|
|
V Announcements
|
|
|
|
COURT PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
|
Court of Justice
|
|
|
2020/C 161/02
|
Case C-10/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 — Mowi ASA, formerly Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Control of concentrations between undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Article 4(1) — Prior notification obligation for concentrations — Article 7(1) — Standstill obligation — Article 7(2) — Exemption — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Article 14(2) — Decision imposing fines for the implementation of a concentration before it has been notified and authorised — Principle ne bis in idem — Set off principle — Concurrent offences)
|
2
|
|
2020/C 161/03
|
Case C-125/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 38 de Barcelona — Spain) — Marc Gómez del Moral Guasch v Bankia SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Variable interest rate — Reference index based on mortgage loans granted by savings banks — Index arising from a regulatory or administrative provision — Unilateral introduction of the term by the seller or supplier — Review of the transparency requirement by the national court — Consequences of a finding that the term is unfair)
|
2
|
|
2020/C 161/04
|
Joined Cases C-155/18 P to C-158/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 — Tulliallan Burlington Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Burlington Fashion GmbH (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Word and figurative marks ‘BURLINGTON’ — Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier word and figurative marks ‘BURLINGTON’ and ‘BURLINGTON ARCADE’ — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Nice Agreement — Class 35 — Concept of ‘retail services’ — Article 8(4) — Passing-off — Article 8(5) — Reputation — Criteria for assessment — Similarity between the goods and services — Opposition rejected)
|
3
|
|
2020/C 161/05
|
Case C-183/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Gdańsk–Południe w Gdańsku — Poland) — Centraal Justitieel Incassobureau, Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (CJIB) v Bank BGŻ BNP Paribas S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Recognition and enforcement of financial penalties imposed on legal persons — Incomplete transposition of a framework decision — Duty to interpret national law in accordance with EU law — Scope)
|
4
|
|
2020/C 161/06
|
Case C-211/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — IDEALMED III — Serviços de Saúde, SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(b) — Exemptions — Hospital and medical care — Hospital establishments — Services provided under social conditions comparable to those applicable to bodies governed by public law — Articles 377 and 391 — Derogations — Right to opt for a taxation regime — Maintenance of the taxation — Variation in the conditions for the exercise of the activity)
|
5
|
|
2020/C 161/07
|
Case C-240/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 — Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(f) — Absolute ground for refusal — Mark contrary to accepted principles of morality — Word sign ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ — Rejection of the application for registration)
|
6
|
|
2020/C 161/08
|
Case C-328/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 — European Union Intellectual Property Office v Equivalenza Manufactory, SL (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Assessment of the similarity of the signs at issue — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Consideration of marketing circumstances — Counteraction of a phonetic similarity through visual and conceptual differences — Conditions for counteraction)
|
6
|
|
2020/C 161/09
|
Case C-586/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 — Buonotourist Srl v European Commission, Associazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori (ANAV) (Appeal — Competition — State aid — Undertaking operating bus route networks in the Regione Campania (Campania Region, Italy) — Compensation for public service obligations paid by the Italian authorities following a judgment of the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy) — European Commission decision declaring the aid measure unlawful and incompatible with the internal market)
|
7
|
|
2020/C 161/10
|
Case C-587/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 — CSTP Azienda della Mobilità SpA v European Commission, Asstra Associazione Trasporti (Appeal — Competition — State aid — Undertaking operating bus route networks in the Regione Campania (Campania Region, Italy) — Compensation for public service obligations paid by the Italian authorities following a judgment of the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy) — European Commission decision declaring the aid measure unlawful and incompatible with the internal market)
|
7
|
|
2020/C 161/11
|
Case C-655/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Teritorialna direktsiya ‘Severna morska’ kam Agentsiya Mitnitsi, successor in law to Mitnitsa Varna v Schenker EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Removal from customs supervision — Theft of goods placed under a customs warehousing procedure — Article 242 — Person responsible for the removal — Holder of the authorisation for customs warehousing — Penalty for failure to comply with the customs legislation — Article 42 — Obligation to pay a sum corresponding to the value of the missing goods — Combination with a pecuniary penalty — Proportionality)
|
8
|
|
2020/C 161/12
|
Case C-766/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), M.J. Dairies EOOD (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Opposition — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Criteria for assessment — Applicability in the case of an earlier collective mark — Interdependence between the similarity of the trade marks at issue and that of the goods or services covered by those marks)
|
9
|
|
2020/C 161/13
|
Case C-34/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Telecom Italia SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Telecommunication services — Implementation of provision of an open telecommunications network — Directive 97/13/EC — Fees and charges for individual licences — Transitional arrangements establishing a charge beyond those authorised by Directive 97/13/EC — Force of res judicata attaching to a higher court judgment considered contrary to EU law)
|
9
|
|
2020/C 161/14
|
Case C-48/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — X-GmbH v Finanzamt Z (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(c) — Exemptions — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — Telephone services — Services provided by nurses and medical assistants)
|
10
|
|
2020/C 161/15
|
Case C-69/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 — Credito Fondiario SpA v Single Resolution Board, Italian Republic, European Commission (Appeal — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Single Resolution Board (SRB) — Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Determination of the 2016 ex ante contribution — Action for annulment — Period within which proceedings must be commenced — Late submission — Plea of illegality — Manifest inadmissibility)
|
11
|
|
2020/C 161/16
|
Case C-135/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v CW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 3 and 11 — Matters covered — Benefits falling within the scope of the regulation — Classification — Sickness benefit — Invalidity benefit — Unemployment benefit — Person who has ceased to be insured under the social security system of a Member State after ceasing to be employed there and moving his or her place of residence to another Member State — Application for a rehabilitation allowance in the former Member State of residence and employment — Refusal — Determination of the legislation applicable)
|
12
|
|
2020/C 161/17
|
Case C-298/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Article 260(2), TFEU — Pecuniary penalties — Lump sum)
|
12
|
|
2020/C 161/18
|
Case C-75/19: Order of the Court of 6 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureş — Romania) — MF v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA Paris Sucursala Bucureşti, Secapital Sàrl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Directive 93/13/EEC — Consumer contracts — Consumer credit — Enforcement proceedings — Time limit of 15 days from service of enforcement proceedings to raise the unfairness of a term)
|
13
|
|
2020/C 161/19
|
Case C-376/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 May 2019 — MAK TURS AD v Direktor na Direktsiya ‘Inspektsiya po truda’ — Blagoevgrad
|
14
|
|
2020/C 161/20
|
Case C-571/19 P: Appeal brought on 24 July 2019 by EMB Consulting SE against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 23 May 2019 in Case T-107/17, Frank Steinhoff and Others v European Central Bank
|
14
|
|
2020/C 161/21
|
Case C-670/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 10 September 2019 — Gardinia Home Decor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Ulm
|
14
|
|
2020/C 161/22
|
Case C-835/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 18 November 2019 — Autostrada Torino Ivrea Valle d’Aosta — Ativa SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Ministero dell’Economia and delle Finanze, Autorità di bacino del Po
|
15
|
|
2020/C 161/23
|
Case C-886/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 December 2019 by Pink Lady America LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2019 in Case T-112/18, Pink Lady America v CPVO
|
16
|
|
2020/C 161/24
|
Case C-892/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2019 by Camelia Manéa against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 September 2019 in Case T-225/18 Manéa v CdT
|
16
|
|
2020/C 161/25
|
Case C-902/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by Esim Chemicals GmbH against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 October 2019 in Case T-713/18, Esim Chemicals v EUIPO
|
17
|
|
2020/C 161/26
|
Case C-920/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 16 December 2019 — Fluctus s.r.o. and Others
|
17
|
|
2020/C 161/27
|
Case C-924/19 PPU: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 18 December 2019 — FMS and FNZ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság
|
18
|
|
2020/C 161/28
|
Case C-925/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 18 December 2019 — SA and SA junior v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság
|
20
|
|
2020/C 161/29
|
Case C-932/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Ítélőtábla (Hungary) lodged on 20 December 2019 — J.Z. v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt. and Others
|
22
|
|
2020/C 161/30
|
Case C-10/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 10 January 2020 — Flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbH
|
23
|
|
2020/C 161/31
|
Case C-17/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia (Italy) lodged on 14 January 2020 — MC v U.T.G. — Prefettura di Foggia
|
24
|
|
2020/C 161/32
|
Case C-18/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 16 January 2020 — XY
|
24
|
|
2020/C 161/33
|
Case C-30/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 2 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 22 January 2020 — RH v AB Volvo and Others
|
25
|
|
2020/C 161/34
|
Case C-31/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Alicante (Spain) lodged on 22 January 2020 — Bankia, S.A. v SI
|
25
|
|
2020/C 161/35
|
Case C-32/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli (Italy) lodged on 22 January 2020 — TJ v Balga Srl
|
26
|
|
2020/C 161/36
|
Case C-33/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg (Germany) lodged on 23 January 2020 — UK v Volkswagen Bank GmbH
|
27
|
|
2020/C 161/37
|
Case C-40/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 27 January 2020 — AQ, BO, CP v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR, Università degli studi di Perugia
|
28
|
|
2020/C 161/38
|
Case C-44/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 27 January 2020 — Autorità di Regolazione per Energia Reti e Ambiente (ARERA) v PC, RE
|
29
|
|
2020/C 161/39
|
Case C-47/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 28 January 2020 — F. v Stadt Karlsruhe
|
30
|
|
2020/C 161/40
|
Case C-53/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 3 February 2020 — Hengstenberg GmbH & Co. KG v Spreewaldverein e.V.
|
31
|
|
2020/C 161/41
|
Case C-60/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa lodged on 5 February 2020 — VAS ‘Latvijas dzelzceļš’ v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija
|
31
|
|
2020/C 161/42
|
Case C-67/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2020 — Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil) v Mr M.
|
32
|
|
2020/C 161/43
|
Case C-68/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2020 — Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil) v Ms C.
|
33
|
|
2020/C 161/44
|
Case C-69/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2020 — Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil) v Ms C.
|
33
|
|
2020/C 161/45
|
Case C-76/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 February 2020 — Balev Bio EOOD v Agentsia ‘Mitnitsi’, Teritorialna Direktsia Severna Morska
|
34
|
|
2020/C 161/46
|
Case C-84/20 P: Appeal brought on 14 February 2020 by Archimandritis Sarantis Sarantos, Protopresvyteros Ioannis Fotopoulos, Protopresvyteros Antonios Bousdekis, Protopresvyteros Vasileios Kokolakis, Estia Paterikon Meleton, Christos Papasotiriou, Charalampos Andralis, against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 11 December 2019 in Case T-547/19, Sarantis Sarantos v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and European Commission
|
35
|
|
2020/C 161/47
|
Case C-88/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux (France) lodged on 20 February 2020 — Procureur de la République v ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL, EP, FQ
|
36
|
|
2020/C 161/48
|
Case C-90/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 24 February 2020 — Apcoa Parking Danmark A/S v Skatteministeriet
|
37
|
|
2020/C 161/49
|
Case C-104/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles (Belgium) lodged on 27 February 2020 — SD v Habitations sociales du Roman Païs SCRL, TE, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Régie des Quartiers de Tubize ASBL
|
37
|
|
2020/C 161/50
|
Case C-106/20 P: Appeal brought on 25 February by the Hellenic Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 19 December 2019 in Case T-14/18, Hellenic Republic v European Commission.
|
38
|
|
2020/C 161/51
|
Case C-107/20 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2020 by the Hellenic Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 19 December 2019 in Case T-295/18, Hellenic Republic v European Commission
|
39
|
|
2020/C 161/52
|
Case C-109/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 27 February 2020 — Republic of Poland v PL Holdings Sàrl
|
40
|
|
2020/C 161/53
|
Case C-112/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgique) lodged on 28 February 2020 — M. A. v État belge
|
40
|
|
2020/C 161/54
|
Case C-117/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 3 March 2020 — bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence
|
41
|
|
|
General Court
|
|
|
2020/C 161/55
|
Case T-92/20: Action brought on 14 February 2020 — Fryč v Commission
|
42
|
|
2020/C 161/56
|
Case T-123/20: Action brought on 20 February 2020 — Sciessent v Commission
|
44
|
|
2020/C 161/57
|
Case T-131/20: Action brought on 27 February 2020 — IR v Commission
|
45
|
|
2020/C 161/58
|
Case T-132/20: Action brought on 28 February 2020 — NEC Oncoimmunity v EASME
|
46
|
|
2020/C 161/59
|
Case T-134/20: Action brought on 27 February 2020 — Huhtamaki v Commission
|
47
|
|
2020/C 161/60
|
Case T-135/20: Action brought on 28 February 2020 — Vulkano Research and Development v EUIPO — Ega (EGA Master)
|
48
|
|
2020/C 161/61
|
Case T-136/20: Action brought on 2 March 2020 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS)
|
49
|
|
2020/C 161/62
|
Case T-139/20: Action brought on 26 February 2020 — Applia v Commission
|
49
|
|
2020/C 161/63
|
Case T-140/20: Action brought on 26 February 2020 — Applia v Commission
|
50
|
|
2020/C 161/64
|
Case T-141/20: Action brought on 26 February 2020 — Applia v Commission
|
51
|
|
2020/C 161/65
|
Case T-142/20: Action brought on 26 February 2020 — Applia v Commission
|
52
|
|
2020/C 161/66
|
Case T-144/20: Action brought on 5 March 2020 — Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan v Commission
|
53
|
