|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2010/C 234/02
|
Case C-139/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeals — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to procedures for reviewing State aid — Exception concerning protection of the purposes of investigations — Duty of the institution concerned to carry out a concrete, individual examination of the content of the documents covered by the application for access)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/03
|
Case C-441/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Alrosa Company Ltd (Appeals — Dominant position — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — World market in rough diamonds — Individual commitments by a company to cease purchasing rough diamonds from another company — Decision making a company’s individual commitments binding and terminating the proceedings)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/04
|
Case C-28/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — European Commission v The Bavarian Lager Co. Ltd, European Data Protection Supervisor (Appeal — Access to the documents of the institutions — Document concerning a meeting held in the context of a procedure for failure to fulfil obligations — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/05
|
Case C-171/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 56 EC and 43 EC — Free movement of capital — Portuguese State’s ‘golden’ shares in Portugal Telecom SGPS SA — Restrictions on the acquisition of holdings and on the management of a privatised company — State measure)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/06
|
Case C-194/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Susanne Gassmayr v Bundesminister für Wissenschaft und Forschung (Social policy — Directive 92/85/EEC — Introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding — Articles 5(3) and 11(1) to (3) — Direct effect — Pregnant worker granted leave during her pregnancy — Worker on maternity leave — Right to payment of an on-call duty allowance)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/07
|
Case C-334/08: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Union’s own resources — Refusal to make available to the Union own resources corresponding to certain unlawful customs authorisations — Force majeure — Fraudulent conduct by the customs authorities — Liability of the Member States — Lawfulness of the entry of established entitlements in a separate account)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/08
|
Case C-393/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma (National legislation governing opening times and closing days of pharmacies — Exemption — Power of decision of the competent authorities)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/09
|
Case C-407/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 July 2010 — Knauf Gips KG, formerly Gebrüder Knauf Westdeutsche Gipswerke KG v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plasterboard — Access to the file — Inculpatory and exculpatory evidence — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Economic unit — Company responsible for the economic unit’s actions — Argument raised for the first time during the judicial proceedings)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/10
|
Case C-428/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank’s Gravenhage — Netherlands) — Monsanto Technology LLC v Cefetra BV, Cefetra Feed Service BV, Cefetra Futures BV, Alfred C. Toepfer International GmbH (Industrial and commercial property — Legal protection of biotechnological inventions — Directive 98/44/EC — Article 9 — Patent protecting a product containing or consisting of genetic information — Material incorporating the product — Protection — Conditions)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/11
|
Case C-442/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a State to fulfil its obligations — EEC-Hungary Association Agreement — Subsequent verification — Failure to comply with rules on origin — Decision of the authorities of the exporting State — Appeal — Commission inspection mission — Customs duties — Post-clearance recovery — Own resources — Making available — Default interest)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/12
|
Joined Cases C-447/08 and C-448/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — Criminal proceedings against Otto Sjöberg (C-447/08), Anders Gerdin (C-448/08) (Freedom to provide services — Gambling — Offer of gambling via the internet — Promotion of gambling organised in other Member States — Activities reserved to public or non-profit-making bodies — Criminal penalties)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/13
|
Case C-471/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin käräjäoikeus — Finland) — Sanna Maria Parviainen v Finnair Oyj (Social policy — Directive 92/85/EEC — Protection of the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding — Articles 5(2) and 11(1) — Worker temporarily transferred to another job during her pregnancy — Compulsory transfer because of a risk to her safety or health and that of her child — Pay less than the average pay received before the transfer — Previous pay made up of a basic salary and various supplementary allowances — Calculation of the salary to which a pregnant worker is entitled during the period of her temporary transfer)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/14
|
Case C-526/08: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Admissibility — Non bis in idem — Res judicata — Articles 226 EC and 228 EC — Article 29 of the Rules of Procedure — Language of the case — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Non-compliance of national measures with the rules relating to the periods, conditions and techniques of land application of fertiliser — Minimum storage capacity for liquid manure — Prohibition on land application on steeply sloping ground — Techniques ensuring a uniform and effective land application of fertiliser)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/15
|
Case C-558/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands)) — Portakabin Ltd, Portakabin B.V. v Primakabin B.V. (Trade marks — Keyword advertising on the internet — Directive 89/104/EEC — Articles 5 to 7 — Display of advertisements on the basis of a keyword identical with a trade mark — Display of advertisements on the basis of keywords reproducing a trade mark with ‘minor spelling mistakes’ — Advertising for second-hand goods — Goods manufactured and placed on the market by the proprietor of the trade mark — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by the trade mark — Affixing of labels bearing the name of the reseller and removal of labels bearing the trade mark — Advertising, on the basis of another person’s trade mark, for second-hand goods including, in addition to goods manufactured by the proprietor of the trade mark, goods from another source)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/16
|
Case C-35/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione — Italy) — Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate v Paolo Speranza (Indirect taxation — Tax on the increase in share capital — Article 4(1)(c) of Directive 69/335/EEC — National legislation making registration of the instrument recording an increase in the capital of a company subject to payment of duty — The recipient company and the notary jointly and severally liable — No capital contribution in fact made — Limitation of means of proof)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/17
|
Case C-99/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland)) — Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (Telecommunication services — Directive 2002/22/EC — Article 30(2) — Portability of telephone numbers — Power of the national regulatory authorities — Direct charge to the subscriber — Disincentive — Taking costs into consideration)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/18
|
Case C-233/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Gerhard Dijkman, Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v Belgische Staat (Freedom to provide services — Free movement of capital — Direct taxation — Difference in treatment according to the place of investment)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/19
|
Case C-246/09: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Susanne Bulicke v Deutsche Büro Service GmbH (Directive 2000/78/EC — Articles 8 and 9 — National procedure for the enforcement of obligations under the Directive — Period within which a claim must be lodged — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Principle of non-reduction of an earlier level of protection)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/20
|
Case C-343/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Afton Chemical Limited v Secretary of State for Transport (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Validity — Directive 2009/30/EC — Article 1(8) — Directive 98/70/EC — Article 8a — Atmospheric pollution — Fuels — Use of metallic additives in fuels — Limit for methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) content — Labelling — Impact assessment — Manifest error of assessment — Precautionary principle — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Admissibility)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/21
|
Case C-363/09: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/444/EEC — Plant protection products — Application for authorisation to place on the market — Data protection)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/22
|
Case C-550/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 June 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)) — Criminal proceedings against E, F (Common foreign and security policy — Specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Articles 2 and 3 — Inclusion of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities implicated in acts of terrorism — Transfer to an organisation, by members of that organisation, of funds originating from the collection of donations and the sale of publications)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/23
|
Case C-211/10 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Doris Povse v Mauro Alpago (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Unlawful removal of a child — Provisional measures relating to ‘right to take parental decisions’ — Rights of custody — Judgment ordering the return of the child — Enforcement — Jurisdiction — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/24
|
Case C-517/08 P: Order of the Court of 15 April 2010 — Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Alfa Agricultural Supplies SA, Aragonesas Agro, SA v European Commission, Bayer CropScience AG, European Crop Protection Association (ECPA), Kingdom of Spain (Appeal — Directive 91/414/EEC — Non-inclusion of endosulfan in Annex I to that directive — Withdrawal of marketing authorisations — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/25
|
Case C-39/09 P: Order of the Court of 22 March 2010 — Société des plantations de Mbanga SA (SPM) v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Non-contractual liability of the Community — Common organisation of the banana market — Arrangements for importing bananas originating in ACP countries into the Community — Loss allegedly suffered by an independent producer — Failure to comply with the rules on competition in the field of the common agricultural policy — Infringement of general principles of law and, in particular, of the principle of sound administration — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/26
|
Case C-91/09: Order of the Court of 26 March 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Eis.de GmbH v BBY Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Trade marks — Internet — Keyword advertising — Display, on the basis of a keyword identical to a trade mark, of an advert of a competitor to the proprietor of that trade mark — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(1)(a))
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/27
|
Case C-193/09 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 — Kaul GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Bayer AG (Appeal — Application for registration of Community word mark ARCOL — Opposition by proprietor of Community word mark CAPOL — Implementation by OHIM of a judgment annulling a decision of its Boards of Appeal — Right to be heard — Likelihood of confusion — Minimal degree of similarity of the marks required — Rejection for manifest irrelevance of new evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal — Articles 8(1)(b), 61(2), 63(6), 73, second sentence, and 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/28
|
Case C-332/09 P: Order of the Court of 23 April 2010 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Frosch Touristik GmbH, DSR touristik GmbH (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Community word mark FLUGBÖRSE — Invalidity proceedings — Material date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/29
|
Case C-451/09 P: Order of the Court of 12 May 2010 — Pigasos Alieftiki Naftiki Etairia v Council of the European Union and European Commission (Appeal — Non-contractual liability — Proof of Community origin of products fished by a vessel owned by a company registered under Greek law — Failure to adopt provisions permitting the customs authorities of the Member States to accept documents issued by a non-Member State, other than form T2M)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/30
|
Case C-514/09 P: Appeal brought on 11 December 2009 by Hubert Ségaud against the Order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2009 in Case T-249/09 Ségaud v European Commission
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/31
|
Case C-214/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2010 — KHS AG v Winfried Schulte
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/32
|
Case C-244/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 May 2010 — Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV v Federal Republic of Germany
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/33
|
Case C-245/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 May 2010 — ROJ TV A/S v Federal Republic of Germany
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/34
|
Case C-250/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 20 May 2010 — Haltergemeinschaft LBL GbR v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/35
|
Case C-263/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Gorj (Romania) lodged on 27 May 2010 — Iulian Andrei Nisipeanu v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Gorj, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Cărbunești, Administrația Fondului Pentru Mediu
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/36
|
Case C-271/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 31 May 2010 — Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/37
|
Case C-280/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Republic of Poland), lodged on 4 June 2010 — Kopalnia Odkrywkowa Polski Trawertyn P. Granatowicz, M. Wąsiewicz (a partnership) v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Poznaniu
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/38
|
Case C-281/10 P: Appeal brought on 4 June 2010 by PepsiCo, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 18 March 2010 in Case T-9/07: Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), PepsiCo, Inc.
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/39
|
Case C-282/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 7 June 2010 — Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique, Prefect of the Centre region
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/40
|
Case C-283/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 7 June 2010 — Circul Globus București (Circ & Variete Globus București) v Uniunea Compozitorilor și Muzicologilor din România — Asociația pentru Drepturi de Autor — U.C.M.R. — A.D.A.
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/41
|
Case C-299/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Amares (Portugal) lodged on 17 June 2010 — Cristiano Marques Vieira v Companhia de Seguros Tranquilidade SA
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/42
|
Case C-300/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 17 June 2010 — Vítor Hugo Marques Almeida v Companhia de Seguros Fidelidade-Mundial SA, Jorge Manuel da Cunha Carvalheira, Paulo Manuel Carvalheira, Fundo de Garantia Automóvel
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/43
|
Case C-305/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/44
|
Case C-310/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 29 June 2010 — Ministerul Justiției și Libertăților Cetățenești v Ștefan Agafiței and Others
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/45
|
Case C-316/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 1 July 2010 — Danske Svineproducenter v Justitsministeriet
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/46
|
Case C-342/10: Action brought on 7 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Finland
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/47
|
Case C-343/10: Action brought on 7 July 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/48
|
Case C-349/10 P: Appeal brought on 9 July 2010 by Claro, S.A. against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) on 28 April 2010 in Case T-225/09 Claro, S.A. v OHIM and Telefónica, S.A.
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/49
|
Case C-566/08: Order of the President of the Court of 25 February 2010 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/50
|
Case C-572/08: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 6 May 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/51
|
Case C-147/09: Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria)) — Ronald Seunig v Maria Hölzel
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2010/C 234/52
|
Case T-331/06: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EEA (Public service contracts — EEA tendering procedure — Provision of information technology consultancy services — Rejection of the tender — Action for annulment — Jurisdiction of the Court — Award criteria set out in the tender specifications — Sub-criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/53
|
Case T-12/08 P-RENV-RX: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — M v EMA (Appeal — Civil service — Review of the judgment of the General Court — Whether the state of the proceedings permits final judgment to be given)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/54
|
Case T-85/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2010 — Exalation v OHIM (Vektor-Lycopin) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Vektor-Lycopin — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/55
|
Case T-160/08 P: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Commission v Putterie-De-Beukelaer (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Annulment at first instance of the career development report — 2005 reporting period — Rules applicable — Heading ‘potential’ — Evaluation procedure — Attestation procedure)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/56
|
Case T-385/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Trautwein v OHIM (Representation of a dog) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a dog — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/57
|
Case T-386/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Trautwein v OHIM (Representation of a horse) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a horse — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/58
|
Case T-396/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission (State aid — Training aid — Decision declaring the aid to be in part compatible and in part incompatible with the common market — Need for the aid — Positive external effects — Obligation to give reasons)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/59
|
Case T-430/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2010 — Grain Millers v OHIM — Grain Millers (GRAIN MILLERS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark GRAIN MILLERS — Earlier national business name Grain Millers and its figurative representation — Partial refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/60
|
Case T-510/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2010 — Toqueville v OHIM — Schiesaro (TOCQUEVILLE 13) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark TOCQUEVILLE 13 — Failure to comply with the time-limit for appealing against a revocation decision — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/61
|
Case T-30/09: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Engelhorn v OHIM — The Outdoor Group (peerstorm) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark peerstorm — Earlier Community and national word marks PETER STORM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Genuine use of the earlier marks — Articles 15 and 43(2) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 15 and 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/62
|
Case T-368/09 P: Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Sevenier v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Resignation — Commission’s refusal to accept the withdrawal of the resignation and refer the matter to the invalidity committee — Time-limit for complaint — Lateness — No excusable error)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/63
|
Case T-570/08: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2010 — Deutsche Post v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Information injunction — Non-actionable measure — Inadmissibility)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/64
|
Case T-571/08: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2010 — Germany v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Information injunction — Non-actionable measure — Inadmissibility)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/65
|
Case T-166/09 P: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Order of referral — Decision which cannot be the object of an appeal — Action for damages — Pre-litigation procedure — Procedural defects — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/66
|
Case T-349/09: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — PAGO International v OHIM — Tirol Milch (Pago) (Community trade mark — Proceedings for revocation — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/67
|
Case T-401/09: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Court of Justice (Action for annulment — Rejection by the Court of Justice of a request for compensation — Action for damages — Service of an appeal to the applicant’s former representative — Absence of harm — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/68
|
Cases T-84/10 R and T-223/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 June 2010 — Regione Puglia v Commission (Application for interim measures — Decision to reduce Community financial assistance — Debit note — Application to suspend the operation of a measure — No urgency)
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/69
|
Case T-177/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 9 July 2010 — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission (Interim measures — State aid — Preferential electricity tariffs — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/70
|
Case T-211/10: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Strålfors v OHIM (ID SOLUTIONS) (Action for annulment — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/71
|
Case T-212/10: Order of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Strålfors v OHIM (IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS) (Action for annulment — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/72
|
Case T-210/10: Action brought on 5 May 2010 — Condé v Council
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/73
|
Case T-243/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Rungis Express/HABM — Žito (MARESTO)
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/74
|
Case T-258/10: Action brought on 10 June 2010 — France Télécom v Commission
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/75
|
Case T-259/10: Action brought on 8 June 2010 — Ax v Council
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/76
|
Case T-267/10: Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Land Wien v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/77
|
Case T-269/10: Action brought on 14 June 2010 — LIS v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/78
|
Case T-274/10: Action brought on 22 June 2010 — Suez Environnement and Lyonnaise des eaux France v Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/79
|
Case T-275/10: Action brought on 22 June 2010 — mPAY24 GmbH v OHIM — ULTRA d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav (MPAY 24)
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/80
|
Case T-276/10: Action brought on 22 June 2010 — El Coto De Rioja v OHIM — Álvarez Serrano (COTO DE GOMARIZ)
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/81
|
Case T-279/10: Action brought on 21 June 2010 — K-Mail Order v OHIM — IVKO (MEN’Z)
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/82
|
Case T-280/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (ANEURYSMCONTROL)
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/83
|
Case T-281/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (APPETITECONTROL)
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/84
|
Case T-282/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (STOMACONTROL)
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/85
|
Case T-283/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (BMICONTROL)
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/86
|
Case T-284/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (IMPLANTCONTROL)
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/87
|
Case T-285/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (CHEMOCONTROL)
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/88
|
Case T-287/10: Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Unilever España and Unilever v OHMI — Med Trans G. Poulias-S. Brakatselos (MED FRIGO S.A.)
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/89
|
Case T-290/10: Action brought on 30 June 2010 — Sports Warehouse/HABM (TENNIS WAREHOUSE)
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/90
|
Case T-291/10: Action brought on 26 June 2010 — Martin v Commission
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/91
|
Case T-295/10: Action brought on 7 July 2010 — Camara v Council
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/92
|
Case T-299/10: Action brought on 15 July 2010 — Babcock Noell v European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/93
|
Case T-178/06: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Bavaria v Council
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/94
|
Case T-286/07: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Torres v OHIM — Torres de Anguix (A TORRES de ANGUIX)
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/95
|
Case T-115/08: Order of the General Court of 29 June 2010 — Gourmet Burger Kitchen v OHIM (GOURMET BURGER KITCHEN)
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/96
|
Case T-121/09: Order of the General Court of 13 July 2010 — Al Shanfari v Council and Commission
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/97
|
Case T-361/09: Order of the General Court of 30 June 2010 — Centraal bureau voor de statistiek v Commission
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/98
|
Case T-112/10: Order of the General Court of 5 July 2010 — Prionics v Commission and EFSA
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2010/C 234/99
|
Case F-64/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Bergström v Commission (Staff case — Appointment — Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials — Candidates names included on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules on grading upon recruitment — Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules — Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/00
|
Case F-67/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Lesniak v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Appointment — Temporary agents appointed as officials — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules — Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/01
|
Case F-139/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Kurrer v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Appointment — Temporary agents appointed as officials — Candidates placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules — Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/02
|
Case F-53/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Plenary Formation) of 5 May 2010 — Bouillez and Others v Council (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2007 promotion procedure — Interest in bringing proceedings — Promotion decision — Liste of promoted officials — Consideration of the comparative merits — Criterion of the level of responsibility held — Application for annulment of the promotion decisions — Balance of interests)
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/03
|
Case F-89/08: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2010 — P v Parliament (Staff case — Temporary staff — European Parliament — Dismissal — Loss of confidence)
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/04
|
Case F-2/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2010 — Menghi v ENISA (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Dismissal following end of the probationary period — Psychological harassment)
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/05
|
Case F-55/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 May 2010 — Maxwell v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Secondment in the interests of the service — Leave on personal grounds — Accommodation and education expenses — Action for damages — Liability for a wrongful act — Unjust enrichment)
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/06
|
Case F-78/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Action for damages — Reimbursement of costs — Availability of a parallel remedy — Manifestly inadmissible)
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
2010/C 234/07
|
Case F-34/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB
|
58
|
|
|
|
