|
V Announcements
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
2015/C 245/02
|
Case C-111/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 4 March 2015 — Občina Gorje v Republic of Slovenia
|
2
|
2015/C 245/03
|
Case C-167/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Civile di Roma (Italy) lodged on 13 April 2015 — X v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
|
3
|
2015/C 245/04
|
Case C-168/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia) lodged on 14 April 2015 — Milena Tomášová v Slovenská republika — Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR, Pohotovosť, s.r.o.
|
3
|
2015/C 245/05
|
Case C-178/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy we Wrocławiu (Poland) lodged on 20 April 2015 — Alicja Sobczyszyn v Szkoła Podstawowa w Rzeplinie
|
4
|
2015/C 245/06
|
Case C-187/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2015 — Joachim Pöpperl v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen
|
5
|
2015/C 245/07
|
Case C-194/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 28 April 2015 — Véronique Baudinet and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Torino
|
5
|
2015/C 245/08
|
Case C-205/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sibiu (Romania) lodged on 30 April 2015 — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Brașov v Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horaţiu-Vasile Cruduleci
|
6
|
2015/C 245/09
|
Case C-211/15 P: Appeal brought on 8 May 2015 by Orange, formerly France Télécom, against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Ninth Chamber) on 26 February 2015 in Case T-385/12 Orange v Commission
|
6
|
2015/C 245/10
|
Case C-213/15 P: Appeal brought on 8 May 2015 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 February 2015 in Case T-188/12 Patrick Breyer v European Commission
|
7
|
2015/C 245/11
|
Case C-217/15: Request a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy) of 11 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Massimo Orsi
|
8
|
2015/C 245/12
|
Case C-222/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 15 May 2015 — Hőszig Kft. v Alstom Power Thermal Services
|
9
|
2015/C 245/13
|
Case C-228/15: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Catania (Italy) lodged on 19 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Snezhana Velikova
|
10
|
2015/C 245/14
|
Case C-233/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 21 May 2015 — SIA ‘Oniors Bio’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
|
11
|
2015/C 245/15
|
Case C-241/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
|
12
|
2015/C 245/16
|
Case C-249/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 28 May 2015 — Wind 1014 GmbH, Kurt Daell v Skatteministeriet
|
12
|
|
General Court
|
|
2015/C 245/17
|
Case T-296/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2015 — Health Food Manufacturers’ Association and Others v Commission (Consumer protection — Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 — Health claims made on foods — Actions for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Infringement of Articles 13 and 28 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Principle of good administration — Non-discrimination — Incorrect assessment criteria — Regulation No 1924/2006 — Plea of illegality — Right to be heard — Legal certainty — Unreasonable transition period — List of claims on hold)
|
14
|
2015/C 245/18
|
Case T-334/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2015 — Plantavis and NEM v Commission and EFSA (Consumer protection — Health claims made on foods — Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 — Action for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern — Admissibility — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Plea of illegality — Register of health claims)
|
15
|
2015/C 245/19
|
Case T-496/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2015 — McCullough v Cedefop (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to the award of public contracts and the conclusion of the ensuing contracts — Request seeking the production of documents in the context of criminal proceedings — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process)
|
16
|
2015/C 245/20
|
Case T-452/14: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2015 — Laboratoires CTRS v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Orphan medicinal products — Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Cholic Acid FGK (renamed Kolbam) — Therapeutic indications — Market exclusivity — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000)
|
17
|
2015/C 245/21
|
Case T-285/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Wirschaftsvereinigung Stahl and Others v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after bringing the action — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new factors — Inadmissibility)
|
18
|
2015/C 245/22
|
Case T-286/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Röchling Oertl Kunststofftechnik v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
19
|
2015/C 245/23
|
Case T-287/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Schaeffler Technologies v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
19
|
2015/C 245/24
|
Case T-288/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Energiewerke Nord v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
20
|
2015/C 245/25
|
Case T-289/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — H-O-T Servicecenter Nürnberg and Others v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new information — Inadmissibility)
|
21
|
2015/C 245/26
|
Case T-294/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Klemme v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new information — Inadmissibility)
|
22
|
2015/C 245/27
|
Case T-295/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Autoneum Germany v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new information — Inadmissibility)
|
23
|
2015/C 245/28
|
Case T-296/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Erbslöh v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
24
|
2015/C 245/29
|
Case T-297/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Walter Klein v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
24
|
2015/C 245/30
|
Case T-298/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Erbslöh Aluminium v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
25
|
2015/C 245/31
|
Case T-300/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Fricopan Back v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Application to amend the form of order sought — No new information — Inadmissibility)
|
26
|
2015/C 245/32
|
Case T-301/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Michelin Reifenwerke v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
27
|
2015/C 245/33
|
Case T-305/14: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2015 — Vestolit v Commission (State aid — Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings — Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
|
27
|
2015/C 245/34
|
Case T-241/15 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 2 June 2015 — Buga v Parliament and Others (Application — Directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing — Application for interim measures — Manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility)
|
28
|
2015/C 245/35
|
Case T-168/15: Action brought on 1 April 2015 — Hellenic Republic v Commission
|
29
|
2015/C 245/36
|
Case T-178/15: Action brought on 8 April 2015 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission
|
30
|
2015/C 245/37
|
Case T-180/15: Action brought on 14 April 2015 — Icap a.o. v Commission
|
30
|
2015/C 245/38
|
Case T-207/15: Action brought on 24 April 2015 — National Iranian Tanker Company v Council
|
32
|
2015/C 245/39
|
Case T-250/15: Action brought on 21 May 2015 — Speciality Drinks v OHIM — William Grant (CLAN)
|
33
|
2015/C 245/40
|
Case T-251/15: Action brought on 14 May 2015 — Espírito Santo Financial (Portugal) v ECB
|
34
|
2015/C 245/41
|
Case T-252/15: Action brought on 21 May 2015 — Ferrovial and others v Commission
|
35
|
2015/C 245/42
|
Case T-253/15: Action brought on 21 May 2015 — Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona v Commission
|
36
|
2015/C 245/43
|
Case T-254/15: Action brought on 18 May 2015 — Aldi Einkauf v OHIM — Dyado Liben OOD (Casale Fresco)
|
37
|
2015/C 245/44
|
Case T-256/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Telefónica v Commission
|
37
|
2015/C 245/45
|
Case T-257/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Arcelormittal Spain Holding v Commission
|
38
|
2015/C 245/46
|
Case T-258/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Axa Mediterranean Holding v Commission
|
39
|
2015/C 245/47
|
Case T-261/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Spirig Pharma v OHIM (Daylong)
|
39
|
2015/C 245/48
|
Case T-267/15: Action brought on 27 May 2015 — db Technologies Deutschland v OHIM — MIP Metro (Sigma)
|
40
|
2015/C 245/49
|
Case T-268/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Apcoa Parking Holdings v OHIM (PARKWAY)
|
41
|
2015/C 245/50
|
Case T-272/15: Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Apcoa Parking Holdings v OHIM (PARKWAY)
|
41
|
2015/C 245/51
|
Case T-277/15: Action brought on 13 May 2015 — Permapore v OHIM — José Joaquim Oliveira II - Jardins & Afins (Terraway)
|
42
|
2015/C 245/52
|
Case T-289/15: Action brought on 2 June 2015 — Hamas v Council
|
43
|
2015/C 245/53
|
Case T-297/15 P: Appeal brought on 8 June 2015 by Ángel Coedo Suárez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-38/14, Coedo Suárez v Council
|
44
|
2015/C 245/54
|
Case T-298/15: Action brought on 8 June 2015 — Atlas v OHIM (EFEKT PERLENIA)
|
44
|
2015/C 245/55
|
Case T-303/15: Action brought on 1 June 2015 — Barqawi v Council
|
45
|
2015/C 245/56
|
Case T-304/15: Action brought on 1 June 2015 — Abdulkarim v Council
|
46
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
2015/C 245/57
|
Case F-27/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Disciplinary procedure — Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority — Disciplinary penalty — Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion — Proportionality of the penalty)
|
47
|
2015/C 245/58
|
Case F-5/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary penalty — Removal from post — Failure by the Appointing Authority to hear the official concerned — Failure to uphold the right to be heard)
|
47
|
2015/C 245/59
|
Case F-65/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2015 — EF v EEAS (Civil service — Member of staff of the EEAS — Officials — 2013 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 — Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade — Calculation of the two-year period — Date of the promotion decision)
|
48
|
2015/C 245/60
|
Case F-68/15: Action brought on 27 April 2015 — ZZ v Frontex
|
49
|
2015/C 245/61
|
Case F-70/15: Action brought on 28 April 2015 — ZZ v Commission
|
49
|
2015/C 245/62
|
Case F-71/15: Action brought on 4 May 2015 — ZZ v ECDC
|
50
|
2015/C 245/63
|
Case F-73/15: Action brought on 6 May 2015 — ZZ v Parliament
|
50
|
2015/C 245/64
|
Case F-76/15: Action brought on 15 May 2015 — ZZ v Council
|
51
|
2015/C 245/65
|
Case F-77/15: Action brought on 18 May 2015 — ZZ v Commission
|
51
|