|
V Announcements
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
2011/C 013/02
|
Case C-137/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Budapesti II. és III. Kerületi Bíróság — Republic of Hungary) — VB Pénzügyi Lízing Zrt. v Ferenc Schneider (Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Criteria for assessment — Examination by the national court of its own motion of the unfairness of a term conferring jurisdiction — Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice)
|
2
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/03
|
Case C-458/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 49 EC — Construction sector — Authorisation required in order to carry on activity in that sector — Justification)
|
2
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/04
|
Case C-540/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)) — Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co. KG v ‘Österreich’ -Zeitungsverlag GmbH (Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair commercial practices — National legislation laying down a prohibition in principle on commercial practices making the offer of bonuses to consumers subject to the purchase of goods or services)
|
3
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/05
|
Case C-543/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 56 EC and 43 EC — Free movement of capital — Golden shares in EDP — Energias de Portugal held by the Portuguese State — Restrictions on the acquisition of holdings and participation in the management of a privatised company)
|
3
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/06
|
Case C-36/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 November 2010 — Transportes Evaristo Molina, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Service station market in Spain — Long-term exclusive fuel supply agreements — Commission decision — Right of purchase granted to certain service stations — Conditions of supply by Repsol — List of the service stations concerned — Action for annulment — Time-limits for commencing proceedings — Starting point)
|
4
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/07
|
Joined Cases C-57/09 and C-101/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v B (C-57/09), D (C-101/09) (Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for the grant of refugee status or of subsidiary protection — Article 12 — Exclusion from refugee status — Article 12(2)(b) and (c) — Notion of ‘serious non-political crime’ — Notion of ‘acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations’ — Membership of an organisation involved in terrorist acts — Subsequent inclusion of that organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities which forms the Annex to Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Individual responsibility for part of the acts committed by that organisation — Conditions — Right of asylum by virtue of national constitutional law — Compatibility with Directive 2004/83/EC)
|
4
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/08
|
Case C-84/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsrätten — Sweden) — X v Skatteverket (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2, first paragraph of Article 20 and Article 138(1) — Intra-Community acquisition of a new sailing boat — Immediate use of the goods purchased in the Member State of acquisition or in another Member State before transporting it to its final destination — Time-limit within which transport of goods to place of destination commences — Maximum duration of transport — Relevant point in time for determining whether a means of transport is new for the purposes of taxation thereof)
|
5
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/09
|
Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden — Germany) — Volker und Markus Schecke GbR (C-92/09), Hartmut Eifert (C-93/09) v Land Hessen (Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Publication of information on beneficiaries of agricultural aid — Validity of the provisions of European Union law providing for that publication and laying down detailed rules for such publication — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7 and 8 — Directive 95/46/EC — Interpretation of Articles 18 and 20)
|
6
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/10
|
Case C-142/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Dendermonde — Belgium) — Criminal proceedings against V. W. Lahousse, Lavichy BVBA (Directives 92/61/EEC and 2002/24/EC — Type-approval of two- or three-wheel motor vehicles — Vehicles intended for use in competition, on roads or in off-road conditions — National legislation prohibiting the manufacture, marketing and use of equipment designed to increase the engine power and/or speed of mopeds)
|
7
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/11
|
Case C-152/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany)) — André Grootes v Amt für Landwirtschaft Parchim (Common agricultural policy — Integrated administration and control system for certain aid schemes — Single payment scheme — Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 — Calculation of payment entitlements — Article 40(5) — Farmers who were under agri-environmental commitments during the reference period — Article 59(3) — Regional implementation of the single payment scheme — Article 61 — Different per-unit values for hectares under permanent pasture and for any other hectare eligible for aid)
|
7
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/12
|
Case C-156/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Leverkusen v Verigen Transplantation Service International AG (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 13(A)(1)(c) — Exemptions for activities in the public interest — Provision of medical care — Removal and multiplication of cartilage cells for the purpose of reimplantation in the patient)
|
8
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/13
|
Case C-159/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Bourges — France) — Lidl SNC v Vierzon Distribution SA (Directives 84/450/EEC and 97/55/EC — Conditions under which a comparative advertising is permitted — Price comparison based on selection of food products marketed by two competing retail store chains — Goods meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose — Misleading advertising — Comparison based on a verifiable feature)
|
9
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/14
|
Case C-164/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 November 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Conservation of wild birds — Directive 79/409/EEC — Derogations from the system of protection for wild birds — Hunting)
|
9
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/15
|
Case C-226/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2004/18/EC — Public procurement procedures — Award of a contract for interpretation and translation services — Services falling within the ambit of Annex II B of the Directive — Services not subject to all the requirements of the Directive — Weighting of the award criteria determined after tenders have been submitted — Weighting altered following an initial review of the tenders submitted — Compliance with the principle of equal treatment and the obligation of transparency)
|
10
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/16
|
Case C-229/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany)) — Hogan Lovells International LLP v Bayer CropScience AG (Patent law — Plant-protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 — Directive 91/414/EEC — Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products — Grant of a certificate for a product which had obtained a provisional marketing authorisation)
|
10
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/17
|
Case C-232/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Latvia)) — Dita Danosa v LKB Līzings SIA (Social policy — Directive 92/85/EEC — Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding — Articles 2(a) and 10 — Concept of ‘pregnant worker’ — Prohibition on the dismissal of a pregnant worker during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave — Directive 76/207/EEC — Equal treatment for men and women — Member of the Board of Directors of a capital company — National legislation permitting the dismissal of a Board Member without any restrictions)
|
11
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/18
|
Case C-247/09: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — Alketa Xhymshiti v Bundesagentur für Arbeit — Familienkasse Lörrach (Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and No 574/72 and Regulation (EC) No 859/2003 — Social security for migrant workers — Family benefits — National of a non member country working in Switzerland and residing with his spouse and children in a Member State of which the children are nationals)
|
11
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/19
|
Joined Cases C-250/09 and C-268/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Plovdiv — Bulgaria) — Vasil Ivanov Georgiev v Tehnicheski universitet — Sofia, filial Plovdiv (Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 6(1) — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — University lecturers — National provision providing for the conclusion of fixed-term employment contracts beyond the age of 65 — Compulsory retirement at the age of 68 — Justification for differences in treatment on grounds of age)
|
12
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/20
|
Case C-261/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued in respect of Gaetano Mantello (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 3(2) — Ne bis in idem — Concept of the ‘same acts’ — Possibility for the executing judicial authority to refuse to execute a European arrest warrant — Final judgment in the issuing Member State — Possession of narcotic drugs — Trafficking in narcotic drugs — Criminal organisation)
|
13
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/21
|
Case C-317/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — Architecture, microclimat, énergies douces — Europe et Sud SARL (ArchiMEDES) v Commission (Appeal — Set-off of claims governed by separate legal orders — Application for repayment of sums advanced — Principle of litis denuntiatio — Rights of the defence and right to a fair hearing)
|
13
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/22
|
Case C-322/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Complaint by a competitor — Admissibility — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Articles 4, 10, 13 and 20 — Commission decision not to examine the complaint further — Classification by the Commission of measures as partially not constituting State aid and partially as existing aid compatible with the common market — Article 230 EC — Concept of ‘an act open to challenge’)
|
14
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/23
|
Case C-356/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Christine Kleist (Social policy — Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation — Directive 76/207/EEC — Article 3(1)(c) — National rules facilitating the dismissal of workers who have acquired the right to draw their retirement pension — Objective of promoting employment of younger persons — National rules setting the age conferring entitlement to a retirement pension at 60 years for women and 65 years for men)
|
14
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/24
|
Case C-48/10: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Environment — Directive 2008/1/EC — Integrated pollution prevention and control — Conditions for the authorisation of existing installations — Obligation to ensure the operation of such installations in accordance with the requirements of the directive)
|
15
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/25
|
Case C-296/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 November 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart — Germany) — Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Lis pendens — Substantive proceedings relating to rights of custody in respect of a child and application for provisional measures relating to rights of custody in respect of the same child)
|
15
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/26
|
Case C-339/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 July 2010 — Krasimir Asparuhov Estov, Monika Lucien Ivanova and ‘KEMKO INTERNATIONAL’ EAD v Ministerski savet na Republika Bulgaria
|
16
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/27
|
Case C-474/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) made on 29 September 2010 — Seaport (NI) Ltd, Magherafelt district Council, F P McCann (Developments) Ltd, Younger Homes Ltd, Heron Brothers Ltd, G Small Contracts, Creagh Concrete Products Ltd v Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland, Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland
|
16
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/28
|
Case C-486/10: Action brought on 8 October 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
|
17
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/29
|
Case C-489/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 12 October 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Łukasz Marcin Bonda
|
17
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/30
|
Case C-490/10: Action brought on 12 October 2010 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union
|
18
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/31
|
Case C-492/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz (Austria) lodged on 14 October 2010 — Immobilien Linz GmbH & Co KG v Finanzamt Freistadt Rohrbach Urfahr
|
18
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/32
|
Case C-493/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland made on 15 October 2010 — M. E. and others v Refugee Applications Commissioner, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
|
18
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/33
|
Case C-498/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 14 October 2010 — X NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
|
19
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/34
|
Case C-499/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brugge (Belgium) lodged on 19 October 2010 — Vlaamse Oliemaatschappij v F.O.D. Financiën
|
19
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/35
|
Case C-505/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 21 October 2010 — Partrederiet Sea Fighter v Skatteministeriet
|
20
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/36
|
Case C-507/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Firenze (Italy), lodged on 25 October 2010 — Denise Bernardi, represented by Katia Mecacci v Fabio Bernardi
|
20
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/37
|
Case C-514/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 2 November 2010 — Wolf Naturprodukte GmbH v Sewar spol. s r. o.
|
20
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/38
|
Case C-516/10: Action brought on 29 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
|
21
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/39
|
Case C-518/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) made on 2 November 2010 — Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd, Aventis Holdings Inc v Comptroller-General of Patents
|
21
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/40
|
Case C-519/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari (Italy) lodged on 27 October 2010 — Giovanni Colapietro v Ispettorato Centrale Repressioni Frodi
|
21
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/41
|
Case C-537/10 P: Appeal brought on 19 November 2010 by Deltafina SpA against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 September 2010 in Case T-29/05 Deltafina v Commission
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
2011/C 013/42
|
Case T-35/08: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2010 — Codorniu Napa v OHIM — Bodegas Ontañón (ASTESA NAPA VALLEY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark ARTESA NAPA VALLEY — Earlier figurative Community trade mark ARTESO and earlier national word mark LA ARTESA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
23
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/43
|
Case T-95/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2010 — Italy v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Support scheme for production in the sector of products processed from fruit and vegetables — Exceptional support measures in the beef and veal sector — Tobacco premiums scheme)
|
23
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/44
|
Case T-113/08: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2010 — Spain v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Aid for the production of olive oil — Aid for arable crop areas)
|
23
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/45
|
Case T-9/09 P: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Staff cases — Officials — Dismissal of the action at first instance as manifestly inadmissible — Request for the return of personal property — Notification of the decision rejecting the complaint in a language other than that of the complaint — Action out of time — No response to a head of claim submitted at first instance)
|
24
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/46
|
Case T-137/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2010 — Nike International v OHIM — Muñoz Molina (R10) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark R10 — Non-registered national word mark R10 — Assignment of the national mark — Procedural defect)
|
24
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/47
|
Case T-260/09: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2010 — OHIM v Simões Dos Santos (Appeal — Cross-appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2003 promotion procedure — Merit points reset at zero and their total recalculated — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Res judicata — Legal basis — Non-retroactivity — Legitimate expectation — Material damage — Loss of opportunity for promotion — Non-material damage)
|
24
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/48
|
Case T-404/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2010 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM (Horizontal combination of the colours grey and red) (Community trade mark — Application for Community trade mark consisting in a horizontal combination of the colours grey and red — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
25
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/49
|
Case T-405/09: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2010 — Deutsche Bahn v OHIM (Vertical combination of the colours grey and red) (Community trade mark — Application for Community trade mark consisting in a vertical combination of the colours grey and red — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
|
25
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/50
|
Case T-61/10: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission (Action for failure to act — Failure to adopt measures — Application for directions to be issued — Request for protective measures — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
|
25
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/51
|
Case T-101/09: Action brought on 1 September 2010 — Maftah v Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/52
|
Case T-102/09: Action brought on 1 September 2010 — Elosta v Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/53
|
Case T-488/10: Action brought on 11 October 2010 — France v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/54
|
Case T-491/10: Action brought on 15 October 2010 — SNCF v OHIM (infotrafic)
|
28
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/55
|
Case T-507/10: Action brought on 28 October 2010 — Viktor Uspaskich v European Parliament
|
28
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/56
|
Case T-511/10: Action brought on 22 October 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki/Commission
|
29
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/57
|
Case T-513/10: Action brought on 1 November 2010 — Hamberger Industriewerke v OHIM (Atrium)
|
29
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/58
|
Case T-514/10: Action brought on 1 November 2010 — Fruit of the Loom v OHIM — Blueshore Management (FRUIT)
|
30
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/59
|
Case T-516/10: Action brought on 3 November 2010 — France v Commission
|
30
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/60
|
Case T-517/10: Action brought on 4 November 2010 — Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers v OHIM — Ozone Laboratories Pharma (HYPOCHOL)
|
31
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/61
|
Case T-519/10: Action brought on 8 November 2010 — Seikoh Giken v OHIM — Seiko (SG SEIKOH GIKEN)
|
32
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/62
|
Case T-520/10: Action brought on 10 November 2010 — Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia v Commission
|
32
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/63
|
Case T-522/10: Action brought on 8 November 2010 — Hell Energy v OHIM — Hansa Mineralbrunnen (HELL)
|
33
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/64
|
Case T-523/10: Action brought on 8 November 2010 — Interkobo v OHIM — XXXLutz Marken (mybaby)
|
33
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/65
|
Case T-525/10: Action brought on 5 November 2010 — Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio v OHIM — Weinkellerei Lenz Moser (SERVO SUO)
|
34
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/66
|
Case T-526/10: Action brought on 9 November 2010 — Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Commission
|
34
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/67
|
Case T-25/08: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2010 — Katjes Fassin v OHMI (Yoghurt-Gums)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
2011/C 013/68
|
Case F-77/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Vicente Carajosa and Others v Commission (Civil service — Open competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 in the field of fraud prevention — Exclusion of candidates in consequence of their results in the admission tests — Decision of the Appointing Authority — Failure to lodge a complaint — Inadmissibility of the action)
|
36
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/69
|
Case F-84/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Cerafogli v European Central Bank (Staff case — ECB Staff — Action for damages seeking compensation for harm resulting directly from alleged illegality of conditions of employment and staff rules — Civil Service Tribunal’s lack of jurisdiction — Inadmissible — Release from service for staff representation — No adjustment of workload — Wrongful act)
|
36
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/70
|
Case F-96/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Cerafogli v European Central Bank (Civil service — ECB Staff — Pay — Additional increase in salary — Ad personam promotion — Consultation with staff committee to determine the criteria for granting additional increases in salary)
|
37
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/71
|
Case F-9/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission (Staff case — Open competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 in the field of fraud prevention — Act adversely affecting the applicants — Exclusion of candidates following results obtained in admission tests — EPSO not competent)
|
37
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/72
|
Case F-49/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 October 2010 — Wendler v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Retirement pension — Payment of pension — Obligation to open a bank account in country of residence — Freedom to provide services — Plea involving a matter of public policy — Principle of equal treatment)
|
37
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/73
|
Case F-3/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 October 2010 — AB v Commission (Staff cases — Contract staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Complaint out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
38
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/74
|
Case F-82/10: Action brought on 22 September 2010 — Nolin v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/75
|
Case F-83/10: Action brought on 23 September 2010 — Giannakouris v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/76
|
Case F-84/10: Action brought on 23 September 2010 — Chatzidoukakis v Commission
|
39
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/77
|
Case F-85/10: Action brought on 23 September 2010 — AI v Court of Justice
|
39
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/78
|
Case F-87/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Adriaens and Others v Commission
|
40
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/79
|
Case F-91/10: Action brought on 30 September 2010 — AK v Commission
|
40
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/80
|
Case F-92/10: Action brought on 1 October 2010 — Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission
|
40
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/81
|
Case F-94/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Carpenito v Council
|
41
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/82
|
Case F-97/10: Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Kerstens v Commission
|
41
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/83
|
Case F-98/10: Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Cervelli v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/84
|
Case F-99/10: Action brought on 5 October 2010 — Ashbrook and Others v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/85
|
Case F-104/10: Action brought on 21 October 2010 — De Pretis Cagnodo and Trampuz v European Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/86
|
Case F-109/10: Action brought on 26 October 2010 — Schätzel v Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/87
|
Case F-110/10: Action brought on 29 October 2010 — Couyoufa v Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/88
|
Case F-112/10: Action brought on 2 November 2010 — Trentea v FRA
|
43
|
|
|
|
2011/C 013/89
|
Case F-17/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 November 2010 — Vereecken v Commission
|
44
|
|
|
|