|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2009/C 193/02
|
Case C-165/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (The Netherlands) lodged on 4 May 2009 — Stichting Natuur en Milieu, Stichting Greenpeace Nederland, B. Meijer and E. Zwaag, F. Pals v College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Groningen, interested third party: RWE Power AG
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/03
|
Case C-166/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (The Netherlands) lodged on 11 May 2009 — Stichting Natuur en Milieu, Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie, Stichting Greenpeace Nederland, Vereniging van Verontruste Burgers van Voorne v Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland, Interveners: Electrabel Nederland NV and Burgemeester en Wethouders Rotterdam
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/04
|
Case C-167/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 May 2009 — Stichting Natuur en Milieu, Stichting Zuid-Hollandse Milieufederatie, Stichting Greenpeace Nederland, Vereniging van Verontruste Burgers van Voorne v Gedeputeerde Staten van Zuid-Holland, interested third parties: E.On Benelux and Burgemeester en Wethouders Rotterdam
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/05
|
Case C-182/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland, Queen's Bench Division (United Kingdom) made on 19 May 2009 — Seaport (NI) Limited v Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/06
|
Case C-188/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Republic of Poland), lodged on 28 May 2009 — Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Białymstoku v ‘Profaktor’ Kulesza, Frankowski, Trzaska spółka jawna w Białymstoku
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/07
|
Case C-191/09 P: Appeal brought on 29 May 2009 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 March 2009 in Case T-249/06: Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT), formerly Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant ‘Niko Tube’ ZAT, Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT), formerly Nizhnedneprovsky Tube-Rolling Plant VAT v Council of the European Union
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/08
|
Case C-193/09 P: Appeal brought on 1 June 2009 by Kaul GmbH against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 25 March 2009 in Case T-402/07: Kaul GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) — Bayer AG
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/09
|
Case C-194/09 P: Appeal brought on 1 June 2009 by Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 25 March 2009 in Case T-332/06: Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl v Commission of the European Communities
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/10
|
Case C-195/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (Patents Court) (England and Wales) made on 29 May 2009 — Synthon BV v Merz Pharma Gmbh & Co KG
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/11
|
Case C-196/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Chambre de recours des Écoles européennes lodged on 29 May 2009 — Paul Miles and Others, Robert Watson MacDonald v Secrétaire général des Écoles européennes
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/12
|
Case C-199/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 4 June 2009 — Schenker SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/13
|
Case C-200/09 P: Appeal brought on 27 May 2009 by Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 March 2009 in Case T-249/06: Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT), formerly Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant ‘Niko Tube’ ZAT, Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT), formerly Nizhnedneprovsky Tube-Rolling Plant VAT v Council of the European Union
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/14
|
Case C-204/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 8 June 2009 — Flachglas Torgau GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/15
|
Case C-208/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 June 2009 — Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/16
|
Case C-209/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 10 June 2009 — Lahti Energia Oy
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/17
|
Case C-211/09: Action brought on 11 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/18
|
Case C-214/09 P: Appeal brought on 12 June 2009 by Anheuser-Busch, Inc. against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 25 March 2009 in Case T-191/07: Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/19
|
Case C-215/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus (Finland) lodged on 15 June 2009 — Mehiläinen Oy, Suomen Terveystalo Oyj v Oulun kaupunki
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/20
|
Case C-220/09: Action brought on 16 June 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Malta
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court of First Instance
|
|
|
2009/C 193/21
|
Case T-259/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Spain v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Fibre flax — Hemp — Bananas — OLAF report — Report of the Court of Auditors — Bilateral meeting under Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 — Breach of essential procedural requirements — Abusive practice — Existence of financial harm to the EAGGF)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/22
|
Case T-435/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Danjaq v OHIM — Mission Productions (Dr. No) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Dr. No — Opposition by the proprietor of the non-registered word marks and signs Dr. No and Dr. NO — Failure to satisfy the requirement for earlier marks — Lack of a distinctive sign used in the course of trade — Article 8(1)(a) and (b), (2)(c) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b), (2)(c) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/23
|
Joined Cases T-273/06 and T-297/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — ISD Polska and Others v Commission (State aid — Scheme for restructuring aid granted by the Republic of Poland to a steel producer — Decision declaring the aid to be in part incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Protocol No 8 on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Actions for annulment — Right of action — Period within which proceedings must be brought — Admissibility — Legitimate expectations — Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Rate of interest to be applied to the repayment of incompatible aid — Duty to cooperate closely with the Member State — Compound interest rate — Articles 9(4) and 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/24
|
Case T-288/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Regionalny Fundusz Gospodarczy v Commission (State aid — Scheme for restructuring aid granted by the Republic of Poland to a steel producer — Decision declaring the aid to be in part incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Protocol No 8 on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Rate of interest to be applied for the repayment of incompatible aid — Duty to cooperate closely with the Member State — Articles 9(4) and 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/25
|
Case T-291/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Operator ARP v Commission (State aid — Scheme for restructuring aid granted by the Republic of Poland to a steel producer — Decision declaring the aid to be in part incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Protocol No 8 on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Concept of beneficiary — Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/26
|
Case T-24/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — ThyssenKrupp Stainless v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Stainless steel flat products — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after expiry of the ECSC Treaty, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Alloy surcharge — Powers of the Commission — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Res judicata — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Limitation period — Principle of non bis in idem — Cooperation during the administrative procedure)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/27
|
Joined Cases T-81/07, T-82/07 and T-83/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — KG Holding and Others v Commission (State aid — Restructuring aid granted by the Netherlands authorities to KG Holding NV — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Action for annulment — Partial inadmissibility — Recovery of aid from recipient undertakings declared bankrupt — Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/28
|
Case T-414/07 (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a hand holding a card with three triangles — Absolute ground for refusal — Absence of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2009 — Euro-Information v OHIM (Representing a hand holding a card with three triangles))
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/29
|
Case T-419/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Okalux v OHIM — Messe Düsseldorf (OKATECH) (Community trade mark — Forfeiture proceedings — Community word mark OKATECH — Partial revocation — Period allowed for appeal — Articles 57 and 77a of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 58 and 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Principles of protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty — Right to a hearing)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/30
|
Case T-444/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — CPEM v Commission of the European Communities (ESF — Cancellation of financial assistance — OLAF report)
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/31
|
Case T-16/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Perfetti Van Melle v OHIM — Cloetta Fazer (CENTER SHOCK) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark CENTER SHOCK — Earlier national word marks CENTER — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/32
|
Case T-311/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 July 2009 — Fitoussi v OHIM — Loriot (IBIZA REPUBLIC) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark IBIZA REPUBLIC — Earlier figurative national mark depicting a five-pointed star in a circle — Absolute ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/33
|
Case T-258/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 June 2009 — Poland v Commission (Action for annulment — Transitional measures to be adopted by reason of the accession of new Member States — Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector — Time-limit for bringing action — Point from which time starts to run — Lateness — Inadmissibility)
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/34
|
Case T-524/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 June 2009 — AVLUX v Parliament (Action for annulment — Public service contracts — Call for tenders for the refurbishment and extension of the Konrad Adenauer Building, Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s offer — Annulment of the public procurement procedure — No need to adjudicate)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/35
|
Case T-550/08 R: Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen v Commission (Application for interim measures — Commission decision imposing a fine — Application for suspension of operation of the measure and interim relief (repayment of the fine already paid and waiver of a bank guarantee — No prima facie case and no urgency)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/36
|
Case T-173/09 R: Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 8 June 2009 — Z v Commission (Interim measures — Access by a third party concerned to a Commission decision imposing a fine but not yet published — Application for interim measures — No need to adjudicate — No urgency)
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/37
|
Case T-184/09: Action brought on 14 May 2009 — Hellenic Republic v Commission
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/38
|
Case T-212/09: Action brought on 2 June 2009 — Denmark v Commission
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/39
|
Case T-226/09: Action brought on 9 June 2009 — British Telecommunications v Commission
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/40
|
Case T-227/09: Action brought on 10 June 2009 — Feng Shen Technology v OHIM — Majtczak (FS)
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/41
|
Case T-230/09: Action brought on 10 June 2009 — BT Pension Scheme Trustees v Commission
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/42
|
Case T-236/09: Action brought on 8 June 2009 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/43
|
Case T-237/09: Action brought on 17 June 2009 — Région Wallonne v Commission
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/44
|
Case T-238/09: Action brought on 23 June 2009 — Sniace v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/45
|
Case T-239/09 P: Appeal brought on 16 June 2009 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal made on 31 March 2009 in Case F-146/07, Marcuccio v Commission
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/46
|
Case T-244/09: Action brought on 22 June 2009 — Accenture Global Services v OHIM — Silver Creek Properties (acsensa)
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/47
|
Case T-245/09: Action brought on 24 June 2009 — Shell Hellas v Commission
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/48
|
Case T-246/09: Action brought on 29 June 2009 — Insula v Commission
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/49
|
Case T-250/09: Action brought on 23 June 2009 — Cesea Group Srl v OHIM — Mangini & C. (mangiami)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/50
|
Case T-251/09: Action brought on 26 June 2009 — Société des Pétroles Shell v Commission
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/51
|
Case T-255/09: Action brought on 30 June 2009 — Caixa Geral de Depósitos v OHIM — Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona (‘la Caixa’)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/52
|
Case T-218/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2009 — Lemans v OHIM — Turner (ICON)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/53
|
Case T-389/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2009 — Lemans v OHIM — Turner (ICON)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/54
|
Case T-435/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 25 June 2009 — Tokita Management Service v OHIM — Eminent Food (Tomatoberry)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2009/C 193/55
|
Case F-39/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Campos Valls v Council (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Appointment — Post of Head of Unit — Rejection of the applicant’s candidature — Conditions required for the notice of vacancy — Manifest error of assessment)
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/56
|
Case F-137/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 6 May 2009 — Sergio v Commission (Staff case — Rights and obligations — Freedom of association — Protocol of Agreement between the Commission and the trade union or professional organisations — Individual decisions on secondment/release from service based on a protocol — Act adversely affecting an official — Locus standi — Official acting on his own account and not on the account of a trade union — Admissibility — Notification of the rejection of the complaint to the applicants’ lawyer — Starting point for the time-limit for bringing an action)
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/57
|
Case F-43/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2009 — Spee v Europol (Staff case — Europol staff — Vacant post — Selection procedure)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/58
|
Case F-72/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2009 — Ketselidis v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action — Prior administrative complaint — Tacit reply — Excusable error — None — Implicit rejection decision — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility — Judgment of a Community court — Substantial new fact — None)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/59
|
Case F-81/08: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2009 — Ketselidou v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action — Judgment of a Community court — Substantial new fact — None)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/60
|
Case F-61/09: Action brought on 25 June 2009 — Strack v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/61
|
Case F-62/09: Action brought on 26 June 2009 — Strack v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/62
|
Joined Cases F-14/05 and F-20/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2009 — Albert-Bousquet and Others and Johansson and Others v Commission
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/63
|
Case F-21/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2009 — De Geest v Council
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/64
|
Case F-38/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2009 — Delplancke and Governatori v Commission
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/65
|
Case F-49/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2009 — Bethuyne and Others v Commission
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 193/66
|
Case F-80/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 June 2009 — De Geest v Council
|
37
|
|
|
|
