Order of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Dreute v Parliament

(Case T-732/17) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Secondment in the interests of the service - Transfer - No longer further interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate in part - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)

(2018/C 427/100)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Olivier Dreute (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and R. Ignătescu, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, on the one hand, the annulment, first, of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 30 January 2017 transferring the applicant within that institution, secondly, of the decision of the President of the Parliament of 20 July 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint and, if necessary, the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 12 July 2017 seconding the applicant, in the interest of the service, to the European Commission and, on the other hand, damages in respect of the harm which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the order

1.	The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible in so far as it seeks the annulment of the decision of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 12 July 2017.

2.	There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 30 January 2017 and on the decision of 20 July 2017 rejecting the complaint brought by Mr Oliver Dreute against the latter.

3.	The claim for compensation is rejected as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

4.	Mr Dreute is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.