Case T-551/11: Order of the General Court of 5 February 2013 — BSI v Council (Action for annulment — Dumping — Extension of anti-dumping duty imposed on the imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia — Independent importer — Article 263, fourth paragraph of TFEU — Lack of individual concern — Legislative measure containing implementing measure — Inadmissible)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/28
|
Case T-347/12 P: Appeal brought on 8 January 2013 by Dana Mocová against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 June 2012 in Case F-41/11 Mocová v Commission
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/29
|
Case T-1/13: Action brought on 4 January 2013 — Advance Magazine Publishers/OHIM — Montres Tudor (GLAMOUR)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/30
|
Case T-12/13: Action brought on 4 January 2013 — Sherwin-Williams Sweden/OHIM — Akzo Nobel Coatings International (ARTI)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/31
|
Case T-13/13: Action brought on 3 January 2013 — MasterCard International/OHIM — Nehra (surfpin)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/32
|
Case T-14/13: Action brought on 3 January 2013 — Seal Trademarks/OHIM — Exel Composites (XCEL)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/33
|
Case T-26/13: Action brought on 18 January 2013 — dm-drogerie markt/OHIM — Semtee (CALDEA)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/34
|
Case T-27/13: Action brought on 23 January 2013 — Elan v Commission
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/35
|
Case T-31/13 P: Appeal brought on 24 January 2013 by Vincent Bouillez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 November 2012 in Case F-75/11, Vincent Bouillez v Council
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/36
|
Case T-32/13 P: Appeal brought on 24 January 2013 by Mario Paulo da Silva Tenreiro against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 November 2012 in Case F-120/11 da Silva Tenreiro v Commission
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/37
|
Case T-33/13: Action brought on 24 January 2013 — Türkiye Garanti Bankasi/OHIM — Card & Finance Consulting (bonus&more)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/38
|
Case T-37/13: Action brought on 22 January 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT)
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/39
|
Case T-41/13: Action brought on 29 January 2013 — Roy v Council and Commission
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/40
|
Case T-46/13: Action brought on 28 January 2013 — Sabores de Navarra v OHIM — Frutas Solano (KIT, EL SABOR DE NAVARRA)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/41
|
Case T-47/13: Action brought on 30 January 2013 — Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald v OHIM — Vieweg (goldstück)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/42
|
Case T-48/13: Action brought on 30 January 2013 — Out of the Blue KG v OHIM — Mombauer (REFLEXX)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/43
|
Case T-50/13: Action brought on 25 January 2013 — Think Schuhwerk v OHIM — Müller (VOODOO)
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/44
|
Case T-51/13: Action brought on 30 January 2013 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EIB
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/45
|
Case T-62/13: Action brought on 6 February 2013 — GOLAM v OHIM — Glaxo Group (METABIOMAX)
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/46
|
Case T-64/13: Action brought on 4 February 2013 — ANKO v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/47
|
Case T-74/13: Action brought on 7 February 2013 — Al-Tabbaa v Council
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/48
|
Case T-80/13: Action brought on 13 February 2013 — Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank v Council
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/49
|
Case T-650/11: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Dimension Data Belgium v Parliament
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2013/C 086/50
|
Case F-158/12: Action brought on 24 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2013/C 086/51
|
Case F-162/12: Action brought on 28 December 2012 — ZZ v EEA
|
30
|
|
|
|
