Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/13

Action brought on 3 July 2015 — JT v OHIM — Carrasco Pirard and others (QUILAPAYÚN)

(Case T-249/15)

(2015/C 337/16)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish


Applicant: JT (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Mena Valenzuela, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eduardo Carrasco Pirard (Santiago, Chile), Guillermo García Campos (Brussels, Belgium), Luis Hernán Gómez Larenas (Paris, France), Hugo Lagos Vásquez (Taverny, France), Ismael Oddo Méndez (Santiago, Chile), Carlos Quezada Salas (Colombes, France), Ricardo Venegas Carhart (Santiago, Chile), Sebastián Quezada (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘QUILAPAYÚN’ — Application for registration No 9 267 287

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2015 in Case R 354/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision; and

reject the application for registration of the figurative mark ‘QUILAPAYÚN’ for goods and services in Class 9 and Class 41 brought before OHIM by the applicants Eduardo Carrasco Pirard, Guillermo García Campos, Luis Hernán Gómez Larenas, Hugo Lagos Vásquez, Ismael Oddo Méndez, Carlos Quezada Salas, Ricardo Venegas Carhart and Sebastián Quezada on 16 September 2010.

Plea in law

Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) and 2(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 read in conjunction with Article 6bis(1) of the Paris Convention.