|
V Announcements
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
2010/C 221/02
|
Case C-105/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Freedom to provide services and free movement of capital — Articles 49 EC and 56 EC and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement — Direct taxation — Taxation of interest received — Discriminatory treatment of non-residents — Burden of proof)
|
2
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/03
|
Case C-211/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 June 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 49 EC — Social security — Hospital care needed during a temporary stay in another Member State — Lack of right to assistance from the competent institution to supplement that of the institution of the Member State of stay)
|
2
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/04
|
Case C-262/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 June 2010 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — CopyGene A/S v Skatteministeriet (Sixth VAT Directive — Exemptions — Article 13A(1)(b) — Hospital and medical care — Closely related activities — Duly recognised establishments of a nature similar to hospitals or centres for medical treatment or diagnosis — Private stem cell bank — Services of collection, transportation, analysis and storage of umbilical cord blood of newborn children — Possible autologous or allogeneic use of stem cells)
|
3
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/05
|
Joined Cases C-338/08 and C-339/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 June 2010 (references for preliminary rulings from the Commissione tributaria regionale di Torino — Italy) — P. Ferrero e C. SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Alba (C-338/08), General Beverage Europe BV v Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Torino 1 (C-339/08) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 90/435/EEC — Concept of withholding tax — Application of a levy of 5 % at the time of distribution of dividends and of the ‘refund of the adjustment surtax’ by an Italian subsidiary to its parent company established in the Netherlands, pursuant to a bilateral convention)
|
4
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/06
|
Case C-375/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Treviso (Italy)) — Criminal proceedings against Luigi Pontini, Emanuele Rech, Dino Bonora, Giovanni Forato, Laura Forato, Adele Adami, Sinergie sas di Rech & C., Impresa individuale Forato Giovanni, Forato srl, Giglio srl, Impresa individuale Rech Emanuele, Ivo Colomberotto, Agenzia Veneta per i pagamenti in agricoltura — AVEPA, Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Agrirocca di Rech Emanuele, Asolat di Rech Emanuele & C. (Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Beef and veal — Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 — Community financial aid concerning special premiums for male bovine animals and payments for extensification — Conditions for granting — Calculation of the stocking density on the holding — Meaning of ‘available forage area’ — Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 and Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 — Integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes — National legislation making the grant of Community financial aid conditional upon production of a valid legal document attesting to the right to use the areas under forage)
|
5
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/07
|
Case C-413/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — Lafarge SA v European Commission, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plasterboard — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Burden of proof — No proper statement of reasons — Regulation No 17 — Article 15(2) — Penalty — Repeated infringement — Stage at which the deterrent effect of the fine is to be taken into account)
|
5
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/08
|
Case C-423/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Own resources — Procedures for collecting import or export duties — Failure to comply with the time-limits for entry of the own resources — Late payment of own resources relating to those duties)
|
6
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/09
|
Case C-492/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 June 2010 — European Commission v French Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/112/EC — Value added tax — Reduced rate — Articles 96 and 98(2) — Annex III, point 15 — Legal aid — Services of lawyers — Payment in full or in part by the State)
|
6
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/10
|
Case C-550/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — British American Tobacco (Germany) GmbH v Hauptzollamt Schweinfurt (Directive 92/12/EEC — Products subject to excise duty — Importation of raw tobacco not subject to excise duty under the inward processing procedure — Processing into cut tobacco — Movement between Member States — Accompanying document)
|
7
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/11
|
Case C-571/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 June 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 95/59/EC — Taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Article 9(1) — Free determination, by manufacturers and importers, of the maximum retail selling prices of their products — National legislation imposing a minimum retail selling price for cigarettes — Justification — Protection of public health)
|
7
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/12
|
Case C-2/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — Regionalna Mitnicheska Direktsia — Plovdiv v Petar Dimitrov Kalinchev (Excise duties — Taxation of used vehicles — Taxation of imported used vehicles higher than that imposed on vehicles which are already in circulation in the national territory — Taxation according to the year of manufacture and mileage of the vehicles — Concept of ‘similar domestic products’)
|
8
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/13
|
Case C-31/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság (Republic of Hungary)) — Nawras Bolbol v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (Directive 2004/83/EC — Minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees — Stateless person of Palestinian origin who has not sought protection or assistance from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) — Application for refugee status — Refusal based on a failure to meet the conditions laid down in Article 1A of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, signed in Geneva on 28 July 1951 — Right of that stateless person to be recognised as a refugee on the basis of the second sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2004/83)
|
9
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/14
|
Case C-37/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Portugal (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Environment — Management of illegally disposed of waste — Directive 2006/12/EC — Directive 80/68/EEC)
|
9
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/15
|
Case C-51/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 June 2010 — Barbara Becker v Harman International Industries, Inc., Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word mark Barbara Becker — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word marks BECKER and BECKER ONLINE PRO — Assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Assessment of the conceptual similarity of the signs)
|
10
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/16
|
Case C-58/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Leo-Libera GmbH v Finanzamt Buchholz in der Nordheide (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 135(1)(i) — Exemption of betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling — Conditions and limitations — Discretionary power of the Member States)
|
10
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/17
|
Case C-75/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Alessandria — Italy) — Agra Srl v Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Alessandria (Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 221(3) and (4) — Post-clearance recovery of the customs debt — Limitation period — Act which could give rise to criminal court proceedings)
|
11
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/18
|
Case C-86/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the VAT and Duties Tribunal, Manchester — United Kingdom) — Future Health Technologies Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 132(1)(b) and (c) — Hospital and medical care and closely related activities — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Collection, testing and processing of umbilical cord blood — Storage of stem cells — Possible future therapeutic use — Transactions comprising a bundle of features and acts)
|
11
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/19
|
Case C-98/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trani (Italy)) — Francesca Sorge v Poste Italiane SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work — Clause 8 — Details to be included in a fixed-term contract concluded for the purpose of replacing an absent worker — Reduction of the general level of protection afforded to workers — Interpretation in conformity with European Union law)
|
12
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/20
|
Joined Cases C-105/09 and C-110/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 June 2010 (References for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Terre wallonne ASBL (C-105/09), Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL (C-110/09) v Région wallonne (Directive 2001/42/EC — Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Action programmes in respect of vulnerable zones)
|
13
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/21
|
Case C-169/09: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 March 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Ecodesign requirements for energy-using products — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
|
13
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/22
|
Case C-478/09: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 June 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Merger or division of public limited liability companies — Requirement of an independent expert’s report — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
|
14
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/23
|
Joined Cases C-188/10 and C-189/10: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 June 2010 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France)) — Proceedings against Aziz Melki (C-188/10) and Sélim Abdeli (C-189/10) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Examination of whether a national law is consistent both with European Union law and with the national constitution — National legislation granting priority to an interlocutory procedure for the review of constitutionality — Article 67 TFEU — Freedom of movement for persons — Abolition of border control at internal borders — Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 — Articles 20 and 21 — National legislation authorising identity checks in the area between the land border of France with States party to the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement and a line drawn 20 kilometres inside that border)
|
14
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/24
|
Case C-507/09 P: Appeal brought on 7 December 2009 by Goldman Management AD against the judgment delivered on 16 November 2009 in Case T-354/09
|
15
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/25
|
Case C-218/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 May 2010 — ADV Allround Vermittlungs AG in liquidation v Finanzamt Hamburg-Bergedorf
|
16
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/26
|
Case C-224/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Baden-Baden (Germany) lodged on 10 May 2010 — Staatsanwaltschaft Baden-Baden v Leo Apelt
|
16
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/27
|
Case C-225/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 10 May 2010 — Juan Pérez García, José Arias Neira, Fernando Barrera Castro, Dolores Verdun Espinosa, successor to José Bernal Fernández v Familienkasse Nürnberg
|
17
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/28
|
Case C-234/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Nanterre (France) lodged on 12 May 2010 — Tereos v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects Receveur principal des douanes et droits indirects de Gennevilliers
|
17
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/29
|
Case C-240/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 14 May 2010 — Cathy Schulz-Delzers and Pascal Schulz v Finanzamt Stuttgart III
|
18
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/30
|
Case C-241/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 17 May 2010 — Harald Jung and Gerald Hellweger v Magistrat der Stadt Salzburg, other party to the proceedings: Finanzamt Salzburg-Stadt
|
18
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/31
|
Case C-252/10 P: Appeal brought on 18 May 2010 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 2 March 2010 in Case T-70/05: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)
|
19
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/32
|
Case C-256/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-León (Spain) lodged on 25 May 2010 — David Barcenilla Fernández v Gerardo García, S.L.
|
20
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/33
|
Case C-258/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Dâmbovița (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2010 — Nicușor Grigore v Regia Națională a Pădurilor Romsilva — Direcția Silvică București
|
20
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/34
|
Case C-261/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-León (Spain) lodged on 25 May 2010 — Pedro Antonio Macedo Lozano v Gerardo García, S.L.
|
21
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/35
|
Case C-265/10: Action brought on 28 May 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
|
21
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/36
|
Case C-267/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium) lodged on 28 May 2010 — André Rossius v État belge — SPF Finances
|
22
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/37
|
Case C-268/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium) lodged on 28 May 2010 — Marc Collard v État belge — SPF Finances
|
23
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/38
|
Case C-269/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 28 May 2010 — Société Accor Services France v Le Chèque Déjeuner CCR, Etablissement Public de Santé de Ville-Evrard
|
24
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/39
|
Case C-270/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 31 May 2010 — Lotta Gistö
|
25
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/40
|
Case C-272/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis (Greece) lodged on 31 May 2010 — Suzanna Verkizi-Nikolakaki v Anotato Simvoulio Epilogis Prosopikou (ASEP) and Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki
|
25
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/41
|
Case C-273/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (Spain) lodged on 1 June 2010 — David Montoya Medina v Fondo de Garantía Salarial and Universidad de Alicante
|
26
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/42
|
Case C-274/10: Action brought on 1 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Hungary
|
26
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/43
|
Case C-286/10: Action brought on 9 June 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic
|
27
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/44
|
Case C-287/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif (Luxembourg) lodged on 10 June 2010 — Tankreederei I SA v Directeur de l’Administration des Contributions Directes
|
28
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/45
|
Case C-291/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic
|
28
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/46
|
Case C-294/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 15 June 2010 — Andrejs Eglītis and Edvards Ratnieks v Ekonomikas Ministrija
|
29
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/47
|
Case C-295/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Vyriausiasis Administracinis Teismas (Republic of Lithuania), lodged on 15 June 2010 — Genovaitė Valčiukienė, Julija Pekelienė, the public organisation ‘The Lithuanian Green Movement’, Petras Girinskis and Laurynas Arimantas Lašas v Municipal Council of the District of Pakruojas, the Šiauliai Centre for Public Health and the Šiauliai Regional Department for Environmental Protection
|
29
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/48
|
Case C-296/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 16 June 2010 — Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez
|
30
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/49
|
Case C-302/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark), lodged on 18 June 2010 — Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening
|
31
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/50
|
Case C-306/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
2010/C 221/51
|
Case T-66/01: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2010 — Imperial Chemical Industries v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for soda ash in the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Commission’s power to impose a fine or sanction — Reasonable time — Essential procedural requirements — Res judicata — Existence of the dominant position — Abuse of the dominant position — Effect on trade between Member States — Fine — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances)
|
33
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/52
|
Case T-321/05: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — AstraZeneca v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market in anti-ulcer medicines — Decision finding an infringement of Article 82 EC — Market definition — Significant competitive constraints — Abuse of procedures relating to supplementary protection certificates for medicinal products and of marketing authorisation procedures for medicinal products — Misleading representations — Deregistration of marketing authorisations — Obstacles to the marketing of generic medicinal products and to parallel imports — Fines)
|
33
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/53
|
Case T-44/06: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Commission v Hellenic Ventures and Others (Arbitration clause — Action for the creation and development of seed-capital funds — Termination of the contract — Action against the members of a company — Inadmissibility — Reimbursement of advances — Interest)
|
34
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/54
|
Case T-111/07: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Agrofert Holding v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure concerning a merger between undertakings — Refusal to grant access)
|
35
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/55
|
Case T-342/07: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — Ryanair v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Air transport — Decision declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market — Assessment of the effects of the concentration on competition — Barriers to entry — Efficiency gains — Commitments)
|
35
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/56
|
Case T-411/07: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — Aer Lingus Group v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the common market — Concept of concentration — Disposal of all the shares acquired, so as to restore the situation prevailing before the implementation of the concentration — Refusal to order appropriate measures — Lack of competence of the Commission)
|
36
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/57
|
Case T-53/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Italian Republic v Commission (State aid — Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest — Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of advantage — Principle of audi alteram partem)
|
36
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/58
|
Case T-62/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — ThyssenKrupp Acciai Speciali Terni v Commission (State aid — Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest — Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of advantage — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Aid measure put into effect)
|
37
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/59
|
Case T-63/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Cementir Italia v Commission (State aid — Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest — Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Concept of advantage — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Aid measure put into effect)
|
37
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/60
|
Case T-64/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche v Commission (State aid — Compensation for expropriation on grounds of public interest — Temporal extension of a preferential tariff for the supply of electricity — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Concept of advantage — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Aid measure put into effect)
|
38
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/61
|
Case T-266/08 P: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2010 — Kerstens v Commission (Appeal — Staff case — Officials — Change of posting — Article 7 of the Staff Regulations — Interests of the service — Distortion of facts and evidence — Obligation on the Civil Service Tribunal to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
|
38
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/62
|
Case T-335/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — BNP Paribas and BNL v European Commission (State aid — Measures taken by the Italian authorities concerning certain restructured banks — Scheme for the realignment of the value of assets for tax purposes — Decision classifying the aid scheme as incompatible with the common market and ordering recovery of the aid — Action for annulment — Individual concern — Admissibility — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Selective nature — Obligation to state reasons)
|
39
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/63
|
Case T-351/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Matratzen Concord v OHIM — Barranco Schnitzler and Barranco Rodriguez (MATRATZEN CONCORD) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark MATRATZEN CONCORD — Earlier national word mark MATRATZEN — Relative ground for refusal — Evidence of use of the earlier mark — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
39
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/64
|
Case T-407/08: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2010 — MIP Metro v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (Metromeet) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ‘Metromeet’ — Earlier national word mark ‘meeting metro’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
40
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/65
|
Case T-485/08 P: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2010 — Lafili v Commission (Appeal — Staff case — Officials — Admissibility — Concept of the party who was unsuccessful at first instance — Promotion — Classification in grade and step — Multiplication factor greater than one — Conversion to seniority in step — Article 7 of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations)
|
40
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/66
|
Case T-557/08: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — mPAY24 GmbH v OHIM — Ultra (M PAY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark M PAY — Earlier Community and national word marks MPAY24 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
41
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/67
|
Joined Cases T-568/08 and T-573/08: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2010 — M6 and TF1 v Commission (State aid — Public service broadcasting — Aid which the French Republic is intending to grant in favour of France Télévisions — Capital funding of EUR 150 million — Decision not to raise objections — Service of general economic interest — Criterion of proportionality — No serious difficulties)
|
41
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/68
|
Case T-51/09: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Commission v Antiche Terre (Arbitration clause — Programme concerning the promotion of energy technologies for Europe (Thermie) — Contract concerning the project for the building in Umbertide (Italy) of an electricity generating plant using an innovative agro-forestry biomass combustion technology — Substantial amendment to the conditions for performance of the contract — Termination — Reimbursement of sums paid — Interest)
|
42
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/69
|
Case T-60/09: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Herhof v OHIM — Stabilator(stabilator) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for community figurative mark stabilator — Earlier Community word mark STABILAT — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
42
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/70
|
Case T-124/09: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Valigeria Roncato v OHIM –Roncato (CARLO RONCATO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for community word mark CARLO RONCATO — Unregistered national figurative and word marks RV RONCATO and RONCATO — Earlier national figurative and word marks RV RONCATO and RONCATO — No likelihood of unfair advantage being taken of the distinctive character and repute of the earlier marks — Due cause for the use of the mark applied for — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
43
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/71
|
Case T-293/08: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — BASF Plant Science and Others v European Commission (Approximation of laws — Deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms — Authorisation procedure for placing on the market — Failure to adopt a decision — Action for failure to act — Action deprived of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
|
43
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/72
|
Case T-515/08: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Mauerhofer v Commission (Multiple framework contract ‘Commission 2007’ — Recruitment of experts in the context of actions relating to aid granted to non-member countries — Tasks requiring expertise — Commission measure relating to the number of billable days’ work — Action for annulment — No challengeable act — Inadmissibility — Action for damages — Causal link — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
|
44
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/73
|
Case T-24/09: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2010 — Biocaps v Commission (Competition — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Existence of the addressee of the decision — Action manifestly unfounded in law)
|
44
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/74
|
Case T-284/09 P: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2010 — Meister v OHIM (Appeal — Public service — Officials — Staff report — Late drawing up of assessment reports — Subject-matter of the action at first instance — Late reply to complaints — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
|
45
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/75
|
Case T-359/09: Order of the General Court of 17 June 2010 — Jurašinović v Council (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Reports of observers sent by the European Union to the Knin region (Croatia) — Interim measure — Inadmissibility — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
45
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/76
|
Order of the President of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission (Affaire T-61/10 R) (Application for interim measures — Disregard of formal requirements — Not admissible)
|
46
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/77
|
Case T-493/09 P: Appeal brought on 21 May 2010 by Y against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 7 October 2009 in Case F-29/08, Y v Commission
|
46
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/78
|
Case T-242/10: Action brought on 27 May 2010 — Danzeisen v Commission
|
47
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/79
|
Case T-244/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Tsakiris-Mallas v OHIM — Seven (7 Seven Fashion Shoes)
|
49
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/80
|
Case T-256/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 June 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 25 March 2010 in Case F-102/08, Marcuccio v Commission
|
49
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/81
|
Case T-257/10: Action brought on 4 June 2010 — Italy v Commission
|
50
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/82
|
Case T-262/10: Action brought on 7 June 2010 — Microban International and Microban (Europe) v Commission
|
51
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/83
|
Case T-263/10: Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Spain v Commission
|
52
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/84
|
Case T-264/10: Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Spain v Commission
|
53
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/85
|
Case T-265/10: Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Spain v Commission
|
53
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/86
|
Case T-266/10: Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Spain v Commission
|
54
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/87
|
Case T-270/10: Action brought on 8 June 2010 — Conceria Kara v OHIM (KARA)
|
54
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/88
|
Case T-271/10: Action brought on 16 June 2010 — H v Council and Others
|
55
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/89
|
Case T-273/10: Action brought on 18 June 2010 — Olive Line International v OHIM — O. International (O·LIVE)
|
56
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/90
|
Case T-278/10: Action brought on 21 June 2010 — Wesergold Getränkeindustrie v OHIM — Lidl Stiftung (WESTERN GOLD)
|
56
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/91
|
Case T-286/10: Action brought on 30 June 2010 — Fondation de l'Institut de Recherche Idiap v European Commission
|
57
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/92
|
Case T-452/07: Order of the General Court of 18 June 2010 — Ecolean Research & Development v OHIM (CAPS)
|
58
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/93
|
Case T-96/08: Order of the General Court of 18 June 2010 — Global Digital Disc v Commission
|
59
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/94
|
Case T-295/08: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2010 — CPS Color Group v OHIM-Fema Farben and Putze (TEMACOLOR)
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
2010/C 221/95
|
Case F-56/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Access of the administration to an official’s lodgings — Respect for the home and private life)
|
60
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/96
|
Case F-45/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Kaser/Commission
|
60
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/97
|
Case F-47/10: Action brought on 18 June 2010 — Hecq v Commission
|
61
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/98
|
Case F-49/10: Action brought on 24 June 2010 — De Nicola v EIB
|
61
|
|
|
|
2010/C 221/99
|
Case F-52/10: Action brought on 3 July 2010 — Merhzaoui v Council
|
61
|
|
|
|