Action brought on 15 July 2019 — Workspace Group v EUIPO — Technopolis (UMA WORKSPACE)

(Case T-506/19)

(2019/C 288/82)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Workspace Group plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Hine, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Technopolis Oyj (Oulu, Finland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark UMA WORKSPACE — Application for registration No 16 443 111

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 May 2019 in Case R 1910/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—	annul the contested decision;

—	uphold the opposition decision;

—	refuse the contested application;

—	order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

—	Infringement of Article 8 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

—	Infringement of Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

—	Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—	Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—	Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.