|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2009/C 113/02
|
Case C-345/06: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederösterreich — Austria) — Gottfried Heinrich (Article 254(2) EC — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Article 2(3) — Regulation (EC) No 622/2003 — Aviation security — Annex — List of articles prohibited on board aircraft — Not published — Binding force)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/03
|
Case C-445/06: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Danske Slagterier v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Measures having equivalent effect — Animal health — Intra-Community trade — Fresh meat — Veterinary checks — Non-contractual liability of a Member State — Limitation period — Determination of the loss or damage)
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/04
|
Case C-489/06: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directives 93/36/EEC and 93/42/EEC — Public contracts — Procedures for the award of public supply contracts — Hospital supplies)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/05
|
Case C-510/06 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Archer Daniels Midland Co. v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Sodium gluconate market — Fines — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Community competition policy — Equal treatment — Turnover to be taken into account — Attenuating circumstances)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/06
|
Case C-113/07 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2009 — Selex Sistemi Integrati SpA. v Commission of the European Communities, European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (Eurocontrol) (Appeals — Competition — Article 82 EC — Concept of an ‘undertaking’ — Economic activity — International organisation — Abuse of a dominant position)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/07
|
Case C-169/07: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)) — Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Wiener Landesregierung, Oberösterreichische Landesregierung (Freedom of establishment — Social security — National health system financed by the State — System of benefits in kind — System of reimbursement of costs paid by the person insured — Authorisation to set up a private outpatient dental clinic — Criterion of assessment of the need to set up a health institution — Objective of maintaining a balanced high-quality medical or hospital service open to all — Objective of preventing a risk of serious harm to the financial balance of the social security system — Consistency — Proportionality)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/08
|
Case C-256/07: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)) — Mitsui & Co. Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf (Community Customs Code — Repayment of customs duties — Article 29(1) and (3)(a) — Value for customs purposes — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 145(2) and (3) — Taking into account, for customs valuation purposes, of payments made by the seller in performance of a warranty obligation provided for in the contract of sale — Temporal application — Substantive rules — Procedural rules — Retroactive application of a rule — Validity)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/09
|
Case C-270/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Common agricultural policy — Fees relating to veterinary inspections and controls — Directive 85/73/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/10
|
Case C-275/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — External Community transit — TIR Carnets — Customs duties — Own resources of the Communities — Making available — Time-limits — Default interest — Accounting rules)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/11
|
Case C-309/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hessischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany)) — Firma Baumann GmbH v Land Hessen (Common agricultural policy — Fees concerning veterinary inspections and controls — Directive 85/73/EEC)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/12
|
Case C-320/07 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Antartica Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), The Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(5) — Refusal to register — Earlier trade mark of repute NASDAQ — Figurative sign ‘nasdaq’ — Use of the earlier mark for goods and services allegedly offered free of charge — Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark — Relevant public)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/13
|
Case C-326/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Articles 43 EC and 56 EC — Articles of association of privatised undertakings — Criteria for the exercise of certain special powers held by the State)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/14
|
Case C-348/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Turgay Semen v Deutsche Tamoil GmbH (Directive 86/653/EEC — Article 17 — Self-employed commercial agents — Termination of a contract — Right to an indemnity — Determining the amount of the indemnity)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/15
|
Case C-458/07: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Telecommunications — Directive 2002/22/EC — Universal service — Obligation to make available to end-users a comprehensive directory and telephone directory enquiry service)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/16
|
Case C-559/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Social policy — Article 141 EC — Equal pay for male and female workers — National civil and military pension regime — Different treatment with regard to retirement age and minimum required service — Justification — Absence)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/17
|
Case C-10/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (Taxation in Finland of second-hand vehicles imported from other Member States — Compatibility of national legislation with the first paragraph of Article 90 EC, the Sixth VAT Directive and Directive 2006/112/EC)
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/18
|
Case C-21/08 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2009 — Sunplus Technology Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Sun Microsystems Inc. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Word and figurative mark ‘SUNPLUS’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the national word marks ‘SUN’ — Refusal of registration)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/19
|
Case C-77/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Graz — Austria) — Dachsberger & Söhne GmbH v Zollamt Salzburg, Erstattungen (Export refund — Differentiated refund — Time of the submission of the request — Export declaration — No proof of clearance for release for consumption in the destination country — Penalty)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/20
|
Case C-143/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/73/EC — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/21
|
Case C-184/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 — Article 18 — Market for detergents and for surfactants for detergents — Sanctions)
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/22
|
Case C-245/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Free movement of persons — Freedom to provide services — Right of establishment — Adjustments consequent on the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/23
|
Case C-289/08: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Article 11(1)(c) — External emergency plans — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/24
|
Case C-298/08: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/22/EC — Approximation of laws — Social legislation relating to road transport activities — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/25
|
Case C-331/08: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environmental liability — Directive 2004/35/EC — Prevention and remedying of environmental damage)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/26
|
Case C-342/08: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 96/82/EC — Article 11(1)(c) — Failure to draw up external emergency plans — Incomplete transposition)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/27
|
Case C-402/08: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Slovenia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2004/35/EC — Environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/28
|
Case C-557/07: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)) — LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Information society — Copyright and related right — Retention and disclosure of certain traffic data — Protecting the confidentiality of electronic communication — ‘Intermediaries’ within the meaning of Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/29/EC)
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/29
|
Case C-17/08 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 February 2009 — MPDV Mikrolab GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Refusal of registration — Word mark manufacturing score card — Descriptive character)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/30
|
Joined Cases C-39/08 and C-43/08: Order of the Court of 12 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany)) — Bild digital GmbH & Co. KG, formerly Bild.T-Online.de AG & Co. KG (C-39/08), ZVS Zeitungsvertrieb Stuttgart GmbH (C-43/08) v Präsident des Deutschen Patent- und Markenamts (First subparagraph of Article 103(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directive 89/104/EEC — Applications for registration of trade marks — Examination on a case-by-case basis — Failure to take account of earlier decisions — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/31
|
Case C-62/08: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België — Belgium) — UDV North America Inc v Brandtraders NV (Article 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 9(1)(a) and (2)(d) — Right of the proprietor of a registered mark to prevent the use by a third party of a sign which is identical to the mark — Concept of ‘use’ — Use of a sign which is identical to the mark by a trade intermediary in its business papers — Intermediary acting in its own name but on behalf of a vendor)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/32
|
Case C-119/08: Order of the Court of 5 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas) — Mechel Nemunas UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos respublikos finansų ministerijos (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — First VAT Directive — Sixth VAT Directive — Article 33(1) — Concept of ‘turnover taxes’ — Tax calculated on the basis of an undertaking’s turnover to finance the maintenance and development programme for national roads)
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/33
|
Case C-131/08: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 January 2009 — Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(b) — Application for word mark SAFETY 1ST — Lack of distinctive character — Refusal of registration)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/34
|
Case C-183/08 P: Order of the Court of 5 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Provincia di Imperia (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Conditions governing the admissibility of an action for annulment — Interest in bringing an action — Call for proposals regarding the financing of innovative actions under the European Social Fund — Dismissal — Benefit for the applicant arising from a possible annulment of the contested act)
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/35
|
Case C-210/08 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 January 2009 — Sebirán S.L. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), El Coto de Rioja S.A. (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Figurative mark Coto D’Arcis — Opposition by the proprietor of word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO — Partial refusal to register)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/36
|
Case C-231/08 P: Order of the Court of 3 February 2009 — Massimo Giannini v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Community civil service — Right to a fair hearing — Infringement of Articles 4, 27 and 29 of the Staff Regulations — Principle of non-discrimination — Interest of the service and duty of care — Distortion of the evidence and rules on evidence — Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part)
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/37
|
Case C-268/08 P: Order of the Court of 3 March 2009 — Christos Michail v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Staff case — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Duty to provide assistance — Distortion of facts — Errors in the legal assessment of the facts)
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/38
|
Case C-497/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Charlottenburg (Germany) lodged on 17 November 2008 — Amiraike Berlin GmbH Aero and Campus Cottbus Ltd.
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/39
|
Case C-58/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany), lodged on 11 February 2009 — Leo-Libera GmbH v Finanzamt Buchholz in der Nordheide
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/40
|
Case C-61/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) lodged on 11 February 2009 — Landkreis Bad Dürkheim v Aufsichts- und Dienstleistungsdirektion, interested party: Frau Astrid Niedermair-Schiemann
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/41
|
Case C-71/09 P: Appeal brought on 17 February 2009 by the Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ against the judgment delivered on 28 November 2008 in Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/42
|
Case C-73/09 P: Appeal brought on 16 February 2009 by Hotel Cipriani SpA against the judgment delivered on 28 November 2008 in Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 Hotel Cipriani SpA and Others v Commission
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/43
|
Case C-76/09 P: Appeal brought on 19 February 2009 by Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) against the judgment delivered on 28 November 2008 in Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 Hotel Cipriani and Others v Commission
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/44
|
Case C-88/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France) lodged on 2 March 2009 — Graphic Procédé v Ministère du budget, des comptes publics et de la fonction publique
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/45
|
Case C-89/09: Action brought on 2 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/46
|
Case C-93/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden (Germany) lodged on 6 March 2009 — Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen, interested party: Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/47
|
Case C-94/09: Action brought on 6 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/48
|
Case C-95/09: Action brought on 6 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/49
|
Case C-96/09 P: Appeal brought on 10 March 2009 by Anheuser-Busch, Inc. against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2008 in Joined Cases T-225/06, T-255/06, T-257/06 and T-309/06: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Anheuser-Busch, Inc
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/50
|
Case C-100/09: Action brought on 11 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/51
|
Case C-114/09: Action brought on 25 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/52
|
Case C-408/07: Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 2 February 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Brigitte Ruf, née Elsässer, Gertrud Elsässer, née Sommer v European Central Bank (ECB), Coop Himmelblau Prix, Dreibholz & Partner ZT GmbH; intervener: the City of Frankfurt am Main
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/53
|
Case C-92/08: Order of the President of the Court of 19 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/54
|
Case C-98/08: Order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of 21 January 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Madrid — Spain) — Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI), Asociación de Artistas Intérpretes o Ejecutantes — Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE) v Sogecable, SA, Canal Satélite Digital SL
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/55
|
Case C-257/08: Order of the President of the Court of 20 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/56
|
Case C-291/08: Order of the President of the Court of 30 January 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/57
|
Case C-329/08: Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/58
|
Case C-332/08: Order of the President of the Court of 19 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/59
|
Case C-354/08: Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court of First Instance
|
|
|
2009/C 113/60
|
Case T-385/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 April 2009 — Valero Jordana v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action for annulment — Action for Damages — Promotion — Award of priority points)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/61
|
Case T-299/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 March 2009 — Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise and Shanghai Adeptech Precision v Council (Dumping — Imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in China — Market economy status — Article 2(7)(a) and (c), Article 2(10), and Article 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96)
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/62
|
Case T-354/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 March 2009 — TF1 v Commission (State aid — Financing of France Télévisions by the audiovisual licence fee — Constant review of existing aid — Recommendation for the adoption of appropriate measures — Member State’s commitments accepted by the Commission — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market — Action for annulment — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Nature of the contested measure — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Altmark judgment)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/63
|
Case T-171/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 March 2009 — Laytoncrest v OHIM — Erico (TRENTON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark TRENTON — Earlier Community word mark LENTON — Right to be heard — Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 and Rule 54 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — No withdrawal of the trade mark application — Article 44(1) of Regulation No 40/94 — Obligation to rule on the basis of the available evidence — Rule 20(3) and Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95)
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/64
|
Joined Cases T-318/06 to T-321/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 March 2009 — Moreira da Fonseca v OHIM — General Óptica (GENERAL OPTICA) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Multi-coloured Community figurative marks GENERAL OPTICA — Earlier business name Generalóptica — Relative ground for refusal — Local significance of the earlier sign — Articles 8(4) and 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/65
|
Case T-332/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariff — Decision initiating the procedure under Article 88(2) EC — Admissibility — Notion of State aid — New aid or existing aid — Advantage — Statement of reasons — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/66
|
Case T-405/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 March 2009 — ArcelorMittal Luxembourg and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Community market in beams — Decision establishing an infringement of Article 65 CS, after expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Competence of the Commission — Liability for the infringement — Limitation — Rights of the defence)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/67
|
Case T-21/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPALINE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark SPALINE — Earlier national word mark SPA — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Unfair advantage derived from the reputation of the earlier mark — Use of the mark applied for without due cause — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/68
|
Case T-109/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Spa Monopole (SPA THERAPY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark SPA THERAPY — Earlier national word mark SPA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/69
|
Case T-191/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Anheuser-Busch v OHIM — Budějovický Budvar (BUDWEISER) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark BUDWEISER — Earlier international word and figurative marks BUDWEISER and Budweiser Budvar — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 — Infringement of rights of defence — Statement of reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 — Late submission of documents — Discretion granted by Article 74(2) of Regulation No 40/94)
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/70
|
Case T-343/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — allsafe Jungfalk v OHIM (ALLSAFE) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark ALLSAFE — Absolute grounds for refusal of registration — Absence of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/71
|
Case T-402/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 March 2009 — Kaul v OHIM — Bayer (ARCOL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ARCOL — Earlier Community word mark CAPOL — Implementation by OHIM of a judgment annulling a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Rights of the defence — Article 8(1)(b), Article 61(2), Article 63(6), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/72
|
Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 March 2009 — Telecom Italia Media v Commission Case T-96/07 (State aid — Subsidies for the purchase of digital decoders — Telecommunications — Commission decision finding aid to be incompatible with the common market — Decision of the Member State, adopted during the proceedings, not to recover the aid from the undertaking which brought the action for annulment against the Commission decision — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/73
|
Case T-59/09: Action brought on 11 February 2009 — Germany v Commission
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/74
|
Case T-71/09: Action brought on 20 February 2009 — Química Atlântica v Commission
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/75
|
Case T-79/09: Action brought on 20 February 2009 — France v Commission
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/76
|
Case T-86/09: Action brought on 19 February 2009 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/77
|
Case T-87/09: Action brought on 25 February 2009 — Gråhundbus v/Jørgen Andersen v Commission
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/78
|
Case T-92/09: Action brought on 2 March 2009 — Strategi Group v OHIM — Reed Business Information (STRATEGI)
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/79
|
Case T-103/09: Action brought on 11 March 2009 — von Oppeln-Bronikowski and von Oppeln-Bronikowski v OHIM — Pomodoro Clothing (promodoro)
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/80
|
Case T-106/09: Action brought on 13 March 2009 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM — Maclean (Archer Maclean’s Mercury)
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/81
|
Case T-107/09: Action brought on 12 March 2009 — United Kingdom v Commission
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/82
|
Case T-109/09: Action brought on 17 March 2009 — Rintisch v OHIM — Valfeuri Pates Alimentaires (PROTIVITAL)
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/83
|
Case T-112/09: Action brought on 19 March 2009 — Icebreaker v OHIM — Gilmar (ICEBREAKER)
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/84
|
Case T-115/09: Action brought on 24 March 2009 — Electrolux v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/85
|
Case T-116/09: Action brought on 24 March 2009 — Whirlpool Europe v Commission
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/86
|
Case T-119/09: Action brought on 23 March 2009 — Protege International v Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/87
|
Case T-121/09: Action brought on 27 March 2009 — Al Shanfari v Council and Commission
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/88
|
Case T-273/07: Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 March 2009 — Torres v OHIM — Vinícola de Tomelloso (TORREGAZATE)
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/89
|
Case T-349/07 and T-350/07: Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 March 2009 — FMC Chemical and Others v Commission
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/90
|
Case T-342/08: Order of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2009 — Batchelor v Commission
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/91
|
Case T-378/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 March 2009 — Portugal v Commission
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/92
|
Case T-457/08: Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 March 2009 — Intel v Commission
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
|
|
|
2009/C 113/93
|
Case F-5/09: Action brought on 26 January 2009 — Soerensen Ferraresi v Commission
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/94
|
Case F-12/09: Action brought on 18 February 2009 — A v Commission
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/95
|
Case F-17/09: Action brought on 27 February 2009 — Meister v OHIM
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/96
|
Case F-18/09: Action brought on 2 March 2009 — Merhzaoui v Council
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/97
|
Case F-19/09: Action brought on 6 March 2009 — Lopez Sanchez v Council
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/98
|
Case F-20/09: Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Juvyns v Council
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/99
|
Case F-21/09: Action brought on 9 March 2009 — De Benedetti-Dagnoni v Council
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/00
|
Case F-22/09: Action brought on 9 March 2009 — Marie-Hélène Willigens v Council
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/01
|
Case F-24/09: Action brought on 16 March 2009 — Wagner-Leclercq v Council
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2009/C 113/02
|
Case F-25/09: Action brought on 16 March 2009 — Van Neyghem v Council
|
48
|
|
|
|
